Conferences – HoopSci

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	17.315	43	2.4977	8
2	USF	15.856	50	1.8253	21
3	Wichita State	12.650	68	0.5171	117
4	FAU	5.297	108	-0.4397	238
5	UAB	4.280	119	0.1442	158
6	Temple	4.150	122	-0.5892	251
7	Memphis	2.862	132	-1.6853	337
8	North Texas	1.499	146	-1.4163	321
9	Charlotte	-0.418	162	0.8088	85
10	Tulane	-5.496	217	-0.3935	233
11	Rice	-7.367	233	-0.2289	212
12	ECU	-9.341	246	0.7602	92
13	UTSA	-23.348	343	-1.5774	334

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.176	41	-0.0043	198
2	Tulsa	0.159	51	0.0146	57
3	USF	0.152	58	0.0036	124
4	UAB	0.110	91	-0.0148	274
5	Temple	0.085	114	-0.0073	220
6	North Texas	0.083	117	-0.0178	299
7	FAU	0.082	118	-0.0065	215
8	Charlotte	0.008	191	0.0014	145
9	Tulane	0.006	193	-0.0179	300
10	Memphis	-0.009	207	-0.0073	219
11	Rice	-0.078	278	-0.0050	203
12	ECU	-0.135	320	-0.0017	183
13	UTSA	-0.195	348	-0.0276	340

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	1628.473	56	26.0691	10
2	UAB	1616.974	63	-0.0145	184
3	Wichita State	1598.507	71	15.0433	49
4	Tulsa	1591.156	78	29.0358	5
5	North Texas	1580.904	89	-12.8962	297
6	Memphis	1569.526	95	-24.6007	352
7	FAU	1551.658	115	-13.0640	299
8	Tulane	1520.501	154	1.5565	167
9	Temple	1490.226	198	-5.4154	248
10	Charlotte	1461.116	232	1.9384	159
11	ECU	1436.424	254	-7.7688	265
12	Rice	1425.736	268	-2.5367	215
13	UTSA	1312.216	352	-20.2777	342

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	0.596	31	0.0217	9
2	Tulsa	0.579	48	0.0092	86
3	Wichita State	0.550	77	0.0103	69
4	UAB	0.525	111	0.0080	104
5	FAU	0.523	116	-0.0137	354
6	North Texas	0.515	137	-0.0044	304
7	Tulane	0.514	142	0.0051	155
8	Memphis	0.500	183	-0.0158	362
9	Charlotte	0.486	210	0.0042	174
10	Temple	0.477	228	-0.0041	297
11	Rice	0.460	252	-0.0021	269
12	ECU	0.455	259	-0.0047	308
13	UTSA	0.413	333	-0.0049	310

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	0.573	14	0.0061	105
2	Charlotte	0.539	79	0.0021	155
3	FAU	0.522	152	-0.0100	310
4	USF	0.511	200	-0.0016	192
5	Temple	0.508	211	0.0084	76
6	Tulane	0.498	259	-0.0032	209
7	Wichita State	0.494	282	-0.0004	183
8	Memphis	0.489	297	-0.0003	182
9	Rice	0.488	301	-0.0002	180
10	UAB	0.483	309	0.0020	156
11	ECU	0.468	342	0.0076	86
12	North Texas	0.468	344	-0.0039	228
13	UTSA	0.450	360	0.0010	164

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	1.209	7	0.0296	31
2	USF	1.143	60	0.0205	63
3	Wichita State	1.122	90	0.0170	73
4	Temple	1.107	116	0.0140	91
5	Charlotte	1.107	120	-0.0078	250
6	FAU	1.092	141	-0.0206	325
7	UAB	1.077	182	0.0004	202
8	Rice	1.047	251	0.0007	197
9	North Texas	1.040	264	-0.0028	222
10	Tulane	1.035	280	-0.0199	320
11	Memphis	1.029	290	0.0088	137
12	ECU	0.999	327	0.0169	75
13	UTSA	0.958	353	0.0133	95

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	0.120	3	-0.0036	169
2	Temple	0.123	9	-0.0048	138
3	Wichita State	0.138	58	-0.0059	110
4	Tulsa	0.140	71	-0.0097	42
5	USF	0.142	85	-0.0073	77
6	Tulane	0.147	117	-0.0018	215
7	North Texas	0.151	144	-0.0101	35
8	ECU	0.157	198	0.0057	328
9	UTSA	0.161	225	-0.0109	28
10	Charlotte	0.164	241	0.0020	283
11	Rice	0.164	245	-0.0016	218
12	FAU	0.166	262	-0.0028	193
13	Memphis	0.177	317	-0.0118	20

