College Basketball Analytics, Insights, and Trends

Quick Links
Teams
- America East
  - Albany
  - Bryant
  - Binghamton
  - Hartford
  - Maine
  - New Hampshire
  - NJIT
  - UMass Lowell
  - UMBC
  - Vermont
- American
  - Charlotte
  - East Carolina
  - Florida Atlantic
  - Memphis
  - North Texas
  - Rice
  - Temple
  - Tulane
  - Tulsa
  - UAB
  - USF
  - UTSA
  - Wichita State
- Atlantic 10
  - Davidson
  - Dayton
  - Duquesne
  - Fordham
  - George Mason
  - George Washington
  - La Salle
  - Loyola-Chicago
  - Richmond
  - St. Josephs
  - Saint Louis
  - St. Bonaventure
  - Rhode Island
  - UMass
  - VCU
- ACC
  - Boston College
  - California
  - Clemson
  - Duke
  - Florida State
  - Georgia Tech
  - Louisville
  - Miami
  - NC State
  - North Carolina
  - Notre Dame
  - Pitt
  - SMU
  - Stanford
  - Syracuse
  - Virginia
  - Virginia Tech
  - Wake Forest
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
  - Arizona
  - Arizona State
  - Baylor
  - BYU
  - Cincinnati
  - Colorado
  - Houston
  - Iowa State
  - Kansas
  - Kansas State
  - Oklahoma State
  - TCU
  - Texas Tech
  - UCF
  - Utah
  - West Virginia
- Big East
  - Butler
  - Creighton
  - Depaul
  - Georgetown
  - Marquette
  - Providence
  - Seton Hall
  - St. John’s
  - UConn
  - Villanova
  - Xavier
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
  - Illinois
  - Indiana
  - Iowa
  - Maryland
  - Michigan State
  - Minnesota
  - Nebraska
  - Northwestern
  - Ohio State
  - Oregon
  - Penn State
  - Purdue
  - Rutgers
  - UCLA
  - USC
  - Washington
  - Wisconsin
- Big West
- Coastal
  - Campbell
  - Charleston
  - Delaware
  - Drexel
  - Elon
  - Hampton
  - Hofstra
  - Monmouth
  - North Carolina A&T
  - Northeastern
  - Stony Brook
  - Towson
  - UNC Wilmington
  - William & Mary
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
  - Brown
  - Columbia
  - Cornell
  - Dartmouth
  - Harvard
  - Pennsylvania
  - Princeton
  - Yale
- MAAC
  - Canisius
  - Fairfield
  - Iona
  - Manhattan
  - Marist
  - Merrimack
  - Mt. St. Mary’s
  - Niagara
  - Quinnipiac
  - Rider
  - Sacred Heart
  - Saint Peter’s
  - Siena
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
  - Air Force
  - Boise State
  - Colorado State
  - Fresno State
  - Nevada
  - New Mexico
  - San Diego State
  - San Jose State
  - UNLV
  - Utah State
  - Wyoming
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
  - American
  - Army
  - Boston University
  - Bucknell
  - Colgate
  - Holy Cross
  - Lafayette
  - Lehigh
  - Loyola (MD)
  - Navy
- SEC
  - Alabama
  - Arkansas
  - Auburn
  - Florida
  - Georgia
  - Kentucky
  - LSU
  - Mississippi State
  - Missouri
  - Oklahoma
  - Ole Miss
  - South Carolina
  - Tennessee
  - Texas
  - Texas A&M
  - Vanderbilt
- Southern
  - Chattanooga
  - East Tennessee State
  - Furman
  - Mercer
  - Samford
  - The Citadel
  - UNC Greensboro
  - VMI
  - Western Carolina
  - Wofford
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Conferences
- America East
- American
- Atlantic 10
- ACC
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
- Big East
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
- Big West
- Coastal
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
- MAAC
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
- SEC
- Southern
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Statistics
Contact Us

Search for:

