Conferences – HoopSci

College Basketball Analytics, Insights, and Trends

Conferences
- America East
- American
- Atlantic 10
- ACC
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
- Big East
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
- Big West
- Coastal
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
- MAAC
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
- SEC
- Southern
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Teams
- America East
  - Albany
  - Bryant
  - Binghamton
  - Maine
  - New Hampshire
  - NJIT
  - UMass Lowell
  - UMBC
  - Vermont
- American
  - Charlotte
  - East Carolina
  - Florida Atlantic
  - Memphis
  - North Texas
  - Rice
  - Temple
  - Tulane
  - Tulsa
  - UAB
  - USF
  - UTSA
  - Wichita State
- Atlantic 10
  - Davidson
  - Dayton
  - Duquesne
  - Fordham
  - George Mason
  - George Washington
  - La Salle
  - Loyola-Chicago
  - Richmond
  - St. Josephs
  - Saint Louis
  - St. Bonaventure
  - Rhode Island
  - VCU
- ACC
  - Boston College
  - California
  - Clemson
  - Duke
  - Florida State
  - Georgia Tech
  - Louisville
  - Miami
  - NC State
  - North Carolina
  - Notre Dame
  - Pitt
  - SMU
  - Stanford
  - Syracuse
  - Virginia
  - Virginia Tech
  - Wake Forest
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
  - Arizona
  - Arizona State
  - Baylor
  - BYU
  - Cincinnati
  - Colorado
  - Houston
  - Iowa State
  - Kansas
  - Kansas State
  - Oklahoma State
  - TCU
  - Texas Tech
  - UCF
  - Utah
  - West Virginia
- Big East
  - Butler
  - Creighton
  - Depaul
  - Georgetown
  - Marquette
  - Providence
  - Seton Hall
  - St. John’s
  - UConn
  - Villanova
  - Xavier
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
  - Illinois
  - Indiana
  - Iowa
  - Maryland
  - Michigan State
  - Minnesota
  - Nebraska
  - Northwestern
  - Ohio State
  - Oregon
  - Penn State
  - Purdue
  - Rutgers
  - UCLA
  - USC
  - Washington
  - Wisconsin
- Big West
- Coastal
  - Campbell
  - Charleston
  - Drexel
  - Elon
  - Hampton
  - Hofstra
  - Monmouth
  - North Carolina A&T
  - Northeastern
  - Stony Brook
  - Towson
  - UNC Wilmington
  - William & Mary
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
  - Brown
  - Columbia
  - Cornell
  - Dartmouth
  - Harvard
  - Pennsylvania
  - Princeton
  - Yale
- MAAC
  - Canisius
  - Fairfield
  - Iona
  - Manhattan
  - Marist
  - Merrimack
  - Mt. St. Mary’s
  - Niagara
  - Quinnipiac
  - Rider
  - Sacred Heart
  - Saint Peter’s
  - Siena
- Mid-American
  - Akron
  - Ball State
  - Bowling Green
  - Buffalo
  - Central Michigan
  - Eastern Michigan
  - Kent State
  - Miami (OH)
  - Northern Illinois
  - Ohio
  - Toledo
  - UMass
  - Western Michigan
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
  - Belmont
  - Bradley
  - Drake
  - Evansville
  - Illinois State
  - Indiana State
  - Murray State
  - Northern Iowa
  - Southern Illinois
  - UIC
  - Valparaiso
- Mountain West
  - Air Force
  - Boise State
  - Colorado State
  - Fresno State
  - Grand Canyon
  - Nevada
  - New Mexico
  - San Diego State
  - San Jose State
  - UNLV
  - Utah State
  - Wyoming
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
  - American
  - Army
  - Boston University
  - Bucknell
  - Colgate
  - Holy Cross
  - Lafayette
  - Lehigh
  - Loyola (MD)
  - Navy
- SEC
  - Alabama
  - Arkansas
  - Auburn
  - Florida
  - Georgia
  - Kentucky
  - LSU
  - Mississippi State
  - Missouri
  - Oklahoma
  - Ole Miss
  - South Carolina
  - Tennessee
  - Texas
  - Texas A&M
  - Vanderbilt
- Southern
  - Chattanooga
  - East Tennessee State
  - Furman
  - Mercer
  - Samford
  - The Citadel
  - UNC Greensboro
  - VMI
  - Western Carolina
  - Wofford
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Games
Models
Statistics
Efficiency Trajectories
Articles
Contact

Search for:

Standings
Statistics
Trend Lab

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	7.385	101	0.1605	163
2	SF Austin	3.723	129	3.2804	17
3	UT Rio Grande	-6.931	220	0.2019	159
4	Lamar	-9.392	242	-0.3719	206
5	Texas A&M-CC	-10.073	250	-0.9217	247
6	New Orleans	-11.866	264	2.0811	56
7	Nicholls	-12.657	270	-0.5108	213
8	SE Louisiana	-16.220	301	-0.7754	234
9	Incarnate Word	-19.277	322	-0.2519	194
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	-20.180	330	0.1907	161
11	Houston Baptist	-20.482	333	-0.7921	236
12	Northwestern St	-22.560	337	-1.6105	289

