Conferences – HoopSci

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	16.904	46	4.8205	2
2	USF	12.987	69	2.4903	37
3	Wichita State	11.617	73	1.4367	84
4	FAU	10.762	81	0.8915	121
5	Temple	6.394	110	0.3581	146
6	Memphis	5.365	114	-1.9941	308
7	UAB	2.298	144	0.2757	155
8	Charlotte	1.786	147	2.0370	59
9	North Texas	1.550	151	-3.4945	352
10	Tulane	-5.152	205	-1.5053	283
11	Rice	-9.417	243	-2.5482	328
12	ECU	-15.114	291	-2.5168	326
13	UTSA	-27.148	355	-4.1446	358

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.204	44	0.0112	92
2	USF	0.172	67	0.0081	108
3	Tulsa	0.158	77	0.0403	9
4	UAB	0.140	93	-0.0077	232
5	North Texas	0.107	113	-0.0219	314
6	Temple	0.104	114	0.0023	149
7	FAU	0.092	120	0.0143	74
8	Tulane	0.026	175	-0.0187	299
9	Charlotte	0.010	193	0.0100	99
10	Memphis	-0.019	210	-0.0100	245
11	Rice	-0.088	269	-0.0238	325
12	ECU	-0.151	318	-0.0360	348
13	UTSA	-0.173	329	-0.0459	359

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	1629.205	53	-17.5883	340
2	FAU	1615.525	60	-3.4113	217
3	North Texas	1600.416	67	-9.8011	285
4	UAB	1588.273	78	-3.7203	224
5	Tulsa	1547.232	118	29.0825	3
6	USF	1543.418	122	3.2714	140
7	Wichita State	1541.974	123	1.7117	161
8	Tulane	1537.311	134	8.3373	77
9	Temple	1532.606	140	4.9130	119
10	Charlotte	1464.905	234	-6.6702	255
11	Rice	1416.486	280	-7.6428	265
12	ECU	1416.033	282	-15.2324	328
13	UTSA	1354.589	340	-10.6292	301

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	0.593	42	0.0061	169
2	Tulsa	0.579	53	0.0307	8
3	USF	0.566	63	0.0254	22
4	Memphis	0.523	126	-0.0220	361
5	Wichita State	0.514	135	0.0016	221
6	North Texas	0.512	138	-0.0151	351
7	Tulane	0.512	140	0.0091	132
8	UAB	0.507	156	0.0020	216
9	Temple	0.497	185	-0.0003	242
10	Charlotte	0.487	206	0.0045	188
11	Rice	0.445	270	-0.0087	318
12	ECU	0.444	272	-0.0068	304
13	UTSA	0.431	303	0.0041	195

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	0.576	14	0.0112	64
2	FAU	0.543	69	0.0059	127
3	Charlotte	0.534	108	0.0243	6
4	USF	0.513	185	0.0050	137
5	Temple	0.510	195	-0.0167	350
6	Wichita State	0.495	256	-0.0020	228
7	Tulane	0.495	258	-0.0142	335
8	Memphis	0.493	262	-0.0005	206
9	UAB	0.482	293	-0.0178	354
10	Rice	0.477	310	0.0101	77
11	North Texas	0.476	312	-0.0079	292
12	ECU	0.448	355	-0.0090	300
13	UTSA	0.429	363	-0.0133	330

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	1.220	9	0.0468	7
2	Wichita State	1.140	76	0.0114	143
3	USF	1.133	91	0.0087	168
4	FAU	1.132	94	-0.0062	266
5	Charlotte	1.112	120	0.0303	45
6	Temple	1.104	131	-0.0233	341
7	UAB	1.088	159	-0.0295	351
8	Tulane	1.056	225	-0.0169	322
9	North Texas	1.045	245	-0.0034	242
10	Rice	1.032	272	0.0211	85
11	Memphis	1.021	290	-0.0114	295
12	ECU	0.949	350	-0.0211	333
13	UTSA	0.917	360	-0.0330	356

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	0.120	4	-0.0067	91
2	Temple	0.130	15	0.0048	304
3	Wichita State	0.140	53	-0.0020	184
4	Tulane	0.142	68	0.0040	292
5	Tulsa	0.143	73	-0.0060	102
6	USF	0.147	99	0.0016	258
7	ECU	0.157	167	-0.0120	19
8	Charlotte	0.162	198	0.0069	326
9	Rice	0.162	207	-0.0033	154
10	FAU	0.170	253	0.0014	255
11	North Texas	0.171	262	0.0040	293
12	UTSA	0.173	275	0.0138	360
13	Memphis	0.188	332	0.0029	278

