Conferences – HoopSci

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	16.367	53	6.0205	2
2	Wichita State	13.897	63	3.3625	41
3	USF	11.552	82	3.3016	42
4	Memphis	9.101	97	-2.7569	302
5	FAU	4.782	126	-0.3990	214
6	UAB	3.476	133	0.5098	166
7	Temple	2.710	137	-0.2587	206
8	North Texas	-2.317	186	-3.1475	322
9	Charlotte	-4.606	203	1.2247	123
10	Rice	-8.859	231	-2.7113	298
11	Tulane	-10.036	239	-2.3879	288
12	ECU	-20.046	316	-4.8451	355
13	UTSA	-24.583	338	-2.9389	314

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.253	41	0.0443	32
2	USF	0.215	61	0.0299	67
3	UAB	0.186	77	0.0162	114
4	North Texas	0.140	104	-0.0162	249
5	Tulsa	0.133	111	0.0412	38
6	Temple	0.131	115	0.0004	180
7	FAU	0.071	149	0.0031	168
8	Tulane	0.062	153	-0.0207	262
9	Charlotte	0.015	185	-0.0010	189
10	Memphis	-0.041	221	-0.0297	298
11	Rice	-0.093	255	-0.0352	309
12	UTSA	-0.128	285	-0.0155	246
13	ECU	-0.161	302	-0.0640	353

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	1653.959	28	-13.8239	326
2	UAB	1621.381	51	-0.6127	180
3	North Texas	1613.770	56	-3.2125	224
4	FAU	1583.047	80	-14.0626	331
5	Wichita State	1533.167	137	1.6467	157
6	Tulane	1532.925	140	8.0139	75
7	USF	1517.982	160	-9.2971	282
8	Tulsa	1495.080	189	18.2820	17
9	Temple	1493.293	193	-2.7999	215
10	ECU	1463.155	237	-0.2864	174
11	Charlotte	1431.302	277	-17.7377	347
12	Rice	1419.379	289	-13.9499	329
13	UTSA	1412.770	297	4.5158	123

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	0.600	46	0.0182	75
2	Tulsa	0.596	51	0.0618	2
3	USF	0.568	71	0.0191	67
4	Wichita State	0.547	101	-0.0052	226
5	Memphis	0.532	121	-0.0442	363
6	UAB	0.527	129	0.0044	157
7	North Texas	0.487	193	-0.0277	337
8	Charlotte	0.481	208	0.0070	136
9	Tulane	0.479	210	0.0110	117
10	UTSA	0.467	227	-0.0174	287
11	Temple	0.462	238	-0.0124	267
12	ECU	0.459	245	-0.0043	218
13	Rice	0.439	279	-0.0055	230

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	0.582	21	0.0261	12
2	Tulane	0.523	143	-0.0062	275
3	Temple	0.522	149	0.0106	93
4	FAU	0.520	156	0.0007	188
5	USF	0.508	190	-0.0055	269
6	Charlotte	0.507	193	0.0013	181
7	North Texas	0.498	216	0.0009	187
8	Wichita State	0.493	235	0.0113	85
9	Memphis	0.490	242	-0.0133	333
10	Rice	0.481	261	0.0019	176
11	UAB	0.478	273	-0.0117	321
12	ECU	0.451	334	-0.0089	299
13	UTSA	0.425	354	-0.0211	351

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	1.231	14	0.0784	1
2	FAU	1.168	57	0.0396	35
3	Wichita State	1.158	66	0.0401	32
4	Temple	1.135	88	0.0198	106
5	USF	1.121	108	0.0056	171
6	UAB	1.097	140	-0.0183	309
7	Tulane	1.091	152	-0.0053	248
8	North Texas	1.049	223	-0.0269	331
9	Charlotte	1.045	232	-0.0111	270
10	Memphis	1.041	240	-0.0074	256
11	Rice	1.013	290	0.0027	192
12	ECU	0.956	331	-0.0224	318
13	UTSA	0.949	334	-0.0504	359

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	0.124	11	-0.0016	142
2	Tulane	0.130	23	-0.0002	159
3	UAB	0.136	37	0.0022	217
4	Wichita State	0.140	49	0.0002	169
5	Tulsa	0.144	72	-0.0111	22
6	USF	0.145	77	0.0009	185
7	UTSA	0.153	125	0.0077	310
8	FAU	0.164	187	0.0003	175
9	Charlotte	0.168	211	0.0138	346
10	North Texas	0.171	226	0.0149	357
11	Rice	0.173	240	0.0048	264
12	Memphis	0.176	251	-0.0022	130
13	ECU	0.178	261	0.0119	339