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	37.790	5	0.0014	81
2	USF	35.730	12	0.0132	15
3	North Texas	33.220	45	-0.0164	242
4	Memphis	33.040	49	-0.0101	184
5	Rice	32.980	52	0.0043	65
6	Charlotte	31.150	93	-0.0054	138
7	FAU	30.570	106	-0.0239	301
8	UAB	30.130	119	-0.0207	277
9	ECU	29.840	124	0.0149	8
10	Tulsa	29.580	137	0.0047	61
11	UTSA	26.880	228	0.0020	78
12	Temple	25.790	262	-0.0132	211
13	Tulane	18.680	359	-0.0253	311

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	0.454	12	-0.0180	300
2	USF	0.433	31	-0.0149	282
3	Temple	0.426	45	-0.0322	351
4	Tulsa	0.419	55	-0.0063	235
5	ECU	0.402	72	0.0036	147
6	North Texas	0.394	90	-0.0072	240
7	Wichita State	0.373	143	-0.0123	261
8	UAB	0.369	153	-0.0034	215
9	Charlotte	0.369	156	-0.0328	353
10	Memphis	0.346	219	0.0120	84
11	Rice	0.343	224	-0.0307	349
12	FAU	0.332	249	-0.0037	218
13	UTSA	0.304	314	-0.0040	221

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	127.505	26	2.4341	5
2	USF	120.835	63	1.2510	71
3	Charlotte	117.088	96	1.3500	59
4	Wichita State	116.950	99	0.5133	199
5	Temple	115.250	118	-0.3081	308
6	FAU	114.590	128	-0.6051	340
7	UAB	112.735	157	-0.3790	318
8	Memphis	110.556	183	-0.9394	355
9	Rice	109.114	210	1.1557	83
10	Tulane	108.528	224	-0.4331	324
11	North Texas	107.113	243	-0.5704	338
12	ECU	105.436	271	0.5927	184
13	UTSA	100.317	330	0.0195	280

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	40.044	65	0.8607	61
2	Wichita State	39.778	73	0.9182	53
3	FAU	39.264	97	-0.5194	279
4	UAB	38.749	126	0.1223	170
5	Charlotte	38.069	169	0.5312	104
6	USF	37.672	186	0.8026	70
7	Temple	37.336	205	1.1460	32
8	Memphis	36.575	246	0.3281	136
9	North Texas	36.302	260	0.4212	125
10	Rice	35.856	282	0.5361	102
11	ECU	34.689	318	0.4377	122
12	UTSA	33.995	340	0.6871	82
13	Tulane	33.309	352	-0.2551	233

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	89.515	9	1.5586	32
2	UAB	87.966	22	-0.2803	230
3	Rice	86.354	51	2.1946	9
4	UTSA	86.078	64	1.4897	36
5	USF	85.606	89	2.2527	7
6	FAU	85.314	103	-0.1117	206
7	North Texas	84.488	144	1.0430	70
8	Memphis	83.963	170	0.1388	168
9	Charlotte	83.154	209	0.8097	90
10	Temple	83.037	215	1.0499	68
11	Tulsa	82.955	220	1.4698	37
12	ECU	82.568	242	0.0299	186
13	Tulane	77.758	359	-0.0406	196

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	48.178	39	0.1713	150
2	Charlotte	45.997	137	0.2943	135
3	FAU	45.975	140	-0.5640	270
4	Temple	45.070	192	0.7656	83
5	Wichita State	44.375	232	0.2531	143
6	UAB	44.180	243	0.3357	131
7	USF	44.035	255	-0.1936	207
8	Memphis	43.590	281	0.3775	124
9	North Texas	43.137	299	-0.1120	189
10	Tulane	42.867	306	-0.3416	226
11	ECU	42.131	328	0.5022	115
12	Rice	41.530	335	-0.3635	232
13	UTSA	39.535	360	0.2925	136

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	69.370	20	-0.0820	186
2	ECU	68.577	29	-0.2985	205
3	North Texas	67.210	43	1.3224	56
4	Memphis	66.223	63	2.1401	22
5	Wichita State	66.074	68	0.8453	90
6	Temple	63.302	130	-0.8978	287
7	FAU	60.985	178	2.4111	13
8	UTSA	59.559	208	1.6871	36
9	Rice	55.968	275	-3.4396	364
10	Tulane	55.771	279	-0.4041	226
11	USF	55.737	281	-0.4470	237
12	Charlotte	55.329	294	-1.3981	325
13	Tulsa	53.821	324	-1.6355	334

