Conferences – HoopSci

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	19.039	42	5.6804	3
2	Wichita State	13.654	66	3.2966	42
3	USF	11.072	84	3.3515	39
4	Memphis	8.942	102	-2.7743	305
5	FAU	4.698	127	-0.4168	219
6	UAB	3.415	134	0.5041	167
7	Temple	2.662	139	-0.2703	207
8	North Texas	-2.278	186	-3.1454	327
9	Charlotte	-4.527	205	1.2431	122
10	Rice	-8.707	231	-2.6530	300
11	Tulane	-9.862	241	-2.3417	284
12	ECU	-19.696	315	-4.7342	355
13	UTSA	-24.154	338	-2.8212	307

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.253	41	0.0443	32
2	USF	0.225	57	0.0352	51
3	UAB	0.186	79	0.0162	119
4	North Texas	0.140	104	-0.0162	248
5	Temple	0.131	113	0.0004	180
6	Tulsa	0.123	120	0.0344	55
7	FAU	0.071	150	0.0031	170
8	Tulane	0.062	153	-0.0207	262
9	Charlotte	0.015	185	-0.0010	187
10	Memphis	-0.041	221	-0.0297	299
11	Rice	-0.093	255	-0.0352	308
12	UTSA	-0.128	286	-0.0155	246
13	ECU	-0.161	302	-0.0640	352

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	1653.959	26	-13.8239	326
2	UAB	1621.381	50	-0.6127	182
3	North Texas	1613.770	55	-3.2125	220
4	FAU	1583.047	81	-14.0626	330
5	Wichita State	1533.167	134	1.6467	158
6	Tulane	1532.925	137	8.0139	76
7	USF	1508.713	173	-11.4331	307
8	Temple	1493.293	193	-2.7999	211
9	Tulsa	1491.757	197	16.1677	22
10	ECU	1463.155	237	-0.2864	177
11	Charlotte	1431.302	276	-17.7377	347
12	Rice	1419.379	288	-13.9499	329
13	UTSA	1412.770	298	4.5158	124

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	0.615	35	0.0655	2
2	FAU	0.612	39	0.0182	72
3	USF	0.583	62	0.0149	93
4	Wichita State	0.548	98	-0.0052	220
5	Memphis	0.528	127	-0.0442	362
6	UAB	0.521	132	0.0044	154
7	North Texas	0.488	191	-0.0277	332
8	Charlotte	0.487	196	0.0070	134
9	Tulane	0.479	208	0.0110	115
10	Temple	0.470	222	-0.0124	264
11	UTSA	0.464	237	-0.0174	284
12	ECU	0.458	247	-0.0043	211
13	Rice	0.435	283	-0.0055	226

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	0.567	43	0.0169	48
2	Tulane	0.523	145	-0.0083	292
3	Temple	0.522	150	-0.0029	249
4	FAU	0.520	158	-0.0079	290
5	USF	0.513	168	-0.0042	259
6	Charlotte	0.507	192	0.0013	174
7	North Texas	0.498	215	0.0009	179
8	Wichita State	0.493	232	0.0113	86
9	Memphis	0.490	242	-0.0133	330
10	Rice	0.481	263	0.0019	167
11	UAB	0.478	273	-0.0117	319
12	ECU	0.451	334	-0.0089	299
13	UTSA	0.425	355	-0.0211	351

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	1.206	31	0.0621	3
2	Wichita State	1.158	62	0.0401	32
3	FAU	1.129	91	0.0073	161
4	USF	1.117	107	-0.0029	230
5	Temple	1.109	113	-0.0033	233
6	UAB	1.097	137	-0.0183	306
7	Tulane	1.088	155	-0.0098	259
8	North Texas	1.049	225	-0.0269	331
9	Charlotte	1.045	231	-0.0111	266
10	Memphis	1.041	241	-0.0074	254
11	Rice	1.013	287	0.0027	191
12	ECU	0.956	331	-0.0224	316
13	UTSA	0.949	334	-0.0504	360

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	0.124	11	-0.0006	154
2	Tulane	0.130	21	-0.0062	71
3	UAB	0.136	35	0.0022	214
4	Wichita State	0.140	52	0.0002	166
5	Tulsa	0.147	82	-0.0112	20
6	USF	0.147	83	0.0026	218
7	UTSA	0.153	122	0.0077	307
8	FAU	0.164	187	0.0039	243
9	Charlotte	0.168	208	0.0138	347
10	North Texas	0.171	224	0.0149	358
11	Rice	0.173	241	0.0048	264
12	Memphis	0.176	254	-0.0022	130
13	ECU	0.178	264	0.0119	339

