Conferences – HoopSci

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	15.520	49	3.7266	3
2	USF	13.350	62	1.9001	35
3	Wichita State	11.411	74	0.8590	104
4	FAU	6.565	103	0.3585	148
5	Memphis	6.519	104	-1.4530	302
6	Temple	4.628	116	-0.0043	181
7	UAB	3.090	128	-0.0937	193
8	North Texas	1.657	144	-2.5683	348
9	Charlotte	1.205	147	1.8132	41
10	Tulane	-3.909	198	-0.9101	265
11	Rice	-7.032	223	-0.8734	261
12	ECU	-11.659	266	-0.9588	270
13	UTSA	-26.268	353	-3.1796	360

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.189	41	0.0013	148
2	Tulsa	0.161	61	0.0265	17
3	USF	0.158	64	0.0031	126
4	UAB	0.123	95	-0.0150	292
5	Temple	0.097	110	-0.0004	170
6	North Texas	0.092	114	-0.0220	323
7	FAU	0.089	118	0.0027	130
8	Tulane	0.016	184	-0.0188	307
9	Charlotte	0.011	187	0.0090	87
10	Memphis	-0.010	202	-0.0017	185
11	Rice	-0.082	269	-0.0107	255
12	ECU	-0.147	327	-0.0207	317
13	UTSA	-0.187	343	-0.0420	361

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	1618.690	56	-16.4692	328
2	UAB	1609.788	63	-3.5566	216
3	USF	1579.855	81	13.3912	48
4	North Texas	1567.994	91	-17.7124	339
5	Tulsa	1564.156	96	33.6338	2
6	FAU	1558.361	109	-6.7980	245
7	Wichita State	1550.251	121	6.1850	111
8	Temple	1536.375	136	6.7831	105
9	Tulane	1526.972	144	0.9111	171
10	Charlotte	1484.064	198	4.6466	133
11	Rice	1434.486	262	-3.6205	219
12	ECU	1430.852	267	-14.4878	315
13	UTSA	1326.126	350	-18.6201	342

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	0.580	51	0.0180	27
2	USF	0.579	53	0.0220	15
3	FAU	0.538	96	-0.0039	294
4	Wichita State	0.527	109	0.0044	187
5	UAB	0.523	125	0.0051	171
6	Memphis	0.513	150	-0.0179	359
7	Tulane	0.511	152	0.0041	193
8	Charlotte	0.506	164	0.0103	105
9	North Texas	0.495	187	-0.0129	351
10	Temple	0.495	189	0.0010	229
11	Rice	0.464	239	-0.0051	307
12	ECU	0.453	258	-0.0065	318
13	UTSA	0.415	324	-0.0038	291

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	0.572	17	-0.0006	200
2	Charlotte	0.533	99	0.0043	129
3	FAU	0.527	128	-0.0155	348
4	USF	0.516	179	0.0039	136
5	Temple	0.503	230	-0.0174	356
6	Tulane	0.500	243	0.0004	189
7	Memphis	0.493	274	-0.0018	218
8	Wichita State	0.493	277	-0.0079	280
9	Rice	0.487	296	0.0070	93
10	UAB	0.484	304	-0.0085	286
11	North Texas	0.466	338	-0.0144	343
12	ECU	0.457	350	0.0056	112
13	UTSA	0.442	361	0.0017	169

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	1.197	17	-0.0121	283
2	USF	1.140	71	0.0101	123
3	Wichita State	1.115	105	-0.0255	336
4	Temple	1.109	115	-0.0066	245
5	FAU	1.107	120	-0.0265	342
6	Charlotte	1.105	124	-0.0107	275
7	UAB	1.081	169	-0.0237	332
8	Rice	1.050	231	0.0196	68
9	Tulane	1.050	232	-0.0135	287
10	North Texas	1.040	261	0.0033	175
11	Memphis	1.026	289	-0.0003	199
12	ECU	0.980	333	0.0280	34
13	UTSA	0.937	359	-0.0040	220

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	0.121	6	-0.0024	167
2	Temple	0.123	10	-0.0079	61
3	Wichita State	0.142	63	0.0019	270
4	Tulsa	0.147	94	0.0029	286
5	Tulane	0.147	95	0.0079	341
6	USF	0.148	99	0.0050	311
7	ECU	0.154	155	-0.0109	30
8	North Texas	0.160	201	-0.0027	164
9	Rice	0.163	228	-0.0031	159
10	Charlotte	0.165	242	0.0093	351
11	FAU	0.172	284	0.0022	275
12	UTSA	0.172	287	0.0069	332
13	Memphis	0.186	341	-0.0016	189

