Conferences

Conferences

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	15.178	60	-0.6423	269
2	North Texas	12.945	67	-0.3928	233
3	UAB	5.737	104	1.2958	36
4	FAU	4.121	114	-2.0511	356
5	Wichita State	1.882	133	-0.7550	278
6	Tulane	0.298	148	-0.3450	224
7	Temple	-0.487	157	-0.6328	266
8	USF	-1.347	165	-0.4670	243
9	ECU	-1.693	174	0.0100	175
10	Rice	-2.025	177	-0.2707	215
11	UTSA	-2.459	184	1.8758	15
12	Tulsa	-7.865	242	-0.3193	223
13	Charlotte	-9.009	251	-1.8552	346

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.153	55	-0.0030	166
2	Memphis	0.083	121	0.0037	113
3	Tulane	0.080	126	-0.0106	239
4	UAB	0.070	139	0.0019	129
5	FAU	0.066	142	-0.0162	283
6	Temple	0.066	143	-0.0105	238
7	ECU	0.062	146	-0.0091	222
8	Wichita State	0.060	149	-0.0104	234
9	Rice	0.055	154	-0.0078	208
10	Tulsa	0.013	198	-0.0150	272
11	USF	0.011	205	-0.0078	209
12	Charlotte	-0.034	263	-0.0186	297
13	UTSA	-0.044	274	0.0094	75

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	1741.363	12	15.7302	48
2	North Texas	1658.119	45	10.7886	87
3	UAB	1648.455	54	10.8080	86
4	FAU	1595.524	77	-11.4670	276
5	Tulane	1527.504	143	8.2507	111
6	Wichita State	1524.432	150	2.5915	170
7	Temple	1508.613	171	0.0760	192
8	ECU	1505.613	176	10.0313	97
9	USF	1484.936	206	-15.6253	313
10	Charlotte	1440.242	255	-23.9806	345
11	Tulsa	1415.072	274	-3.7272	227
12	Rice	1411.908	281	-12.1510	285
13	UTSA	1395.827	300	0.2314	191

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	0.632	8	-0.0098	335
2	North Texas	0.582	42	0.0027	195
3	UAB	0.555	71	0.0205	12
4	FAU	0.529	108	-0.0123	348
5	Wichita State	0.514	137	-0.0022	269
6	Tulane	0.498	171	0.0118	57
7	Temple	0.495	180	-0.0031	282
8	ECU	0.492	185	0.0029	187
9	UTSA	0.475	222	0.0096	80
10	USF	0.470	232	-0.0034	289
11	Rice	0.451	271	-0.0030	278
12	Tulsa	0.437	292	0.0080	107
13	Charlotte	0.435	295	-0.0116	343

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	0.536	75	-0.0144	314
2	FAU	0.536	78	-0.0021	162
3	Tulane	0.520	143	-0.0021	163
4	North Texas	0.517	156	-0.0177	333
5	Temple	0.508	209	-0.0038	180
6	UAB	0.506	221	-0.0168	329
7	USF	0.505	232	-0.0261	360
8	Tulsa	0.503	241	-0.0019	157
9	UTSA	0.503	243	0.0039	99
10	ECU	0.492	289	-0.0020	160
11	Wichita State	0.489	298	-0.0087	246
12	Rice	0.487	306	-0.0169	330
13	Charlotte	0.486	312	-0.0034	175

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	1.136	35	-0.0333	344
2	North Texas	1.108	70	-0.0280	331
3	Memphis	1.093	94	-0.0141	252
4	FAU	1.088	104	-0.0035	168
5	Temple	1.081	122	0.0045	114
6	ECU	1.076	134	-0.0031	163
7	Tulane	1.073	138	-0.0052	182
8	UTSA	1.070	145	0.0031	119
9	USF	1.047	201	-0.0346	349
10	Charlotte	1.040	218	-0.0065	192
11	Rice	1.039	224	-0.0239	317
12	Wichita State	1.034	233	-0.0109	226
13	Tulsa	1.024	263	0.0003	135

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	0.133	22	-0.0035	150
2	Charlotte	0.136	34	0.0047	312
3	UTSA	0.141	46	-0.0042	132
4	Temple	0.144	61	-0.0060	96
5	Tulane	0.146	76	-0.0018	196
6	North Texas	0.147	86	-0.0069	78
7	ECU	0.147	87	-0.0074	64
8	USF	0.150	111	-0.0099	36
9	Tulsa	0.153	135	-0.0024	176
10	Wichita State	0.156	153	-0.0004	226
11	FAU	0.156	155	-0.0020	185
12	Rice	0.166	234	-0.0078	57
13	Memphis	0.184	332	0.0016	267