Conferences

Conferences

Standings
Statistics
Trend Lab

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	13.038	66	0.7030	95
2	Texas A&M-CC	-0.332	154	0.4959	118
3	Nicholls	-1.568	169	1.3283	35
4	Lamar	-2.939	189	1.1351	50
5	SE Louisiana	-5.758	218	0.9224	70
6	Incarnate Word	-6.557	227	0.8284	78
7	Northwestern St	-6.568	228	0.9120	71
8	UT Rio Grande	-7.541	238	0.1453	160
9	SF Austin	-10.660	270	-1.3672	324
10	Houston Baptist	-11.271	276	2.8517	3
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	-17.150	329	-0.4000	235
12	New Orleans	-20.766	345	0.2870	137

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.166	43	0.0048	106
2	Incarnate Word	0.062	144	0.0067	94
3	SF Austin	0.055	155	-0.0202	308
4	Texas A&M-CC	0.030	184	0.0071	90
5	Nicholls	0.024	191	0.0105	66
6	UT Rio Grande	0.007	210	0.0117	60
7	SE Louisiana	-0.006	225	0.0150	40
8	Lamar	-0.012	234	0.0092	78
9	Houston Baptist	-0.053	280	0.0173	29
10	Northwestern St	-0.059	289	0.0138	49
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	-0.205	353	0.0002	142
12	New Orleans	-0.226	356	-0.0002	147

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1655.899	46	26.3528	10
2	Nicholls	1523.645	152	6.4229	130
3	Lamar	1498.320	183	20.1850	26
4	Texas A&M-CC	1496.738	185	-4.2020	231
5	SE Louisiana	1463.070	228	7.4167	118
6	SF Austin	1443.869	247	-14.6473	305
7	Northwestern St	1435.470	259	8.7217	106
8	Incarnate Word	1395.779	301	17.5758	37
9	UT Rio Grande	1376.772	317	-1.3767	207
10	Houston Baptist	1323.955	338	6.9606	124
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	1297.735	350	-22.2193	335
12	New Orleans	1248.637	363	-23.7513	344

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.581	46	0.0084	101
2	Lamar	0.521	128	0.0200	13
3	Nicholls	0.512	140	0.0141	41
4	Texas A&M-CC	0.489	190	0.0089	91
5	Northwestern St	0.482	209	0.0069	125
6	SE Louisiana	0.478	215	0.0090	88
7	SF Austin	0.459	252	0.0048	157
8	UT Rio Grande	0.459	254	0.0044	162
9	Incarnate Word	0.458	256	0.0171	25
10	Houston Baptist	0.430	301	0.0145	38
11	New Orleans	0.402	335	-0.0027	274
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.395	342	-0.0037	294

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.540	64	-0.0068	222
2	Texas A&M-CC	0.538	68	0.0085	54
3	Incarnate Word	0.533	86	-0.0037	177
4	UT Rio Grande	0.525	117	0.0105	38
5	Northwestern St	0.498	267	0.0130	23
6	Houston Baptist	0.497	269	-0.0108	277
7	SE Louisiana	0.497	270	-0.0156	322
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.494	283	0.0002	136
9	Nicholls	0.492	288	-0.0132	300
10	Lamar	0.485	313	-0.0195	341
11	SF Austin	0.476	329	-0.0078	236
12	New Orleans	0.463	348	-0.0072	228

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1.143	25	-0.0209	301
2	Incarnate Word	1.104	75	0.0073	99
3	Texas A&M-CC	1.086	112	0.0023	124
4	UT Rio Grande	1.052	193	0.0034	118
5	SE Louisiana	1.049	198	0.0046	113
6	Nicholls	1.042	213	-0.0261	323
7	Northwestern St	1.014	284	0.0205	33
8	Lamar	1.012	287	-0.0299	339
9	Houston Baptist	0.996	311	-0.0328	343
10	SF Austin	0.951	352	-0.0088	211
11	New Orleans	0.946	355	0.0027	121
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.930	359	0.0075	97