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	39.570	6	0.0199	25
2	USF	34.350	38	0.0128	54
3	Memphis	34.260	39	-0.0053	197
4	North Texas	33.720	51	0.0249	14
5	Charlotte	32.240	87	0.0046	99
6	UAB	31.450	106	-0.0249	330
7	FAU	31.330	107	-0.0223	316
8	Rice	30.720	131	0.0031	120
9	Tulsa	29.440	163	0.0065	87
10	ECU	27.660	207	-0.0261	334
11	UTSA	25.220	276	-0.0074	216
12	Temple	24.520	295	0.0024	123
13	Tulane	20.510	350	-0.0034	181

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	0.462	8	-0.0179	320
2	Tulane	0.457	15	0.0133	121
3	Tulsa	0.454	18	0.0315	43
4	USF	0.432	46	-0.0053	247
5	Charlotte	0.396	106	-0.0051	244
6	North Texas	0.394	109	0.0011	204
7	ECU	0.392	116	-0.0120	287
8	Wichita State	0.387	127	0.0044	180
9	Rice	0.380	140	-0.0227	334
10	UAB	0.371	157	0.0024	193
11	Memphis	0.341	239	-0.0229	336
12	FAU	0.335	251	0.0136	119
13	UTSA	0.328	267	-0.0014	220

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	125.968	17	4.4609	1
2	USF	116.925	75	1.5039	73
3	FAU	115.872	85	0.0111	220
4	Charlotte	115.264	96	1.5357	70
5	Wichita State	114.998	99	1.0220	108
6	Temple	112.171	135	-0.1038	230
7	UAB	110.722	152	-0.6954	282
8	Memphis	108.030	187	-2.3750	358
9	Tulane	106.266	214	-1.0212	304
10	Rice	104.807	246	-0.6942	281
11	North Texas	103.873	260	-2.9201	363
12	ECU	98.085	326	-2.5537	360
13	UTSA	93.053	356	-3.4490	364

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	40.504	56	0.1153	172
2	Tulsa	39.809	89	0.7388	82
3	Wichita State	39.754	94	0.0233	187
4	UAB	39.218	112	-1.3510	356
5	Charlotte	37.594	200	1.1909	36
6	USF	37.142	221	-0.1578	213
7	Temple	36.751	241	-0.8103	310
8	Memphis	36.414	253	-0.2017	219
9	North Texas	36.066	268	-0.0348	191
10	Rice	34.683	311	0.9880	51
11	Tulane	33.663	332	-1.3740	357
12	ECU	33.231	339	-0.2533	232
13	UTSA	31.675	362	-1.1630	345

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	89.520	9	1.2638	54
2	UAB	88.425	17	-0.1880	209
3	FAU	85.511	82	-1.3749	328
4	USF	84.585	135	0.2057	162
5	Rice	84.055	159	0.9848	78
6	Memphis	84.019	162	0.3260	150
7	UTSA	83.810	171	-1.1642	308
8	Charlotte	82.996	212	-0.7171	262
9	North Texas	82.388	237	0.8124	89
10	ECU	82.252	246	0.7710	95
11	Tulsa	81.839	260	-0.2955	222
12	Temple	81.169	281	0.5360	119
13	Tulane	78.708	344	-0.3812	230

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	48.473	42	1.0031	46
2	FAU	47.417	75	0.8954	68
3	Charlotte	45.454	173	1.9104	8
4	Temple	45.407	175	-1.4117	348
5	UAB	44.402	239	-1.3958	347
6	Wichita State	44.314	245	-0.5566	278
7	USF	43.992	258	-0.3422	246
8	North Texas	43.987	259	-0.5653	280
9	Memphis	43.318	277	-0.3868	250
10	Tulane	42.705	302	-1.5955	356
11	Rice	41.133	337	0.6017	106
12	ECU	40.581	349	-0.5717	281
13	UTSA	37.712	365	-0.9280	314

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	71.328	9	1.3040	52
2	ECU	68.926	20	1.4847	49
3	Wichita State	65.015	86	-1.6342	316
4	North Texas	64.748	93	0.7365	105
5	Temple	63.908	113	-0.3768	218
6	Memphis	63.357	123	-1.7565	325
7	Rice	58.955	212	-1.0152	279
8	FAU	58.671	223	1.0329	70
9	UTSA	56.725	250	-0.5258	239
10	Tulane	56.335	257	-0.9977	277
11	Charlotte	55.997	266	-0.6611	251
12	Tulsa	55.168	292	0.7400	104
13	USF	54.863	300	-2.4273	345

