Conferences – HoopSci

College Basketball Analytics, Insights, and Trends

Quick Links
Teams
- America East
  - Albany
  - Bryant
  - Binghamton
  - Maine
  - New Hampshire
  - NJIT
  - UMass Lowell
  - UMBC
  - Vermont
- American
  - Charlotte
  - East Carolina
  - Florida Atlantic
  - Memphis
  - North Texas
  - Rice
  - Temple
  - Tulane
  - Tulsa
  - UAB
  - USF
  - UTSA
  - Wichita State
- Atlantic 10
  - Davidson
  - Dayton
  - Duquesne
  - Fordham
  - George Mason
  - George Washington
  - La Salle
  - Loyola-Chicago
  - Richmond
  - St. Josephs
  - Saint Louis
  - St. Bonaventure
  - Rhode Island
  - VCU
- ACC
  - Boston College
  - California
  - Clemson
  - Duke
  - Florida State
  - Georgia Tech
  - Louisville
  - Miami
  - NC State
  - North Carolina
  - Notre Dame
  - Pitt
  - SMU
  - Stanford
  - Syracuse
  - Virginia
  - Virginia Tech
  - Wake Forest
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
  - Arizona
  - Arizona State
  - Baylor
  - BYU
  - Cincinnati
  - Colorado
  - Houston
  - Iowa State
  - Kansas
  - Kansas State
  - Oklahoma State
  - TCU
  - Texas Tech
  - UCF
  - Utah
  - West Virginia
- Big East
  - Butler
  - Creighton
  - Depaul
  - Georgetown
  - Marquette
  - Providence
  - Seton Hall
  - St. John’s
  - UConn
  - Villanova
  - Xavier
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
  - Illinois
  - Indiana
  - Iowa
  - Maryland
  - Michigan State
  - Minnesota
  - Nebraska
  - Northwestern
  - Ohio State
  - Oregon
  - Penn State
  - Purdue
  - Rutgers
  - UCLA
  - USC
  - Washington
  - Wisconsin
- Big West
- Coastal
  - Campbell
  - Charleston
  - Drexel
  - Elon
  - Hampton
  - Hofstra
  - Monmouth
  - North Carolina A&T
  - Northeastern
  - Stony Brook
  - Towson
  - UNC Wilmington
  - William & Mary
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
  - Brown
  - Columbia
  - Cornell
  - Dartmouth
  - Harvard
  - Pennsylvania
  - Princeton
  - Yale
- MAAC
  - Canisius
  - Fairfield
  - Iona
  - Manhattan
  - Marist
  - Merrimack
  - Mt. St. Mary’s
  - Niagara
  - Quinnipiac
  - Rider
  - Sacred Heart
  - Saint Peter’s
  - Siena
- Mid-American
  - Akron
  - Ball State
  - Bowling Green
  - Buffalo
  - Central Michigan
  - Eastern Michigan
  - Kent State
  - Miami (OH)
  - Northern Illinois
  - Ohio
  - Toledo
  - UMass
  - Western Michigan
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
  - Belmont
  - Bradley
  - Drake
  - Evansville
  - Illinois State
  - Indiana State
  - Murray State
  - Northern Iowa
  - Southern Illinois
  - UIC
  - Valparaiso
- Mountain West
  - Air Force
  - Boise State
  - Colorado State
  - Fresno State
  - Grand Canyon
  - Nevada
  - New Mexico
  - San Diego State
  - San Jose State
  - UNLV
  - Utah State
  - Wyoming
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
  - American
  - Army
  - Boston University
  - Bucknell
  - Colgate
  - Holy Cross
  - Lafayette
  - Lehigh
  - Loyola (MD)
  - Navy
- SEC
  - Alabama
  - Arkansas
  - Auburn
  - Florida
  - Georgia
  - Kentucky
  - LSU
  - Mississippi State
  - Missouri
  - Oklahoma
  - Ole Miss
  - South Carolina
  - Tennessee
  - Texas
  - Texas A&M
  - Vanderbilt
- Southern
  - Chattanooga
  - East Tennessee State
  - Furman
  - Mercer
  - Samford
  - The Citadel
  - UNC Greensboro
  - VMI
  - Western Carolina
  - Wofford
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Conferences
- America East
- American
- Atlantic 10
- ACC
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
- Big East
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
- Big West
- Coastal
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
- MAAC
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
- SEC
- Southern
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Games
Models
Statistics
Contact

Search for:

Standings
Statistics
Trend Lab

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	12.632	74	1.5258	107
2	SF Austin	3.949	130	4.0755	25
3	UT Rio Grande	2.138	143	3.2997	41
4	Lamar	-2.799	191	2.0000	90
5	New Orleans	-9.537	237	5.2271	6
6	Nicholls	-10.057	244	-0.7527	234
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	-10.131	247	2.3158	74
8	Texas A&M-CC	-10.360	249	-1.2214	250
9	Houston Baptist	-11.360	258	2.1595	80
10	SE Louisiana	-12.469	266	-0.2463	206
11	Incarnate Word	-21.951	325	-1.2649	253
12	Northwestern St	-26.289	346	-2.9814	318