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	31.114	12	0.4085	121
2	Wichita State	29.350	42	1.2826	26
3	FAU	28.237	95	0.2463	147
4	North Texas	27.877	117	0.7483	72
5	Memphis	27.557	130	1.0272	49
6	ECU	27.139	149	0.0389	186
7	Temple	27.004	158	0.8826	61
8	USF	25.158	243	0.3576	124
9	Charlotte	25.002	249	0.5800	95
10	Tulsa	24.962	254	-0.1756	225
11	UTSA	23.638	313	0.9096	57
12	Rice	22.611	340	-0.3270	249
13	Tulane	22.266	348	-0.2067	229

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	60.973	6	-0.2481	218
2	Wichita State	58.884	16	1.8202	31
3	North Texas	56.764	40	1.8248	30
4	ECU	56.553	43	-0.1507	209
5	Memphis	55.616	56	1.9397	24
6	Temple	52.661	129	-0.1040	202
7	FAU	51.964	151	1.9600	22
8	UTSA	51.200	173	2.4129	15
9	Rice	48.223	237	-1.9961	350
10	USF	47.661	254	0.8146	92
11	Charlotte	45.935	293	-0.7469	272
12	Tulsa	44.812	312	-0.6667	260
13	Tulane	43.273	340	-0.1530	210

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	55.113	74	0.0702	177
2	Charlotte	55.059	76	2.1995	10
3	FAU	54.577	92	-1.5554	338
4	USF	53.400	148	-0.2762	231
5	Temple	51.690	218	1.7678	25
6	Tulane	51.390	234	-0.3027	235
7	UAB	51.280	240	0.7232	96
8	North Texas	49.878	288	-0.4322	255
9	Wichita State	49.849	289	0.4696	124
10	Memphis	49.504	296	0.1598	157
11	ECU	48.049	327	0.1502	161
12	Rice	47.049	345	1.0582	71
13	UTSA	45.760	354	0.1169	165

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	46.179	42	1.6355	32
2	Charlotte	44.671	72	1.3981	41
3	USF	44.263	85	0.4470	129
4	Tulane	44.229	87	0.4041	140
5	Rice	44.032	91	3.4396	2
6	UTSA	40.441	158	-1.6871	330
7	FAU	39.015	188	-2.4111	353
8	Temple	36.698	236	0.8978	79
9	Wichita State	33.926	298	-0.8453	276
10	Memphis	33.777	303	-2.1401	344
11	North Texas	32.790	323	-1.3224	310
12	ECU	31.423	337	0.2985	161
13	UAB	30.630	346	0.0820	180

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	15.082	17	1.0363	19
2	Rice	13.245	70	0.8630	33
3	Charlotte	13.067	80	-0.0487	191
4	USF	12.514	106	0.4450	80
5	Tulane	11.043	188	-0.0483	190
6	FAU	11.027	189	-0.7658	330
7	Wichita State	10.428	226	-0.3645	265
8	UTSA	10.357	233	-0.2225	234
9	Temple	10.332	236	0.2634	99
10	Memphis	9.018	318	-0.6991	322
11	North Texas	8.425	336	-0.3271	259
12	UAB	7.635	352	-0.2863	250
13	ECU	7.550	355	0.3989	83

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	38.143	57	2.1365	9
2	Rice	38.132	58	4.1907	1
3	USF	37.945	61	1.4382	37
4	Charlotte	37.219	80	1.5566	29
5	UTSA	34.878	136	-0.9232	286
6	Tulane	34.484	147	0.1124	177
7	FAU	33.351	174	-2.0717	354
8	Wichita State	30.631	240	-0.2616	232
9	Temple	30.376	245	1.1539	57
10	Memphis	28.347	293	-1.8009	343
11	North Texas	27.724	307	-0.7819	279
12	UAB	26.993	325	-0.0322	199
13	ECU	26.015	341	0.1806	169

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	39.676	6	0.4671	120
2	Charlotte	35.549	92	-1.2718	297
3	Rice	35.076	129	-0.8235	262
4	Temple	33.860	191	-0.7270	255
5	Wichita State	33.860	192	-0.5717	236
6	FAU	32.672	248	0.1157	156
7	USF	32.646	252	-0.0025	167
8	Tulane	31.342	310	-0.1111	175
9	Memphis	31.063	320	-0.3442	208
10	UTSA	29.734	350	0.2475	144
11	North Texas	29.607	352	-0.5034	230
12	ECU	29.217	358	1.3831	52
13	UAB	28.674	363	-0.7109	251