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	37.810	17	0.0520	40
2	UAB	36.000	38	0.0122	165
3	USF	35.600	44	0.0219	122
4	Memphis	34.590	54	0.0119	169
5	FAU	34.490	58	0.0789	8
6	Charlotte	34.150	60	0.0271	103
7	North Texas	31.840	98	-0.0151	336
8	Rice	31.300	111	0.0044	232
9	Tulsa	30.200	141	0.0491	45
10	ECU	29.460	165	0.0097	186
11	UTSA	25.240	266	0.0098	184
12	Temple	24.240	291	0.0536	39
13	Tulane	16.970	363	0.0507	41

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	0.504	8	0.0226	67
2	Tulane	0.465	25	0.0141	110
3	USF	0.451	36	0.0141	111
4	ECU	0.436	46	0.0118	127
5	North Texas	0.420	59	0.0209	75
6	Tulsa	0.411	70	0.0172	93
7	Rice	0.399	95	0.0005	195
8	Charlotte	0.394	106	-0.0031	222
9	UAB	0.379	138	0.0211	74
10	Memphis	0.367	163	-0.0098	268
11	Wichita State	0.365	169	-0.0027	220
12	UTSA	0.354	203	0.0066	163
13	FAU	0.337	239	-0.0009	208

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	125.216	22	5.2137	2
2	USF	115.306	91	1.9564	61
3	FAU	115.113	95	-0.1504	205
4	Temple	115.068	97	0.9284	122
5	Wichita State	115.029	98	1.6434	78
6	Memphis	111.274	131	-2.3875	325
7	UAB	109.675	153	-1.7822	299
8	Tulane	108.918	167	0.3752	162
9	Charlotte	108.802	168	0.8351	129
10	North Texas	103.323	242	-2.5308	334
11	Rice	102.704	256	-1.2132	269
12	ECU	97.052	313	-3.0848	347
13	UTSA	90.745	356	-3.3373	351

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	40.989	64	1.0091	79
2	Tulsa	40.886	67	1.8502	24
3	Wichita State	40.832	68	1.0453	74
4	UAB	39.328	116	-1.0990	325
5	Temple	37.722	186	0.4224	141
6	USF	36.619	238	-0.3521	248
7	Memphis	36.527	244	-0.2989	242
8	Charlotte	36.045	259	-0.0103	201
9	North Texas	35.235	282	-0.9183	308
10	Tulane	35.011	288	-0.7017	282
11	Rice	33.478	324	-0.0764	215
12	UTSA	32.849	338	-1.5748	348
13	ECU	32.304	344	-0.9840	314

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	89.975	12	1.3232	51
2	FAU	89.196	19	1.8035	22
3	UAB	89.062	21	-0.7180	265
4	UTSA	86.055	79	-0.1351	207
5	Tulsa	84.548	126	0.9510	79
6	Memphis	84.378	136	1.3227	52
7	USF	83.930	148	0.8601	84
8	Charlotte	83.345	179	-0.1079	202
9	Rice	82.171	228	-0.5038	247
10	Temple	80.522	283	-0.6199	257
11	North Texas	79.398	309	-2.5134	360
12	ECU	78.950	320	-1.2260	304
13	Tulane	77.656	336	-0.1546	209

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	48.342	71	1.6993	35
2	Temple	47.218	103	0.9170	97
3	FAU	45.886	154	0.0783	186
4	Wichita State	45.214	180	0.3973	141
5	Tulane	45.099	189	-0.7551	292
6	North Texas	44.893	197	0.3230	150
7	UAB	44.267	232	-0.8612	303
8	USF	43.875	244	-0.7865	294
9	Charlotte	43.412	264	-0.0016	201
10	Memphis	43.176	269	-1.1136	328
11	Rice	40.710	329	0.0648	188
12	ECU	40.559	333	-0.7747	293
13	UTSA	38.281	358	-1.6971	349

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	68.311	36	-0.2809	186
2	ECU	67.082	49	0.5941	120
3	North Texas	65.351	90	0.8362	99
4	Wichita State	64.840	99	-2.9531	345
5	Memphis	64.064	114	-0.1175	171
6	Temple	63.590	120	-1.4442	274
7	Rice	59.724	191	-0.7480	231
8	FAU	58.618	213	-0.6862	225
9	Charlotte	57.547	237	-1.2856	262
10	Tulane	56.188	267	-2.2823	321
11	UTSA	56.167	269	-1.1371	252
12	USF	55.777	275	-1.7232	292
13	Tulsa	52.834	319	-1.8007	297