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	37.730	7	-0.0118	202
2	USF	35.040	25	0.0073	39
3	North Texas	33.890	38	0.0122	24
4	Memphis	33.540	44	-0.0071	147
5	Rice	32.770	62	0.0095	31
6	Charlotte	32.290	73	-0.0003	87
7	FAU	32.180	76	-0.0054	132
8	UAB	30.960	105	-0.0204	275
9	Tulsa	29.060	164	-0.0105	190
10	ECU	28.500	180	-0.0076	151
11	UTSA	26.630	234	0.0056	48
12	Temple	26.020	259	0.0055	49
13	Tulane	19.130	359	-0.0250	300

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	0.482	3	0.0516	3
2	USF	0.452	16	0.0232	54
3	Temple	0.450	22	-0.0217	308
4	Tulsa	0.433	43	-0.0219	309
5	North Texas	0.405	74	0.0358	20
6	ECU	0.399	89	0.0032	165
7	Charlotte	0.393	102	-0.0144	286
8	UAB	0.375	142	-0.0004	189
9	Wichita State	0.374	147	-0.0091	249
10	Rice	0.357	193	-0.0291	343
11	FAU	0.342	226	0.0085	129
12	Memphis	0.338	238	-0.0101	253
13	UTSA	0.312	298	-0.0126	270

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	125.286	38	3.6200	1
2	USF	119.098	68	1.4718	70
3	Charlotte	116.287	87	1.8972	31
4	FAU	114.809	111	-0.1879	281
5	Wichita State	114.596	112	0.7487	153
6	Temple	113.941	125	-0.2369	288
7	UAB	111.679	155	-0.4781	310
8	Memphis	109.252	186	-1.6894	359
9	Rice	108.450	199	0.8738	134
10	Tulane	108.318	202	-0.6570	320
11	North Texas	105.638	252	-1.7715	362
12	ECU	102.030	297	-1.0919	343
13	UTSA	96.894	347	-1.6629	358

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	39.619	83	-0.0473	183
2	FAU	39.508	91	-0.7805	315
3	Wichita State	39.335	99	-0.6347	287
4	UAB	38.847	122	-1.0393	340
5	Charlotte	37.473	204	0.0723	162
6	USF	37.418	209	0.0974	156
7	Temple	36.735	237	-0.3723	252
8	Memphis	36.535	245	-0.0250	175
9	North Texas	35.943	269	-0.2287	228
10	Rice	35.853	277	1.4007	19
11	ECU	34.006	335	0.8344	57
12	Tulane	33.301	348	-1.3020	354
13	UTSA	33.137	352	0.6347	80

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	89.119	9	0.2418	161
2	UAB	88.069	22	-0.0017	187
3	Rice	85.811	71	2.4779	2
4	FAU	85.278	96	-0.1810	215
5	UTSA	84.903	116	0.4503	130
6	USF	84.004	164	-0.9099	302
7	Memphis	83.598	182	-0.0743	200
8	North Texas	83.581	183	0.5218	120
9	ECU	82.560	241	0.7023	100
10	Charlotte	82.536	244	-0.6774	281
11	Temple	82.484	245	1.9055	11
12	Tulsa	81.886	268	0.1557	169
13	Tulane	77.117	360	-2.7454	362

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	48.302	41	-0.0713	192
2	FAU	46.253	123	-0.9280	316
3	Charlotte	45.535	156	0.4561	120
4	Temple	44.666	210	-1.5392	353
5	USF	44.515	224	0.4331	123
6	UAB	44.204	251	-1.0929	330
7	Wichita State	44.069	256	-0.7966	299
8	Memphis	43.682	266	0.0086	185
9	North Texas	43.226	290	-0.5752	274
10	Tulane	43.210	291	-0.0133	186
11	Rice	41.758	331	0.4917	114
12	ECU	41.305	338	0.6086	93
13	UTSA	38.983	362	0.5997	98

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	69.590	15	-1.8324	326
2	ECU	68.692	27	0.2501	161
3	North Texas	66.283	61	1.8841	26
4	Wichita State	64.700	96	-1.7523	324
5	Memphis	64.620	99	0.4220	146
6	Temple	63.064	128	-1.6239	318
7	FAU	59.526	207	1.5696	45
8	UTSA	58.847	216	2.0170	19
9	Rice	57.887	237	-1.4941	307
10	Charlotte	56.534	263	0.0202	182
11	Tulane	56.268	266	-0.4924	236
12	USF	55.284	287	-0.6858	251
13	Tulsa	55.199	288	-0.6819	250