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	37.810	18	0.0520	31
2	UAB	36.000	35	0.0122	164
3	Memphis	34.590	55	0.0119	168
4	USF	34.530	57	0.0109	177
5	FAU	34.490	59	0.0326	74
6	Charlotte	34.150	63	0.0271	91
7	North Texas	31.840	101	-0.0151	332
8	Rice	31.300	114	0.0044	232
9	ECU	29.460	164	0.0097	188
10	Tulsa	29.070	175	0.0533	30
11	UTSA	25.240	268	0.0098	186
12	Temple	24.240	292	-0.0065	301
13	Tulane	16.970	363	-0.0150	331

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	0.504	9	0.0299	50
2	Tulane	0.465	25	0.0196	82
3	USF	0.462	27	0.0239	64
4	ECU	0.436	47	0.0118	128
5	North Texas	0.420	64	0.0209	76
6	Rice	0.399	97	0.0005	199
7	Charlotte	0.394	107	-0.0031	228
8	Tulsa	0.390	120	-0.0019	219
9	UAB	0.379	141	0.0211	75
10	Memphis	0.367	165	-0.0098	271
11	Wichita State	0.365	170	-0.0027	226
12	UTSA	0.354	201	0.0066	161
13	FAU	0.337	238	0.0026	186

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	121.796	28	4.3379	3
2	FAU	113.104	94	-0.6481	204
3	Temple	113.064	95	0.5060	116
4	Wichita State	113.020	96	1.0975	79
5	USF	112.839	98	1.5593	53
6	Memphis	109.333	132	-2.8827	327
7	UAB	107.758	154	-2.2897	300
8	Tulane	107.016	164	0.0843	149
9	Charlotte	106.899	166	0.3176	129
10	North Texas	101.519	241	-3.0130	333
11	Rice	100.922	253	-1.6807	270
12	ECU	95.359	311	-3.5170	348
13	UTSA	89.162	357	-3.7377	353

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	40.832	65	1.0453	70
2	Tulsa	40.480	75	1.6443	33
3	FAU	39.644	101	-0.1351	213
4	UAB	39.328	115	-1.0990	323
5	Temple	36.601	231	-0.6406	277
6	Memphis	36.527	238	-0.2989	237
7	USF	36.238	251	-0.8152	293
8	Charlotte	36.045	255	-0.0103	198
9	North Texas	35.235	282	-0.9183	304
10	Tulane	34.775	291	-0.9282	305
11	Rice	33.478	322	-0.0764	210
12	UTSA	32.849	337	-1.5748	349
13	ECU	32.304	344	-0.9840	310

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	89.975	13	1.3232	48
2	UAB	89.062	19	-0.7180	259
3	FAU	88.063	28	0.8619	87
4	UTSA	86.055	81	-0.1351	195
5	Tulsa	85.463	99	1.7603	23
6	Memphis	84.378	138	1.3227	49
7	Charlotte	83.345	175	-0.1079	190
8	USF	82.292	224	-0.4475	233
9	Rice	82.171	226	-0.5038	240
10	Temple	80.468	285	-0.8004	268
11	North Texas	79.398	310	-2.5134	358
12	ECU	78.950	318	-1.2260	302
13	Tulane	77.147	344	-0.4301	230

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	47.242	99	0.9109	89
2	Temple	45.907	152	-0.2492	242
3	Wichita State	45.214	179	0.3973	140
4	Tulane	45.092	187	-0.8765	307
5	FAU	45.048	191	-0.6466	282
6	North Texas	44.893	199	0.3230	151
7	UAB	44.267	230	-0.8612	305
8	USF	44.241	233	-0.6725	285
9	Charlotte	43.412	262	-0.0016	199
10	Memphis	43.176	270	-1.1136	326
11	Rice	40.710	330	0.0648	189
12	ECU	40.559	334	-0.7747	292
13	UTSA	38.281	356	-1.6971	351

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	68.311	39	-0.2809	189
2	ECU	67.082	52	0.5941	119
3	North Texas	65.351	87	0.8362	101
4	Wichita State	64.840	97	-2.9531	345
5	Temple	64.281	108	-0.8770	239
6	Memphis	64.064	114	-0.1175	171
7	Rice	59.724	193	-0.7480	229
8	FAU	58.891	209	-0.5099	208
9	Charlotte	57.547	235	-1.2856	266
10	Tulane	56.696	254	-1.9797	307
11	UTSA	56.167	268	-1.1371	256
12	USF	56.016	271	-1.4138	277
13	Tulsa	52.494	322	-2.1171	316