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Nicholls	0.143	51	0.0043	307
2	McNeese	0.152	125	-0.0038	142
3	Incarnate Word	0.156	157	-0.0063	90
4	SE Louisiana	0.159	188	-0.0143	10
5	Texas A&M-CC	0.160	191	-0.0005	224
6	Houston Baptist	0.167	246	-0.0024	178
7	Lamar	0.174	292	0.0024	281
8	New Orleans	0.175	294	-0.0005	223
9	UT Rio Grande	0.175	297	0.0028	289
10	Northwestern St	0.187	335	0.0044	310
11	SF Austin	0.208	361	-0.0146	7
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.210	362	-0.0092	40

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Incarnate Word	0.396	5	-0.0196	294
2	Texas A&M-CC	0.377	17	-0.0314	354
3	SF Austin	0.377	18	-0.0330	355
4	Lamar	0.373	20	-0.0021	124
5	McNeese	0.357	37	-0.0264	331
6	UT Rio Grande	0.353	43	-0.0284	341
7	Northwestern St	0.350	49	-0.0098	201
8	Nicholls	0.338	72	-0.0134	239
9	SE Louisiana	0.338	73	0.0033	71
10	New Orleans	0.278	234	0.0263	3
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.249	307	-0.0053	151
12	Houston Baptist	0.249	310	-0.0238	319

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	0.359	109	-0.0097	235
2	McNeese	0.359	110	-0.0006	159
3	SE Louisiana	0.353	127	-0.0003	156
4	New Orleans	0.350	131	-0.0208	313
5	Nicholls	0.338	171	0.0159	50
6	SF Austin	0.333	189	-0.0471	363
7	Northwestern St	0.332	193	-0.0098	236
8	Houston Baptist	0.324	206	-0.0262	341
9	Incarnate Word	0.298	292	0.0353	9
10	Lamar	0.291	308	0.0023	129
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.286	318	-0.0081	226
12	UT Rio Grande	0.230	362	-0.0440	361

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	113.205	65	0.4735	103
2	Texas A&M-CC	105.214	167	-0.3183	242
3	Incarnate Word	104.929	174	-0.3311	244
4	Nicholls	103.732	203	0.9358	49
5	UT Rio Grande	102.900	216	-0.5716	282
6	SE Louisiana	102.407	219	1.1534	30
7	Northwestern St	100.669	246	-0.0930	201
8	Lamar	99.183	274	-0.2865	239
9	Houston Baptist	98.673	284	1.2844	19
10	New Orleans	96.180	321	0.3120	132
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	93.858	340	0.1114	170
12	SF Austin	93.334	343	-0.2271	231

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	41.076	18	-0.5133	236
2	Texas A&M-CC	40.804	22	0.2385	112
3	Incarnate Word	40.746	25	-0.3402	208
4	UT Rio Grande	38.494	109	0.6472	47
5	SE Louisiana	37.159	197	0.1443	124
6	Lamar	37.059	205	-1.2918	339
7	Nicholls	36.950	210	-1.3550	342
8	Northwestern St	35.743	279	0.1878	119
9	Houston Baptist	35.053	304	-0.7881	288
10	SF Austin	34.742	319	-0.0798	162
11	New Orleans	34.111	339	0.6267	48
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	33.242	350	0.3786	93

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Incarnate Word	87.388	39	-0.8084	306
2	Lamar	87.054	49	0.5399	131
3	UT Rio Grande	86.843	54	0.4336	148
4	Nicholls	86.482	65	-0.8632	314
5	McNeese	86.340	71	-0.1870	239
6	Texas A&M-CC	83.729	187	-0.2562	251
7	SE Louisiana	83.681	188	2.5971	6
8	Northwestern St	82.857	225	-0.2479	250
9	Houston Baptist	82.850	226	0.4484	145
10	New Orleans	82.770	230	2.0325	14
11	SF Austin	82.430	246	2.3480	10
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	79.944	331	0.9280	80

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	48.782	14	0.3849	86
2	McNeese	47.584	40	-0.5101	207
3	Incarnate Word	46.629	75	0.0618	126
4	SE Louisiana	44.475	192	-1.0923	297
5	UT Rio Grande	44.230	207	0.4950	69
6	Northwestern St	43.353	260	0.3441	91
7	Nicholls	42.887	285	-1.2823	319
8	Lamar	42.636	298	-1.7050	344
9	Houston Baptist	42.503	304	-1.2434	313
10	SF Austin	42.223	318	-1.1659	306
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	41.663	330	-0.0362	141
12	New Orleans	41.620	332	-0.2681	172