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	31.020	15	-1.4753	353
2	Wichita State	28.241	94	-0.6766	293
3	FAU	28.103	104	0.3388	122
4	North Texas	27.448	138	1.1834	32
5	Memphis	27.018	151	0.2811	132
6	ECU	26.866	158	0.8310	53
7	Temple	26.348	183	-0.2807	230
8	Tulsa	25.264	236	-0.1313	205
9	USF	25.003	253	0.2319	135
10	Charlotte	24.591	268	0.2252	137
11	UTSA	23.018	324	1.3423	23
12	Rice	22.950	327	0.7259	67
13	Tulane	22.439	339	-1.0078	321

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	61.235	6	-1.5462	320
2	Wichita State	57.374	30	-1.4131	313
3	ECU	56.585	41	0.6418	115
4	North Texas	55.354	63	1.9998	22
5	Memphis	53.997	90	0.2846	153
6	Temple	52.071	143	-0.1704	206
7	FAU	50.703	177	1.2894	54
8	UTSA	49.816	194	2.0335	21
9	Rice	49.661	201	0.1139	174
10	Charlotte	46.624	271	-0.3657	221
11	USF	46.362	276	-1.1462	296
12	Tulsa	45.447	301	-0.6095	246
13	Tulane	43.157	342	-2.0061	339

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	55.594	70	-0.8731	285
2	Tulsa	55.308	75	0.0898	169
3	USF	54.477	113	1.4101	48
4	Charlotte	53.265	149	0.9373	76
5	Tulane	51.857	211	0.3396	140
6	UAB	51.047	240	-0.9581	291
7	Temple	51.022	241	-0.6117	251
8	North Texas	50.424	266	0.1263	164
9	Memphis	49.932	284	0.2255	157
10	Wichita State	49.373	297	-0.0212	186
11	ECU	47.576	335	1.0248	69
12	Rice	46.576	348	1.3845	49
13	UTSA	45.481	355	0.9034	79

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	44.801	78	0.6819	116
2	USF	44.716	79	0.6858	115
3	Tulane	43.732	100	0.4924	130
4	Charlotte	43.466	103	-0.0202	184
5	Rice	42.113	129	1.4941	59
6	UTSA	41.153	150	-2.0170	347
7	FAU	40.474	159	-1.5696	321
8	Temple	36.936	238	1.6239	48
9	Memphis	35.380	267	-0.4220	220
10	Wichita State	35.300	270	1.7523	42
11	North Texas	33.717	305	-1.8841	340
12	ECU	31.308	339	-0.2501	205
13	UAB	30.410	351	1.8324	40

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	14.355	32	0.0840	168
2	Rice	12.903	83	0.6748	44
3	Charlotte	12.882	84	-0.1528	228
4	USF	12.415	115	-0.1345	224
5	FAU	11.405	168	-1.1193	356
6	Wichita State	11.095	189	0.0418	179
7	Tulane	10.861	200	-0.2942	260
8	Temple	10.388	236	-0.0916	213
9	UTSA	10.119	255	-0.7076	322
10	Memphis	9.516	287	-0.3061	263
11	North Texas	8.495	334	-1.4121	365
12	UAB	7.827	349	0.4360	86
13	ECU	7.140	358	0.0034	189

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	37.642	71	0.2362	152
2	Tulsa	36.439	105	0.7652	102
3	Rice	36.150	110	2.3640	12
4	Charlotte	35.912	113	-0.3118	211
5	UTSA	35.087	136	-1.5832	337
6	FAU	34.575	146	-1.4704	331
7	Tulane	33.959	160	-0.7393	265
8	Wichita State	31.745	217	1.6549	38
9	Temple	30.413	246	2.0759	15
10	Memphis	29.601	265	-0.3589	214
11	North Texas	28.227	299	-1.4780	332
12	UAB	26.835	324	1.5446	48
13	ECU	25.975	340	0.0606	169

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	39.654	8	-0.5306	255
2	Charlotte	36.285	62	0.3126	140
3	Rice	35.665	88	-0.1361	202
4	Wichita State	34.817	134	-0.9667	294
5	Temple	34.381	161	-2.4864	357
6	USF	32.557	249	-0.4832	252
7	FAU	32.349	257	-2.0316	345
8	Memphis	31.342	305	-0.4222	245
9	Tulane	31.148	315	-0.4774	251
10	North Texas	29.481	347	-3.6542	365
11	UAB	29.227	354	0.0665	174
12	UTSA	28.794	360	-1.0191	298
13	ECU	27.790	364	0.2458	152