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.233	31	-0.0028	189
2	SF Austin	0.181	56	0.0278	26
3	UT Rio Grande	0.023	180	0.0123	86
4	Lamar	-0.010	202	-0.0006	172
5	Texas A&M-CC	-0.045	233	-0.0039	200
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	-0.047	237	0.0072	112
7	Incarnate Word	-0.051	242	0.0046	135
8	New Orleans	-0.090	271	0.0198	52
9	Nicholls	-0.123	292	-0.0004	167
10	Houston Baptist	-0.126	297	-0.0157	285
11	SE Louisiana	-0.157	321	-0.0075	231
12	Northwestern St	-0.188	336	0.0002	163

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1647.078	39	10.6975	56
2	SF Austin	1551.840	111	15.4543	28
3	Lamar	1486.082	202	4.9126	120
4	Texas A&M-CC	1485.839	203	-5.3895	244
5	Nicholls	1485.624	204	-2.8767	212
6	Incarnate Word	1407.582	287	14.8692	31
7	Northwestern St	1405.906	289	0.1877	180
8	SE Louisiana	1403.672	295	-15.2802	329
9	UT Rio Grande	1395.259	310	0.5701	175
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	1355.784	337	3.4205	138
11	Houston Baptist	1352.616	341	2.3463	154
12	New Orleans	1349.728	343	6.8095	96

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.583	50	0.0101	122
2	SF Austin	0.542	96	0.0090	134
3	Texas A&M-CC	0.495	194	0.0078	154
4	Nicholls	0.487	205	0.0146	81
5	New Orleans	0.474	225	0.0019	217
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.462	236	0.0199	45
7	UT Rio Grande	0.452	259	0.0013	229
8	Lamar	0.443	277	-0.0058	296
9	Incarnate Word	0.426	309	0.0053	179
10	Houston Baptist	0.415	324	0.0010	232
11	Northwestern St	0.414	325	0.0014	224
12	SE Louisiana	0.411	329	-0.0008	247

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	0.524	142	0.0156	34
2	McNeese	0.523	146	-0.0102	311
3	UT Rio Grande	0.521	157	0.0070	115
4	Nicholls	0.518	165	0.0038	157
5	SF Austin	0.514	177	0.0014	177
6	Northwestern St	0.512	189	0.0180	21
7	New Orleans	0.506	213	0.0160	30
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.491	266	0.0023	174
9	Lamar	0.483	288	0.0115	63
10	Incarnate Word	0.482	291	-0.0272	363
11	Texas A&M-CC	0.467	331	-0.0046	254
12	SE Louisiana	0.458	347	-0.0054	261

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1.196	22	-0.0036	243
2	SF Austin	1.116	115	0.0307	42
3	Incarnate Word	1.101	137	-0.0427	363
4	UT Rio Grande	1.082	175	0.0104	150
5	Northwestern St	1.068	201	0.0454	8
6	Nicholls	1.061	212	0.0075	174
7	New Orleans	1.047	240	0.0428	13
8	Houston Baptist	1.040	258	0.0454	9
9	Lamar	1.035	265	0.0246	63
10	Texas A&M-CC	1.021	296	-0.0137	305
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	1.005	318	0.0174	107
12	SE Louisiana	0.961	341	-0.0221	337

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.135	32	-0.0113	25
2	McNeese	0.140	52	-0.0002	222
3	Incarnate Word	0.141	62	-0.0026	169
4	Nicholls	0.164	220	0.0052	308
5	SE Louisiana	0.164	222	0.0030	280
6	Lamar	0.170	255	0.0022	270
7	Texas A&M-CC	0.170	257	0.0069	325
8	Houston Baptist	0.172	265	0.0036	289
9	UT Rio Grande	0.172	269	0.0003	231
10	Northwestern St	0.174	279	-0.0095	43
11	New Orleans	0.187	330	-0.0009	206
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.192	344	-0.0069	85

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	36.790	13	0.0032	119
2	Lamar	33.900	45	-0.0020	165
3	New Orleans	33.480	54	0.0250	13
4	SF Austin	33.370	57	0.0100	73
5	Incarnate Word	29.250	167	-0.0306	352
6	Houston Baptist	28.330	191	0.0145	41
7	Nicholls	26.880	243	0.0045	100
8	Texas A&M-CC	26.230	257	-0.0329	356
9	SE Louisiana	25.110	280	-0.0198	300
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	24.260	299	0.0027	121
11	UT Rio Grande	24.230	300	-0.0189	294
12	Northwestern St	24.110	303	-0.0064	206

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	0.449	23	0.0323	41
2	New Orleans	0.427	51	0.0486	6
3	SE Louisiana	0.410	75	0.0123	129
4	Texas A&M-CC	0.398	94	0.0394	23
5	McNeese	0.392	119	0.0090	147
6	Houston Baptist	0.377	146	0.0329	37
7	Nicholls	0.367	175	-0.0100	279
8	Incarnate Word	0.339	243	-0.0001	211
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.311	294	0.0023	195
10	SF Austin	0.309	297	0.0069	158
11	Lamar	0.304	301	0.0158	103
12	UT Rio Grande	0.270	348	0.0253	60