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	31.694	19	-0.5425	267
2	Wichita State	29.367	67	-0.4395	257
3	FAU	28.484	99	0.7655	87
4	Temple	27.327	148	0.2723	153
5	Memphis	26.720	177	-0.0887	201
6	North Texas	25.430	230	-0.2590	228
7	ECU	25.207	243	-0.6189	280
8	USF	25.106	246	-0.8059	298
9	Tulsa	24.712	262	0.2222	163
10	Charlotte	24.032	282	-0.2034	215
11	Tulane	23.732	289	-0.8698	304
12	UTSA	21.617	340	-0.9700	315
13	Rice	21.092	349	-0.2994	233

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	60.534	8	-0.8805	240
2	Wichita State	58.085	25	-1.8072	308
3	Memphis	54.137	93	0.8130	95
4	ECU	52.821	124	-0.3639	198
5	FAU	52.122	132	0.4656	118
6	North Texas	51.769	142	-1.0079	251
7	Temple	51.260	152	-1.6102	297
8	Rice	48.986	209	-0.9807	248
9	Charlotte	48.240	230	-1.0427	255
10	UTSA	47.763	235	-1.3620	281
11	USF	46.765	258	-1.0029	250
12	Tulsa	44.748	296	-0.9753	246
13	Tulane	43.550	318	-1.9560	314

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	54.963	130	1.5027	83
2	FAU	54.931	131	0.9154	128
3	USF	54.765	134	-0.6477	281
4	Temple	54.425	146	2.3001	40
5	Tulane	53.888	161	0.3378	191
6	UAB	52.732	190	-0.0841	239
7	Wichita State	50.635	255	0.7388	144
8	Charlotte	50.527	260	0.8136	140
9	North Texas	50.102	273	0.5114	171
10	Memphis	48.985	296	-0.9275	301
11	ECU	47.204	322	-1.1308	311
12	UTSA	44.176	355	-1.1145	309
13	Rice	43.586	358	0.3861	186

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	47.166	47	1.8007	69
2	USF	44.223	91	1.7232	74
3	UTSA	43.833	97	1.1371	114
4	Tulane	43.812	99	2.2823	45
5	Charlotte	42.453	129	1.2856	104
6	FAU	41.382	153	0.6862	141
7	Rice	40.276	175	0.7480	135
8	Temple	36.410	246	1.4442	92
9	Memphis	35.936	252	0.1175	195
10	Wichita State	35.160	267	2.9531	21
11	North Texas	34.649	276	-0.8362	267
12	ECU	32.918	317	-0.5941	246
13	UAB	31.689	330	0.2809	180

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	16.174	7	1.6280	5
2	FAU	12.505	104	0.2437	127
3	Rice	12.385	108	0.2231	135
4	Charlotte	12.012	129	0.1931	143
5	USF	11.513	154	0.4537	89
6	Wichita State	11.466	160	1.4848	9
7	Tulane	11.279	167	0.1681	147
8	UTSA	11.232	169	-0.6048	316
9	Temple	10.395	223	0.1500	152
10	Memphis	9.807	264	-0.2102	230
11	North Texas	9.805	265	-0.6593	321
12	UAB	7.634	338	-0.5565	301
13	ECU	7.097	352	-0.3651	266

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	39.800	46	1.9263	49
2	UTSA	38.293	68	1.2268	87
3	USF	37.166	89	1.8630	52
4	FAU	37.074	91	1.3379	82
5	Charlotte	35.105	134	0.9348	109
6	Tulane	34.105	153	1.8014	57
7	Rice	33.185	177	0.4769	155
8	Wichita State	31.890	214	3.1304	14
9	Memphis	30.241	245	0.5096	150
10	Temple	29.262	266	0.9903	103
11	UAB	28.528	283	0.1625	186
12	North Texas	27.628	304	-1.5054	321
13	ECU	26.128	332	-0.8621	276

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	41.283	5	2.7003	6
2	Rice	37.495	51	0.2087	147
3	Temple	35.938	93	-0.5138	227
4	Charlotte	35.295	118	0.0950	152
5	North Texas	34.885	139	-0.5581	235
6	Wichita State	34.545	154	1.2393	66
7	FAU	33.427	192	-0.6334	246
8	Tulane	33.170	200	-0.9890	278
9	Memphis	31.000	277	-1.9082	331
10	USF	30.636	288	-0.2169	195
11	UTSA	30.229	297	-2.1504	346
12	ECU	27.086	351	-0.0484	174
13	UAB	26.078	361	-2.4942	355