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	31.890	7	-0.6264	283
2	FAU	28.459	83	0.8333	63
3	Wichita State	28.320	92	-0.7964	306
4	North Texas	26.465	185	0.2032	135
5	ECU	26.435	187	0.2605	130
6	Temple	26.324	194	-0.4656	263
7	Memphis	26.260	198	-0.8312	309
8	Tulsa	25.159	248	0.5547	98
9	Charlotte	24.374	280	0.4851	106
10	USF	24.129	287	-1.6796	360
11	Tulane	22.549	333	-1.6701	359
12	Rice	22.231	338	0.1347	151
13	UTSA	21.281	354	-0.3465	240

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	62.926	1	1.0447	78
2	Wichita State	57.867	23	-0.8035	260
3	ECU	56.599	38	1.8290	30
4	Memphis	53.216	110	-1.3428	296
5	North Texas	53.173	112	1.1042	71
6	Temple	51.990	145	0.0907	163
7	FAU	50.059	192	0.0518	169
8	Rice	49.614	205	-0.2268	196
9	UTSA	47.235	248	-1.0984	277
10	Charlotte	46.450	274	-0.9818	269
11	USF	46.297	280	-2.0098	344
12	Tulsa	45.524	294	0.4382	136
13	Tulane	44.084	323	-1.1644	282

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	57.163	52	1.4749	43
2	Tulsa	55.255	93	0.6402	116
3	Charlotte	53.042	170	2.1788	13
4	USF	52.950	174	-1.4825	329
5	Temple	51.134	241	-1.2756	319
6	UAB	50.946	249	-1.8908	341
7	North Texas	50.776	254	-0.7188	277
8	Tulane	50.761	255	-2.5997	364
9	Memphis	49.282	299	-0.3033	231
10	Wichita State	49.169	303	-0.4671	247
11	ECU	46.774	341	-0.9462	294
12	Rice	45.179	353	0.6226	118
13	UTSA	44.385	357	0.3597	144

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	45.137	66	2.4273	21
2	Tulsa	44.832	74	-0.7400	262
3	Charlotte	44.003	100	0.6611	115
4	Tulane	43.665	109	0.9977	89
5	UTSA	43.275	116	0.5258	127
6	FAU	41.329	143	-1.0329	296
7	Rice	41.045	154	1.0152	87
8	Memphis	36.643	243	1.7565	41
9	Temple	36.092	253	0.3768	148
10	North Texas	35.252	273	-0.7365	261
11	Wichita State	34.985	280	1.6342	50
12	ECU	31.074	346	-1.4847	317
13	UAB	28.672	357	-1.3040	314

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	14.650	25	0.1841	148
2	Charlotte	13.220	72	0.7059	66
3	USF	13.013	85	1.5218	9
4	Rice	12.452	103	0.8533	49
5	FAU	12.045	134	-0.7179	328
6	Wichita State	11.434	163	0.8197	55
7	Tulane	11.115	186	0.2962	123
8	Temple	10.427	231	-0.3447	265
9	UTSA	10.395	239	-0.8165	341
10	Memphis	10.155	252	0.6295	76
11	North Texas	9.601	281	-0.2380	242
12	UAB	7.328	355	-0.7246	330
13	ECU	6.795	359	-0.5138	293

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	38.287	60	2.2155	24
2	UTSA	36.576	97	-0.0658	183
3	Charlotte	36.547	98	0.2646	144
4	Tulsa	36.315	108	-0.7337	267
5	FAU	35.452	125	-1.4267	333
6	Tulane	34.624	145	0.7832	93
7	Rice	34.442	150	1.2115	61
8	Wichita State	31.653	219	2.0673	27
9	Memphis	30.803	242	1.6688	41
10	North Texas	29.215	273	-0.2918	220
11	Temple	29.179	274	0.4452	126
12	ECU	25.653	339	-1.0580	304
13	UAB	25.499	341	-1.2328	319

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	40.691	6	1.4352	59
2	Charlotte	36.393	61	1.8104	35
3	Rice	35.887	80	1.0675	91
4	Wichita State	35.711	89	1.1575	84
5	Temple	35.702	90	-1.8737	340
6	USF	33.560	205	2.1864	17
7	FAU	33.421	210	-0.7403	282
8	North Texas	32.541	246	-0.4919	248
9	Memphis	31.870	274	0.3407	158
10	Tulane	31.454	296	-0.1401	202
11	UAB	28.771	353	-0.9369	297
12	UTSA	28.728	354	-2.2632	352
13	ECU	26.826	364	-0.3854	231