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.261	38	0.0237	92
2	SF Austin	0.190	75	0.0294	73
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.011	188	0.0512	25
4	UT Rio Grande	0.002	191	0.0075	150
5	Lamar	-0.017	205	0.0027	172
6	New Orleans	-0.075	243	0.0253	86
7	Texas A&M-CC	-0.100	260	-0.0405	318
8	Houston Baptist	-0.124	282	-0.0044	202
9	Incarnate Word	-0.132	288	-0.0231	273
10	Nicholls	-0.214	324	-0.0582	346
11	SE Louisiana	-0.231	330	-0.0405	317
12	Northwestern St	-0.254	338	-0.0430	324

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1625.861	45	12.4877	37
2	Lamar	1497.319	187	18.2539	16
3	SF Austin	1492.041	196	-1.0849	191
4	Texas A&M-CC	1485.158	207	-9.0409	281
5	Nicholls	1479.382	214	-8.6579	275
6	SE Louisiana	1453.575	249	-4.1504	231
7	Northwestern St	1433.638	274	8.8992	63
8	Incarnate Word	1417.043	292	24.0912	5
9	UT Rio Grande	1409.506	303	8.4057	69
10	Houston Baptist	1379.911	326	14.2583	27
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	1370.430	335	1.9034	155
12	New Orleans	1325.979	356	1.3414	162

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.564	80	0.0128	103
2	Texas A&M-CC	0.557	92	0.0042	157
3	SF Austin	0.535	115	0.0374	11
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.496	177	0.0062	139
5	New Orleans	0.487	199	0.0279	32
6	UT Rio Grande	0.472	218	-0.0005	193
7	Incarnate Word	0.447	266	0.0219	59
8	Houston Baptist	0.442	274	-0.0014	195
9	Nicholls	0.409	310	-0.0268	326
10	Lamar	0.408	312	-0.0100	251
11	Northwestern St	0.395	326	-0.0351	352
12	SE Louisiana	0.380	338	-0.0253	315

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	0.537	96	0.0102	98
2	SF Austin	0.530	121	0.0117	84
3	McNeese	0.525	136	-0.0001	199
4	UT Rio Grande	0.509	185	-0.0055	271
5	New Orleans	0.504	198	0.0163	52
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.503	203	0.0100	99
7	Incarnate Word	0.498	215	0.0055	133
8	Northwestern St	0.491	235	0.0060	129
9	Nicholls	0.481	265	0.0055	134
10	Lamar	0.458	322	-0.0063	276
11	SE Louisiana	0.447	337	-0.0005	207
12	Texas A&M-CC	0.416	360	-0.0088	297

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1.243	12	0.0088	153
2	Incarnate Word	1.187	42	0.0220	90
3	SF Austin	1.102	131	0.0344	47
4	UT Rio Grande	1.077	176	-0.0025	228
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	1.065	196	0.0241	82
6	Houston Baptist	1.051	220	0.0375	42
7	Northwestern St	1.008	293	0.0019	201
8	Lamar	1.005	299	-0.0103	262
9	New Orleans	1.003	301	0.0206	98
10	Nicholls	0.970	326	-0.0009	218
11	Texas A&M-CC	0.955	332	-0.0316	344
12	SE Louisiana	0.936	340	-0.0173	302

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	0.142	57	-0.0145	7
2	SF Austin	0.142	60	-0.0219	1
3	Incarnate Word	0.143	61	-0.0021	134
4	McNeese	0.144	63	-0.0022	126
5	Nicholls	0.156	138	-0.0016	144
6	Lamar	0.157	145	-0.0053	81
7	Texas A&M-CC	0.161	167	0.0040	245
8	UT Rio Grande	0.167	204	-0.0034	109
9	SE Louisiana	0.170	220	0.0060	284
10	New Orleans	0.189	312	0.0025	216
11	Northwestern St	0.191	322	0.0025	217
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.194	333	-0.0074	48

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	35.390	45	0.0106	179
2	Lamar	34.830	52	0.0231	108
3	Incarnate Word	31.610	106	0.0168	131
4	SF Austin	30.030	145	-0.0149	330
5	New Orleans	28.840	181	-0.0022	278
6	Houston Baptist	26.630	234	0.0174	127
7	UT Rio Grande	25.070	275	0.0029	243
8	Nicholls	23.700	301	-0.0246	358
9	Texas A&M-CC	23.670	302	-0.0043	290
10	Northwestern St	23.590	304	-0.0102	317
11	SE Louisiana	22.940	318	-0.0097	314
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	21.020	347	0.0060	216

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	0.431	56	0.0140	115
2	SE Louisiana	0.416	69	0.0145	107
3	McNeese	0.414	71	-0.0039	233
4	Nicholls	0.391	116	0.0343	32
5	New Orleans	0.378	143	0.0103	135
6	Incarnate Word	0.376	145	0.0294	52
7	Houston Baptist	0.360	185	0.0314	40
8	Texas A&M-CC	0.357	196	0.0005	198
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.318	272	0.0077	151
10	SF Austin	0.257	352	-0.0371	361
11	Lamar	0.245	355	-0.0134	293
12	UT Rio Grande	0.245	355	-0.0022	223