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	0.379	15	-0.0248	321
2	ECU	0.363	30	-0.0254	325
3	North Texas	0.345	63	-0.0104	214
4	Memphis	0.337	76	0.0213	5
5	Rice	0.316	126	-0.0019	120
6	Wichita State	0.302	162	-0.0014	115
7	FAU	0.299	169	-0.0004	100
8	UTSA	0.294	181	-0.0063	163
9	Temple	0.283	216	-0.0006	101
10	Tulane	0.274	246	-0.0176	274
11	Tulsa	0.270	265	-0.0230	313
12	USF	0.268	273	-0.0119	224
13	Charlotte	0.229	339	0.0103	29

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	0.460	5	0.0403	4
2	Rice	0.444	9	-0.0021	176
3	Charlotte	0.430	16	0.0089	83
4	Memphis	0.397	31	0.0047	112
5	ECU	0.363	94	-0.0174	298
6	North Texas	0.361	102	-0.0163	284
7	Tulane	0.360	105	-0.0061	202
8	Wichita State	0.355	118	0.0118	68
9	USF	0.346	146	0.0054	106
10	Tulsa	0.341	161	0.0220	33
11	FAU	0.340	168	0.0159	51
12	UAB	0.313	252	-0.0125	260
13	UTSA	0.292	304	-0.0031	188

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	113.690	61	1.0176	39
2	Memphis	112.376	73	-0.6748	299
3	North Texas	110.780	85	-0.1630	219
4	FAU	110.065	93	-1.5500	362
5	Temple	107.904	123	0.4746	102
6	UTSA	106.892	139	0.8137	61
7	Tulane	106.146	153	0.0006	188
8	ECU	105.665	164	0.4504	108
9	Wichita State	104.938	173	-0.3406	245
10	Charlotte	103.784	201	-0.9223	332
11	Rice	103.654	205	0.4603	105
12	USF	102.938	214	-1.0713	344
13	Tulsa	99.761	257	-0.2552	236

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	41.486	12	-1.2808	338
2	FAU	38.848	90	-0.3795	212
3	Memphis	38.428	113	-0.2770	193
4	North Texas	38.177	126	-0.7198	272
5	ECU	37.798	153	-0.0693	160
6	Wichita State	37.458	176	-0.9776	315
7	USF	37.111	199	-1.2058	332
8	Tulane	37.095	202	0.0600	135
9	UTSA	36.726	229	0.4720	75
10	Tulsa	36.175	262	-0.3326	206
11	Temple	36.036	271	-0.4785	231
12	Rice	34.646	323	-0.4490	224
13	Charlotte	34.137	338	-0.6194	255

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	91.073	5	0.1881	177
2	UTSA	86.823	55	0.5976	123
3	ECU	86.710	58	0.5594	129
4	North Texas	85.100	119	1.4096	40
5	Wichita State	84.131	165	-0.1522	235
6	FAU	84.062	169	-0.3133	256
7	USF	83.554	194	0.8614	88
8	Tulsa	83.109	219	-1.1145	334
9	Rice	82.134	257	0.5968	124
10	Tulane	82.093	258	0.1078	192
11	Memphis	81.282	284	0.7376	106
12	Charlotte	81.134	290	-0.3116	255
13	Temple	80.595	312	-0.8847	319

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	47.313	48	-0.7684	247
2	FAU	46.425	84	-0.1380	154
3	UAB	45.577	130	-1.5164	334
4	Tulane	45.271	152	-0.1938	163
5	North Texas	45.033	164	-1.4663	330
6	Temple	44.978	166	-0.1891	161
7	Wichita State	44.598	182	-1.0670	296
8	USF	44.547	186	-1.8120	347
9	ECU	43.627	242	-0.3184	179
10	Tulsa	43.391	259	0.0441	130
11	Rice	42.315	314	-0.8498	262
12	UTSA	42.274	316	0.2612	103
13	Charlotte	42.182	320	-0.6155	223

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	71.718	6	-0.6502	247
2	UAB	70.427	14	-0.0571	187
3	Temple	68.009	28	0.6925	104
4	Memphis	66.484	45	1.5897	32
5	ECU	65.055	82	0.0549	172
6	North Texas	63.331	118	1.7786	25
7	USF	62.544	147	2.4036	4
8	Rice	61.234	186	2.0645	16
9	Tulane	60.434	197	0.6962	103
10	FAU	59.399	221	0.3108	139
11	Charlotte	58.863	235	-1.4436	331
12	Tulsa	57.057	280	0.5507	120
13	UTSA	55.819	296	0.8516	94