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	46.200	8	-1.7914	320
2	Tulane	45.650	15	1.3262	121
3	Tulsa	45.380	18	3.1511	43
4	USF	43.240	46	-0.5345	247
5	Charlotte	39.550	106	-0.5070	244
6	North Texas	39.390	109	0.1131	204
7	ECU	39.240	116	-1.2018	287
8	Wichita State	38.720	127	0.4455	180
9	Rice	37.950	140	-2.2737	334
10	UAB	37.140	157	0.2391	193
11	Memphis	34.090	239	-2.2894	336
12	FAU	33.470	251	1.3615	119
13	UTSA	32.770	267	-0.1419	220

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	27.696	6	3.0376	5
2	Tulane	27.192	8	0.7676	123
3	Temple	26.521	20	-0.3621	269
4	USF	26.018	23	-0.3376	268
5	Wichita State	23.047	105	0.2782	194
6	UAB	23.041	106	0.4775	162
7	Charlotte	22.804	119	-0.0561	238
8	North Texas	22.615	127	-0.0807	239
9	ECU	21.631	161	-1.0934	328
10	Rice	21.369	171	-0.7229	306
11	FAU	20.167	220	-0.1273	245
12	Memphis	19.154	254	-1.3628	342
13	UTSA	17.991	304	-0.1555	250

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	35.911	16	-1.0668	306
2	USF	35.438	21	-0.3534	247
3	Tulane	35.228	23	0.6583	155
4	Tulsa	34.556	36	2.4039	31
5	Wichita State	33.137	65	0.7942	141
6	North Texas	32.771	73	0.6870	151
7	UAB	32.123	96	0.1802	212
8	Charlotte	32.050	100	-0.6201	274
9	ECU	31.574	108	-0.5986	271
10	Rice	30.749	140	-1.5421	335
11	Memphis	27.911	231	-1.7849	341
12	FAU	27.762	236	0.6725	153
13	UTSA	26.212	279	-0.5829	269

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	80.831	2	4.2959	4
2	Tulane	77.602	22	1.1998	111
3	Temple	74.058	111	1.1067	121
4	USF	72.513	163	-0.3689	236
5	FAU	72.328	172	-1.7437	315
6	UAB	71.735	193	1.1674	113
7	Charlotte	71.660	197	1.7911	59
8	Rice	69.642	257	0.7378	150
9	UTSA	69.535	262	0.2780	189
10	Wichita State	69.424	267	-0.8739	279
11	North Texas	68.430	293	-2.2096	336
12	ECU	67.741	307	-2.5363	345
13	Memphis	67.283	319	-0.9656	286

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	59.043	46	2.1077	62
2	Tulsa	55.908	106	-0.7800	239
3	Tulane	55.135	123	0.5145	148
4	Memphis	54.372	134	1.6908	78
5	North Texas	53.214	174	0.1071	178
6	Charlotte	50.340	250	-0.5809	228
7	UAB	49.269	268	-1.0751	260
8	Temple	48.871	281	-0.5802	227
9	FAU	47.959	295	0.0412	184
10	Rice	46.468	324	-1.8234	303
11	UTSA	46.140	328	-0.4557	217
12	ECU	45.344	336	-2.3223	323
13	Wichita State	41.897	356	-0.4789	220

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	7.539	53	0.1177	217
2	UAB	7.666	64	-0.7779	29
3	Temple	7.850	77	0.2129	239
4	Tulsa	8.173	104	-0.2301	128
5	Tulane	8.217	113	0.3724	274
6	USF	8.475	145	0.2961	259
7	ECU	8.834	184	-0.2872	110
8	Charlotte	8.900	192	0.3315	267
9	FAU	9.283	239	-0.1326	152
10	North Texas	9.449	256	0.2235	244
11	Rice	9.535	263	-0.4157	81
12	Memphis	11.413	351	0.1977	233
13	UTSA	11.560	354	1.3936	361

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	3.487	43	0.0107	173
2	Tulane	3.754	78	-0.2722	73
3	Charlotte	3.783	82	-0.1537	115
4	Tulsa	3.966	108	0.2795	276
5	Wichita State	4.632	217	0.6949	345
6	ECU	4.695	228	0.0198	177
7	Rice	5.356	313	0.2766	275
8	North Texas	5.456	321	0.8971	358
9	UAB	5.747	339	0.9971	362
10	Temple	6.219	356	0.8497	354
11	Memphis	6.272	360	0.8971	357
12	USF	6.336	361	0.6500	341
13	UTSA	6.354	362	0.2082	250