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	114.649	79	0.8426	96
2	SF Austin	106.697	167	3.7887	9
3	UT Rio Grande	104.745	202	0.9867	85
4	Houston Baptist	104.688	203	0.8838	92
5	Incarnate Word	103.908	211	-0.3250	187
6	New Orleans	103.508	216	2.3686	31
7	Nicholls	100.722	257	-1.1887	237
8	Northwestern St	99.576	270	0.0886	147
9	Lamar	97.689	289	-0.6910	207
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	97.205	297	0.5286	115
11	SE Louisiana	95.299	314	-1.5956	265
12	Texas A&M-CC	91.304	347	-3.4568	346

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	44.226	9	0.5061	125
2	Incarnate Word	42.059	30	-0.0511	206
3	SF Austin	41.431	46	1.9415	16
4	UT Rio Grande	39.544	105	0.0258	195
5	Lamar	39.525	107	0.3789	141
6	Houston Baptist	38.652	139	1.1526	61
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.120	162	0.5248	122
8	Texas A&M-CC	34.518	296	-1.4883	347
9	New Orleans	34.036	306	0.2872	160
10	Northwestern St	33.480	321	-0.3415	243
11	Nicholls	32.927	331	-0.6534	278
12	SE Louisiana	31.878	347	-0.8245	295

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	91.844	3	1.0965	69
2	SF Austin	90.839	8	2.8426	2
3	Incarnate Word	88.451	24	-0.8439	275
4	UT Rio Grande	86.907	56	0.4390	133
5	McNeese	86.780	60	0.1997	157
6	Texas A&M-CC	83.045	186	-1.4423	315
7	Houston Baptist	82.835	196	0.2918	152
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	82.167	227	-0.1186	193
9	Nicholls	80.444	287	-1.7020	333
10	SE Louisiana	79.215	315	-1.6434	325
11	New Orleans	79.139	316	-1.2413	303
12	Northwestern St	76.692	349	-1.5863	323

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	50.996	28	0.4924	131
2	Incarnate Word	47.330	95	0.3572	147
3	Houston Baptist	46.616	122	1.1906	66
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	45.986	148	0.6382	117
5	SF Austin	45.660	159	0.7627	104
6	UT Rio Grande	45.391	170	-0.1962	229
7	New Orleans	43.551	258	1.0970	71
8	Northwestern St	43.474	259	0.3722	144
9	Lamar	42.954	277	-0.1647	224
10	Texas A&M-CC	41.939	307	-0.9425	313
11	Nicholls	40.890	329	0.0699	188
12	SE Louisiana	40.370	339	-0.0358	205

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	70.030	18	1.2643	65
2	McNeese	68.668	31	1.7004	40
3	Texas A&M-CC	67.208	50	-0.7631	230
4	Northwestern St	62.816	130	-1.1994	262
5	Incarnate Word	62.390	140	-0.4409	202
6	UT Rio Grande	61.552	160	2.4036	17
7	New Orleans	61.279	168	-1.8444	299
8	SF Austin	59.979	188	-0.6911	223
9	Houston Baptist	59.970	189	1.0691	84
10	Nicholls	57.411	240	-0.8302	237
11	SE Louisiana	56.391	262	-2.3929	328
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	52.835	318	-0.6108	218

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	35.443	3	1.3964	39
2	Lamar	30.939	32	1.0752	61
3	Incarnate Word	29.035	78	-0.2741	226
4	Houston Baptist	27.972	121	1.3945	40
5	SF Austin	27.968	122	0.8989	75
6	UT Rio Grande	26.441	188	0.5424	123
7	Texas A&M-CC	26.129	210	-1.4262	345
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	24.411	269	-0.0827	198
9	Northwestern St	23.629	291	-0.5510	264
10	SE Louisiana	23.444	298	-0.5806	268
11	New Orleans	23.238	301	-0.4454	252
12	Nicholls	21.417	341	-1.1642	327

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	64.482	1	1.8720	38
2	McNeese	59.923	13	1.6846	42
3	Texas A&M-CC	55.626	68	-1.5746	288
4	Incarnate Word	55.105	76	-0.8498	231
5	SF Austin	54.485	84	1.1496	71
6	UT Rio Grande	53.124	116	2.3906	22
7	Houston Baptist	49.624	188	1.1088	75
8	New Orleans	48.429	217	-2.3961	331
9	Northwestern St	48.258	223	-2.0010	318
10	Nicholls	46.419	264	-1.7043	297
11	SE Louisiana	44.514	305	-3.0684	349
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	43.318	322	-0.5367	211

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	58.929	46	0.8042	135
2	Houston Baptist	56.356	97	1.6973	70
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	56.122	103	0.6683	147
4	SE Louisiana	52.751	183	2.1561	45
5	Incarnate Word	52.536	190	0.3239	190
6	SF Austin	51.118	239	0.5535	161
7	UT Rio Grande	50.831	249	-0.8901	297
8	Lamar	48.723	302	0.4621	173
9	New Orleans	48.449	306	1.3873	85
10	Northwestern St	48.353	308	0.5149	167
11	Texas A&M-CC	46.975	326	-1.0366	308
12	Nicholls	46.512	333	-0.5896	281