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	48.240	3	5.1577	3
2	USF	45.240	16	2.3255	54
3	Temple	44.990	22	-2.1749	308
4	Tulsa	43.290	43	-2.1918	309
5	North Texas	40.500	74	3.5840	20
6	ECU	39.930	89	0.3224	165
7	Charlotte	39.300	102	-1.4444	286
8	UAB	37.530	142	-0.0363	189
9	Wichita State	37.440	147	-0.9141	249
10	Rice	35.730	193	-2.9061	343
11	FAU	34.150	226	0.8456	129
12	Memphis	33.770	238	-1.0097	253
13	UTSA	31.200	298	-1.2606	270

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	27.530	5	1.5520	41
2	Temple	27.044	10	0.1717	178
3	USF	26.747	12	0.9510	100
4	Tulsa	26.120	20	-1.1812	310
5	North Texas	23.470	85	2.2196	15
6	ECU	22.838	110	1.1262	80
7	Charlotte	22.657	123	-1.0587	300
8	UAB	22.609	126	-0.7297	274
9	Wichita State	21.717	156	-1.3198	317
10	Rice	20.397	210	-1.5214	332
11	FAU	20.239	217	0.0321	193
12	Memphis	19.998	221	0.3298	164
13	UTSA	17.273	331	-0.9637	295

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	36.487	11	1.4909	70
2	Tulane	35.927	13	2.2906	30
3	Temple	35.771	16	-0.7305	254
4	North Texas	33.555	44	2.8218	8
5	Tulsa	33.152	48	-1.4104	303
6	UAB	32.308	73	-0.1189	202
7	ECU	32.202	75	0.6817	137
8	Wichita State	32.144	78	-0.5625	242
9	Charlotte	31.912	91	-1.2817	297
10	Rice	29.916	164	-1.6961	320
11	FAU	28.033	221	0.4515	158
12	Memphis	27.875	230	-0.7574	258
13	UTSA	25.226	306	-0.9295	273

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	78.795	11	-0.5480	250
2	Tulane	77.175	24	0.0909	207
3	Temple	75.580	59	1.7482	60
4	USF	72.567	162	-0.3300	235
5	FAU	72.059	188	-0.8213	268
6	Charlotte	70.954	216	-1.1284	287
7	Memphis	70.525	233	3.1499	11
8	ECU	70.261	242	2.0114	48
9	UAB	70.103	246	-1.9780	328
10	North Texas	69.255	274	0.2262	191
11	UTSA	69.231	277	-1.7548	320
12	Rice	67.854	310	-1.8693	326
13	Wichita State	67.311	323	-3.0559	352

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	59.309	41	0.6118	125
2	Tulane	55.661	101	1.7504	57
3	Tulsa	53.899	146	-1.5430	281
4	Memphis	52.222	193	-0.9933	251
5	Temple	50.973	227	2.3516	30
6	North Texas	50.648	240	-1.9956	309
7	UAB	49.518	268	0.3658	148
8	Charlotte	48.828	280	-2.8466	347
9	ECU	46.894	313	0.1992	157
10	FAU	46.551	318	-3.0821	352
11	Rice	45.988	327	-1.2042	266
12	UTSA	44.396	338	-1.2619	268
13	Wichita State	43.672	347	2.4141	27

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	7.698	48	-0.3336	86
2	UAB	7.748	51	-0.2240	114
3	Wichita State	8.023	76	0.6100	316
4	USF	8.375	120	0.1663	207
5	Tulane	8.465	135	0.6435	320
6	Tulsa	8.558	149	0.3382	259
7	ECU	8.667	161	-0.6143	41
8	Charlotte	9.385	237	0.9007	340
9	North Texas	9.447	247	0.4251	290
10	FAU	9.661	270	0.2035	218
11	Rice	9.829	283	0.0595	180
12	Memphis	11.448	353	0.3741	271
13	UTSA	11.866	359	0.8206	333

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	3.386	27	-0.2321	91
2	Tulsa	4.039	102	0.2620	264
3	Tulane	4.170	127	0.1827	244
4	Charlotte	4.465	191	0.6904	348
5	Wichita State	4.646	218	0.1204	220
6	ECU	4.741	235	-0.0558	162
7	Rice	5.130	283	0.1338	227
8	UAB	5.756	341	0.2504	262
9	USF	5.940	348	-0.2956	73
10	North Texas	6.016	351	1.0332	363
11	Memphis	6.052	353	0.1303	225
12	Temple	6.149	357	0.4247	307
13	UTSA	6.332	360	-0.0014	178