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	45.410	12	-1.8024	300
2	USF	43.310	31	-1.4924	282
3	Temple	42.600	45	-3.2163	351
4	Tulsa	41.890	55	-0.6335	235
5	ECU	40.160	72	0.3570	147
6	North Texas	39.420	90	-0.7157	240
7	Wichita State	37.330	143	-1.2309	261
8	UAB	36.940	153	-0.3401	215
9	Charlotte	36.870	156	-3.2832	353
10	Memphis	34.580	219	1.2046	84
11	Rice	34.310	224	-3.0693	349
12	FAU	33.190	249	-0.3665	218
13	UTSA	30.360	314	-0.3947	221

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	26.468	11	-0.0034	188
2	Tulane	25.849	19	-1.4283	338
3	Tulsa	25.739	22	0.2124	163
4	Temple	25.685	23	-1.1576	324
5	ECU	22.937	99	0.4163	135
6	North Texas	22.898	104	-0.7614	293
7	UAB	22.581	117	0.0834	177
8	Wichita State	22.244	131	0.2340	161
9	Charlotte	21.445	170	-1.7915	350
10	Memphis	20.692	197	0.9249	73
11	Rice	19.719	238	-1.8643	353
12	FAU	19.672	239	-0.2562	230
13	UTSA	17.485	326	0.1827	165

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	35.658	12	-0.4471	240
2	Temple	34.284	28	-2.0199	342
3	Tulane	34.041	33	-1.5540	321
4	North Texas	32.886	51	-0.4326	235
5	Tulsa	32.838	53	0.3463	147
6	ECU	32.513	58	0.4497	135
7	Wichita State	32.263	64	-0.5994	253
8	UAB	31.849	81	-0.3648	227
9	Charlotte	30.023	153	-2.4634	354
10	Rice	28.863	194	-2.1369	347
11	Memphis	28.668	199	0.9972	84
12	FAU	27.478	237	-0.2009	209
13	UTSA	25.178	308	0.4341	137

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	78.346	14	0.0044	203
2	Tulane	76.909	32	-0.3959	240
3	Temple	74.897	84	1.4989	81
4	USF	73.467	141	0.8669	132
5	FAU	71.405	214	-0.4113	241
6	Charlotte	71.254	220	-0.5954	261
7	Memphis	71.012	228	0.9650	127
8	UAB	70.970	230	0.9810	126
9	UTSA	70.222	253	-0.2023	231
10	ECU	70.064	260	0.5019	157
11	Wichita State	69.099	282	2.9512	17
12	North Texas	68.591	297	-2.1651	345
13	Rice	67.914	318	-1.9373	341

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	59.328	42	1.6770	54
2	Tulane	56.057	92	1.0576	92
3	Tulsa	55.093	113	1.2891	74
4	Memphis	50.306	237	-1.7997	299
5	Temple	49.140	263	-1.2535	266
6	Charlotte	49.096	266	-0.8386	229
7	UAB	49.007	268	-0.3139	196
8	North Texas	48.962	269	-2.9068	341
9	FAU	47.115	311	-1.0775	248
10	ECU	46.924	314	0.3372	145
11	Rice	46.509	319	-0.2421	191
12	UTSA	43.210	350	-2.4411	322
13	Wichita State	41.408	356	-1.9238	302

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	7.602	40	-0.7119	27
2	UAB	7.745	49	-0.0801	161
3	USF	7.848	61	-0.7918	21
4	Wichita State	7.979	71	-0.0806	160
5	Tulane	8.437	123	0.1303	223
6	Tulsa	8.552	135	0.0250	190
7	North Texas	8.688	156	-1.0448	6
8	ECU	9.178	218	0.5932	319
9	FAU	9.537	252	-0.0039	180
10	Charlotte	9.616	262	0.6077	321
11	Rice	10.210	308	0.2658	257
12	UTSA	11.040	348	-0.7138	26
13	Memphis	11.129	351	-0.1446	147

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	3.415	25	-0.0714	163
2	Tulsa	4.099	114	0.0177	201
3	Tulane	4.218	137	0.1031	231
4	Charlotte	4.320	162	-0.0801	160
5	ECU	4.461	185	-0.3766	53
6	Wichita State	4.696	222	0.0399	209
7	Rice	5.033	271	-0.0617	167
8	Temple	5.748	338	-0.4826	32
9	UAB	5.783	340	-0.2751	88
10	Memphis	5.911	350	-0.3024	80
11	USF	6.131	353	-0.0587	171
12	North Texas	6.220	356	0.4053	315
13	UTSA	6.373	360	0.0166	199