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	47.165	48	0.6108	148
2	SE Louisiana	43.609	104	2.3929	38
3	Nicholls	42.589	126	0.8302	129
4	Houston Baptist	40.030	177	-1.0691	282
5	SF Austin	40.021	178	0.6911	143
6	New Orleans	38.721	198	1.8444	67
7	UT Rio Grande	38.448	206	-2.4036	349
8	Incarnate Word	37.610	226	0.4409	164
9	Northwestern St	37.184	236	1.1994	104
10	Texas A&M-CC	32.792	316	0.7631	136
11	McNeese	31.332	335	-1.7004	326
12	Lamar	29.970	348	-1.2643	301

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	13.708	52	0.6076	69
2	SF Austin	13.463	66	1.0426	30
3	UT Rio Grande	13.103	78	-0.5166	293
4	Incarnate Word	13.024	84	0.2230	135
5	Nicholls	11.510	154	0.5108	84
6	New Orleans	10.798	196	0.7326	49
7	Houston Baptist	10.680	203	-0.2419	237
8	Northwestern St	9.851	257	0.2095	137
9	McNeese	8.783	307	-0.8902	343
10	Lamar	8.587	316	-0.6964	326
11	SE Louisiana	8.434	326	-0.2439	238
12	Texas A&M-CC	8.389	327	-0.0621	190

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.849	62	0.4182	161
2	SF Austin	36.355	104	1.6930	59
3	SE Louisiana	34.701	139	1.4250	76
4	Nicholls	34.024	154	0.0023	204
5	UT Rio Grande	33.784	163	-1.9517	347
6	Incarnate Word	33.346	174	0.0059	203
7	Houston Baptist	33.211	176	-0.8170	278
8	New Orleans	30.710	234	1.1548	87
9	Northwestern St	28.434	288	0.4148	162
10	Texas A&M-CC	27.419	309	0.1323	188
11	Lamar	27.363	311	-0.7756	271
12	McNeese	26.857	318	-1.4849	321

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Incarnate Word	37.737	44	-0.1617	189
2	SF Austin	37.081	63	1.4883	45
3	UT Rio Grande	37.008	64	0.2520	140
4	Nicholls	35.144	123	2.2902	17
5	Northwestern St	34.901	135	0.5716	107
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	34.835	141	1.1735	70
7	New Orleans	34.831	142	1.7228	28
8	McNeese	32.718	206	-0.8007	258
9	Lamar	32.682	208	-1.4512	308
10	Houston Baptist	32.141	236	-0.1460	186
11	Texas A&M-CC	30.113	298	-0.6687	244
12	SE Louisiana	25.652	362	-1.2878	299

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	43.100	56	1.3989	115
2	SE Louisiana	41.640	69	1.4490	107
3	McNeese	41.450	71	-0.3912	233
4	Nicholls	39.050	116	3.4293	32
5	New Orleans	37.810	143	1.0348	135
6	Incarnate Word	37.620	145	2.9422	52
7	Houston Baptist	36.010	185	3.1396	40
8	Texas A&M-CC	35.700	196	0.0503	198
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	31.840	272	0.7736	151
10	SF Austin	25.740	352	-3.7113	361
11	Lamar	24.460	355	-1.3436	293
12	UT Rio Grande	24.460	355	-0.2253	223

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	27.043	28	0.7552	124
2	Northwestern St	23.967	85	0.6619	130
3	Incarnate Word	21.575	155	2.0806	23
4	New Orleans	21.441	162	0.7550	125
5	SE Louisiana	21.438	163	0.1627	181
6	Nicholls	19.598	229	0.7004	129
7	Houston Baptist	19.425	236	1.6940	39
8	Texas A&M-CC	18.111	277	-0.1181	209
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	16.552	317	0.8881	108
10	UT Rio Grande	15.519	337	0.2157	174
11	SF Austin	13.864	354	-1.4894	340
12	Lamar	12.845	358	-1.0544	317

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	34.105	59	-0.1678	227
2	Northwestern St	32.641	89	0.6043	151
3	Houston Baptist	30.895	128	2.9487	18
4	Nicholls	30.706	135	1.7110	60
5	SE Louisiana	30.663	138	0.4296	170
6	Incarnate Word	30.272	151	2.3779	35
7	New Orleans	29.533	182	0.4842	163
8	Texas A&M-CC	27.228	246	-0.4274	251
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	23.727	319	0.5144	162
10	SF Austin	21.983	340	-2.3808	355
11	UT Rio Grande	21.787	343	0.0713	200
12	Lamar	20.669	349	-0.7513	280

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	78.669	18	2.7567	20
2	Northwestern St	72.926	143	0.8000	114
3	New Orleans	72.917	144	1.3913	63
4	Incarnate Word	72.089	162	1.3373	70
5	UT Rio Grande	71.250	186	1.3487	69
6	SE Louisiana	70.867	193	-0.5267	219
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	67.834	273	1.5702	55
8	SF Austin	66.401	307	1.2118	78
9	Texas A&M-CC	65.797	318	0.1354	164
10	Nicholls	64.553	334	-1.2401	268
11	Houston Baptist	63.051	348	-0.5635	224
12	Lamar	60.714	358	-2.4415	321