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	115.462	92	0.6710	143
2	SF Austin	107.153	198	2.7749	16
3	New Orleans	107.016	202	2.1669	32
4	Nicholls	105.169	237	1.3448	82
5	Northwestern St	104.205	254	0.6387	146
6	Houston Baptist	103.708	267	0.9992	110
7	UT Rio Grande	103.073	273	-0.8420	291
8	Lamar	101.584	290	-0.2560	250
9	Incarnate Word	101.377	291	-0.7829	287
10	SE Louisiana	96.823	337	-0.4638	266
11	Texas A&M-CC	96.750	338	-1.6639	340
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	96.369	341	0.4234	172

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	42.233	14	-0.5208	276
2	SF Austin	41.005	41	0.7769	77
3	UT Rio Grande	38.944	120	-0.2588	235
4	Incarnate Word	38.830	124	-1.9728	363
5	Lamar	37.597	199	0.3630	134
6	Houston Baptist	36.989	230	0.7276	84
7	Texas A&M-CC	36.799	238	-1.2438	350
8	Nicholls	36.595	245	0.0807	176
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	35.783	280	0.9510	53
10	Northwestern St	35.556	289	1.2889	29
11	New Orleans	35.136	303	0.8777	60
12	SE Louisiana	32.779	350	-0.9214	321

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	91.332	3	1.4124	46
2	Incarnate Word	88.009	21	0.2863	153
3	Lamar	87.719	26	-0.5190	240
4	McNeese	87.685	27	0.3810	142
5	UT Rio Grande	84.876	117	-1.3773	329
6	Nicholls	83.119	210	0.4288	138
7	Texas A&M-CC	82.541	232	-2.3067	358
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	81.715	267	1.0078	75
9	Houston Baptist	80.858	294	-0.5839	247
10	SE Louisiana	80.710	301	-1.0911	298
11	New Orleans	79.570	326	-1.1745	311
12	Northwestern St	77.656	358	-0.6562	256

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	48.390	43	-0.7270	296
2	Houston Baptist	45.811	150	1.1982	35
3	UT Rio Grande	45.725	157	0.4880	126
4	Northwestern St	45.617	165	1.9593	6
5	SF Austin	44.834	211	0.1603	177
6	Texas A&M-CC	44.754	215	-0.2985	239
7	New Orleans	44.456	236	1.6970	14
8	Incarnate Word	44.089	253	-2.2268	363
9	Nicholls	44.027	257	-0.0429	204
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	43.464	271	0.5248	120
11	Lamar	43.026	293	0.8791	74
12	SE Louisiana	40.703	347	-0.5517	277

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	68.507	29	0.2163	158
2	McNeese	65.420	75	-0.2349	202
3	Lamar	65.173	82	-0.6185	246
4	New Orleans	63.952	112	0.9382	81
5	Northwestern St	63.759	115	0.1909	160
6	Incarnate Word	62.275	152	0.3871	143
7	Houston Baptist	61.942	155	0.6744	113
8	SE Louisiana	60.244	187	0.0881	171
9	SF Austin	59.596	198	-0.7730	262
10	UT Rio Grande	56.821	247	-1.5337	312
11	Nicholls	54.592	309	-2.4284	346
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	54.000	320	1.1508	62

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	32.483	5	-0.0726	187
2	Texas A&M-CC	28.111	103	-0.7720	302
3	SF Austin	27.904	111	0.6006	93
4	Lamar	27.531	137	-0.0089	178
5	Incarnate Word	26.612	177	-1.0568	333
6	Houston Baptist	26.574	179	0.1954	139
7	Northwestern St	25.799	215	1.5906	9
8	UT Rio Grande	25.437	231	-0.2730	226
9	New Orleans	25.408	233	1.0612	44
10	SE Louisiana	23.964	296	-0.8470	312
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	23.332	316	1.2719	28
12	Nicholls	23.050	323	-0.7390	296

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	57.523	27	-0.9549	268
2	McNeese	57.391	29	-0.0693	181
3	Texas A&M-CC	56.517	40	-1.3738	298
4	Incarnate Word	54.736	71	0.5598	125
5	SF Austin	54.103	84	0.1664	152
6	New Orleans	50.566	179	-0.2763	201
7	Houston Baptist	49.890	196	0.2221	147
8	Northwestern St	49.490	209	-0.3648	210
9	SE Louisiana	48.579	222	-0.7095	244
10	UT Rio Grande	48.131	233	-1.8980	335
11	Nicholls	45.291	300	-1.8916	334
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	44.101	322	1.5154	50

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	56.351	74	-0.0589	200
2	UT Rio Grande	53.556	150	1.8280	27
3	Houston Baptist	53.438	153	0.2869	155
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	52.504	188	0.7865	96
5	Northwestern St	51.589	223	3.4534	3
6	SF Austin	51.392	229	1.0645	70
7	Nicholls	51.028	242	0.4430	137
8	New Orleans	50.232	272	1.9862	19
9	Texas A&M-CC	50.170	274	-0.0760	201
10	SE Louisiana	49.786	287	-0.9768	296
11	Incarnate Word	48.711	311	-2.1185	350
12	Lamar	47.627	332	0.8403	92