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	26.602	40	-0.9762	341
2	Charlotte	25.700	79	-1.2672	357
3	Tulane	25.620	86	-0.3350	274
4	Tulsa	25.553	91	0.1457	187
5	ECU	25.211	109	-0.5238	298
6	USF	25.076	119	0.1573	185
7	Memphis	24.614	152	0.4745	130
8	North Texas	24.580	153	0.1211	191
9	Wichita State	24.556	156	-0.3892	281
10	Rice	24.286	169	-0.6523	311
11	UAB	22.975	245	-0.3745	278
12	FAU	22.144	300	-0.2235	254
13	UTSA	20.869	343	-0.0904	232

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	77.259	3	-0.9257	273
2	Memphis	73.361	33	1.0186	12
3	UAB	73.113	43	-1.3554	329
4	FAU	72.640	61	-0.6476	233
5	ECU	71.901	89	0.6873	35
6	UTSA	71.479	105	-0.4849	201
7	Tulsa	70.256	170	-0.6748	236
8	Wichita State	70.165	174	0.7234	31
9	Tulane	69.907	189	0.9971	15
10	Rice	69.716	194	-0.2869	161
11	North Texas	67.225	302	-0.1504	137
12	Temple	67.044	311	-0.8479	257
13	Charlotte	65.986	339	-0.0555	123

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.476	32	-0.0067	88
2	North Texas	0.487	54	0.0103	275
3	Memphis	0.488	57	0.0177	327
4	USF	0.492	72	-0.0087	69
5	UAB	0.495	80	-0.0051	106
6	Tulsa	0.501	99	-0.0042	115
7	FAU	0.502	103	0.0032	197
8	Temple	0.507	128	0.0005	169
9	Tulane	0.511	153	0.0143	309
10	Charlotte	0.511	154	-0.0076	81
11	Rice	0.514	172	-0.0097	61
12	ECU	0.526	237	0.0088	263
13	UTSA	0.534	276	-0.0069	85

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.993	34	-0.0046	119
2	North Texas	0.994	36	0.0069	190
3	USF	1.005	47	-0.0192	49
4	UAB	1.020	73	-0.0030	125
5	Memphis	1.041	104	0.0454	350
6	Tulsa	1.047	113	-0.0098	89
7	FAU	1.048	116	0.0174	258
8	Temple	1.060	152	0.0138	231
9	Tulane	1.079	212	0.0354	334
10	ECU	1.092	241	0.0185	264
11	Rice	1.101	267	-0.0129	71
12	Charlotte	1.119	298	0.0167	251
13	UTSA	1.172	353	0.0144	236

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.199	10	-0.0024	162
2	USF	0.177	54	0.0096	14
3	Memphis	0.174	69	-0.0150	358
4	Tulane	0.157	164	-0.0095	307
5	ECU	0.153	200	-0.0084	292
6	Wichita State	0.150	218	-0.0021	153
7	UAB	0.149	219	-0.0051	221
8	FAU	0.146	235	-0.0077	280
9	Tulsa	0.145	245	0.0038	59
10	Rice	0.143	264	-0.0073	275
11	Temple	0.139	293	-0.0077	281
12	UTSA	0.139	296	-0.0118	342
13	Charlotte	0.123	350	-0.0097	308

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	75.090	45	-0.0066	270
2	Wichita State	74.760	58	0.0043	155
3	FAU	74.660	66	-0.0068	271
4	Temple	74.210	82	0.0095	95
5	Tulsa	73.520	109	0.0057	143
6	USF	72.010	177	-0.0086	291
7	North Texas	70.490	242	0.0038	169
8	Rice	69.580	280	0.0001	203
9	Charlotte	69.520	283	-0.0278	363
10	ECU	69.040	299	0.0022	181
11	Memphis	67.060	337	-0.0027	231
12	Tulane	66.980	339	0.0038	170
13	UTSA	62.760	363	-0.0157	342

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	0.286	30	-0.0135	96
2	Tulsa	0.320	93	-0.0059	156
3	ECU	0.326	102	-0.0112	114
4	UTSA	0.340	133	-0.0262	28
5	Wichita State	0.348	151	0.0116	274
6	FAU	0.357	177	-0.0215	54
7	Temple	0.371	219	0.0237	324
8	Tulane	0.384	254	0.0146	287
9	Charlotte	0.384	256	-0.0338	12
10	USF	0.389	269	-0.0259	30
11	Rice	0.415	305	0.0063	241
12	Memphis	0.433	329	0.0050	230
13	North Texas	0.450	345	-0.0223	48