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	62.211	23	-0.2359	228
2	Texas A&M-CC	58.704	57	1.8596	71
3	SE Louisiana	56.977	96	1.7781	77
4	Houston Baptist	56.851	102	3.7791	20
5	Lamar	56.503	108	-0.1663	224
6	New Orleans	55.386	137	3.2840	23
7	Nicholls	52.475	196	3.8943	17
8	UT Rio Grande	52.349	197	-2.4534	338
9	Northwestern St	51.800	207	-0.5455	243
10	McNeese	51.124	222	-1.5148	299
11	SF Austin	50.563	231	0.1583	192
12	Incarnate Word	45.390	326	0.5360	157

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	5.390	3	-0.2146	169
2	Incarnate Word	5.643	7	-0.2723	151
3	Houston Baptist	5.887	15	-1.4672	5
4	UT Rio Grande	6.370	29	-0.1713	175
5	Texas A&M-CC	6.661	49	-0.6544	79
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	7.101	70	-1.2091	13
7	SF Austin	7.604	96	-1.3453	8
8	SE Louisiana	8.247	147	0.1144	250
9	Nicholls	8.759	189	-0.2226	162
10	Lamar	9.143	226	-0.3089	147
11	New Orleans	9.964	275	-0.1923	172
12	Northwestern St	10.582	313	0.0975	247

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	2.225	5	-0.8410	10
2	Incarnate Word	2.718	20	-0.0187	205
3	Houston Baptist	3.368	73	0.1764	271
4	Lamar	3.427	79	-0.4569	58
5	McNeese	3.686	108	-0.2672	117
6	SE Louisiana	3.826	122	-0.9954	6
7	SF Austin	4.640	236	0.1385	260
8	UT Rio Grande	4.794	250	0.2029	281
9	Nicholls	5.357	305	-0.1895	145
10	Northwestern St	5.694	326	-0.2155	131
11	New Orleans	6.042	345	-0.0027	213
12	Texas A&M-CC	7.166	363	0.5265	330

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	26.489	71	1.2967	26
2	New Orleans	26.423	73	0.7729	63
3	SE Louisiana	23.894	158	0.2221	133
4	Nicholls	23.182	185	0.8583	55
5	McNeese	22.182	219	0.2127	136
6	Lamar	19.097	310	-0.9247	287
7	Incarnate Word	18.684	321	0.4610	98
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	18.283	332	-0.2501	203
9	UT Rio Grande	18.157	334	0.1354	150
10	Texas A&M-CC	17.897	338	-0.7505	274
11	Houston Baptist	17.763	340	0.5291	90
12	SF Austin	17.659	341	-1.5305	330

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	73.460	101	0.1487	229
2	Texas A&M-CC	72.281	154	1.4240	59
3	UT Rio Grande	72.049	162	-0.7343	329
4	Nicholls	71.588	185	-0.1691	276
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	71.153	198	0.8078	123
6	SF Austin	70.875	204	0.1153	233
7	Northwestern St	68.938	274	0.5916	152
8	SE Louisiana	68.694	289	-0.1893	279
9	Incarnate Word	68.604	294	0.9703	91
10	McNeese	68.346	303	0.5189	163
11	Lamar	67.473	328	-0.6699	324
12	Houston Baptist	65.713	354	-0.2738	287

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.453	32	-0.0102	66
2	McNeese	0.479	82	0.0012	181
3	UT Rio Grande	0.496	118	-0.0155	32
4	Lamar	0.499	137	0.0043	226
5	New Orleans	0.506	167	0.0004	170
6	Texas A&M-CC	0.519	212	0.0023	195
7	SE Louisiana	0.536	264	0.0038	221
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.543	282	-0.0006	156
9	Nicholls	0.557	313	0.0217	351
10	Northwestern St	0.580	343	0.0187	341
11	Incarnate Word	0.581	345	0.0161	331
12	Houston Baptist	0.582	348	0.0175	338

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.966	54	-0.0057	139
2	Lamar	0.974	65	-0.0129	95
3	McNeese	0.988	88	-0.0016	165
4	UT Rio Grande	1.045	170	-0.0189	63
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	1.047	172	-0.0175	69
6	Texas A&M-CC	1.052	179	0.0022	188
7	SE Louisiana	1.058	187	0.0022	189
8	Houston Baptist	1.117	282	0.0176	270
9	New Orleans	1.119	284	0.0061	211
10	Nicholls	1.124	290	0.0370	336
11	Northwestern St	1.213	353	0.0363	332
12	Incarnate Word	1.221	356	0.0333	322

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.217	10	0.0075	71
2	SE Louisiana	0.194	44	0.0113	33
3	Lamar	0.189	59	0.0086	58
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.189	61	-0.0039	258
5	Nicholls	0.179	95	0.0046	110
6	Texas A&M-CC	0.167	160	-0.0029	247
7	Houston Baptist	0.159	208	-0.0017	223
8	SF Austin	0.158	212	-0.0138	355
9	Northwestern St	0.154	231	-0.0028	244
10	Incarnate Word	0.148	259	0.0010	168
11	UT Rio Grande	0.148	263	-0.0076	321
12	New Orleans	0.125	351	-0.0051	285