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	32.430	3	-1.0262	315
2	Wichita State	30.332	13	-1.1862	336
3	Memphis	28.254	75	0.7364	34
4	ECU	28.142	78	-0.3482	221
5	USF	27.217	115	0.0488	152
6	North Texas	26.908	128	-0.3065	215
7	FAU	26.828	131	-0.2229	202
8	Temple	26.763	137	-0.0618	168
9	Tulane	25.950	189	0.0619	148
10	Tulsa	24.653	270	0.2545	111
11	Rice	24.187	290	0.8534	28
12	Charlotte	23.729	314	-1.0337	316
13	UTSA	22.908	335	0.1577	125

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	64.329	3	0.0374	178
2	Wichita State	60.580	8	-0.5104	250
3	ECU	56.335	47	0.3300	154
4	Temple	54.932	72	0.0137	181
5	Memphis	54.133	97	1.8044	27
6	North Texas	53.962	100	2.6252	6
7	USF	52.419	140	2.6409	5
8	Rice	50.552	192	2.0307	12
9	FAU	49.776	217	-0.0806	202
10	Tulane	49.540	225	0.6849	120
11	UTSA	48.507	255	1.1665	68
12	Charlotte	47.657	278	-1.3188	330
13	Tulsa	47.553	280	0.0053	184

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	53.961	96	-0.4209	173
2	Tulane	52.609	140	-0.7248	224
3	USF	52.582	142	-2.0684	344
4	Memphis	52.017	165	-0.2707	156
5	Tulsa	51.832	170	0.0065	115
6	UAB	50.525	231	-1.7302	323
7	North Texas	50.409	236	-2.4250	357
8	Wichita State	50.143	248	-1.6891	320
9	Charlotte	50.017	256	-0.6374	210
10	ECU	49.960	258	-0.8464	232
11	Temple	49.486	271	-0.3330	166
12	Rice	48.287	302	-0.3789	170
13	UTSA	46.862	335	-0.6857	216

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UTSA	44.181	69	-0.8516	271
2	Tulsa	42.943	85	-0.5507	245
3	Charlotte	41.137	130	1.4436	34
4	FAU	40.601	144	-0.3108	226
5	Tulane	39.566	168	-0.6962	262
6	Rice	38.766	179	-2.0645	349
7	USF	37.456	218	-2.4036	361
8	North Texas	36.669	247	-1.7786	340
9	ECU	34.945	283	-0.0549	193
10	Memphis	33.516	320	-1.5897	333
11	Temple	31.991	337	-0.6925	261
12	UAB	29.573	351	0.0571	178
13	Wichita State	28.282	359	0.6502	118

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UTSA	13.818	35	0.3143	96
2	FAU	12.020	111	-0.1565	215
3	Tulsa	11.522	148	-0.5871	314
4	North Texas	11.269	167	-0.4134	273
5	Tulane	11.145	179	-0.0019	172
6	Rice	10.458	231	-1.3024	360
7	Charlotte	10.407	237	0.4143	82
8	Memphis	10.174	253	-1.0135	351
9	USF	9.894	276	-1.2547	357
10	ECU	9.656	292	0.2788	100
11	Temple	9.272	305	-0.4167	276
12	UAB	9.056	315	-0.2546	237
13	Wichita State	7.125	357	0.2087	114

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UTSA	38.316	54	-0.5689	267
2	Tulsa	35.556	100	-1.1198	313
3	FAU	34.286	129	-0.2327	226
4	Charlotte	33.477	157	1.0072	76
5	Tulane	32.553	184	-0.5772	269
6	Rice	31.582	211	-1.4339	339
7	North Texas	31.138	225	-1.2156	323
8	USF	31.135	226	-1.7795	349
9	ECU	30.375	244	0.2295	172
10	Memphis	27.149	329	-1.0668	308
11	UAB	26.744	335	0.1507	178
12	Temple	25.663	345	-0.8984	294
13	Wichita State	23.551	357	0.3582	161

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	38.130	18	-2.2382	342
2	North Texas	36.118	61	0.1264	148
3	Temple	36.116	62	-0.0291	167
4	UTSA	35.969	72	1.6723	37
5	FAU	34.896	126	-0.2763	187
6	Tulane	33.595	202	0.7305	89
7	UAB	33.469	207	-1.3504	293
8	Rice	32.712	241	-3.3405	361
9	Tulsa	32.005	275	-0.5194	218
10	USF	31.391	307	-2.2899	346
11	ECU	31.097	317	0.5225	112
12	Wichita State	30.723	327	-0.0180	162
13	Charlotte	30.516	333	0.3015	133