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	104.300	42	0.0416	85
2	USF	104.978	49	-0.5125	25
3	North Texas	105.615	51	0.6940	197
4	Memphis	107.695	88	0.7458	212
5	UAB	108.456	95	-0.5867	19
6	FAU	109.294	115	-0.1496	58
7	Tulsa	110.191	129	0.0675	91
8	Temple	111.100	147	0.3049	130
9	Tulane	114.023	195	-0.0511	73
10	ECU	114.777	213	-0.1602	55
11	Rice	116.480	238	1.3770	306
12	Charlotte	117.506	256	0.5412	170
13	UTSA	123.665	335	1.5745	323

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	33.097	12	0.7249	263
2	USF	33.935	31	-0.2756	100
3	Memphis	34.310	43	1.8540	353
4	Wichita State	35.252	78	-0.4167	87
5	FAU	36.551	139	1.2112	318
6	Tulsa	36.839	159	-0.3489	90
7	Tulane	36.981	168	0.9266	281
8	UAB	37.011	169	0.4883	220
9	Temple	37.275	185	-0.3022	96
10	Rice	37.603	206	-0.4738	80
11	Charlotte	38.361	247	0.9868	288
12	ECU	38.845	275	1.4455	338
13	UTSA	41.052	338	1.0067	292

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	77.340	9	0.9366	272
2	USF	80.815	78	0.7479	254
3	Memphis	81.021	81	0.6835	244
4	Wichita State	83.048	156	-0.2027	139
5	FAU	83.201	167	1.7876	336
6	Rice	83.478	176	0.6276	230
7	Temple	83.611	180	-0.5764	91
8	Tulane	84.050	211	-0.1942	141
9	Tulsa	84.932	257	-0.3038	125
10	UAB	85.318	275	1.4153	309
11	ECU	85.405	279	0.8394	267
12	Charlotte	86.883	325	3.6932	364
13	UTSA	89.972	360	3.5546	363

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	42.233	50	-0.8613	54
2	Memphis	42.327	52	1.9231	348
3	Wichita State	42.519	57	-0.4036	102
4	North Texas	42.744	69	0.5806	231
5	UAB	43.310	86	-0.0928	145
6	Tulsa	43.411	94	-0.3166	117
7	FAU	43.972	123	0.4618	214
8	Tulane	44.150	133	1.1869	306
9	Charlotte	44.267	138	-0.7899	63
10	Temple	44.733	177	-0.1077	140
11	Rice	45.243	207	-0.7284	73
12	ECU	45.739	234	1.2501	310
13	UTSA	45.786	236	-0.5373	87

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UTSA	57.075	77	-1.0287	73
2	Memphis	57.154	78	1.8298	332
3	Charlotte	59.519	146	-0.7369	97
4	Tulane	59.834	156	0.2846	217
5	Tulsa	59.921	160	-0.6429	108
6	USF	60.122	168	-1.8937	25
7	ECU	60.854	189	1.8160	330
8	UAB	61.072	204	0.8242	267
9	North Texas	61.884	233	-1.5108	35
10	Temple	63.608	278	-0.6692	104
11	FAU	63.732	281	-0.0703	173
12	Rice	64.183	298	-0.4796	123
13	Wichita State	66.642	343	2.0764	345

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	22.819	26	-0.2865	99
2	Memphis	23.848	61	2.0312	359
3	North Texas	23.865	62	-0.1483	123
4	Tulane	25.327	127	0.4805	232
5	Tulsa	25.495	135	-0.1328	127
6	FAU	26.218	189	1.2392	329
7	Charlotte	26.354	193	0.4533	227
8	UAB	26.464	204	1.0719	315
9	Wichita State	26.713	222	0.0704	160
10	ECU	27.150	248	1.9319	358
11	UTSA	27.400	266	0.7920	282
12	Temple	27.405	267	-0.4981	72
13	Rice	27.440	270	-0.1071	133

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	46.371	55	1.8996	335
2	North Texas	47.852	88	-0.7732	82
3	USF	48.823	121	-0.9131	69
4	Tulane	50.385	172	-0.0241	156
5	Tulsa	51.012	194	-0.7303	84
6	UTSA	51.120	199	0.9605	268
7	Charlotte	51.631	226	1.6290	327
8	ECU	51.953	245	1.9856	340
9	UAB	52.279	259	1.6437	328
10	FAU	53.050	282	1.1410	284
11	Temple	53.256	294	-0.9085	70
12	Rice	53.673	302	-0.0126	158
13	Wichita State	55.351	336	1.6488	329