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	46.000	46	-1.1508	304
2	Nicholls	45.408	57	2.4284	20
3	UT Rio Grande	43.179	119	1.5337	54
4	SF Austin	40.404	168	0.7730	104
5	SE Louisiana	39.756	179	-0.0881	195
6	Houston Baptist	38.058	211	-0.6744	253
7	Incarnate Word	37.725	214	-0.3871	223
8	Northwestern St	36.241	251	-0.1909	206
9	New Orleans	36.048	254	-0.9382	285
10	Lamar	34.827	284	0.6185	120
11	McNeese	34.580	291	0.2349	164
12	Texas A&M-CC	31.493	337	-0.2163	208

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Nicholls	13.545	57	0.8197	54
2	UT Rio Grande	13.508	61	0.0142	188
3	SF Austin	13.101	80	0.1763	149
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	12.451	104	-0.3209	260
5	Incarnate Word	12.218	125	-0.9160	351
6	Houston Baptist	10.415	235	0.5322	83
7	Lamar	10.066	260	0.3720	105
8	Northwestern St	9.757	270	-0.3017	257
9	McNeese	9.749	271	-0.4482	280
10	New Orleans	9.728	274	-0.1835	226
11	SE Louisiana	8.815	319	-0.0745	207
12	Texas A&M-CC	8.687	329	-0.4718	286

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Nicholls	37.828	70	2.3204	21
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	37.614	72	-0.5076	241
3	SF Austin	37.229	81	1.2460	59
4	UT Rio Grande	36.745	92	0.5207	118
5	Incarnate Word	33.273	180	-0.2735	217
6	SE Louisiana	32.131	204	-0.3817	229
7	Houston Baptist	30.968	236	-0.8060	281
8	McNeese	30.294	250	0.4504	125
9	Lamar	30.196	254	0.4359	127
10	New Orleans	29.003	281	-0.8981	287
11	Northwestern St	28.166	300	-0.2915	219
12	Texas A&M-CC	26.024	336	-0.9329	295

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Nicholls	35.979	76	-0.1678	205
2	UT Rio Grande	35.881	81	-0.2163	212
3	SF Austin	35.126	127	-0.8261	289
4	Incarnate Word	35.097	129	-3.0163	360
5	Northwestern St	34.906	135	-0.4188	238
6	Lamar	33.912	184	1.1639	83
7	Texas A&M-CC	33.120	221	-0.6275	272
8	New Orleans	32.947	228	0.0127	192
9	Houston Baptist	32.755	236	1.8925	31
10	McNeese	32.550	244	-1.5610	330
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	32.470	251	-0.6604	275
12	SE Louisiana	28.453	357	0.2490	170

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	44.900	23	3.2344	41
2	New Orleans	42.690	51	4.8569	6
3	SE Louisiana	40.980	75	1.2291	129
4	Texas A&M-CC	39.830	94	3.9356	23
5	McNeese	39.180	119	0.9026	147
6	Houston Baptist	37.700	146	3.2872	37
7	Nicholls	36.670	175	-1.0017	279
8	Incarnate Word	33.940	243	-0.0050	211
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	31.090	294	0.2336	195
10	SF Austin	30.870	297	0.6868	158
11	Lamar	30.360	301	1.5849	103
12	UT Rio Grande	26.950	348	2.5302	60

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	25.904	27	2.2631	23
2	McNeese	25.384	33	1.1288	89
3	New Orleans	24.676	51	2.7063	9
4	SE Louisiana	21.762	154	-0.2896	266
5	Houston Baptist	20.668	199	2.3232	20
6	Incarnate Word	20.187	219	0.5909	149
7	Texas A&M-CC	19.782	230	1.5903	56
8	Nicholls	19.404	242	-0.2317	256
9	Lamar	18.246	292	1.3769	71
10	UT Rio Grande	16.849	336	1.5417	58
11	SF Austin	16.538	341	1.3454	75
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	16.507	342	0.2178	203

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	34.809	31	2.4493	30
2	McNeese	32.991	67	0.9536	128
3	New Orleans	32.870	70	3.0539	12
4	SE Louisiana	31.652	107	0.6763	152
5	Houston Baptist	30.652	141	2.6197	24
6	Texas A&M-CC	29.723	176	2.1271	47
7	Nicholls	29.333	189	-0.6210	275
8	Incarnate Word	28.465	212	0.1053	222
9	Lamar	25.579	288	1.1371	112
10	SF Austin	25.208	303	1.2613	103
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	24.309	320	0.6547	156
12	UT Rio Grande	23.166	345	1.7916	60

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	76.417	39	1.6571	72
2	New Orleans	74.734	83	0.8114	143
3	Northwestern St	74.345	97	1.3715	99
4	UT Rio Grande	73.499	131	2.3614	37
5	Incarnate Word	70.673	226	1.3695	100
6	SE Louisiana	70.594	227	-2.0422	326
7	Lamar	69.224	272	2.2947	42
8	Houston Baptist	67.493	312	1.9137	53
9	SF Austin	67.233	321	1.4431	93
10	Nicholls	67.217	324	0.8250	140
11	Texas A&M-CC	66.586	334	0.5893	164
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	66.418	337	-0.9063	281