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	27.201	28	0.4490	172
2	Charlotte	26.430	55	-0.8944	334
3	Tulane	26.292	60	1.8086	16
4	Tulsa	25.773	79	0.1545	221
5	ECU	25.530	92	-0.0019	247
6	USF	25.329	101	1.0088	90
7	Wichita State	24.642	137	0.5843	149
8	Memphis	24.455	147	-0.0831	261
9	North Texas	24.320	154	0.9448	100
10	Rice	24.297	157	-1.0284	340
11	UAB	23.213	215	0.2880	192
12	FAU	22.199	278	0.3747	180
13	UTSA	20.902	335	0.2266	204

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	78.057	3	-0.4737	198
2	UAB	74.291	27	-0.5883	225
3	FAU	73.183	56	0.2770	66
4	Memphis	72.992	62	-0.1900	142
5	UTSA	72.046	100	-0.2912	161
6	ECU	71.426	128	-0.4614	196
7	Tulsa	70.702	162	0.2240	72
8	Rice	70.078	195	0.1846	79
9	Tulane	69.809	205	0.5879	36
10	Wichita State	69.499	218	0.5705	39
11	Temple	67.615	295	-0.4423	192
12	North Texas	67.588	298	1.5419	6
13	Charlotte	66.035	342	0.1594	81

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	0.475	33	-0.0040	116
2	North Texas	0.475	33	0.0036	212
3	Wichita State	0.478	46	-0.0043	106
4	USF	0.498	99	-0.0041	114
5	UAB	0.500	102	-0.0022	134
6	Tulsa	0.500	106	-0.0082	68
7	FAU	0.505	130	0.0033	207
8	Tulane	0.507	141	-0.0138	33
9	Temple	0.508	148	0.0027	200
10	Charlotte	0.513	178	-0.0095	59
11	Rice	0.515	183	-0.0088	64
12	ECU	0.525	234	-0.0080	72
13	UTSA	0.536	273	0.0051	226

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.982	36	0.0004	159
2	Wichita State	0.988	39	-0.0212	43
3	Memphis	1.001	56	-0.0064	111
4	USF	1.017	75	-0.0059	114
5	UAB	1.024	88	-0.0089	91
6	FAU	1.045	126	0.0100	221
7	Tulsa	1.048	132	-0.0021	143
8	Temple	1.050	137	0.0044	191
9	Tulane	1.063	178	-0.0050	122
10	ECU	1.085	234	-0.0024	139
11	Rice	1.101	263	-0.0017	144
12	Charlotte	1.108	278	0.0104	226
13	UTSA	1.174	352	0.0442	348

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.205	9	0.0089	22
2	Memphis	0.187	30	0.0045	62
3	USF	0.170	103	-0.0048	234
4	Tulane	0.165	127	-0.0004	142
5	Wichita State	0.157	179	0.0146	5
6	ECU	0.157	180	-0.0080	299
7	UAB	0.155	201	0.0040	68
8	FAU	0.152	220	-0.0066	270
9	Rice	0.147	243	-0.0044	224
10	Temple	0.147	250	0.0069	35
11	Tulsa	0.143	275	-0.0084	304
12	UTSA	0.140	297	-0.0126	353
13	Charlotte	0.129	341	-0.0067	272

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	75.420	41	-0.0047	250
2	FAU	75.380	42	0.0011	183
3	Wichita State	74.420	71	0.0006	190
4	Temple	74.000	87	-0.0041	242
5	Tulsa	72.930	123	-0.0067	267
6	USF	72.490	142	-0.0011	208
7	Charlotte	70.730	218	-0.0215	350
8	ECU	69.330	277	-0.0172	337
9	North Texas	69.300	279	-0.0152	330
10	Rice	69.010	283	-0.0104	306
11	Memphis	67.940	319	0.0004	192
12	Tulane	66.480	340	-0.0101	301
13	UTSA	62.820	363	-0.0255	357

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	0.300	48	-0.0163	62
2	Tulsa	0.324	90	-0.0046	151
3	ECU	0.340	128	-0.0181	55
4	Wichita State	0.347	147	0.0236	321
5	UTSA	0.350	161	-0.0127	89
6	Temple	0.363	199	0.0656	363
7	FAU	0.373	223	0.0003	191
8	Tulane	0.385	249	0.0334	348
9	USF	0.406	285	-0.0294	23
10	Rice	0.408	287	0.0123	269
11	Charlotte	0.410	293	-0.0077	127
12	Memphis	0.428	319	0.0438	358
13	North Texas	0.469	349	-0.0209	41