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	46.030	5	4.0330	4
2	Rice	44.393	9	-0.2139	176
3	Charlotte	42.992	16	0.8941	83
4	Memphis	39.682	31	0.4663	112
5	ECU	36.314	94	-1.7346	298
6	North Texas	36.057	102	-1.6298	284
7	Tulane	35.961	105	-0.6076	202
8	Wichita State	35.473	118	1.1849	68
9	USF	34.632	146	0.5433	106
10	Tulsa	34.115	161	2.1989	33
11	FAU	33.989	168	1.5883	51
12	UAB	31.275	252	-1.2486	260
13	UTSA	29.176	304	-0.3094	188

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	26.771	2	1.8280	11
2	Charlotte	25.363	6	0.1716	138
3	Rice	24.168	19	-0.1891	190
4	North Texas	23.138	34	-0.9440	300
5	ECU	22.318	59	-0.4534	230
6	Memphis	22.232	65	0.1608	139
7	Tulane	21.991	73	-0.6206	248
8	UAB	21.543	84	-0.5152	238
9	Wichita State	21.356	97	0.6723	82
10	USF	20.583	134	0.2025	136
11	UTSA	19.698	178	-0.9460	301
12	FAU	19.107	212	0.5632	94
13	Tulsa	18.410	254	1.3319	33

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	36.462	4	2.7741	7
2	Rice	35.517	6	0.3213	125
3	Charlotte	33.977	14	0.4668	111
4	Memphis	31.621	33	0.8300	81
5	ECU	30.985	43	-1.3631	310
6	North Texas	30.024	70	-1.0152	273
7	Wichita State	29.339	87	0.8119	85
8	Tulane	29.022	107	-0.4264	217
9	USF	28.599	127	0.8379	78
10	UAB	28.212	148	-0.9351	267
11	Tulsa	27.635	175	1.1668	51
12	FAU	27.456	181	1.3799	36
13	UTSA	24.890	282	0.0193	155

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UTSA	79.024	8	-3.5246	360
2	North Texas	77.183	28	-0.7715	259
3	UAB	76.478	39	1.2560	88
4	Tulane	74.853	80	-1.1847	288
5	Temple	74.592	87	-0.3941	238
6	Charlotte	74.270	99	-0.3141	228
7	ECU	72.681	153	3.0006	13
8	USF	72.644	155	-1.2012	289
9	Wichita State	72.253	167	0.4936	148
10	Memphis	70.190	247	-1.1098	283
11	FAU	69.295	267	-0.6766	252
12	Rice	67.638	307	-1.1631	286
13	Tulsa	64.419	353	1.2141	91

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	56.844	65	-0.0921	157
2	FAU	56.575	70	1.7503	52
3	Tulsa	54.186	116	-0.9794	230
4	USF	53.940	122	-1.8076	288
5	Charlotte	53.385	135	-0.5534	197
6	UAB	52.832	148	0.0330	148
7	Memphis	51.223	204	-1.1097	243
8	Rice	50.510	221	-0.6458	200
9	ECU	49.129	262	1.6596	55
10	UTSA	47.815	287	-0.6688	204
11	North Texas	44.866	332	-1.2672	251
12	Wichita State	44.109	344	-0.7106	208
13	Temple	41.092	359	1.1664	83

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	7.647	20	-0.2746	100
2	Charlotte	7.963	43	0.2065	222
3	Tulane	8.098	57	-0.1895	118
4	ECU	8.367	81	0.4985	299
5	USF	8.910	142	-0.4299	62
6	North Texas	8.942	148	-0.2348	109
7	UTSA	9.072	165	0.0247	177
8	Temple	9.404	201	-0.0110	164
9	Tulsa	9.818	244	0.2128	226
10	Wichita State	9.975	254	0.3415	258
11	FAU	10.013	260	-0.0076	166
12	Rice	10.349	289	-1.1108	4
13	Memphis	10.458	299	-0.0106	165

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	4.208	104	0.3522	275
2	North Texas	4.352	141	-0.0131	143
3	ECU	4.724	222	0.7476	345
4	Rice	4.804	238	0.6737	335
5	Memphis	4.971	256	-0.3157	62
6	Tulane	5.002	260	0.9210	357
7	Tulsa	5.026	263	-0.3991	43
8	UAB	5.052	266	0.3918	286
9	USF	5.106	271	1.2035	363
10	Charlotte	5.159	279	0.4291	298
11	Temple	5.568	326	-0.4812	26
12	UTSA	5.675	333	0.2821	244
13	Wichita State	6.326	358	0.2107	221