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	64.519	9	-0.7118	237
2	UT Rio Grande	61.551	24	3.5886	12
3	Houston Baptist	58.957	47	4.4090	3
4	SE Louisiana	55.297	120	2.8647	31
5	Lamar	55.003	125	-0.7941	240
6	Nicholls	53.816	152	2.2389	55
7	Texas A&M-CC	51.865	210	-3.3557	351
8	Northwestern St	51.418	222	-0.1711	197
9	SF Austin	49.906	255	-1.4095	276
10	New Orleans	48.953	279	-2.3748	326
11	McNeese	47.505	306	-2.5653	335
12	Incarnate Word	44.922	338	-0.7011	236

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	6.080	3	-0.1280	155
2	Incarnate Word	7.066	28	0.4380	287
3	SF Austin	7.565	56	-0.4809	73
4	Texas A&M-CC	8.155	102	0.7778	335
5	UT Rio Grande	8.288	124	0.6564	319
6	Nicholls	8.293	125	0.1269	219
7	SE Louisiana	8.408	138	-0.1140	158
8	Houston Baptist	9.421	251	0.6771	322
9	Northwestern St	9.531	262	-0.5992	52
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	9.630	274	0.0388	196
11	Lamar	10.165	310	0.1858	229
12	New Orleans	10.827	334	0.3724	275

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	3.594	54	-0.0331	158
2	McNeese	3.643	63	-0.2961	66
3	Incarnate Word	3.934	105	0.0267	181
4	Houston Baptist	4.255	152	0.2869	278
5	Lamar	4.269	156	-0.1612	110
6	Nicholls	4.448	180	-0.4395	28
7	SE Louisiana	4.523	193	0.1581	236
8	UT Rio Grande	4.578	206	-0.0318	159
9	SF Austin	4.764	240	0.0970	209
10	Northwestern St	5.116	281	-0.0702	142
11	New Orleans	5.303	305	-0.4042	34
12	Texas A&M-CC	5.680	336	-0.0757	139

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	27.746	26	1.7436	25
2	Northwestern St	27.042	44	2.1524	8
3	SE Louisiana	25.987	70	0.8773	110
4	McNeese	24.153	155	1.3068	50
5	Lamar	23.838	170	1.3715	45
6	Nicholls	22.503	236	0.1915	217
7	Houston Baptist	21.332	293	1.7678	23
8	SF Austin	20.840	312	1.2696	57
9	Incarnate Word	20.725	317	1.1862	74
10	Texas A&M-CC	20.706	319	2.6763	2
11	UT Rio Grande	20.466	324	2.4419	5
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	19.581	347	0.2695	206

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	71.571	140	-0.0338	150
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	70.561	187	-1.0669	314
3	Nicholls	70.407	195	-0.4506	219
4	Texas A&M-CC	69.222	241	-1.2934	333
5	SF Austin	68.757	263	-1.0413	307
6	UT Rio Grande	68.478	277	-1.8400	358
7	McNeese	68.088	288	-0.8038	269
8	SE Louisiana	67.812	305	-0.1111	168
9	Incarnate Word	67.664	312	-1.0578	313
10	Lamar	67.506	317	-0.5069	230
11	Northwestern St	67.219	324	-1.0512	310
12	Houston Baptist	65.828	349	-1.4243	344

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.453	10	-0.0115	41
2	UT Rio Grande	0.491	81	-0.0099	52
3	McNeese	0.502	131	0.0138	314
4	New Orleans	0.504	138	-0.0146	22
5	Texas A&M-CC	0.504	138	-0.0045	108
6	Lamar	0.510	166	0.0053	233
7	SE Louisiana	0.521	217	-0.0084	70
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.530	255	-0.0176	14
9	Incarnate Word	0.537	271	0.0004	162
10	Houston Baptist	0.567	345	0.0088	267
11	Nicholls	0.570	348	0.0248	362
12	Northwestern St	0.574	351	0.0222	354

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.947	16	-0.0199	37
2	Texas A&M-CC	1.013	75	-0.0138	58
3	McNeese	1.013	77	0.0151	232
4	Lamar	1.030	112	0.0208	272
5	UT Rio Grande	1.037	127	-0.0114	67
6	SE Louisiana	1.062	177	0.0006	138
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	1.087	239	-0.0068	90
8	Nicholls	1.117	282	0.0421	347
9	Incarnate Word	1.122	291	0.0046	168
10	New Orleans	1.129	305	-0.0031	118
11	Houston Baptist	1.159	334	0.0384	340
12	Northwestern St	1.176	346	0.0349	330

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.215	5	0.0002	133
2	Nicholls	0.201	12	0.0068	36
3	Texas A&M-CC	0.186	44	0.0099	21
4	SE Louisiana	0.185	50	0.0005	125
5	Lamar	0.179	71	0.0003	132
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.165	138	-0.0106	328
7	Northwestern St	0.159	182	0.0009	115
8	SF Austin	0.157	193	-0.0065	277
9	UT Rio Grande	0.156	204	-0.0035	225
10	Incarnate Word	0.151	233	-0.0056	265
11	Houston Baptist	0.146	260	-0.0055	260
12	New Orleans	0.126	348	-0.0076	294