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	102.734	43	-0.2364	82
2	Wichita State	103.185	51	-0.0529	97
3	North Texas	103.981	57	0.5966	186
4	USF	105.748	70	-0.3535	73
5	FAU	108.245	112	-0.5387	53
6	UAB	108.590	119	-0.4756	60
7	Temple	109.313	128	-0.2006	83
8	Tulsa	109.766	137	0.0627	108
9	Tulane	112.227	184	0.2379	136
10	ECU	113.690	209	-0.1245	91
11	Charlotte	115.082	240	0.0840	111
12	Rice	115.482	246	1.7251	312
13	UTSA	123.163	336	1.4804	288

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	32.276	12	0.5237	245
2	Memphis	32.861	15	-0.8899	40
3	USF	34.142	41	-0.0164	148
4	Wichita State	35.059	86	-1.0389	26
5	FAU	36.084	122	0.5159	242
6	Tulane	36.516	144	-0.8785	42
7	UAB	36.559	148	0.1317	171
8	Tulsa	36.718	160	0.0602	160
9	Temple	37.164	184	-0.6959	68
10	Charlotte	37.639	213	0.2875	202
11	Rice	37.798	222	-0.0929	140
12	ECU	38.020	244	0.2539	191
13	UTSA	40.886	334	2.1056	361

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	76.583	4	0.2351	191
2	Memphis	80.173	60	-1.7856	19
3	USF	80.372	69	1.6188	339
4	FAU	81.652	111	0.3721	208
5	Wichita State	82.419	140	-2.2993	8
6	Rice	83.430	180	0.5874	236
7	Temple	83.443	182	-2.3754	6
8	Tulane	83.545	191	-0.5227	97
9	UAB	84.042	219	0.7341	251
10	ECU	84.437	244	2.2594	359
11	Charlotte	84.789	260	2.0693	354
12	Tulsa	85.179	276	1.5801	335
13	UTSA	89.042	353	2.7510	363

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	40.950	31	-0.1807	126
2	North Texas	41.995	55	0.5461	239
3	Wichita State	42.607	74	-0.1191	135
4	USF	42.837	82	-0.8066	63
5	Tulsa	43.213	94	-0.6742	73
6	UAB	43.369	102	-0.1169	136
7	Tulane	43.836	124	-0.8482	57
8	FAU	44.196	143	0.3781	215
9	Charlotte	44.579	168	-0.7167	68
10	Temple	44.727	178	0.5376	236
11	ECU	45.253	209	-0.7880	64
12	Rice	45.402	218	-0.3486	103
13	UTSA	45.976	251	0.8521	288

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	55.705	45	-0.8339	95
2	UTSA	57.617	87	0.8458	278
3	ECU	59.675	159	-0.9346	81
4	Tulane	59.775	162	0.9356	287
5	Tulsa	59.900	165	-0.0940	174
6	UAB	60.066	174	-0.7353	107
7	Charlotte	60.148	178	-0.2106	163
8	USF	60.930	201	-2.6707	13
9	Temple	62.827	258	0.5503	244
10	North Texas	62.845	261	0.7955	272
11	FAU	63.727	288	-0.3403	152
12	Rice	65.185	326	1.2842	309
13	Wichita State	65.454	331	0.5917	250

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	22.362	24	-0.3498	111
2	USF	22.999	39	-0.8726	42
3	North Texas	23.837	68	0.7760	291
4	Tulane	25.121	123	0.0636	172
5	Tulsa	25.140	125	0.0870	180
6	UAB	25.485	149	0.2372	212
7	FAU	25.716	164	0.5223	260
8	ECU	25.908	176	0.0109	163
9	Charlotte	26.119	189	0.4054	238
10	Wichita State	26.384	213	-0.3113	120
11	Temple	27.126	256	0.0884	181
12	UTSA	27.321	267	2.3674	362
13	Rice	27.795	290	0.7933	293

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	44.678	29	-1.7790	28
2	North Texas	48.201	102	0.7127	251
3	USF	49.038	143	-1.2753	56
4	Tulane	50.175	181	0.4684	230
5	ECU	50.443	192	0.5368	239
6	UAB	50.595	201	-0.2238	153
7	Charlotte	50.834	211	1.0687	287
8	Tulsa	51.116	219	0.8884	271
9	UTSA	51.138	221	2.4571	354
10	FAU	52.013	256	-0.1336	164
11	Temple	52.468	270	-0.8149	93
12	Wichita State	53.908	303	-1.0123	80
13	Rice	54.445	317	1.5106	325