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	26.634	54	-0.1956	279
2	Charlotte	26.590	55	-0.7545	335
3	ECU	25.673	76	0.4068	181
4	Tulsa	25.430	90	1.3985	39
5	Tulane	25.365	93	0.4293	176
6	Rice	24.765	125	-0.7308	333
7	USF	24.408	141	-0.8609	343
8	Wichita State	24.365	145	0.3180	197
9	Memphis	24.344	146	-0.2949	284
10	North Texas	23.892	168	0.3097	198
11	UAB	22.797	227	0.5783	150
12	FAU	22.114	255	1.2374	61
13	UTSA	20.720	318	0.3366	192

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	79.268	2	1.3888	11
2	UAB	75.129	30	1.1974	22
3	FAU	73.272	70	1.2334	17
4	Memphis	72.603	93	-0.8737	282
5	UTSA	72.496	99	-0.5217	234
6	ECU	72.208	114	0.3320	92
7	Tulsa	70.776	177	0.1322	125
8	Rice	69.924	214	-0.9375	292
9	Tulane	69.169	247	0.1086	128
10	Wichita State	68.895	257	0.0870	133
11	Temple	67.862	301	-0.6394	248
12	North Texas	66.490	338	1.2626	15
13	Charlotte	66.101	343	-0.0789	162

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.466	28	-0.0015	142
2	Memphis	0.475	43	-0.0089	64
3	Wichita State	0.476	44	-0.0053	100
4	USF	0.494	94	-0.0167	15
5	FAU	0.501	125	-0.0118	38
6	Temple	0.503	133	-0.0156	17
7	UAB	0.504	141	0.0107	287
8	Tulsa	0.506	148	-0.0020	137
9	Tulane	0.513	182	-0.0081	72
10	Charlotte	0.517	199	-0.0118	39
11	Rice	0.522	223	0.0038	217
12	ECU	0.532	260	-0.0005	154
13	UTSA	0.537	275	0.0216	351

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.970	32	-0.0065	96
2	Wichita State	0.998	57	-0.0024	123
3	USF	1.010	73	-0.0098	74
4	Memphis	1.011	74	0.0029	160
5	FAU	1.026	106	-0.0231	27
6	UAB	1.028	110	0.0088	191
7	Temple	1.032	118	-0.0383	6
8	Tulsa	1.048	154	0.0016	148
9	Tulane	1.055	164	-0.0112	68
10	ECU	1.092	247	0.0113	206
11	Charlotte	1.096	251	0.0002	135
12	Rice	1.098	254	0.0102	200
13	UTSA	1.154	328	0.0444	354

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.202	10	0.0103	18
2	Memphis	0.183	55	0.0010	112
3	USF	0.175	90	-0.0129	347
4	Tulane	0.166	136	0.0042	63
5	ECU	0.163	155	-0.0024	190
6	FAU	0.160	175	0.0085	25
7	UAB	0.157	201	0.0054	52
8	Rice	0.155	215	0.0014	110
9	Tulsa	0.151	233	-0.0012	166
10	UTSA	0.147	256	-0.0057	266
11	Wichita State	0.146	264	-0.0059	271
12	Temple	0.142	284	0.0051	53
13	Charlotte	0.133	333	-0.0082	302

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	76.260	27	0.0065	83
2	UAB	76.010	31	0.0005	150
3	Temple	75.300	44	0.0042	113
4	Wichita State	74.130	73	-0.0061	239
5	Tulsa	73.920	86	0.0004	153
6	USF	72.350	149	-0.0005	165
7	Charlotte	71.840	171	-0.0128	298
8	North Texas	71.080	200	-0.0007	168
9	ECU	70.190	238	-0.0176	328
10	Rice	69.620	259	-0.0112	288
11	Tulane	67.900	312	-0.0065	243
12	Memphis	67.000	330	-0.0114	289
13	UTSA	63.980	355	-0.0251	356

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	0.311	65	-0.0009	138
2	Temple	0.312	66	-0.0216	31
3	Tulsa	0.321	82	-0.0109	78
4	Wichita State	0.338	121	0.0027	168
5	UTSA	0.340	125	-0.0295	13
6	ECU	0.358	167	0.0018	162
7	Tulane	0.363	180	0.0191	293
8	FAU	0.381	233	0.0299	328
9	Rice	0.392	256	0.0002	150
10	Memphis	0.406	273	0.0065	205
11	Charlotte	0.407	276	-0.0204	35
12	USF	0.439	327	0.0029	172
13	North Texas	0.507	359	0.0436	356