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	47.135	28	-0.1179	135
2	Wichita State	48.980	57	-1.3391	44
3	North Texas	49.386	70	0.5891	218
4	FAU	49.636	75	1.2529	290
5	Tulsa	50.460	108	0.3214	194
6	UAB	50.739	116	0.7319	235
7	Tulane	50.782	121	0.8475	245
8	Charlotte	50.824	124	-0.8496	69
9	Rice	51.039	137	0.0406	154
10	Memphis	51.586	154	2.0676	340
11	Temple	52.120	187	-0.0861	138
12	ECU	52.459	205	1.7063	316
13	UTSA	54.093	270	0.5886	217

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	33.358	23	-2.0764	21
2	Rice	35.817	68	0.4796	243
3	FAU	36.268	85	0.0703	193
4	Temple	36.392	88	0.6692	262
5	North Texas	38.116	133	1.5108	331
6	UAB	38.928	162	-0.8242	99
7	ECU	39.146	177	-1.8160	36
8	USF	39.878	198	1.8937	341
9	Tulsa	40.079	206	0.6429	258
10	Tulane	40.166	210	-0.2846	149
11	Charlotte	40.481	220	0.7369	269
12	Memphis	42.846	288	-1.8298	34
13	UTSA	42.925	289	1.0287	293

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	8.538	13	-0.4872	72
2	North Texas	9.232	36	0.8732	335
3	Temple	9.871	64	0.1959	227
4	Rice	10.164	80	-0.3667	101
5	FAU	10.332	95	-0.0280	173
6	Memphis	10.462	110	-0.1772	144
7	UAB	10.547	119	-0.5836	57
8	USF	11.116	182	0.0109	180
9	Tulsa	11.344	205	-0.2161	133
10	Tulane	11.654	229	0.4461	279
11	ECU	11.695	234	-0.4864	74
12	Charlotte	12.007	264	0.5334	294
13	UTSA	13.652	345	0.2146	232

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	27.697	29	-1.8515	22
2	North Texas	29.488	62	1.7098	333
3	Rice	29.805	68	0.6401	253
4	FAU	30.151	81	0.6466	255
5	Temple	30.355	90	0.3321	229
6	USF	31.991	142	1.6610	331
7	UAB	33.040	184	-0.2284	151
8	ECU	33.453	199	-1.1462	60
9	Tulane	33.664	212	-0.1701	158
10	Tulsa	33.920	223	0.4265	236
11	Memphis	34.650	254	-1.2160	55
12	Charlotte	35.252	274	2.0642	351
13	UTSA	38.852	347	2.5941	360

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	29.831	15	0.7525	254
2	Memphis	29.904	16	0.9334	270
3	North Texas	30.966	40	1.1446	293
4	UAB	31.189	47	-1.6628	38
5	Temple	31.967	75	0.6005	237
6	Tulsa	32.984	123	-1.0364	85
7	Rice	33.772	170	-1.7402	35
8	Charlotte	33.806	175	-0.8392	98
9	ECU	33.890	181	-0.1332	173
10	FAU	34.378	214	-0.3839	144
11	Tulane	34.584	227	1.2719	303
12	USF	34.749	237	-1.6136	41
13	UTSA	34.877	249	-1.4149	51

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	28.590	30	-1.3470	96
2	Tulsa	32.010	93	-0.5939	156
3	ECU	32.600	102	-1.1201	114
4	UTSA	33.950	133	-2.6250	28
5	Wichita State	34.790	151	1.1602	274
6	FAU	35.710	177	-2.1527	54
7	Temple	37.060	219	2.3665	324
8	Tulane	38.400	254	1.4561	287
9	Charlotte	38.440	256	-3.3830	12
10	USF	38.900	269	-2.5863	30
11	Rice	41.470	305	0.6339	241
12	Memphis	43.330	329	0.5011	230
13	North Texas	44.990	345	-2.2262	48

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	17.452	38	-0.6884	105
2	Tulsa	19.550	104	-0.0371	168
3	ECU	19.784	112	-0.5554	117
4	Wichita State	20.238	131	0.8614	277
5	FAU	21.383	191	-0.6581	109
6	UTSA	21.484	198	-0.7893	88
7	USF	21.496	199	-1.3799	27
8	Temple	21.582	203	1.7843	345
9	Tulane	22.317	250	1.2419	309
10	Charlotte	23.208	292	-0.8326	80
11	North Texas	23.928	308	-1.6366	14
12	Rice	24.767	331	0.0255	178
13	Memphis	24.973	339	1.0382	289