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	47.616	37	-0.7737	83
2	North Texas	48.763	66	0.7448	252
3	FAU	49.598	87	1.1229	282
4	Wichita State	49.638	88	0.2289	192
5	Tulsa	49.910	92	-0.3153	122
6	Memphis	50.342	110	1.1927	286
7	UAB	50.400	113	0.7087	249
8	Tulane	50.703	127	-0.4183	113
9	Rice	50.752	132	0.2225	191
10	Charlotte	51.465	157	-0.1867	142
11	ECU	51.548	165	-0.3967	114
12	Temple	52.381	196	1.2679	298
13	UTSA	53.738	258	1.7680	328

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	34.546	35	-0.5917	116
2	Rice	34.815	40	-1.2842	57
3	FAU	36.273	78	0.3403	214
4	North Texas	37.155	105	-0.7955	94
5	Temple	37.173	108	-0.5503	122
6	USF	39.070	165	2.6707	353
7	Charlotte	39.852	188	0.2106	203
8	UAB	39.934	192	0.7353	259
9	Tulsa	40.100	201	0.0940	192
10	Tulane	40.225	204	-0.9356	79
11	ECU	40.325	207	0.9346	285
12	UTSA	42.383	279	-0.8458	88
13	Memphis	44.295	321	0.8339	271

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	8.439	12	-0.2522	116
2	Wichita State	8.675	16	-0.7275	38
3	Rice	10.003	75	-0.8862	19
4	Temple	10.038	77	-0.7843	30
5	FAU	10.368	108	-0.0063	175
6	Memphis	10.500	121	-0.5401	52
7	UAB	11.074	180	-0.1055	147
8	USF	11.143	186	0.8562	332
9	Tulane	11.395	202	-0.9421	13
10	Charlotte	11.521	215	-0.1179	144
11	Tulsa	11.578	223	-0.0268	172
12	ECU	12.112	274	0.2430	224
13	UTSA	13.566	339	-0.2619	114

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	28.381	41	-0.4775	117
2	Wichita State	28.511	44	-1.2871	46
3	Rice	28.985	60	-0.9232	75
4	FAU	29.639	72	0.5057	236
5	Temple	30.975	115	-1.5606	34
6	USF	31.334	126	2.8941	359
7	Tulane	33.370	193	-0.9910	70
8	UAB	33.447	197	0.9578	283
9	Charlotte	33.956	224	1.0006	294
10	ECU	33.994	227	1.7227	331
11	Tulsa	34.063	233	0.6917	257
12	Memphis	35.495	279	-0.0066	167
13	UTSA	37.905	326	0.2939	216

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	29.022	12	-1.5383	42
2	Wichita State	29.147	15	-1.0488	75
3	North Texas	29.423	18	-0.5174	121
4	Temple	31.615	70	-1.0612	72
5	UAB	32.561	111	-1.1343	63
6	Tulsa	33.807	183	-0.3888	139
7	Rice	34.042	192	-2.2579	13
8	Tulane	34.170	201	-1.9038	20
9	Charlotte	34.224	202	-0.9969	78
10	ECU	34.272	205	-0.8249	95
11	FAU	34.810	234	-0.2425	151
12	UTSA	35.435	264	-1.2248	58
13	USF	35.530	269	-0.1758	159

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	29.990	48	-1.6336	62
2	Tulsa	32.420	90	-0.4642	151
3	ECU	34.030	128	-1.8113	55
4	Wichita State	34.720	147	2.3569	321
5	UTSA	35.040	161	-1.2750	89
6	Temple	36.280	199	6.5636	363
7	FAU	37.300	223	0.0314	191
8	Tulane	38.530	249	3.3437	348
9	USF	40.590	285	-2.9413	23
10	Rice	40.760	287	1.2324	269
11	Charlotte	41.040	293	-0.7668	127
12	Memphis	42.800	319	4.3785	358
13	North Texas	46.860	349	-2.0877	41

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	18.213	60	-1.0356	49
2	Tulsa	19.700	110	-0.2776	141
3	Wichita State	19.990	127	0.6812	256
4	ECU	20.329	143	-0.9941	50
5	Temple	20.596	155	2.6172	359
6	Tulane	21.918	219	2.1988	348
7	FAU	21.954	224	-0.0273	177
8	UTSA	22.034	229	0.4727	233
9	USF	22.321	249	-1.4103	25
10	Memphis	23.750	298	1.6985	337
11	Charlotte	24.033	311	0.5823	249
12	Rice	24.549	323	0.8986	288
13	North Texas	25.161	338	-0.7521	76