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	31.694	17	-0.5425	263
2	Wichita State	29.367	71	-0.4395	251
3	FAU	27.564	141	0.0061	184
4	Memphis	26.720	175	-0.0887	199
5	Temple	26.527	182	-0.4618	255
6	North Texas	25.430	232	-0.2590	225
7	ECU	25.207	243	-0.6189	276
8	USF	24.877	255	-1.1040	324
9	Tulsa	24.430	268	0.0829	176
10	Charlotte	24.032	279	-0.2034	213
11	Tulane	23.717	288	-0.8940	307
12	UTSA	21.617	339	-0.9700	313
13	Rice	21.092	349	-0.2994	228

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	60.534	9	-0.8805	233
2	Wichita State	58.085	27	-1.8072	307
3	Memphis	54.137	91	0.8130	97
4	ECU	52.821	119	-0.3639	195
5	Temple	51.791	137	-1.2675	267
6	North Texas	51.769	139	-1.0079	242
7	FAU	51.711	141	0.0783	147
8	Rice	48.986	207	-0.9807	240
9	Charlotte	48.240	224	-1.0427	246
10	UTSA	47.763	235	-1.3620	275
11	USF	46.082	273	-1.4361	280
12	Tulsa	44.979	293	-0.7737	222
13	Tulane	43.673	318	-1.8654	311

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	55.144	126	-0.7049	286
2	Tulsa	53.976	155	0.8545	130
3	FAU	53.717	158	-0.0515	232
4	Tulane	53.625	161	0.1400	211
5	UAB	52.732	184	-0.0841	235
6	Temple	52.218	212	0.4405	174
7	Wichita State	50.635	257	0.7388	139
8	Charlotte	50.527	261	0.8136	134
9	North Texas	50.102	274	0.5114	168
10	Memphis	48.985	297	-0.9275	302
11	ECU	47.204	322	-1.1308	315
12	UTSA	44.176	354	-1.1145	313
13	Rice	43.586	358	0.3861	181

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	47.506	44	2.1171	50
2	USF	43.984	95	1.4138	89
3	UTSA	43.833	98	1.1371	110
4	Tulane	43.304	112	1.9797	59
5	Charlotte	42.453	131	1.2856	100
6	FAU	41.109	157	0.5099	158
7	Rice	40.276	173	0.7480	137
8	Memphis	35.936	252	0.1175	195
9	Temple	35.719	258	0.8770	127
10	Wichita State	35.160	269	2.9531	21
11	North Texas	34.649	279	-0.8362	265
12	ECU	32.918	314	-0.5941	247
13	UAB	31.689	327	0.2809	177

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	16.051	10	1.5615	7
2	Rice	12.385	108	0.2231	134
3	FAU	12.079	122	-0.1413	209
4	Charlotte	12.012	127	0.1931	142
5	Wichita State	11.466	158	1.4848	11
6	USF	11.362	161	0.2888	120
7	UTSA	11.232	170	-0.6048	315
8	Tulane	11.059	181	-0.0342	183
9	Temple	10.074	245	-0.1787	220
10	Memphis	9.807	264	-0.2102	228
11	North Texas	9.805	265	-0.6593	322
12	UAB	7.634	338	-0.5565	304
13	ECU	7.097	351	-0.3651	266

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	40.485	32	2.5340	27
2	UTSA	38.293	69	1.2268	83
3	FAU	36.352	105	0.7836	121
4	USF	36.210	110	0.9886	103
5	Charlotte	35.105	132	0.9348	110
6	Tulane	33.474	169	1.4353	75
7	Rice	33.185	177	0.4769	150
8	Wichita State	31.890	215	3.1304	11
9	Memphis	30.241	245	0.5096	145
10	Temple	28.677	279	0.4671	154
11	UAB	28.528	284	0.1625	185
12	North Texas	27.628	304	-1.5054	326
13	ECU	26.128	331	-0.8621	282

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	40.193	14	1.8372	25
2	Rice	37.495	50	0.2087	143
3	Temple	35.658	103	-0.8664	264
4	Charlotte	35.295	119	0.0950	153
5	North Texas	34.885	137	-0.5581	232
6	Wichita State	34.545	152	1.2393	64
7	Tulane	33.151	195	-1.1782	292
8	FAU	32.974	201	-1.1454	289
9	Memphis	31.000	276	-1.9082	329
10	USF	30.915	282	-0.0315	168
11	UTSA	30.229	294	-2.1504	345
12	ECU	27.086	351	-0.0484	172
13	UAB	26.078	359	-2.4942	354