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	102.323	52	0.3914	183
2	Memphis	102.665	57	-0.3809	107
3	Wichita State	103.380	62	-0.3527	109
4	USF	103.938	68	-0.9167	62
5	FAU	105.109	82	-0.8910	64
6	Temple	105.777	90	-0.4242	105
7	UAB	108.424	142	-1.0816	47
8	Tulsa	109.064	157	-0.1802	123
9	Tulane	111.418	193	0.4753	191
10	ECU	113.200	215	-0.0281	138
11	Charlotte	113.478	220	-0.5013	99
12	Rice	114.224	241	1.8056	307
13	UTSA	120.202	325	0.6462	210

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	31.005	6	-1.1403	22
2	Memphis	33.418	31	-0.3334	113
3	USF	33.529	37	-0.5311	78
4	FAU	35.116	96	-1.5260	9
5	Wichita State	35.394	108	-0.0978	143
6	UAB	36.242	137	0.0966	177
7	Tulsa	36.439	146	0.0243	164
8	Tulane	36.770	165	-0.4974	81
9	Temple	37.181	191	-0.8015	46
10	Charlotte	37.369	203	-0.1481	140
11	ECU	37.860	240	0.1184	180
12	Rice	37.957	245	0.2560	210
13	UTSA	39.972	313	2.0748	361

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	75.301	3	-2.5195	5
2	USF	78.901	47	1.5121	327
3	FAU	80.450	80	-1.8222	12
4	Memphis	81.502	114	0.3211	220
5	ECU	82.786	162	0.8098	274
6	UAB	82.808	163	-0.7628	90
7	Rice	83.006	171	0.2545	209
8	Tulane	83.635	208	-0.6884	98
9	Charlotte	83.932	224	2.0800	357
10	Tulsa	83.974	227	0.6457	255
11	Wichita State	84.051	234	0.5307	242
12	Temple	84.660	254	0.0696	180
13	UTSA	88.261	344	2.0561	355

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	40.992	38	-0.6258	71
2	North Texas	41.010	39	-0.1552	139
3	Wichita State	42.190	68	-0.3476	110
4	USF	42.886	97	-1.3368	15
5	Tulsa	43.472	121	-0.3231	112
6	UAB	43.493	124	0.4688	245
7	FAU	43.680	132	-0.9428	46
8	Temple	44.036	146	-1.0241	37
9	Tulane	44.138	154	-0.2532	122
10	Charlotte	44.679	180	-1.2588	19
11	UTSA	45.430	225	1.2699	322
12	Rice	45.777	236	0.2615	205
13	ECU	45.868	240	-0.2355	124

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UTSA	55.346	46	-2.1365	25
2	Memphis	56.230	62	-0.5302	135
3	Tulsa	59.091	138	-0.9568	90
4	UAB	59.291	149	-2.2941	22
5	ECU	59.565	161	-1.5380	57
6	Tulane	59.780	169	2.4461	355
7	Charlotte	60.421	191	0.2779	229
8	North Texas	61.969	229	-0.3260	148
9	Temple	62.415	242	1.5771	328
10	USF	63.427	277	1.1720	303
11	FAU	63.614	282	0.1704	211
12	Rice	64.517	310	-0.2007	173
13	Wichita State	65.144	320	0.7695	281

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	22.634	29	-0.8689	46
2	Memphis	22.731	30	0.0306	178
3	USF	23.362	52	-0.1482	153
4	Tulsa	24.551	99	-0.3223	129
5	UAB	24.693	108	-0.8109	50
6	FAU	24.789	122	-0.9346	43
7	Tulane	24.957	133	0.5665	271
8	UTSA	25.275	152	0.2124	216
9	Charlotte	25.482	164	-0.5615	87
10	ECU	25.702	174	-0.2764	142
11	Wichita State	26.270	215	0.1871	214
12	Temple	26.592	233	0.0216	176
13	Rice	27.427	277	0.0978	194

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	45.867	54	-0.2799	161
2	North Texas	46.764	77	-1.8531	33
3	UTSA	48.634	132	-0.6511	118
4	UAB	49.233	161	-2.3928	9
5	ECU	49.313	164	-0.9660	91
6	Tulsa	49.676	175	-0.5143	136
7	USF	50.234	199	2.0024	342
8	Tulane	50.305	200	1.7325	336
9	Charlotte	50.577	208	1.5695	327
10	FAU	51.172	228	-1.0607	82
11	Temple	52.626	276	1.3177	304
12	Rice	53.572	296	0.0232	197
13	Wichita State	54.726	317	1.0364	292