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	24.799	46	-1.1837	56
2	Tulsa	27.304	107	0.0282	178
3	ECU	28.091	131	-0.7257	98
4	Wichita State	28.435	148	1.0085	281
5	Temple	28.934	173	3.4586	363
6	FAU	30.111	226	0.2173	205
7	UTSA	30.586	244	0.1031	192
8	Tulane	31.669	272	2.7096	357
9	USF	31.881	280	-1.7383	31
10	Rice	33.123	312	1.3674	308
11	Memphis	33.183	315	2.3434	345
12	Charlotte	34.045	325	0.2992	215
13	North Texas	35.159	341	-1.3371	47

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	68.681	40	0.0454	177
2	Wichita State	69.034	47	0.4712	217
3	Charlotte	69.188	55	0.7687	241
4	USF	69.248	57	-0.5217	114
5	Memphis	70.500	98	-0.8056	98
6	Temple	70.574	100	0.7164	236
7	North Texas	71.093	134	1.0110	263
8	Tulsa	71.725	171	-1.1333	73
9	ECU	71.965	178	-1.5615	44
10	FAU	72.997	230	-0.6672	107
11	UTSA	73.349	255	1.3744	288
12	Rice	73.951	277	-0.0866	159
13	UAB	74.210	291	-1.6707	41

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	44.413	23	-2.9483	25
2	FAU	46.808	50	-0.3533	150
3	Rice	47.170	57	-3.3961	15
4	North Texas	48.320	82	-1.2885	88
5	Charlotte	49.482	106	0.5997	234
6	Tulsa	49.911	121	0.6457	236
7	USF	50.176	127	1.1906	274
8	Temple	50.813	141	0.2193	205
9	UAB	51.097	151	-1.7910	65
10	ECU	54.942	245	0.8218	250
11	Memphis	55.043	251	-2.4292	39
12	Tulane	55.487	268	-1.3592	81
13	UTSA	57.125	300	0.9386	260

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	13.477	8	1.3287	5
2	Memphis	12.872	15	0.2261	97
3	Tulane	11.155	57	-0.2528	228
4	USF	11.093	60	-0.0877	183
5	UAB	10.686	86	0.6352	37
6	Rice	9.662	161	-0.0329	168
7	ECU	9.209	190	-0.7169	330
8	Tulsa	9.065	198	-0.7276	331
9	UTSA	8.915	212	-0.8168	339
10	Wichita State	8.907	213	1.1624	8
11	Temple	8.291	263	0.1744	112
12	FAU	8.153	276	-0.2148	219
13	Charlotte	7.107	339	-0.4202	270

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	7.434	12	-0.2285	254
2	Tulane	6.890	24	0.2301	100
3	North Texas	6.607	30	-0.1898	239
4	Temple	6.414	39	-0.2167	250
5	UTSA	6.182	51	0.4397	49
6	ECU	6.020	59	0.4943	41
7	Memphis	5.927	62	0.0445	154
8	Rice	5.716	76	0.1085	129
9	USF	5.610	89	-0.0937	204
10	Wichita State	5.499	98	-0.0546	193
11	Charlotte	5.356	108	-0.1939	242
12	UAB	4.670	181	0.2973	86
13	Tulsa	3.368	317	0.0661	140

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	20.223	4	-0.4952	86
2	ECU	23.021	56	-0.3527	117
3	Tulsa	23.518	77	-0.0950	164
4	UTSA	24.462	123	-0.1277	161
5	FAU	25.180	170	-0.1465	157
6	Wichita State	25.259	175	0.6775	298
7	Tulane	25.631	204	1.2507	347
8	Temple	25.641	205	1.5388	357
9	USF	26.280	252	-0.5109	82
10	Charlotte	27.245	303	0.2258	236
11	Rice	27.366	310	0.2924	247
12	Memphis	27.461	313	0.4542	271
13	North Texas	28.724	345	-0.7298	50

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	78.035	1	-0.9546	297
2	UAB	73.829	37	-0.3429	190
3	FAU	73.251	51	0.7336	36
4	Memphis	72.874	61	-0.2731	174
5	UTSA	71.115	138	-0.5384	230
6	Wichita State	70.744	155	0.7917	33
7	ECU	70.674	160	0.1222	103
8	Tulsa	70.408	174	0.4519	58
9	Rice	70.351	177	0.4514	59
10	Tulane	69.880	206	0.4725	53
11	North Texas	68.661	265	1.7772	5
12	Temple	68.028	286	-0.5130	226
13	Charlotte	66.201	342	-0.2428	167