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	77.100	30	0.0084	69
2	SF Austin	75.720	53	0.0216	8
3	Lamar	74.710	80	0.0212	9
4	SE Louisiana	73.430	122	-0.0041	185
5	Texas A&M-CC	73.080	138	0.0046	96
6	UT Rio Grande	71.770	183	0.0163	25
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	70.340	220	0.0262	1
8	Nicholls	69.360	254	-0.0088	237
9	New Orleans	69.250	255	0.0039	106
10	Incarnate Word	69.110	260	-0.0048	193
11	McNeese	63.640	344	-0.0126	265
12	Northwestern St	62.790	354	-0.0102	251

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	0.296	60	0.0068	192
2	McNeese	0.387	225	0.0129	232
3	UT Rio Grande	0.391	241	0.0257	305
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.404	274	-0.0120	75
5	SF Austin	0.406	279	0.0009	148
6	New Orleans	0.414	292	0.0314	323
7	Nicholls	0.423	305	0.0108	220
8	Lamar	0.431	314	0.0233	291
9	Texas A&M-CC	0.437	316	-0.0084	97
10	Northwestern St	0.471	339	0.0379	343
11	SE Louisiana	0.491	347	0.0475	355
12	Incarnate Word	0.504	354	0.0575	362

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	100.488	70	-2.6164	40
2	Texas A&M-CC	101.663	88	-1.9182	75
3	McNeese	102.018	93	-0.6237	167
4	UT Rio Grande	102.607	100	-2.0996	65
5	SF Austin	102.748	103	-0.3691	193
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	107.336	178	-1.8298	84
7	SE Louisiana	107.768	188	-1.2811	118
8	Nicholls	110.779	226	-0.4598	180
9	New Orleans	113.045	264	-2.8513	32
10	Houston Baptist	116.048	301	-1.1722	125
11	Incarnate Word	125.859	361	1.0418	286
12	Northwestern St	125.864	362	3.1217	359

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	31.409	25	-0.5822	115
2	SF Austin	32.501	43	-0.2303	158
3	Lamar	33.009	52	-0.7763	78
4	SE Louisiana	34.843	112	-0.5965	111
5	Texas A&M-CC	35.128	121	0.1535	214
6	UT Rio Grande	35.207	127	-1.5125	25
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	37.279	202	-0.0455	186
8	New Orleans	37.539	215	-0.5079	121
9	Nicholls	37.765	224	1.0297	306
10	Incarnate Word	39.898	303	-0.0463	184
11	Houston Baptist	40.552	321	0.2162	218
12	Northwestern St	41.068	331	1.1749	319

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SE Louisiana	73.235	3	-2.6398	8
2	Lamar	75.134	14	-2.6232	9
3	Incarnate Word	77.934	52	-2.2387	18
4	Texas A&M-CC	77.996	54	0.1763	218
5	Nicholls	78.314	60	-0.8128	117
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	78.536	63	-0.3516	170
7	SF Austin	79.399	86	0.2840	229
8	McNeese	80.248	106	-0.9065	106
9	Northwestern St	81.095	130	-1.2810	66
10	Houston Baptist	82.209	175	-0.6699	133
11	UT Rio Grande	82.267	177	-0.6312	136
12	New Orleans	84.843	264	-1.0486	88

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	39.172	29	-0.3009	124
2	SF Austin	40.937	57	-0.4304	108
3	UT Rio Grande	42.923	118	-1.5069	23
4	Lamar	43.717	151	0.3909	225
5	New Orleans	44.158	169	-0.0609	160
6	Texas A&M-CC	45.583	217	0.1736	192
7	SE Louisiana	47.488	289	0.7602	273
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	47.535	291	0.0537	174
9	Nicholls	48.332	312	1.7237	346
10	Houston Baptist	49.859	340	0.7723	275
11	Northwestern St	50.442	345	2.0112	356
12	Incarnate Word	51.298	356	1.3255	330

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	49.711	7	-1.7058	67
2	UT Rio Grande	57.435	102	-1.2236	94
3	Houston Baptist	57.915	117	-2.8738	17
4	New Orleans	58.402	134	0.0551	211
5	Northwestern St	60.606	189	0.7478	282
6	Nicholls	61.022	205	-0.7091	135
7	Lamar	61.557	221	-0.2579	181
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	61.788	226	-1.2339	92
9	Incarnate Word	62.645	248	-0.9600	110
10	Texas A&M-CC	63.506	275	-0.2569	182
11	SE Louisiana	64.048	292	2.3571	354
12	SF Austin	70.891	362	2.2762	353