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Rice	29.453	1	-0.2566	252
2	Charlotte	27.928	8	0.4740	101
3	Temple	27.331	15	1.1700	26
4	Memphis	25.352	75	0.0906	170
5	North Texas	24.147	141	-0.0295	194
6	USF	23.612	179	0.9835	41
7	FAU	23.124	212	0.2054	150
8	Tulsa	22.936	227	0.6845	70
9	Wichita State	22.889	228	0.6682	73
10	ECU	22.849	233	-0.4062	279
11	Tulane	21.972	287	0.1373	167
12	UAB	21.786	296	-0.4712	288
13	UTSA	19.467	360	0.5084	95

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	73.160	37	0.7594	43
2	Temple	72.838	44	-1.6288	350
3	UAB	72.505	52	1.0300	28
4	FAU	72.251	59	-1.1032	325
5	UTSA	71.635	86	-0.6762	258
6	Wichita State	71.517	93	0.9067	34
7	USF	71.145	113	0.0636	119
8	ECU	70.436	152	-0.0019	131
9	Tulsa	69.678	196	-1.3055	339
10	Tulane	69.550	202	-0.0425	137
11	Charlotte	67.903	277	-0.4905	226
12	Rice	67.866	278	-0.1263	151
13	North Texas	61.633	363	1.0325	26

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.475	35	0.0079	267
2	Rice	0.479	50	-0.0053	95
3	Memphis	0.488	74	-0.0019	137
4	Tulane	0.493	99	0.0137	304
5	Tulsa	0.499	118	-0.0051	99
6	USF	0.499	119	0.0072	256
7	Wichita State	0.502	142	-0.0078	65
8	FAU	0.503	151	0.0015	185
9	Temple	0.511	184	-0.0018	140
10	UAB	0.515	207	-0.0089	51
11	ECU	0.520	236	-0.0006	162
12	UTSA	0.536	314	-0.0092	48
13	Charlotte	0.540	319	0.0070	254

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.978	34	-0.0023	109
2	Memphis	1.010	85	0.0087	190
3	Wichita State	1.029	135	0.0094	197
4	Rice	1.036	154	0.0056	175
5	Tulane	1.040	163	0.0200	269
6	USF	1.041	168	0.0052	171
7	Tulsa	1.054	211	0.0127	224
8	ECU	1.065	242	0.0190	262
9	UAB	1.066	245	-0.0134	48
10	FAU	1.067	248	0.0128	226
11	Temple	1.073	262	0.0148	238
12	UTSA	1.089	294	-0.0145	44
13	Charlotte	1.111	329	0.0034	156

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UTSA	0.193	29	0.0042	47
2	North Texas	0.178	71	0.0058	31
3	Memphis	0.174	89	-0.0078	284
4	USF	0.168	121	0.0079	14
5	ECU	0.161	162	-0.0098	309
6	Tulane	0.159	185	-0.0021	153
7	FAU	0.144	292	-0.0125	333
8	Temple	0.143	300	-0.0141	352
9	Wichita State	0.142	309	-0.0057	239
10	UAB	0.142	313	-0.0022	157
11	Charlotte	0.136	331	0.0004	107
12	Tulsa	0.135	334	-0.0062	249
13	Rice	0.127	346	-0.0076	280

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.744	98	-0.0151	330
2	Rice	0.743	102	-0.0032	207
3	North Texas	0.743	103	-0.0014	193
4	Charlotte	0.729	167	0.0077	87
5	UAB	0.725	192	-0.0012	187
6	Tulsa	0.722	209	-0.0088	274
7	FAU	0.717	241	0.0128	48
8	Temple	0.715	251	0.0133	45
9	ECU	0.715	252	-0.0082	267
10	Tulane	0.706	281	-0.0044	221
11	Memphis	0.703	292	0.0120	52
12	USF	0.698	304	-0.0067	252
13	UTSA	0.674	351	-0.0135	318

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.287	64	0.0220	324
2	UAB	0.290	69	-0.0185	60
3	ECU	0.324	153	-0.0088	120
4	Tulsa	0.332	176	0.0283	341
5	Tulane	0.333	178	-0.0010	183
6	FAU	0.336	187	0.0212	319
7	Memphis	0.340	200	0.0218	322
8	Temple	0.370	268	0.0135	281
9	Rice	0.370	269	0.0267	336
10	USF	0.371	271	0.0097	259
11	Charlotte	0.375	280	0.0420	359
12	North Texas	0.382	297	-0.0265	26
13	UTSA	0.445	355	0.0135	280