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	50.390	9	2.9911	50
2	Tulane	46.490	25	1.9550	82
3	USF	46.220	27	2.3950	64
4	ECU	43.620	47	1.1745	128
5	North Texas	42.040	64	2.0931	76
6	Rice	39.880	97	0.0469	199
7	Charlotte	39.430	107	-0.3127	228
8	Tulsa	38.950	120	-0.1861	219
9	UAB	37.930	141	2.1096	75
10	Memphis	36.660	165	-0.9837	271
11	Wichita State	36.460	170	-0.2645	226
12	UTSA	35.440	201	0.6545	161
13	FAU	33.700	238	0.2595	186

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	28.204	13	0.9206	102
2	USF	27.902	17	1.0575	87
3	Temple	27.666	22	1.1334	79
4	North Texas	24.633	64	-0.1955	225
5	ECU	23.863	88	0.0901	191
6	Tulsa	23.574	94	1.4043	57
7	UAB	23.423	99	0.9275	99
8	Wichita State	22.708	119	0.4479	150
9	Rice	21.969	142	0.1966	177
10	FAU	21.495	157	1.1390	77
11	Memphis	21.202	171	0.0684	192
12	Charlotte	20.374	197	-1.2835	330
13	UTSA	17.934	283	-1.2817	329

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	38.479	12	1.6118	71
2	USF	37.568	21	1.3142	98
3	Tulane	36.283	33	1.4857	79
4	North Texas	35.264	43	0.8761	126
5	ECU	34.046	61	0.3599	173
6	UAB	33.263	72	1.6018	72
7	Charlotte	32.218	97	-0.1425	225
8	Rice	31.860	106	-0.1089	219
9	Wichita State	31.353	117	0.2502	184
10	Memphis	30.204	155	-0.2658	235
11	Tulsa	30.115	160	0.3482	174
12	FAU	28.588	208	0.6189	150
13	UTSA	28.363	217	0.0369	204

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	79.587	9	4.9325	3
2	Tulane	78.166	22	-0.2372	200
3	FAU	74.367	99	1.9020	38
4	USF	73.030	139	-0.0153	179
5	Temple	71.818	170	-0.3425	210
6	Wichita State	71.775	172	1.0281	97
7	ECU	70.639	200	-0.6815	237
8	Rice	70.433	205	1.3699	67
9	UAB	70.109	214	-0.7742	240
10	Memphis	70.048	218	0.8181	110
11	North Texas	69.892	223	-2.9492	334
12	UTSA	66.438	306	-3.4958	350
13	Charlotte	63.196	345	-3.6663	354

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	59.591	46	0.6757	150
2	USF	56.951	97	1.4728	101
3	North Texas	56.885	100	2.7980	36
4	Memphis	54.935	145	-0.0688	215
5	Tulane	51.516	213	-0.2476	231
6	UAB	48.612	275	-2.0750	323
7	Temple	48.485	279	1.8711	68
8	Rice	47.051	303	-2.0829	324
9	Charlotte	46.322	313	-2.4304	337
10	FAU	45.795	319	-3.2226	350
11	ECU	45.600	323	-1.1227	278
12	Wichita State	42.621	347	0.0456	204
13	UTSA	41.959	351	-1.2672	287

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	6.421	36	-1.1332	22
2	Tulsa	6.957	63	-1.2705	9
3	Temple	7.938	128	0.0910	245
4	Tulane	7.998	134	-0.2186	166
5	ECU	8.263	148	-0.0272	214
6	USF	8.463	165	-0.1262	188
7	FAU	9.060	218	0.1492	257
8	UAB	9.257	234	0.5072	301
9	North Texas	9.553	253	1.0624	351
10	Charlotte	9.642	262	0.9248	345
11	UTSA	9.895	270	0.8135	338
12	Memphis	10.253	297	-0.0280	213
13	Rice	10.742	318	0.2037	263

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	2.450	10	-0.9383	7
2	Wichita State	3.203	60	-1.3503	3
3	FAU	3.486	84	-0.3917	75
4	Charlotte	3.620	99	-0.6674	23
5	Tulane	3.638	101	-0.3933	74
6	ECU	4.164	174	0.1071	253
7	UAB	4.524	225	0.2248	285
8	North Texas	4.874	259	0.3985	311
9	UTSA	5.315	301	-0.0256	203
10	Memphis	5.470	313	0.3617	307
11	USF	5.617	317	0.5067	328
12	Temple	5.688	324	-0.1409	158
13	Rice	6.030	342	-0.0410	198