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	74.930	51	0.0061	89
2	Lamar	72.580	138	-0.0188	334
3	Texas A&M-CC	72.080	159	-0.0108	285
4	SE Louisiana	71.060	201	-0.0149	317
5	UT Rio Grande	70.410	228	0.0066	80
6	Houston Baptist	70.320	231	-0.0279	359
7	Incarnate Word	69.920	249	-0.0011	176
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	68.200	303	0.0015	138
9	New Orleans	67.510	321	-0.0109	286
10	McNeese	67.490	322	0.0168	26
11	Nicholls	67.260	326	-0.0290	362
12	Northwestern St	66.460	337	-0.0006	167

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	0.319	77	0.0189	289
2	SF Austin	0.353	155	-0.0306	11
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.368	199	0.0022	164
4	UT Rio Grande	0.375	217	0.0112	240
5	New Orleans	0.407	276	0.0130	250
6	Nicholls	0.410	286	-0.0100	84
7	Northwestern St	0.428	317	0.0087	216
8	McNeese	0.429	319	0.0310	331
9	Incarnate Word	0.430	320	-0.0109	79
10	Texas A&M-CC	0.453	335	0.0018	161
11	SE Louisiana	0.462	341	0.0279	321
12	Lamar	0.487	353	0.0509	360

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	103.430	64	-0.2264	119
2	Texas A&M-CC	106.823	116	-1.0411	52
3	McNeese	108.077	136	0.4259	187
4	UT Rio Grande	110.004	167	-0.8525	67
5	Lamar	110.976	185	0.1052	155
6	SE Louisiana	113.043	210	0.2751	167
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	116.549	275	0.3493	175
8	Nicholls	117.826	291	1.8359	311
9	New Orleans	118.882	305	0.0895	153
10	Incarnate Word	120.655	333	-0.4467	103
11	Houston Baptist	124.190	348	1.8571	315
12	Northwestern St	126.765	358	2.3290	340

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	32.702	19	0.2934	218
2	SF Austin	33.368	28	-0.0776	145
3	Lamar	34.008	49	0.1303	184
4	Texas A&M-CC	34.329	60	-0.0170	158
5	SE Louisiana	34.976	90	-0.6128	68
6	UT Rio Grande	35.373	105	-0.9126	37
7	New Orleans	37.743	233	-0.6820	59
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.220	250	-0.8602	40
9	Nicholls	38.641	267	1.6083	345
10	Incarnate Word	38.894	281	0.5307	258
11	Northwestern St	40.698	333	1.1702	322
12	Houston Baptist	42.016	352	0.8126	293

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	76.405	11	-1.2119	44
2	Texas A&M-CC	76.771	13	-0.7680	88
3	SE Louisiana	77.445	20	-0.2515	142
4	Nicholls	77.597	22	-0.0425	165
5	McNeese	78.159	32	-1.7340	13
6	Northwestern St	81.426	111	-0.8682	75
7	Incarnate Word	81.729	127	0.9666	291
8	SF Austin	82.448	145	1.6157	335
9	UT Rio Grande	83.223	178	-0.3758	129
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	83.912	223	1.6070	334
11	Houston Baptist	85.721	297	0.7288	266
12	New Orleans	86.905	330	1.1666	305

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	40.545	30	-0.8300	55
2	McNeese	42.118	67	1.2951	324
3	UT Rio Grande	42.597	84	-0.9146	47
4	New Orleans	43.392	115	-1.3529	13
5	Lamar	44.489	173	0.9242	293
6	Texas A&M-CC	45.037	199	0.3634	221
7	SE Louisiana	45.349	219	-0.6199	72
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	45.908	245	-1.7205	11
9	Incarnate Word	47.908	317	0.1074	187
10	Houston Baptist	49.179	342	0.4652	244
11	Northwestern St	49.926	352	1.8750	356
12	Nicholls	50.147	354	2.0016	359

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	52.225	12	0.1797	214
2	UT Rio Grande	58.810	124	-0.8423	97
3	Houston Baptist	59.001	134	-2.0360	30
4	New Orleans	59.139	142	0.4039	244
5	Northwestern St	59.925	176	-0.5462	132
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	61.320	213	-1.1407	78
7	SE Louisiana	62.004	232	0.5322	259
8	Lamar	62.586	249	2.1023	347
9	Nicholls	63.361	273	-0.3101	152
10	Incarnate Word	64.142	301	-1.0612	86
11	Texas A&M-CC	66.228	336	1.9334	342
12	SF Austin	67.271	350	-0.4253	143