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	17.463	1	-1.1158	53
2	Lamar	23.624	88	-0.5270	115
3	UT Rio Grande	24.354	130	-1.3376	32
4	Texas A&M-CC	25.333	169	0.0259	195
5	SF Austin	25.747	190	0.7261	290
6	SE Louisiana	25.996	203	0.3597	241
7	Nicholls	26.284	219	0.4140	251
8	New Orleans	26.562	229	-0.4842	121
9	Houston Baptist	26.745	233	-1.3226	37
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	26.868	235	0.2027	217
11	Northwestern St	28.772	306	1.5269	348
12	Incarnate Word	29.606	328	-0.1817	165

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	40.366	8	-1.7334	65
2	Lamar	46.322	89	-1.8440	52
3	SE Louisiana	46.927	106	0.2317	245
4	UT Rio Grande	47.216	118	-1.4025	88
5	Houston Baptist	47.300	121	-2.8860	14
6	Nicholls	47.719	130	-1.0611	122
7	Incarnate Word	48.775	157	-2.3523	28
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	48.846	159	-1.1087	117
9	Northwestern St	49.453	183	-0.0607	214
10	Texas A&M-CC	49.661	193	-0.0549	215
11	New Orleans	49.845	201	-0.4437	172
12	SF Austin	56.565	335	2.0911	345

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	43.956	15	-0.7504	84
2	SF Austin	45.350	31	-0.6328	99
3	Lamar	50.211	135	0.5867	215
4	Texas A&M-CC	52.999	206	0.4338	195
5	UT Rio Grande	53.141	209	-0.7012	92
6	New Orleans	53.684	226	-0.5776	103
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	54.897	259	1.2340	272
8	SE Louisiana	55.363	276	0.5759	210
9	Houston Baptist	56.608	305	0.4624	199
10	Nicholls	56.760	308	2.5961	350
11	Northwestern St	59.152	335	3.2742	360
12	Incarnate Word	60.330	348	1.8508	327

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	29.109	4	-2.2762	13
2	SE Louisiana	35.952	74	-2.3571	12
3	Texas A&M-CC	36.494	91	0.2569	184
4	Incarnate Word	37.355	118	0.9600	256
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.212	140	1.2339	274
6	Lamar	38.443	145	0.2579	185
7	Nicholls	38.978	161	0.7091	231
8	Northwestern St	39.394	177	-0.7478	84
9	New Orleans	41.598	232	-0.0551	155
10	Houston Baptist	42.085	249	2.8738	349
11	UT Rio Grande	42.565	264	1.2236	272
12	McNeese	50.289	359	1.7058	299

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	6.754	5	-0.9564	21
2	SE Louisiana	8.847	49	-0.9562	22
3	Lamar	9.385	72	-0.2493	122
4	Texas A&M-CC	9.794	103	0.1276	205
5	Incarnate Word	10.292	140	0.1353	208
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	10.411	155	-0.2482	123
7	UT Rio Grande	10.853	183	-0.1750	139
8	New Orleans	10.978	189	-0.0237	176
9	Nicholls	11.481	228	0.6157	298
10	Northwestern St	12.297	268	-0.3519	103
11	Houston Baptist	13.808	336	1.5388	360
12	McNeese	13.946	338	0.5336	285

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	22.835	3	-1.8071	24
2	SE Louisiana	26.309	19	-2.8716	4
3	Texas A&M-CC	28.335	51	0.2313	195
4	Lamar	28.812	67	-0.7792	79
5	Incarnate Word	29.159	81	0.1136	182
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	29.690	95	0.7571	249
7	Nicholls	30.595	120	0.2482	200
8	Northwestern St	31.642	156	-1.2202	44
9	Houston Baptist	34.908	242	2.2162	340
10	New Orleans	34.998	244	-0.6049	101
11	UT Rio Grande	35.051	249	0.7712	251
12	McNeese	39.882	344	0.8269	256

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	30.621	88	-1.4543	54
2	SF Austin	30.753	91	-0.9359	87
3	New Orleans	31.646	118	0.6178	258
4	Lamar	31.865	130	-0.1417	169
5	SE Louisiana	33.914	212	0.1554	207
6	Texas A&M-CC	34.676	238	0.1969	213
7	McNeese	35.117	250	0.7791	277
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	35.277	259	-1.6778	37
9	Incarnate Word	35.337	262	0.9240	287
10	Nicholls	35.643	272	0.6919	266
11	Northwestern St	38.569	340	0.3579	234
12	Houston Baptist	39.983	351	2.5079	357

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	29.590	60	0.6844	192
2	McNeese	38.690	225	1.2873	232
3	UT Rio Grande	39.050	241	2.5688	305
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	40.410	274	-1.2051	75
5	SF Austin	40.570	279	0.0944	148
6	New Orleans	41.420	292	3.1411	323
7	Nicholls	42.340	305	1.0841	220
8	Lamar	43.100	314	2.3289	291
9	Texas A&M-CC	43.700	316	-0.8430	97
10	Northwestern St	47.060	339	3.7880	343
11	SE Louisiana	49.130	347	4.7545	355
12	Incarnate Word	50.430	354	5.7470	362