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	29.003	17	1.1932	32
2	Tulane	27.945	37	1.3347	25
3	Charlotte	27.785	39	0.1962	141
4	Rice	26.902	64	-0.0013	167
5	USF	26.285	77	0.1495	149
6	ECU	26.240	80	1.1097	36
7	Memphis	25.110	117	-0.1304	185
8	North Texas	25.083	119	0.7926	62
9	FAU	22.777	193	0.2789	127
10	Wichita State	22.645	198	-0.5505	254
11	UAB	21.799	236	0.3358	117
12	Tulsa	21.609	241	-1.1906	307
13	UTSA	20.545	272	-0.0050	168

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	80.133	6	1.9261	27
2	UAB	73.442	102	-0.3390	300
3	Memphis	73.319	109	-0.3194	297
4	UTSA	72.689	135	0.7757	130
5	ECU	72.375	151	-0.1956	281
6	Rice	71.756	180	1.1798	78
7	Tulsa	69.710	247	0.8255	120
8	Tulane	69.314	261	0.3699	187
9	FAU	68.816	283	-1.1763	349
10	Wichita State	68.614	293	-1.2790	352
11	Temple	68.122	312	-1.8709	364
12	North Texas	66.158	348	1.4394	57
13	Charlotte	65.525	357	-0.8095	334

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.457	35	0.0029	201
2	Wichita State	0.464	45	-0.0032	122
3	UTSA	0.476	72	-0.0175	23
4	Memphis	0.480	83	-0.0130	43
5	UAB	0.485	97	-0.0073	87
6	Rice	0.505	164	-0.0027	132
7	USF	0.517	202	0.0131	307
8	Tulsa	0.518	209	0.0040	223
9	Charlotte	0.524	228	-0.0095	69
10	FAU	0.533	260	0.0158	329
11	Temple	0.544	284	0.0076	264
12	ECU	0.552	303	0.0024	196
13	Tulane	0.559	316	0.0205	347

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.982	78	0.0010	179
2	North Texas	0.984	82	0.0039	201
3	USF	0.995	92	-0.0046	147
4	UAB	1.002	103	-0.0112	106
5	Tulsa	1.020	125	-0.0173	72
6	Memphis	1.020	127	-0.0060	136
7	Rice	1.061	192	-0.0114	104
8	FAU	1.064	198	0.0027	192
9	UTSA	1.083	231	0.0015	183
10	Charlotte	1.102	258	-0.0030	154
11	ECU	1.109	267	0.0022	186
12	Temple	1.111	270	0.0215	283
13	Tulane	1.113	276	0.0172	267

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	0.203	23	0.0055	96
2	North Texas	0.182	85	0.0004	188
3	Memphis	0.168	149	-0.0012	216
4	Tulsa	0.162	189	0.0083	65
5	Rice	0.160	198	0.0091	50
6	Tulane	0.160	201	0.0059	91
7	ECU	0.159	207	0.0005	187
8	UAB	0.155	224	-0.0040	261
9	FAU	0.155	229	0.0079	69
10	Wichita State	0.152	237	-0.0036	255
11	UTSA	0.141	298	-0.0156	358
12	Charlotte	0.139	309	-0.0039	259
13	Temple	0.132	337	-0.0032	249

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	77.390	23	0.0201	13
2	UAB	76.520	36	0.0173	21
3	Tulsa	75.640	58	0.0161	26
4	Temple	75.610	60	-0.0058	205
5	Wichita State	74.330	96	-0.0001	149
6	ECU	73.980	103	0.0030	117
7	USF	73.490	120	0.0204	10
8	Charlotte	73.270	130	-0.0027	170
9	North Texas	71.870	179	-0.0030	175
10	Rice	71.000	201	-0.0097	247
11	Tulane	70.370	219	-0.0007	158
12	Memphis	66.460	317	-0.0225	320
13	UTSA	65.620	324	-0.0137	275

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	0.294	58	-0.0140	67
2	Temple	0.317	95	-0.0161	58
3	UAB	0.328	119	-0.0006	138
4	Wichita State	0.341	141	0.0157	255
5	FAU	0.342	145	0.0077	197
6	ECU	0.357	172	-0.0080	99
7	UTSA	0.374	199	-0.0209	32
8	Tulane	0.382	218	0.0213	282
9	Rice	0.400	265	0.0007	145
10	Memphis	0.402	270	0.0173	266
11	USF	0.433	315	-0.0057	111
12	Charlotte	0.489	345	0.0434	352
13	North Texas	0.497	351	0.0272	314