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	19.908	5	0.3510	242
2	Lamar	24.018	80	0.8325	304
3	SE Louisiana	24.592	101	-0.2149	145
4	UT Rio Grande	24.659	104	-0.7380	59
5	SF Austin	25.581	169	0.2783	232
6	New Orleans	25.606	171	-0.6505	74
7	Texas A&M-CC	26.214	211	1.3524	342
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	26.371	221	-0.9523	41
9	Nicholls	27.950	292	0.8315	302
10	Northwestern St	28.608	313	0.6994	289
11	Houston Baptist	29.206	329	0.0234	177
12	Incarnate Word	29.667	341	0.4886	262

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	40.871	5	-0.9328	94
2	Lamar	47.741	93	0.7006	267
3	SE Louisiana	47.947	106	0.2664	224
4	Nicholls	48.785	136	-0.2947	157
5	Northwestern St	48.896	144	-1.0289	84
6	UT Rio Grande	48.899	145	-0.9798	88
7	Houston Baptist	50.365	203	-1.2844	62
8	Texas A&M-CC	50.752	213	0.9510	285
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	51.557	244	0.0264	198
10	New Orleans	51.641	248	1.0358	291
11	Incarnate Word	52.349	268	-0.3776	147
12	SF Austin	55.320	333	0.6002	261

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	46.100	23	-0.1018	148
2	McNeese	49.232	89	1.8960	334
3	New Orleans	50.072	114	-2.2813	10
4	Lamar	50.077	116	0.8969	263
5	UT Rio Grande	51.392	160	-0.5430	100
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	51.397	162	-1.7575	24
7	SE Louisiana	51.643	174	-0.5278	101
8	Texas A&M-CC	52.447	207	1.4479	316
9	Incarnate Word	57.223	324	1.4215	312
10	Houston Baptist	57.702	331	1.2029	295
11	Nicholls	58.056	338	1.8196	332
12	Northwestern St	58.736	347	2.3972	351

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	32.729	16	0.4253	223
2	Texas A&M-CC	33.772	30	-1.9334	24
3	Incarnate Word	35.858	65	1.0612	280
4	Nicholls	36.639	93	0.3101	214
5	Lamar	37.414	117	-2.1023	19
6	SE Louisiana	37.996	134	-0.5322	107
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.680	153	1.1407	288
8	Northwestern St	40.075	190	0.5462	234
9	New Orleans	40.861	224	-0.4039	122
10	Houston Baptist	40.999	232	2.0360	336
11	UT Rio Grande	41.190	242	0.8423	269
12	McNeese	47.775	354	-0.1797	152

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	7.787	5	-0.3559	97
2	Texas A&M-CC	8.115	9	-1.3694	4
3	Incarnate Word	9.227	43	0.0421	170
4	Lamar	9.990	87	-0.7022	39
5	SE Louisiana	10.384	122	-0.3979	84
6	Nicholls	10.691	149	0.7768	324
7	UT Rio Grande	10.714	151	-0.1747	127
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	11.849	248	0.0921	181
9	Northwestern St	12.090	266	0.4708	271
10	New Orleans	12.137	270	-0.0315	153
11	McNeese	12.793	305	-0.0576	147
12	Houston Baptist	12.810	307	0.7892	326

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	26.018	12	-1.7190	24
2	SF Austin	27.128	20	1.0155	279
3	Lamar	28.664	49	-1.9125	16
4	Nicholls	28.812	55	0.2522	213
5	Incarnate Word	29.380	70	1.3443	305
6	SE Louisiana	29.497	73	-0.5178	103
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	32.355	161	1.5805	323
8	Northwestern St	32.530	165	0.1607	194
9	UT Rio Grande	34.324	234	0.6039	249
10	New Orleans	35.264	273	0.1308	191
11	Houston Baptist	35.356	278	2.0132	343
12	McNeese	37.287	314	-0.8012	68

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	28.754	13	-2.3405	10
2	UT Rio Grande	31.338	74	-1.0083	85
3	Incarnate Word	31.446	77	-1.1598	69
4	Texas A&M-CC	32.022	95	-2.5558	6
5	Lamar	33.654	172	-1.0827	77
6	McNeese	33.696	177	0.0236	173
7	New Orleans	34.364	212	-0.4236	130
8	SE Louisiana	35.268	255	-0.3126	141
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	36.357	311	-1.5087	45
10	Houston Baptist	36.561	318	0.3271	206
11	Nicholls	36.681	322	2.9830	359
12	Northwestern St	37.068	331	1.1354	279

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	31.890	77	1.8944	289
2	SF Austin	35.310	155	-3.0561	11
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	36.850	199	0.2182	164
4	UT Rio Grande	37.520	217	1.1208	240
5	New Orleans	40.660	276	1.2966	250
6	Nicholls	40.990	286	-0.9966	84
7	Northwestern St	42.820	317	0.8672	216
8	McNeese	42.870	319	3.0995	331
9	Incarnate Word	43.000	320	-1.0853	79
10	Texas A&M-CC	45.320	335	0.1763	161
11	SE Louisiana	46.220	341	2.7864	321
12	Lamar	48.670	353	5.0915	360