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	23.973	33	-0.7128	109
2	Tulsa	26.938	101	-0.5778	123
3	ECU	27.299	109	-0.5255	130
4	Wichita State	28.750	160	0.9616	273
5	FAU	29.188	179	-1.3460	55
6	UTSA	29.868	210	-1.2356	64
7	Temple	29.907	212	1.8843	338
8	USF	30.629	250	-1.9164	24
9	Tulane	31.695	284	1.0712	289
10	Charlotte	32.549	306	-1.6748	37
11	Rice	33.715	326	0.8321	258
12	North Texas	34.025	328	-1.3284	57
13	Memphis	34.242	332	0.8738	259

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	69.275	45	-2.8570	8
2	USF	69.420	49	-0.3111	133
3	Wichita State	69.465	50	1.1118	254
4	Charlotte	70.028	69	1.0053	245
5	Tulane	70.071	72	1.6254	292
6	Temple	71.601	153	1.4592	277
7	Memphis	71.903	170	1.4573	275
8	ECU	72.480	202	-0.2173	143
9	UTSA	72.594	209	-0.2446	139
10	Tulsa	72.925	235	2.1948	320
11	FAU	73.212	246	1.5001	282
12	Rice	73.404	251	-1.5561	41
13	UAB	73.842	270	-1.0082	79

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	41.650	7	-4.5667	3
2	FAU	45.805	33	-1.2847	100
3	Rice	46.938	55	-2.5568	33
4	North Texas	47.976	75	-1.5998	78
5	UAB	49.062	102	-2.6516	28
6	Tulsa	49.426	112	0.1529	213
7	Temple	49.795	119	-0.1083	194
8	Charlotte	50.408	133	2.8738	344
9	USF	51.964	176	2.4126	329
10	ECU	54.373	244	0.3686	224
11	Memphis	54.394	245	-2.0914	51
12	Tulane	55.277	262	-0.1340	190
13	UTSA	55.440	266	-2.5718	31

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	12.871	10	-0.1693	187
2	Memphis	11.679	28	-1.3458	362
3	USF	11.425	35	0.6928	20
4	Tulane	10.814	75	-0.3866	244
5	UAB	10.257	106	-0.3521	234
6	ECU	9.222	186	-0.2925	221
7	Tulsa	9.196	188	-0.0647	162
8	Rice	9.183	190	-0.5978	304
9	UTSA	8.990	198	-0.5551	295
10	Wichita State	8.648	230	0.2735	85
11	Temple	7.973	289	-0.1427	180
12	FAU	7.879	300	-0.1551	182
13	Charlotte	6.789	349	-0.6439	316

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	7.358	13	-0.4143	308
2	Tulane	6.772	19	-0.4027	303
3	North Texas	6.132	44	-0.4020	302
4	UTSA	6.042	49	0.1175	101
5	Temple	5.922	57	-0.6736	351
6	Memphis	5.815	65	-0.1749	226
7	ECU	5.590	83	-0.6128	343
8	Rice	5.540	87	-0.0568	174
9	Wichita State	5.416	100	0.0075	143
10	USF	5.372	103	-0.4431	319
11	Charlotte	5.110	128	-0.2579	256
12	UAB	4.851	158	0.2479	64
13	Tulsa	3.327	320	-0.0270	157

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	19.830	3	-0.6869	69
2	ECU	22.564	41	-0.6741	71
3	Tulsa	23.296	69	-0.5028	94
4	UTSA	24.036	110	-1.0385	33
5	FAU	24.336	130	-1.1011	28
6	Wichita State	24.816	155	-0.3691	117
7	Tulane	25.171	181	-0.0546	196
8	USF	25.753	222	-0.4139	109
9	Temple	25.991	239	0.8150	331
10	Charlotte	26.355	263	-1.1653	25
11	Rice	27.068	305	-0.5933	79
12	Memphis	27.612	329	0.2028	242
13	North Texas	28.434	347	-0.2414	153

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	76.819	6	-1.5884	344
2	Memphis	73.548	34	1.2433	10
3	UAB	72.725	56	-1.0447	303
4	FAU	72.572	59	-0.6642	235
5	ECU	71.261	106	0.7566	31
6	Wichita State	71.136	111	0.3167	82
7	UTSA	70.686	138	-0.4378	205
8	Tulane	70.175	167	1.1200	14
9	Tulsa	70.009	182	-0.2963	181
10	Rice	69.842	194	-0.1651	161
11	North Texas	67.976	282	-0.2091	166
12	Temple	67.562	293	-0.8012	265
13	Charlotte	66.412	334	0.1845	99