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	99.366	55	-2.1253	63
2	Memphis	100.390	69	-0.1084	212
3	USF	101.767	90	-1.8030	88
4	Tulsa	102.757	106	-1.4670	108
5	North Texas	103.797	121	0.1516	228
6	UAB	104.343	129	-2.7407	36
7	FAU	108.406	195	-0.2437	203
8	Rice	109.629	208	0.9721	280
9	Temple	110.402	218	0.7763	271
10	Charlotte	111.426	235	-0.9256	140
11	UTSA	113.316	268	-0.8923	145
12	ECU	115.055	291	1.2833	297
13	Tulane	116.878	312	2.3775	341

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	31.005	20	0.0471	202
2	USF	33.312	59	-0.0766	180
3	Memphis	34.081	86	-0.7997	76
4	Wichita State	34.355	99	-0.1536	168
5	UAB	35.342	129	-0.6833	93
6	Charlotte	36.100	152	-1.1484	42
7	UTSA	36.332	168	-0.1891	160
8	Tulsa	36.440	171	-0.6598	99
9	Rice	36.678	185	-0.2504	156
10	FAU	37.501	213	0.2203	219
11	Tulane	38.005	238	0.4408	248
12	ECU	38.382	254	0.3126	230
13	Temple	39.647	297	0.7033	279

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	75.346	16	-1.2624	68
2	North Texas	77.176	40	-0.9120	104
3	Charlotte	79.580	90	-0.9410	98
4	FAU	80.982	123	-2.1489	23
5	ECU	81.311	138	-0.1502	183
6	Tulane	81.535	148	-1.8713	36
7	Rice	81.945	165	-0.4437	162
8	UAB	82.098	171	-0.1183	189
9	Tulsa	82.686	193	-1.0019	95
10	Memphis	82.691	194	0.5836	260
11	Wichita State	83.522	220	-0.3761	168
12	Temple	85.538	283	1.3368	319
13	UTSA	89.493	347	3.3414	363

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	39.872	41	0.4774	239
2	UTSA	40.507	48	-2.0173	9
3	Wichita State	41.044	60	-0.0732	158
4	Memphis	41.317	67	-1.2324	38
5	UAB	42.643	104	-0.8261	71
6	Tulsa	44.302	175	-0.1794	144
7	USF	44.640	185	0.7250	265
8	Rice	44.735	187	-0.0381	164
9	Charlotte	45.406	208	-0.9466	62
10	FAU	46.510	260	1.5234	337
11	Temple	46.532	261	0.1421	185
12	Tulane	46.760	268	1.4869	335
13	ECU	47.280	285	0.3757	223

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	54.712	53	-1.4056	83
2	UTSA	55.811	70	-3.3971	10
3	ECU	57.749	113	-0.8189	127
4	Temple	58.086	123	-2.6729	23
5	Charlotte	58.295	130	-1.5195	75
6	Memphis	58.427	135	-0.3032	177
7	Tulsa	59.334	157	-1.6705	69
8	North Texas	60.404	182	0.5873	262
9	UAB	60.803	195	-1.1541	99
10	USF	61.887	228	-0.4208	167
11	FAU	64.787	305	0.1734	221
12	Wichita State	64.839	307	0.2016	224
13	Rice	65.169	315	1.2445	318

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	22.002	39	0.4023	248
2	USF	22.803	61	-0.7619	92
3	Memphis	23.023	68	-0.8163	80
4	Tulane	23.173	71	-0.1880	163
5	UTSA	23.447	83	-1.1746	47
6	Tulsa	24.307	128	-1.3987	30
7	Charlotte	24.928	153	-1.0585	55
8	Wichita State	25.354	170	0.3074	230
9	ECU	25.564	182	0.5262	262
10	UAB	25.669	187	-0.8138	81
11	Temple	26.224	214	-0.5476	112
12	FAU	26.257	218	0.3114	231
13	Rice	27.190	249	0.2291	219

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	44.852	58	-2.1128	37
2	Charlotte	46.171	84	-1.8542	49
3	USF	46.682	101	-1.1432	111
4	North Texas	46.828	103	-0.1904	202
5	ECU	47.110	113	-0.8132	143
6	Memphis	48.169	143	0.0151	223
7	Tulsa	49.340	179	-1.9465	44
8	Temple	49.489	186	-1.5573	71
9	UTSA	49.611	191	-1.1751	105
10	UAB	50.129	215	-0.9652	129
11	FAU	52.209	257	-1.4091	86
12	Rice	53.392	292	0.7287	285
13	Wichita State	54.062	303	-0.0673	213