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	97.198	49	-0.0315	151
2	North Texas	97.835	57	0.3044	235
3	Wichita State	103.056	113	0.4153	259
4	USF	104.285	142	-0.6289	62
5	Rice	105.679	173	0.7316	304
6	Tulane	105.849	175	0.2538	222
7	FAU	105.944	180	0.5554	278
8	ECU	107.358	197	0.4630	265
9	Tulsa	107.626	201	-0.0092	159
10	UAB	107.953	207	-0.2641	114
11	Temple	108.391	222	1.1084	336
12	UTSA	109.352	237	-1.0523	22
13	Charlotte	112.793	303	0.9340	327

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	33.151	17	0.5837	243
2	Memphis	34.998	70	-0.4168	74
3	Rice	35.717	107	-0.0156	134
4	USF	35.878	115	-0.1492	111
5	Tulane	35.889	116	1.2015	320
6	UTSA	36.580	162	-0.7924	33
7	FAU	37.233	207	0.0419	145
8	Wichita State	37.708	232	0.1814	173
9	Temple	37.726	233	0.4510	218
10	ECU	37.815	241	0.9442	294
11	Tulsa	37.993	250	-0.3005	89
12	UAB	39.065	305	-0.0837	126
13	Charlotte	40.279	334	-0.2553	94

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UTSA	78.624	29	-0.2602	111
2	North Texas	80.063	45	0.3871	201
3	USF	82.399	127	-0.8209	54
4	Memphis	83.152	158	-0.0273	141
5	Charlotte	83.372	168	-1.8439	5
6	ECU	84.317	221	1.6177	324
7	Temple	84.685	237	0.1607	168
8	Rice	85.059	256	0.1418	165
9	Tulane	85.150	260	0.5493	219
10	FAU	85.406	277	-0.2421	114
11	Tulsa	86.168	302	-0.1210	129
12	Wichita State	86.707	319	0.3714	196
13	UAB	86.748	320	1.2491	294

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	41.554	43	0.5382	248
2	Rice	41.951	58	-0.1554	137
3	Memphis	42.104	64	-0.4279	98
4	Tulane	42.329	74	1.3687	328
5	FAU	43.572	136	0.2143	195
6	USF	43.596	138	0.2416	200
7	Wichita State	43.787	151	-0.0611	151
8	Tulsa	44.187	172	-0.3488	109
9	Temple	44.865	214	0.3620	221
10	ECU	45.110	227	0.1947	192
11	UAB	45.367	242	-0.7469	57
12	UTSA	46.800	313	-0.7585	56
13	Charlotte	48.196	346	0.7915	277

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	57.491	69	0.7091	273
2	Memphis	59.012	112	-1.3616	59
3	North Texas	61.343	196	0.0141	197
4	Wichita State	61.760	209	3.2651	357
5	UTSA	61.963	215	0.3083	238
6	USF	62.285	231	-0.5759	140
7	Rice	63.197	259	0.6193	262
8	Temple	63.547	266	2.1043	342
9	FAU	63.746	272	-0.3193	165
10	ECU	64.460	294	1.2009	301
11	UAB	65.355	320	0.0514	203
12	Charlotte	65.386	322	1.3945	313
13	Tulsa	65.463	324	-0.1732	181

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	23.767	60	0.1145	184
2	Tulane	23.924	69	1.1784	331
3	Memphis	23.953	72	-0.7816	39
4	USF	25.522	159	-0.7988	37
5	Rice	25.552	163	0.6483	271
6	FAU	25.898	185	0.2114	203
7	UTSA	25.935	188	-0.4450	86
8	ECU	26.367	213	1.1249	323
9	Wichita State	26.539	223	1.3557	345
10	Temple	27.354	264	1.2851	340
11	Tulsa	28.264	313	-0.0094	158
12	UAB	28.511	324	0.0244	165
13	Charlotte	30.675	359	0.0889	179

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UTSA	48.724	102	0.0316	182
2	Tulane	48.744	103	0.8286	265
3	Memphis	49.113	113	-1.1244	59
4	North Texas	49.540	130	0.0415	185
5	USF	51.449	196	-0.9458	80
6	Wichita State	53.531	276	3.0642	360
7	Rice	53.764	283	0.8365	269
8	Temple	53.927	287	1.8506	331
9	ECU	54.576	305	2.0219	342
10	Charlotte	54.584	306	-0.0853	168
11	FAU	54.932	317	-0.4103	129
12	Tulsa	56.537	343	-0.1647	153
13	UAB	56.618	345	0.8326	268