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	50.390	8	2.2646	67
2	Tulane	46.490	25	1.4068	110
3	USF	45.050	36	1.4065	111
4	ECU	43.620	46	1.1745	127
5	North Texas	42.040	59	2.0931	75
6	Tulsa	41.150	70	1.7213	93
7	Rice	39.880	95	0.0469	195
8	Charlotte	39.430	106	-0.3127	222
9	UAB	37.930	138	2.1096	74
10	Memphis	36.660	163	-0.9837	268
11	Wichita State	36.460	169	-0.2645	220
12	UTSA	35.440	203	0.6545	163
13	FAU	33.700	239	-0.0867	208

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	27.771	15	0.7129	127
2	Temple	27.688	18	0.9806	95
3	USF	27.400	22	0.8112	120
4	Tulsa	25.177	53	2.5539	10
5	North Texas	24.633	68	-0.1955	221
6	ECU	23.863	88	0.0901	193
7	UAB	23.423	97	0.9275	98
8	Wichita State	22.708	115	0.4479	148
9	FAU	22.341	127	1.6991	40
10	Rice	21.969	143	0.1966	180
11	Memphis	21.202	170	0.0684	194
12	Charlotte	20.374	197	-1.2835	322
13	UTSA	17.934	285	-1.2817	321

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	38.350	14	1.3045	92
2	USF	37.100	25	1.0989	110
3	Tulane	35.838	36	1.1902	99
4	North Texas	35.264	41	0.8761	128
5	ECU	34.046	59	0.3599	179
6	UAB	33.263	74	1.6018	69
7	Charlotte	32.218	96	-0.1425	223
8	Rice	31.860	103	-0.1089	218
9	Tulsa	31.809	104	1.6418	61
10	Wichita State	31.353	115	0.2502	185
11	Memphis	30.204	155	-0.2658	233
12	FAU	28.724	206	0.6365	148
13	UTSA	28.363	214	0.0369	205

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	80.054	9	5.0964	2
2	Tulane	77.850	26	-0.2001	199
3	FAU	76.930	43	3.8215	7
4	USF	72.683	148	-0.2018	200
5	Temple	72.136	160	-0.1602	196
6	Wichita State	71.775	167	1.0281	104
7	ECU	70.639	201	-0.6815	239
8	Rice	70.433	209	1.3699	73
9	UAB	70.109	220	-0.7742	242
10	Memphis	70.048	223	0.8181	117
11	North Texas	69.892	228	-2.9492	332
12	UTSA	66.438	311	-3.4958	347
13	Charlotte	63.196	343	-3.6663	351

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	57.908	73	-0.3496	242
2	North Texas	56.885	96	2.7980	41
3	USF	56.613	101	1.0979	125
4	Memphis	54.935	148	-0.0688	221
5	Tulane	53.864	166	1.5069	96
6	Temple	50.581	235	3.5234	25
7	UAB	48.612	274	-2.0750	322
8	Rice	47.051	301	-2.0829	323
9	Charlotte	46.322	315	-2.4304	335
10	FAU	45.831	322	-3.1023	347
11	ECU	45.600	323	-1.1227	276
12	Wichita State	42.621	347	0.0456	215
13	UTSA	41.959	350	-1.2672	291

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	6.421	35	-1.1332	22
2	Tulsa	6.729	52	-1.3675	7
3	Temple	7.144	75	-0.6307	96
4	Tulane	7.199	79	-0.8256	52
5	FAU	8.154	146	-0.6548	90
6	ECU	8.263	153	-0.0272	216
7	USF	8.475	168	-0.1043	198
8	UAB	9.257	235	0.5072	301
9	North Texas	9.553	258	1.0624	349
10	Charlotte	9.642	265	0.9248	345
11	UTSA	9.895	273	0.8135	337
12	Memphis	10.253	301	-0.0280	215
13	Rice	10.742	319	0.2037	265

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	2.450	7	-0.8804	8
2	FAU	3.137	54	-0.6400	25
3	Wichita State	3.203	61	-1.3503	2
4	Tulane	3.274	67	-0.7074	17
5	Charlotte	3.620	99	-0.6674	19
6	ECU	4.164	175	0.1071	257
7	UAB	4.524	223	0.2248	286
8	North Texas	4.874	256	0.3985	316
9	Temple	5.119	290	-0.5541	38
10	UTSA	5.315	305	-0.0256	206
11	Memphis	5.470	313	0.3617	310
12	Rice	6.030	341	-0.0410	200
13	USF	6.485	354	1.0985	362