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	46.087	42	0.6536	224
2	UTSA	47.909	68	-1.0383	72
3	Wichita State	47.931	69	0.8417	244
4	Memphis	48.292	85	-1.5047	40
5	Tulsa	49.890	121	-0.7876	81
6	Rice	49.895	122	-0.3864	115
7	USF	49.976	129	-0.2920	124
8	FAU	51.071	158	2.1123	335
9	UAB	51.128	162	-0.7202	90
10	Tulane	52.460	188	2.2764	341
11	Charlotte	53.709	229	-0.2001	136
12	Temple	53.959	231	0.6924	230
13	ECU	54.110	237	1.5449	300

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Rice	34.831	51	-1.2445	48
2	Wichita State	35.161	59	-0.2016	142
3	FAU	35.213	61	-0.1734	145
4	USF	38.113	138	0.4208	199
5	UAB	39.197	171	1.1541	267
6	North Texas	39.596	184	-0.5873	104
7	Tulsa	40.666	209	1.6705	297
8	Memphis	41.573	231	0.3032	189
9	Charlotte	41.705	236	1.5195	291
10	Temple	41.914	243	2.6729	343
11	ECU	42.251	253	0.8189	239
12	UTSA	44.189	296	3.3971	356
13	Tulane	45.288	313	1.4056	283

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	9.001	57	-0.4610	79
2	North Texas	9.003	58	-0.3552	101
3	Rice	9.488	80	-0.4795	75
4	UAB	9.672	92	0.1305	206
5	USF	10.509	162	0.6853	305
6	Memphis	11.058	197	0.0166	183
7	Charlotte	11.173	205	-0.0899	160
8	FAU	11.243	210	-0.0911	158
9	Tulsa	12.133	261	0.7389	314
10	ECU	12.817	301	-0.2136	132
11	UTSA	12.885	306	0.9855	338
12	Temple	13.423	327	1.2509	350
13	Tulane	14.832	353	0.6288	301

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Rice	28.552	60	-1.1724	48
2	USF	28.664	62	-0.1192	161
3	FAU	28.773	66	-0.7398	83
4	Wichita State	29.459	90	-0.3088	134
5	North Texas	30.347	113	-0.7215	86
6	UAB	31.969	161	0.8469	257
7	Tulsa	33.345	196	0.9446	268
8	Charlotte	33.409	199	0.9132	263
9	ECU	34.201	225	0.6630	233
10	Memphis	34.522	230	0.5685	226
11	Temple	36.048	279	2.8941	356
12	Tulane	36.682	293	0.2414	198
13	UTSA	39.883	345	4.5164	364

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	28.289	31	-1.5984	43
2	North Texas	29.092	47	-0.7651	110
3	UAB	29.754	60	-0.6016	125
4	Memphis	32.723	168	-0.7105	114
5	UTSA	33.193	182	-0.9698	85
6	Charlotte	33.411	192	-1.0551	81
7	Rice	33.557	197	-0.0493	182
8	USF	35.828	277	2.3087	350
9	Tulsa	35.885	280	1.2973	311
10	ECU	35.986	286	-1.8913	28
11	Temple	37.309	321	0.7713	274
12	FAU	37.849	330	0.4676	247
13	Tulane	41.423	362	1.5474	327

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	29.430	58	-1.3949	67
2	Temple	31.660	95	-1.6122	58
3	UAB	32.770	119	-0.0578	138
4	Wichita State	34.090	141	1.5649	255
5	FAU	34.210	145	0.7666	197
6	ECU	35.740	172	-0.7992	99
7	UTSA	37.430	199	-2.0925	32
8	Tulane	38.180	218	2.1333	282
9	Rice	40.000	265	0.0720	145
10	Memphis	40.220	270	1.7343	266
11	USF	43.330	315	-0.5730	111
12	Charlotte	48.910	345	4.3430	352
13	North Texas	49.750	351	2.7157	314

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	16.985	48	-1.1461	24
2	Temple	18.354	88	-0.5016	99
3	UAB	19.869	138	0.1344	174
4	FAU	20.161	144	-0.0820	152
5	Wichita State	20.463	157	0.8720	263
6	Tulane	20.472	158	0.2084	181
7	ECU	21.303	186	-0.1955	131
8	USF	22.372	237	-0.9879	42
9	UTSA	22.705	251	-0.4522	104
10	Memphis	22.807	257	0.9821	274
11	Rice	23.241	272	-0.1635	135
12	Charlotte	26.818	336	2.0892	346
13	North Texas	27.361	343	0.6498	235