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	47.533	42	-1.8392	23
2	North Texas	47.608	44	-0.3794	117
3	FAU	48.566	70	-0.9929	59
4	Wichita State	48.779	74	-0.5529	99
5	Memphis	49.883	105	0.2086	187
6	Tulsa	49.974	111	-0.0473	157
7	UAB	50.139	118	0.6798	243
8	Tulane	50.374	124	-0.5019	105
9	Charlotte	50.434	125	-2.4425	5
10	Rice	50.726	139	0.4299	219
11	Temple	51.067	152	-1.3325	47
12	ECU	52.102	195	0.3800	213
13	UTSA	52.535	209	0.9434	271

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	34.856	46	-0.7695	85
2	Rice	35.483	56	0.2007	193
3	FAU	36.386	84	-0.1704	155
4	USF	36.573	89	-1.1720	63
5	Temple	37.585	124	-1.5771	38
6	North Texas	38.031	137	0.3260	218
7	Charlotte	39.579	175	-0.2779	137
8	Tulane	40.220	197	-2.4461	11
9	ECU	40.435	205	1.5380	309
10	UAB	40.709	217	2.2941	344
11	Tulsa	40.909	228	0.9568	276
12	Memphis	43.770	304	0.5302	231
13	UTSA	44.654	320	2.1365	341

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	8.370	10	-0.2714	113
2	Wichita State	9.124	34	-0.2849	111
3	USF	10.166	103	-0.3829	87
4	FAU	10.327	117	-0.5914	48
5	Rice	10.530	131	0.1583	201
6	Temple	10.588	139	-0.8230	24
7	Memphis	10.687	146	-0.3640	95
8	UAB	11.549	222	0.9075	334
9	Tulane	11.813	246	-1.0639	11
10	Charlotte	11.887	250	0.4134	260
11	Tulsa	11.888	251	0.3466	237
12	ECU	12.158	273	0.3948	254
13	UTSA	14.697	359	1.8623	364

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	28.537	47	-0.6664	81
2	USF	28.667	50	-0.4903	111
3	FAU	29.278	66	-0.7616	72
4	Wichita State	29.325	68	-0.5057	106
5	Rice	29.435	71	0.2312	209
6	Temple	32.034	152	-1.2481	45
7	Tulane	33.330	193	-2.4208	7
8	Charlotte	33.355	195	0.5105	238
9	ECU	33.473	199	1.7758	331
10	UAB	33.575	204	1.6300	324
11	Tulsa	34.298	232	1.1601	288
12	Memphis	35.635	283	0.6009	246
13	UTSA	39.627	349	2.7072	358

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	29.150	15	0.0840	183
2	Memphis	29.266	17	-1.9059	25
3	Wichita State	29.736	31	-0.3111	143
4	Temple	32.551	119	-1.3046	59
5	UAB	33.701	178	1.0092	264
6	Tulsa	34.277	207	-0.0243	169
7	FAU	34.642	226	-1.2122	66
8	ECU	34.718	228	-0.5552	120
9	USF	35.241	254	-0.4711	126
10	Tulane	35.558	267	-0.6387	116
11	Rice	35.774	278	0.5123	220
12	Charlotte	35.947	291	1.3533	300
13	UTSA	36.972	330	2.1104	340

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	31.090	65	-0.0908	138
2	Temple	31.200	66	-2.1561	31
3	Tulsa	32.120	82	-1.0898	78
4	Wichita State	33.790	121	0.2706	168
5	UTSA	34.010	125	-2.9506	13
6	ECU	35.780	167	0.1803	162
7	Tulane	36.340	180	1.9134	293
8	FAU	38.080	233	2.9939	328
9	Rice	39.170	256	0.0223	150
10	Memphis	40.560	273	0.6461	205
11	Charlotte	40.660	276	-2.0377	35
12	USF	43.890	327	0.2925	172
13	North Texas	50.730	359	4.3642	356

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	18.205	63	-1.4017	20
2	UAB	18.724	74	-0.2112	115
3	Tulsa	19.833	109	-0.2321	109
4	Wichita State	19.871	113	0.2409	169
5	Tulane	20.168	129	0.9359	254
6	UTSA	20.760	157	-1.5756	17
7	ECU	21.351	183	0.5016	199
8	FAU	22.056	218	1.3330	299
9	Charlotte	22.986	263	-0.0940	129
10	Rice	23.340	274	0.3517	182
11	Memphis	23.426	278	1.2782	294
12	USF	23.779	294	0.4627	195
13	North Texas	26.585	349	1.9034	338