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Charlotte	27.785	36	0.1962	130
2	Rice	26.902	55	-0.0013	151
3	USF	26.660	63	0.5113	84
4	ECU	26.240	73	1.1097	34
5	Temple	26.102	79	-1.2419	303
6	Tulane	25.151	109	-0.9077	273
7	Memphis	25.110	111	-0.1304	175
8	North Texas	25.083	114	0.7926	59
9	Wichita State	22.645	194	-0.5505	235
10	Tulsa	22.205	213	-0.6313	245
11	UAB	21.799	229	0.3358	106
12	UTSA	20.545	270	-0.0050	152
13	FAU	20.500	272	-1.6213	328

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	79.112	10	1.2029	76
2	UAB	73.442	104	-0.3390	299
3	Memphis	73.319	110	-0.3194	297
4	UTSA	72.689	132	0.7757	135
5	ECU	72.375	147	-0.1956	280
6	Rice	71.756	174	1.1798	77
7	Tulsa	71.197	193	1.6670	40
8	Tulane	69.314	262	0.7805	134
9	FAU	68.816	286	-0.6821	324
10	Wichita State	68.614	295	-1.2790	353
11	Temple	68.122	313	-1.1251	348
12	North Texas	66.158	348	1.4394	58
13	Charlotte	65.525	355	-0.8095	336

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.457	35	0.0029	194
2	Wichita State	0.464	44	-0.0032	127
3	UTSA	0.476	68	-0.0175	23
4	Memphis	0.480	80	-0.0130	43
5	UAB	0.485	100	-0.0073	94
6	Rice	0.505	158	-0.0027	134
7	USF	0.509	170	0.0057	238
8	Charlotte	0.524	227	-0.0095	73
9	Tulsa	0.526	234	0.0092	271
10	FAU	0.533	256	0.0158	324
11	Temple	0.544	281	0.0076	260
12	ECU	0.552	303	0.0024	191
13	Tulane	0.559	315	0.0205	347

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.982	77	0.0010	179
2	North Texas	0.984	80	0.0039	196
3	USF	0.997	94	-0.0042	146
4	UAB	1.002	100	-0.0112	102
5	Memphis	1.020	126	-0.0060	133
6	Tulsa	1.033	147	-0.0089	115
7	Rice	1.061	190	-0.0114	100
8	FAU	1.064	196	0.0027	189
9	UTSA	1.083	229	0.0015	181
10	Charlotte	1.102	259	-0.0030	153
11	ECU	1.109	267	0.0022	183
12	Temple	1.111	270	0.0215	285
13	Tulane	1.113	278	0.0172	265

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	0.200	25	0.0037	125
2	North Texas	0.182	84	0.0004	183
3	Memphis	0.168	149	-0.0012	215
4	Tulsa	0.166	164	0.0115	31
5	Rice	0.160	195	0.0091	52
6	Tulane	0.160	198	0.0059	92
7	ECU	0.159	201	0.0005	182
8	UAB	0.155	223	-0.0040	267
9	FAU	0.155	226	0.0079	69
10	Wichita State	0.152	235	-0.0036	261
11	UTSA	0.141	299	-0.0156	358
12	Charlotte	0.139	308	-0.0039	265
13	Temple	0.132	338	-0.0032	254

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	77.390	25	0.0201	11
2	UAB	76.520	35	0.0173	21
3	Temple	75.610	57	-0.0058	210
4	Tulsa	75.570	61	0.0147	27
5	Wichita State	74.330	93	-0.0001	154
6	ECU	73.980	102	0.0030	118
7	Charlotte	73.270	133	-0.0027	177
8	USF	72.430	159	0.0094	56
9	North Texas	71.870	182	-0.0030	182
10	Rice	71.000	203	-0.0097	247
11	Tulane	70.370	223	-0.0007	162
12	Memphis	66.460	317	-0.0225	323
13	UTSA	65.620	325	-0.0137	280

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	0.302	70	-0.0085	91
2	Temple	0.317	98	-0.0161	59
3	UAB	0.328	120	-0.0006	138
4	Wichita State	0.341	142	0.0157	260
5	FAU	0.342	145	0.0077	200
6	ECU	0.357	173	-0.0080	95
7	UTSA	0.374	205	-0.0209	37
8	Tulane	0.382	227	0.0213	294
9	Rice	0.400	269	0.0007	146
10	Memphis	0.402	272	0.0173	272
11	USF	0.431	311	-0.0046	111
12	Charlotte	0.489	345	0.0434	353
13	North Texas	0.497	351	0.0272	319