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	23.580	41	-1.4837	20
2	Temple	26.312	101	-0.7623	78
3	UAB	26.735	114	-0.1058	130
4	FAU	27.509	128	-0.1016	131
5	ECU	28.356	147	-0.6719	90
6	Wichita State	28.901	166	1.4212	276
7	Tulane	31.041	222	1.1167	256
8	UTSA	31.761	245	-0.6486	92
9	Rice	32.247	261	-0.1636	127
10	USF	32.850	281	-0.8012	75
11	Memphis	33.170	289	1.6377	290
12	North Texas	38.751	350	1.9551	309
13	Charlotte	39.576	353	3.0894	355

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	66.719	47	-1.6767	61
2	USF	67.278	59	-1.6473	63
3	Charlotte	67.882	73	0.1022	218
4	Wichita State	69.236	109	-0.7889	138
5	Temple	70.023	138	0.2114	231
6	Memphis	70.493	155	0.0240	206
7	Rice	71.136	186	-0.2700	179
8	Tulsa	71.581	201	-0.2967	178
9	North Texas	71.660	208	-1.7093	59
10	ECU	73.688	262	0.6784	264
11	UTSA	74.003	270	0.9372	277
12	FAU	74.335	287	0.3837	245
13	UAB	76.452	326	1.4305	311

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	43.938	34	-0.9735	102
2	Wichita State	46.157	59	1.0595	241
3	North Texas	48.874	107	-0.6183	126
4	Temple	50.269	133	0.0826	171
5	UTSA	51.095	145	-0.2739	148
6	Charlotte	53.289	194	1.4640	263
7	Tulsa	53.391	197	1.4879	266
8	USF	53.845	213	0.3612	190
9	UAB	54.312	227	0.3144	185
10	Rice	54.976	242	0.0865	172
11	Tulane	58.765	302	-0.5530	130
12	Memphis	58.978	305	1.1225	242
13	ECU	59.940	323	1.3414	255

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	12.459	31	0.0322	174
2	Memphis	11.429	68	0.1045	158
3	Tulane	11.413	69	0.5607	69
4	North Texas	11.309	74	-0.0966	193
5	UAB	10.544	116	0.0703	166
6	Rice	9.678	173	0.8842	30
7	Tulsa	9.550	184	0.2082	133
8	UTSA	9.543	186	-0.7114	315
9	ECU	8.998	223	-0.5317	285
10	FAU	8.401	252	0.0348	173
11	Wichita State	8.053	271	-0.6187	306
12	Temple	7.350	310	-0.5711	295
13	Charlotte	6.542	338	-0.6531	308

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	7.907	14	0.6458	31
2	North Texas	6.774	38	0.2482	112
3	Tulane	6.645	45	-0.1263	208
4	Temple	6.391	52	0.4461	58
5	UTSA	5.960	70	0.4432	60
6	Memphis	5.881	76	0.1830	130
7	Rice	5.738	88	0.8201	19
8	Wichita State	5.446	107	-0.5482	319
9	USF	5.391	113	-0.0850	200
10	Charlotte	5.364	116	0.5868	40
11	UAB	4.665	178	-0.0749	196
12	ECU	4.030	241	-0.6425	335
13	Tulsa	2.919	317	-0.2232	241

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	20.891	18	-0.4350	74
2	Tulsa	21.237	22	-0.8005	33
3	ECU	23.870	103	-0.1126	131
4	FAU	24.678	146	-0.1871	112
5	Temple	25.171	167	0.3990	222
6	Tulane	25.301	175	0.1305	170
7	UTSA	25.390	181	-0.3356	85
8	Wichita State	26.511	244	1.6241	352
9	Rice	27.038	273	0.0710	159
10	USF	27.962	300	0.4415	230
11	Memphis	28.509	315	1.0598	319
12	North Texas	30.140	347	0.5920	252
13	Charlotte	30.837	356	1.7651	357

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	80.275	4	1.4973	49
2	Memphis	72.709	136	-0.2585	275
3	Rice	72.686	140	1.5213	48
4	UAB	72.681	141	-0.7344	326
5	UTSA	71.329	192	0.4088	167
6	ECU	71.112	201	0.0061	238
7	Tulane	69.678	250	0.3997	170
8	Tulsa	69.163	270	-0.4655	301
9	FAU	69.150	271	-0.9015	336
10	Wichita State	68.833	284	-0.5113	306
11	Temple	68.053	311	-1.6904	360
12	North Texas	67.794	321	1.8503	26
13	Charlotte	64.361	364	-0.6925	320