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	47.182	37	1.2843	297
2	Rice	47.634	49	0.4482	213
3	Memphis	48.638	75	-0.3337	128
4	ECU	48.731	80	0.0417	158
5	Tulane	48.838	86	1.6182	321
6	North Texas	48.934	89	0.0763	166
7	USF	49.682	122	-0.7299	96
8	Wichita State	50.358	148	-0.4439	111
9	Tulsa	50.495	151	0.1035	173
10	UAB	50.779	167	-0.6973	99
11	Temple	50.818	171	0.6479	230
12	UTSA	53.933	291	-0.7490	94
13	Charlotte	56.002	344	0.2737	192

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	34.537	41	0.1732	184
2	Charlotte	34.614	43	-1.3945	52
3	UAB	34.645	45	-0.0514	162
4	ECU	35.540	71	-1.2009	64
5	FAU	36.254	93	0.3193	200
6	Temple	36.453	99	-2.1043	23
7	Rice	36.803	106	-0.6193	103
8	USF	37.715	134	0.5759	225
9	UTSA	38.037	150	-0.3083	127
10	Wichita State	38.240	156	-3.2651	8
11	North Texas	38.657	169	-0.0141	168
12	Memphis	40.988	253	1.3616	306
13	Tulane	42.509	296	-0.7091	92

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	9.384	37	0.4692	257
2	Charlotte	9.604	52	-0.3442	83
3	Tulsa	9.729	62	-0.2911	96
4	Rice	10.165	92	-0.6640	37
5	USF	10.356	114	0.6496	286
6	Temple	10.372	116	-0.8341	26
7	UAB	10.555	139	-0.1081	139
8	UTSA	10.645	148	-0.3474	81
9	Memphis	11.045	190	0.3648	235
10	Wichita State	11.169	208	-1.1743	7
11	FAU	11.335	225	-0.1695	121
12	ECU	11.448	238	-0.1807	118
13	Tulane	11.965	282	0.0232	158

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Charlotte	28.788	46	-1.7586	24
2	Tulsa	29.631	65	0.0437	150
3	ECU	29.741	71	-0.4042	113
4	UTSA	29.901	79	-0.2918	120
5	UAB	30.130	87	0.4165	205
6	FAU	30.474	107	0.1682	171
7	North Texas	30.523	110	0.3457	193
8	Temple	30.758	118	-1.6899	27
9	USF	30.950	124	0.1249	161
10	Rice	31.296	139	-0.6947	77
11	Wichita State	33.176	205	-2.6928	9
12	Memphis	34.039	246	1.0972	280
13	Tulane	36.406	315	-0.2793	122

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	30.786	34	1.2874	283
2	Charlotte	32.084	90	-0.4481	123
3	Rice	32.096	91	-2.3317	13
4	Tulsa	32.355	103	-0.8531	87
5	Memphis	32.387	105	0.0249	167
6	Tulane	32.759	134	0.7643	241
7	Wichita State	32.998	144	-1.0371	71
8	Temple	33.367	169	-1.4682	41
9	USF	33.380	170	1.8874	323
10	UAB	35.144	271	-0.5008	119
11	UTSA	35.529	293	-0.3294	134
12	FAU	37.181	344	-0.8361	89
13	ECU	38.663	360	-0.2969	138

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	28.716	64	2.2012	324
2	UAB	28.953	69	-1.8490	60
3	ECU	32.413	153	-0.8817	120
4	Tulsa	33.204	176	2.8340	341
5	Tulane	33.320	178	-0.0991	183
6	FAU	33.583	187	2.1206	319
7	Memphis	34.013	200	2.1839	322
8	Temple	36.959	268	1.3535	281
9	Rice	37.011	269	2.6709	336
10	USF	37.094	271	0.9734	259
11	Charlotte	37.507	280	4.2048	359
12	North Texas	38.171	297	-2.6513	26
13	UTSA	44.519	355	1.3451	280

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	16.294	31	1.7505	340
2	UAB	17.852	92	-1.0290	46
3	ECU	19.400	164	0.1956	195
4	Tulsa	19.643	173	2.1656	355
5	Memphis	19.916	195	1.3378	316
6	Tulane	20.269	216	-0.4208	115
7	Charlotte	20.929	249	1.1985	306
8	FAU	20.931	250	1.3657	320
9	Temple	21.455	272	1.4145	324
10	USF	22.002	299	0.1683	191
11	Rice	22.027	302	1.2562	309
12	North Texas	22.065	305	-1.8654	12
13	UTSA	25.117	355	0.4845	232