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	101.132	55	-1.6519	63
2	Memphis	102.173	70	0.3695	212
3	USF	103.754	90	-1.3553	84
4	North Texas	105.641	122	0.6411	227
5	UAB	106.199	129	-2.2377	36
6	Tulsa	108.850	170	-0.8781	115
7	FAU	110.332	196	0.2594	200
8	Rice	111.562	206	1.4978	281
9	Temple	112.358	215	1.3015	269
10	Charlotte	113.407	233	-0.3896	139
11	UTSA	115.328	273	-0.3853	142
12	ECU	117.098	293	1.8247	298
13	Tulane	118.954	315	2.9386	341

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	31.005	21	0.0471	190
2	USF	33.094	52	-0.3433	140
3	Memphis	34.081	83	-0.7997	76
4	Wichita State	34.355	97	-0.1536	165
5	UAB	35.342	129	-0.6833	92
6	Charlotte	36.100	153	-1.1484	42
7	UTSA	36.332	167	-0.1891	157
8	Rice	36.678	180	-0.2504	152
9	Tulsa	36.720	182	-0.4420	126
10	FAU	37.501	212	0.2203	212
11	Tulane	38.005	239	0.4408	244
12	ECU	38.382	253	0.3126	226
13	Temple	39.647	296	0.7033	277

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	76.204	26	-0.6791	126
2	North Texas	77.176	39	-0.9120	97
3	Charlotte	79.580	92	-0.9410	93
4	FAU	80.982	123	-2.1489	25
5	ECU	81.311	131	-0.1502	181
6	Tulane	81.535	143	-1.8713	35
7	Tulsa	81.853	152	-1.5414	50
8	Rice	81.945	160	-0.4437	159
9	UAB	82.098	168	-0.1183	188
10	Memphis	82.691	190	0.5836	266
11	Wichita State	83.522	222	-0.3761	165
12	Temple	85.538	283	1.3368	321
13	UTSA	89.493	345	3.3414	363

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	39.872	38	0.4774	237
2	UTSA	40.507	48	-2.0173	11
3	Wichita State	41.044	60	-0.0732	160
4	Memphis	41.317	69	-1.2324	39
5	UAB	42.643	104	-0.8261	69
6	USF	43.886	157	0.0553	173
7	Rice	44.735	184	-0.0381	167
8	Tulsa	45.124	201	0.3957	226
9	Charlotte	45.406	208	-0.9466	60
10	FAU	46.510	258	1.5234	334
11	Temple	46.532	259	0.1421	186
12	Tulane	46.760	264	1.4869	331
13	ECU	47.280	281	0.3757	221

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	54.712	51	-1.4056	82
2	UTSA	55.811	72	-3.3971	11
3	ECU	57.749	112	-0.8189	131
4	Temple	58.086	123	-2.6729	25
5	Charlotte	58.295	129	-1.5195	75
6	Memphis	58.427	133	-0.3032	176
7	Tulsa	58.935	153	-1.8927	53
8	North Texas	60.404	183	0.5873	260
9	UAB	60.803	197	-1.1541	102
10	USF	61.183	208	-0.9053	122
11	FAU	64.787	306	0.1734	215
12	Wichita State	64.839	308	0.2016	219
13	Rice	65.169	316	1.2445	312

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	22.002	38	0.4023	252
2	USF	22.418	49	-1.0135	58
3	Memphis	23.023	67	-0.8163	79
4	Tulane	23.173	72	-0.1880	165
5	UTSA	23.447	83	-1.1746	42
6	Tulsa	24.770	140	-1.0466	52
7	Charlotte	24.928	148	-1.0585	48
8	Wichita State	25.354	168	0.3074	230
9	ECU	25.564	180	0.5262	267
10	UAB	25.669	185	-0.8138	80
11	Temple	26.224	214	-0.5476	111
12	FAU	26.257	217	0.3114	231
13	Rice	27.190	250	0.2291	215

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	44.852	56	-2.1128	40
2	Charlotte	46.171	86	-1.8542	51
3	USF	46.616	98	-1.1968	98
4	North Texas	46.828	103	-0.1904	201
5	ECU	47.110	113	-0.8132	138
6	Memphis	48.169	141	0.0151	226
7	Tulsa	48.508	149	-2.4652	23
8	Temple	49.489	184	-1.5573	66
9	UTSA	49.611	186	-1.1751	103
10	UAB	50.129	208	-0.9652	124
11	FAU	52.209	260	-1.4091	79
12	Rice	53.392	292	0.7287	285
13	Wichita State	54.062	307	-0.0673	215