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	16.796	46	-0.1866	133
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	19.737	134	-1.4135	14
3	Lamar	21.946	213	0.5520	222
4	McNeese	21.990	218	0.4814	216
5	UT Rio Grande	23.259	273	1.3114	309
6	SF Austin	24.820	304	0.8552	262
7	Texas A&M-CC	25.133	309	-0.2047	127
8	Nicholls	25.388	316	1.0763	287
9	New Orleans	25.843	329	1.6598	325
10	Northwestern St	26.875	337	1.6410	323
11	SE Louisiana	27.307	341	2.3862	355
12	Incarnate Word	32.054	364	3.2955	364

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	23.734	47	0.4432	183
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	30.235	199	-1.1419	45
3	McNeese	31.466	232	0.8287	235
4	SF Austin	32.630	277	0.3035	167
5	UT Rio Grande	33.331	292	2.1404	322
6	Nicholls	33.439	295	0.6274	203
7	Lamar	33.539	298	0.8213	234
8	Texas A&M-CC	33.923	305	-0.6356	93
9	New Orleans	35.888	330	2.4853	338
10	SE Louisiana	37.149	338	2.6432	343
11	Northwestern St	38.374	346	2.2924	331
12	Incarnate Word	40.564	359	3.4484	359

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	63.935	13	-3.1673	5
2	Lamar	66.385	42	0.0210	204
3	Northwestern St	68.982	100	-0.3644	171
4	McNeese	69.336	111	-0.3869	166
5	UT Rio Grande	69.676	121	-0.5516	148
6	New Orleans	71.777	219	-0.0200	202
7	SE Louisiana	72.326	235	1.2415	301
8	Texas A&M-CC	72.531	239	0.5277	259
9	Houston Baptist	73.067	247	-0.4002	163
10	SF Austin	76.945	334	2.1726	340
11	Nicholls	77.697	342	3.4760	361
12	Incarnate Word	79.547	361	2.5281	352

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	45.913	50	-3.5304	8
2	SE Louisiana	49.318	112	-1.4406	74
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	53.533	202	-1.4608	71
4	Lamar	54.206	224	-0.1620	157
5	Incarnate Word	56.138	264	2.0826	300
6	Houston Baptist	59.072	308	4.7114	362
7	Nicholls	59.072	309	0.7690	220
8	Northwestern St	59.543	314	1.5190	270
9	UT Rio Grande	60.067	324	2.4152	314
10	New Orleans	60.646	329	2.5225	320
11	McNeese	60.802	330	2.0053	293
12	Texas A&M-CC	65.723	362	4.4690	359

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	14.904	7	0.4995	80
2	Nicholls	12.565	26	0.7975	41
3	SE Louisiana	12.361	34	0.7218	47
4	Texas A&M-CC	10.611	110	0.2934	115
5	Lamar	10.509	119	0.0113	175
6	Houston Baptist	9.816	158	-0.5004	280
7	Northwestern St	9.469	190	-0.1404	207
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	9.044	216	-1.0708	352
9	SF Austin	8.754	237	-0.9281	343
10	New Orleans	8.376	253	-0.2020	219
11	Incarnate Word	8.245	262	-0.0499	187
12	UT Rio Grande	7.545	301	-0.6871	312

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	8.552	7	0.5033	50
2	SF Austin	7.101	24	0.3507	84
3	McNeese	6.914	31	0.2090	125
4	New Orleans	5.426	109	0.9856	9
5	Houston Baptist	5.405	110	0.1169	147
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	4.607	182	-0.0506	189
7	Nicholls	3.724	264	-0.5633	324
8	UT Rio Grande	3.324	291	0.0531	159
9	Texas A&M-CC	3.257	296	-0.6424	334
10	Northwestern St	3.197	302	-1.0365	362
11	SE Louisiana	2.750	326	0.0274	166
12	Incarnate Word	2.140	352	-0.9145	359

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	23.013	59	1.1036	321
2	Nicholls	26.405	237	-0.1562	119
3	SF Austin	26.592	254	0.1474	172
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	26.728	260	0.2690	195
5	Lamar	27.701	288	0.9841	307
6	New Orleans	27.724	290	1.1767	329
7	Texas A&M-CC	27.887	296	-0.3208	88
8	UT Rio Grande	28.618	319	1.1084	322
9	Northwestern St	29.249	331	1.0333	314
10	McNeese	29.603	337	0.9631	303
11	SE Louisiana	31.609	360	2.1850	362
12	Incarnate Word	31.648	361	1.8120	358

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	73.593	96	0.2409	198
2	UT Rio Grande	73.140	112	-0.1668	260
3	Nicholls	72.084	164	0.3256	181
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	71.987	167	0.7984	111
5	Texas A&M-CC	71.059	203	0.0942	223
6	SF Austin	70.300	224	0.0693	225
7	Northwestern St	69.278	264	0.5006	158
8	Lamar	68.845	282	-0.2483	273
9	McNeese	68.568	293	0.2622	191
10	SE Louisiana	67.434	328	-0.1317	257
11	Incarnate Word	66.260	348	-0.1117	255
12	Houston Baptist	65.681	353	-0.6190	314

Location invert reset

Result invert reset

Game Type invert reset

Points Per Possession reset

Mean
Std
Median
Min
Max

selected out of records.

Showing - of

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Envo Magazine