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	24.185	66	2.1942	340
2	UAB	24.675	88	-1.2498	55
3	ECU	26.531	154	-0.0468	167
4	Tulane	27.684	200	0.3225	198
5	Memphis	28.012	210	1.7797	323
6	Tulsa	28.078	213	2.3403	344
7	FAU	28.323	221	1.7721	322
8	North Texas	29.554	268	-2.1142	19
9	USF	30.091	287	0.6123	242
10	Temple	30.381	297	1.2348	297
11	Rice	30.599	304	1.9395	331
12	Charlotte	30.642	306	2.6422	350
13	UTSA	34.413	356	1.0355	280

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	67.499	13	0.6921	225
2	Charlotte	68.434	29	-1.2529	55
3	Tulsa	69.468	65	1.7011	305
4	Temple	69.775	82	1.8695	318
5	Rice	70.633	117	-0.8642	79
6	Memphis	70.899	132	0.1656	176
7	ECU	71.803	184	1.0658	261
8	UAB	72.080	204	0.0199	162
9	USF	72.472	226	-0.5041	107
10	UTSA	72.875	241	-0.8306	84
11	Tulane	73.378	266	-1.4811	47
12	FAU	73.616	277	0.2741	183
13	North Texas	73.863	285	-1.9766	25

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Charlotte	45.440	40	1.0468	261
2	Tulsa	45.985	43	-0.0519	171
3	Rice	47.579	76	1.3076	276
4	North Texas	47.851	80	1.8905	313
5	UAB	49.140	115	2.1279	319
6	Wichita State	50.907	165	-2.6848	19
7	FAU	51.841	185	0.6803	229
8	Memphis	53.926	241	-0.1827	159
9	Temple	54.283	252	-0.0113	174
10	USF	54.888	264	-0.8239	109
11	ECU	55.969	288	-0.7998	112
12	UTSA	57.577	309	-1.0478	90
13	Tulane	60.041	345	0.3012	207

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UTSA	12.415	23	0.3803	73
2	North Texas	11.784	38	-0.2368	217
3	USF	11.144	62	0.8224	18
4	ECU	10.809	84	-0.4552	272
5	Tulane	10.785	86	0.2949	85
6	Memphis	10.594	96	0.1819	103
7	Wichita State	9.471	187	-0.4665	275
8	UAB	8.920	230	-0.3631	246
9	Temple	8.732	252	-0.7955	340
10	Tulsa	8.595	268	-0.2796	225
11	FAU	8.169	300	-0.9964	351
12	Charlotte	7.640	324	-0.3529	240
13	Rice	6.790	349	-0.1667	200

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	6.479	36	0.8061	11
2	ECU	6.298	46	0.0250	156
3	Tulane	6.177	53	-0.4421	318
4	Wichita State	6.171	54	0.4660	54
5	FAU	6.132	57	0.5684	33
6	UAB	5.957	68	-0.4048	307
7	Temple	5.137	129	-0.0127	167
8	USF	4.903	159	0.1766	105
9	UTSA	4.733	171	0.2376	82
10	Rice	4.518	190	-0.4062	308
11	North Texas	4.154	238	0.0640	144
12	Tulsa	3.905	270	-0.0444	186
13	Charlotte	3.244	326	0.3626	66

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	21.449	31	1.2119	347
2	UAB	21.601	34	-0.1594	150
3	ECU	22.347	61	-0.2189	136
4	Tulsa	22.495	67	0.6967	298
5	USF	24.065	173	0.1021	213
6	FAU	24.129	176	0.5066	278
7	Memphis	24.485	193	0.7320	301
8	North Texas	24.623	201	-0.8030	51
9	Temple	24.817	211	1.1812	345
10	Tulane	24.868	216	0.0837	209
11	Charlotte	25.761	263	1.3442	353
12	Rice	26.175	291	0.6915	297
13	UTSA	26.343	304	0.3333	250

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	72.845	35	-0.0087	132
2	Temple	72.526	43	-1.7432	354
3	USF	72.421	49	0.0553	115
4	UAB	71.944	66	1.2689	13
5	FAU	71.839	70	-1.1806	328
6	Wichita State	71.272	96	0.4306	74
7	UTSA	71.145	102	-0.3005	195
8	Tulsa	70.283	147	-1.0997	319
9	ECU	69.377	191	0.3281	89
10	Tulane	69.206	199	0.0154	126
11	Rice	68.039	260	-0.6439	254
12	Charlotte	67.284	294	-0.7255	273
13	North Texas	62.100	362	1.1236	23