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	25.392	60	-0.1930	115
2	Temple	25.939	71	-1.8058	20
3	Tulsa	26.723	89	-0.6142	78
4	Wichita State	28.348	133	0.5080	199
5	ECU	28.993	164	0.6391	215
6	UTSA	29.361	179	-1.5128	32
7	Tulane	29.757	198	1.3410	277
8	FAU	30.220	219	1.6917	298
9	Rice	31.521	254	-0.0302	129
10	Memphis	32.366	280	0.6891	222
11	Charlotte	33.291	308	-0.8335	58
12	USF	33.876	315	0.6218	211
13	North Texas	37.453	358	2.3305	338

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Charlotte	67.847	26	0.8703	243
2	Tulane	68.061	32	-0.1435	152
3	Wichita State	68.328	41	-0.3348	127
4	USF	69.156	70	-0.0994	155
5	Temple	69.537	86	-0.4894	115
6	North Texas	70.108	103	0.1956	183
7	Memphis	71.788	179	1.2855	268
8	UTSA	72.271	197	-1.2276	61
9	FAU	72.893	229	-0.1570	150
10	ECU	73.136	245	0.5611	210
11	Tulsa	73.727	273	0.8571	240
12	Rice	74.016	288	1.9621	311
13	UAB	75.365	322	0.0571	171

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	46.189	41	-1.5659	68
2	Wichita State	46.492	47	-1.7171	59
3	Rice	48.510	83	-4.1532	4
4	USF	48.629	88	-3.0419	18
5	North Texas	49.592	107	0.7432	230
6	Charlotte	49.667	108	-0.1075	158
7	Temple	50.460	129	-2.2798	38
8	Tulsa	51.098	145	-0.6654	119
9	UAB	53.155	206	0.8378	235
10	ECU	54.712	243	0.1411	181
11	Memphis	56.145	277	-0.8625	108
12	Tulane	56.691	289	0.2329	189
13	UTSA	57.433	303	2.3285	336

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	12.872	18	0.4573	61
2	North Texas	12.787	19	0.8374	20
3	USF	11.357	57	-0.7000	319
4	Tulane	11.276	60	-0.1535	194
5	UAB	10.557	101	0.6162	33
6	Rice	10.088	131	0.5385	45
7	ECU	9.615	169	-0.4186	270
8	Tulsa	9.568	172	-0.2911	236
9	UTSA	9.297	188	-0.7192	323
10	FAU	8.568	242	0.5469	43
11	Temple	8.005	289	0.0155	155
12	Wichita State	7.976	293	-0.3040	239
13	Charlotte	7.437	323	-0.3374	252

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	7.626	12	-0.0302	200
2	North Texas	7.231	18	0.3159	88
3	Tulane	6.850	27	0.0543	168
4	Temple	6.831	28	0.8998	8
5	Memphis	6.040	63	0.1912	120
6	UTSA	6.027	65	0.9991	5
7	USF	5.980	69	0.6063	29
8	Rice	5.933	74	0.5601	36
9	Charlotte	5.819	81	0.4391	62
10	ECU	5.808	83	0.5365	39
11	Wichita State	5.559	103	-0.0265	199
12	UAB	4.245	220	-0.3333	295
13	Tulsa	3.490	299	0.2629	100

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	20.360	9	-0.2324	107
2	Tulsa	23.443	70	0.3105	196
3	ECU	23.461	73	-0.0900	130
4	UTSA	23.800	91	-0.7531	38
5	Temple	24.416	120	-0.4890	66
6	Tulane	24.643	131	0.4726	238
7	Wichita State	25.014	147	0.1460	163
8	FAU	25.686	197	0.8101	296
9	Charlotte	26.874	279	-0.3548	87
10	USF	27.074	289	-0.1053	125
11	Rice	27.182	294	0.2958	192
12	Memphis	27.569	310	0.3349	201
13	North Texas	29.913	359	0.8937	305

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	79.650	1	0.9637	39
2	UAB	74.626	30	1.6148	8
3	FAU	72.836	78	1.0801	30
4	Memphis	72.607	90	-0.8998	302
5	UTSA	71.678	126	-0.4364	232
6	ECU	70.843	173	-0.0716	160
7	Wichita State	70.287	200	0.9475	40
8	Rice	70.091	207	-0.8466	297
9	Tulsa	69.854	222	-0.0694	158
10	Tulane	69.621	237	-0.1125	177
11	Temple	68.333	286	-0.3406	211
12	North Texas	67.984	307	1.4467	13
13	Charlotte	66.751	339	0.5546	70