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	46.087	39	0.6536	219
2	UTSA	47.909	69	-1.0383	71
3	Wichita State	47.931	70	0.8417	244
4	Memphis	48.292	83	-1.5047	45
5	USF	49.096	107	-0.8493	81
6	Rice	49.895	128	-0.3864	115
7	FAU	51.071	153	2.1123	335
8	UAB	51.128	157	-0.7202	90
9	Tulsa	51.857	176	0.5814	211
10	Tulane	52.460	190	2.2764	339
11	Charlotte	53.709	230	-0.2001	130
12	Temple	53.959	233	0.6924	224
13	ECU	54.110	239	1.5449	299

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Rice	34.831	50	-1.2445	54
2	Wichita State	35.161	58	-0.2016	147
3	FAU	35.213	60	-0.1734	151
4	USF	38.817	158	0.9053	244
5	UAB	39.197	169	1.1541	264
6	North Texas	39.596	183	-0.5873	106
7	Tulsa	41.065	213	1.8927	313
8	Memphis	41.573	233	0.3032	190
9	Charlotte	41.705	237	1.5195	291
10	Temple	41.914	243	2.6729	341
11	ECU	42.251	254	0.8189	235
12	UTSA	44.189	294	3.3971	355
13	Tulane	45.288	315	1.4056	284

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	9.001	56	-0.4610	80
2	North Texas	9.003	57	-0.3552	98
3	Rice	9.488	75	-0.4795	76
4	UAB	9.672	89	0.1305	207
5	USF	10.676	174	0.6701	302
6	Memphis	11.058	195	0.0166	181
7	Charlotte	11.173	203	-0.0899	160
8	FAU	11.243	209	-0.0911	158
9	Tulsa	11.950	255	0.6046	295
10	ECU	12.817	299	-0.2136	131
11	UTSA	12.885	304	0.9855	338
12	Temple	13.423	327	1.2509	350
13	Tulane	14.832	353	0.6288	299

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Rice	28.552	58	-1.1724	54
2	FAU	28.773	65	-0.7398	87
3	Wichita State	29.459	86	-0.3088	141
4	USF	29.588	90	0.5177	223
5	North Texas	30.347	116	-0.7215	90
6	UAB	31.969	164	0.8469	258
7	Tulsa	33.345	197	0.9238	263
8	Charlotte	33.409	200	0.9132	262
9	ECU	34.201	225	0.6630	238
10	Memphis	34.522	230	0.5685	230
11	Temple	36.048	276	2.8941	354
12	Tulane	36.682	291	0.2414	195
13	UTSA	39.883	344	4.5164	364

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	28.289	29	-1.5984	43
2	North Texas	29.092	45	-0.7651	110
3	UAB	29.754	60	-0.6016	128
4	Memphis	32.723	166	-0.7105	114
5	UTSA	33.193	182	-0.9698	87
6	Charlotte	33.411	191	-1.0551	84
7	Rice	33.557	196	-0.0493	181
8	Tulsa	35.400	257	0.9510	284
9	USF	35.460	260	1.6312	331
10	ECU	35.986	285	-1.8913	25
11	Temple	37.309	319	0.7713	264
12	FAU	37.849	331	0.4676	236
13	Tulane	41.423	362	1.5474	327

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	30.250	70	-0.8542	91
2	Temple	31.660	98	-1.6122	59
3	UAB	32.770	120	-0.0578	138
4	Wichita State	34.090	142	1.5649	260
5	FAU	34.210	145	0.7666	200
6	ECU	35.740	173	-0.7992	95
7	UTSA	37.430	205	-2.0925	37
8	Tulane	38.180	227	2.1333	294
9	Rice	40.000	269	0.0720	146
10	Memphis	40.220	272	1.7343	272
11	USF	43.060	311	-0.4615	111
12	Charlotte	48.910	345	4.3430	353
13	North Texas	49.750	351	2.7157	319

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	17.863	73	-0.6105	80
2	Temple	18.354	88	-0.5016	97
3	UAB	19.869	139	0.1344	177
4	FAU	20.161	145	-0.0820	151
5	Wichita State	20.463	158	0.8720	265
6	Tulane	20.472	159	0.2084	187
7	ECU	21.303	192	-0.1955	132
8	UTSA	22.705	251	-0.4522	101
9	Memphis	22.807	257	0.9821	278
10	USF	22.842	258	-0.4025	107
11	Rice	23.241	271	-0.1635	136
12	Charlotte	26.818	336	2.0892	347
13	North Texas	27.361	344	0.6498	239