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	19.094	89	1.4417	310
2	SF Austin	20.151	125	-1.4762	19
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	20.436	142	0.9455	255
4	UT Rio Grande	22.200	229	0.8564	242
5	McNeese	23.103	268	0.9838	259
6	Nicholls	23.757	292	0.2378	168
7	Northwestern St	24.077	306	0.6871	219
8	Texas A&M-CC	24.482	317	0.0320	145
9	Lamar	25.021	325	2.5371	361
10	Incarnate Word	25.202	330	-0.6378	61
11	New Orleans	25.273	333	1.0857	269
12	SE Louisiana	25.901	344	1.6861	327

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	26.495	83	1.7592	304
2	SF Austin	28.567	144	-1.9372	15
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	29.731	197	0.7965	232
4	UT Rio Grande	30.849	239	0.9447	255
5	Nicholls	31.010	245	-0.5630	83
6	McNeese	32.534	284	1.7339	299
7	Northwestern St	33.935	316	0.4894	195
8	Incarnate Word	34.149	320	-0.5553	84
9	Texas A&M-CC	34.575	325	0.1365	159
10	New Orleans	34.763	327	1.4973	287
11	SE Louisiana	34.940	332	1.9501	315
12	Lamar	36.807	350	3.3609	359

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	68.040	31	1.5166	285
2	Lamar	68.208	38	0.3089	191
3	McNeese	69.511	83	-1.0301	70
4	SF Austin	70.389	111	-0.7980	96
5	Texas A&M-CC	70.946	130	-0.1368	153
6	UT Rio Grande	71.717	173	0.3301	194
7	Northwestern St	72.401	203	2.1006	320
8	New Orleans	72.673	216	0.6789	223
9	Houston Baptist	72.928	234	0.9031	246
10	Incarnate Word	72.971	238	-0.7107	101
11	SE Louisiana	73.619	268	0.7612	235
12	Nicholls	76.975	352	2.3052	334

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	44.377	22	-2.8532	24
2	SE Louisiana	50.424	127	-0.2898	144
3	Incarnate Word	51.954	164	0.0490	173
4	Houston Baptist	54.571	241	2.2067	330
5	Texas A&M-CC	54.631	242	-2.8101	26
6	Northwestern St	55.220	257	0.2468	190
7	Lamar	55.246	259	0.7639	233
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	56.310	282	-1.2619	83
9	Nicholls	56.505	287	-0.3540	140
10	McNeese	59.463	327	0.5828	218
11	New Orleans	60.443	338	-0.8831	104
12	UT Rio Grande	61.159	347	2.6089	340

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	14.140	1	-0.0170	164
2	Nicholls	13.192	13	0.6341	32
3	SE Louisiana	11.232	64	-0.2604	226
4	Lamar	10.631	97	0.2709	95
5	Texas A&M-CC	10.353	116	-0.1349	191
6	SF Austin	9.686	163	-0.0018	161
7	Northwestern St	9.584	170	-0.0646	173
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	9.412	183	-0.2908	235
9	Houston Baptist	9.082	200	-0.5002	285
10	UT Rio Grande	8.823	218	-0.2487	224
11	Incarnate Word	8.368	257	-0.4312	275
12	New Orleans	7.229	329	-0.9560	353

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	6.666	33	0.1940	118
2	Lamar	6.619	35	-0.5714	345
3	New Orleans	5.681	91	0.4308	63
4	SF Austin	5.274	118	-0.6822	353
5	Houston Baptist	5.081	137	0.1477	134
6	Texas A&M-CC	4.643	187	0.4465	57
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	4.362	213	-0.5534	342
8	SE Louisiana	4.191	228	0.4882	50
9	Incarnate Word	3.853	268	-0.1115	220
10	UT Rio Grande	3.535	293	-0.1981	250
11	Nicholls	3.175	330	-0.3650	303
12	Northwestern St	2.603	349	-0.7065	356

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	23.612	80	1.3849	339
2	SF Austin	24.988	146	-0.6741	44
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	25.298	171	0.6631	278
4	UT Rio Grande	26.093	226	0.2828	187
5	Nicholls	26.229	233	-0.2321	108
6	Northwestern St	27.092	290	0.1039	152
7	Incarnate Word	27.805	320	-0.4235	75
8	Lamar	27.946	324	1.4019	341
9	New Orleans	28.189	330	1.7486	356
10	SE Louisiana	28.943	339	1.4871	347
11	Texas A&M-CC	29.376	348	0.5862	257
12	McNeese	29.625	354	1.3374	336

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	72.293	102	-0.3348	209
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	70.914	166	-1.0775	324
3	Nicholls	70.424	193	-0.6060	262
4	UT Rio Grande	69.957	215	-1.2735	343
5	Texas A&M-CC	68.705	273	-0.5556	251
6	McNeese	68.500	281	-0.7841	292
7	Lamar	68.340	285	0.0635	139
8	SF Austin	68.218	291	-0.5857	257
9	Northwestern St	67.371	320	-1.0977	326
10	SE Louisiana	67.081	329	-0.3887	222
11	Incarnate Word	65.941	349	-0.9185	305
12	Houston Baptist	65.540	355	-0.7322	280

Location invert reset

Result invert reset

Game Type invert reset

Points Per Possession reset

Mean
Std
Median
Min
Max

selected out of records.

Showing - of

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Envo Magazine