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	24.133	52	-1.1978	46
2	Temple	26.312	98	-0.7623	75
3	UAB	26.735	109	-0.1058	130
4	FAU	27.509	125	-0.1016	131
5	ECU	28.356	153	-0.6719	84
6	Wichita State	28.901	173	1.4212	281
7	Tulane	31.041	230	1.1167	262
8	UTSA	31.761	251	-0.6486	86
9	Rice	32.247	263	-0.1636	125
10	USF	32.949	285	-0.4662	103
11	Memphis	33.170	290	1.6377	296
12	North Texas	38.751	350	1.9551	317
13	Charlotte	39.576	354	3.0894	356

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	66.719	44	-1.6767	56
2	Charlotte	67.882	72	0.1022	208
3	USF	68.550	90	-0.5051	146
4	Wichita State	69.236	111	-0.7889	129
5	Temple	70.023	137	0.2114	225
6	Memphis	70.493	151	0.0240	195
7	Rice	71.136	178	-0.2700	174
8	North Texas	71.660	203	-1.7093	54
9	Tulsa	73.348	249	0.9227	274
10	ECU	73.688	259	0.6784	258
11	UTSA	74.003	267	0.9372	275
12	FAU	74.335	284	0.3837	237
13	UAB	76.452	324	1.4305	307

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	43.938	35	-0.9735	100
2	Wichita State	46.157	60	1.0595	244
3	North Texas	48.874	106	-0.6183	124
4	Temple	50.269	133	0.0826	170
5	UTSA	51.095	144	-0.2739	143
6	USF	52.808	183	-0.4988	130
7	Charlotte	53.289	193	1.4640	264
8	Tulsa	53.614	203	1.6768	280
9	UAB	54.312	221	0.3144	186
10	Rice	54.976	239	0.0865	171
11	Tulane	58.765	299	-0.5530	127
12	Memphis	58.978	303	1.1225	245
13	ECU	59.940	324	1.3414	256

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	12.567	26	0.1627	145
2	Memphis	11.429	66	0.1045	164
3	Tulane	11.413	69	0.5607	70
4	North Texas	11.309	74	-0.0966	191
5	UAB	10.544	116	0.0703	172
6	Tulsa	10.357	128	0.7470	48
7	Rice	9.678	171	0.8842	35
8	UTSA	9.543	182	-0.7114	316
9	ECU	8.998	222	-0.5317	287
10	FAU	8.401	250	0.0348	177
11	Wichita State	8.053	273	-0.6187	304
12	Temple	7.350	312	-0.5711	295
13	Charlotte	6.542	338	-0.6531	306

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	7.907	12	0.6458	35
2	North Texas	6.774	38	0.2482	111
3	Tulane	6.645	44	-0.1263	213
4	Temple	6.391	53	0.4461	66
5	UTSA	5.960	74	0.4432	68
6	USF	5.935	76	0.3763	78
7	Memphis	5.881	80	0.1830	131
8	Rice	5.738	90	0.8201	21
9	Wichita State	5.446	110	-0.5482	323
10	Charlotte	5.364	119	0.5868	43
11	UAB	4.665	180	-0.0749	202
12	ECU	4.030	238	-0.6425	337
13	Tulsa	2.554	338	-0.4603	305

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	20.891	19	-0.4350	74
2	Tulsa	21.417	27	-0.6341	53
3	ECU	23.870	104	-0.1126	132
4	FAU	24.678	150	-0.1871	117
5	Temple	25.171	172	0.3990	228
6	Tulane	25.301	181	0.1305	173
7	UTSA	25.390	186	-0.3356	91
8	Wichita State	26.511	248	1.6241	352
9	Rice	27.038	275	0.0710	162
10	USF	28.144	306	0.6926	279
11	Memphis	28.509	316	1.0598	318
12	North Texas	30.140	347	0.5920	260
13	Charlotte	30.837	356	1.7651	357

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	79.635	4	1.1039	79
2	Memphis	72.709	136	-0.2585	280
3	Rice	72.686	138	1.5213	47
4	UAB	72.681	139	-0.7344	329
5	UTSA	71.329	187	0.4088	164
6	ECU	71.112	197	0.0061	234
7	Tulsa	69.825	245	0.0967	217
8	Tulane	69.678	251	0.3997	165
9	FAU	69.150	271	-0.9015	334
10	Wichita State	68.833	281	-0.5113	308
11	Temple	68.053	312	-1.6904	361
12	North Texas	67.794	325	1.8503	25
13	Charlotte	64.361	364	-0.6925	322