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	70.704	11	-2.0173	346
2	New Orleans	69.347	20	1.6588	29
3	SE Louisiana	67.973	29	1.6591	28
4	Lamar	66.900	40	-0.4205	222
5	Incarnate Word	64.119	98	1.3820	43
6	Nicholls	63.992	101	0.1325	160
7	Northwestern St	63.942	104	-2.0265	347
8	McNeese	63.383	116	0.5585	119
9	SF Austin	63.243	125	-1.9121	342
10	Houston Baptist	56.277	292	-1.3780	323
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	51.383	351	0.2685	145
12	UT Rio Grande	49.511	359	-0.7621	262

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	32.393	4	-0.4960	250
2	McNeese	29.870	21	-0.1722	187
3	Incarnate Word	29.109	40	0.5045	68
4	SE Louisiana	28.400	66	0.7290	35
5	Lamar	26.885	129	-0.9340	305
6	New Orleans	26.359	168	1.1865	8
7	Nicholls	26.212	177	-1.2215	340
8	SF Austin	25.927	191	-1.0029	314
9	Northwestern St	25.223	241	-1.4292	353
10	UT Rio Grande	23.983	299	-0.3022	214
11	Houston Baptist	23.225	328	-1.1446	329
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	20.996	361	0.1564	126

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	59.153	16	-1.8245	347
2	Lamar	58.350	23	-0.0591	196
3	New Orleans	57.376	31	2.8350	2
4	SE Louisiana	56.957	36	3.2571	1
5	Incarnate Word	55.936	52	0.6098	125
6	Nicholls	55.421	62	-0.4576	243
7	McNeese	54.674	83	0.4268	144
8	Northwestern St	53.125	118	-1.9570	352
9	SF Austin	52.123	146	-0.2399	223
10	Houston Baptist	46.534	298	-0.8621	290
11	UT Rio Grande	42.743	348	-0.2447	224
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	41.148	356	0.8197	103

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	55.247	50	-0.5778	196
2	Texas A&M-CC	54.895	64	0.9682	47
3	McNeese	54.636	73	-0.7311	225
4	Incarnate Word	51.822	172	0.4396	79
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	51.067	209	-0.4331	176
6	SE Louisiana	50.095	253	-1.2779	281
7	SF Austin	49.714	263	-1.8960	335
8	Houston Baptist	49.665	264	-1.5018	303
9	Northwestern St	47.930	316	-1.1240	267
10	Nicholls	47.046	331	-2.0417	342
11	New Orleans	46.237	342	-0.3083	163
12	Lamar	45.969	345	-1.6184	315

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	50.489	6	0.7621	103
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	48.617	14	-0.2685	220
3	Houston Baptist	43.723	73	1.3780	42
4	SF Austin	36.757	240	1.9121	23
5	McNeese	36.617	249	-0.5585	246
6	Northwestern St	36.058	261	2.0265	18
7	Nicholls	36.008	264	-0.1325	205
8	Incarnate Word	35.881	267	-1.3820	322
9	Lamar	33.100	325	0.4205	143
10	SE Louisiana	32.027	336	-1.6591	337
11	New Orleans	30.653	345	-1.6588	336
12	Texas A&M-CC	29.296	354	2.0173	19

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	14.511	24	0.9495	18
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	12.247	100	0.2222	111
3	Houston Baptist	11.828	126	0.3565	91
4	Incarnate Word	11.638	142	-0.8448	343
5	McNeese	11.206	172	-0.3411	256
6	Nicholls	10.738	206	-0.1335	210
7	Northwestern St	10.521	227	1.6170	2
8	Lamar	10.174	252	-0.3578	261
9	SF Austin	8.815	328	0.9232	19
10	SE Louisiana	8.759	330	-0.5847	312
11	Texas A&M-CC	8.411	341	0.7345	38
12	New Orleans	7.752	352	-0.5598	305

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	44.100	2	0.6784	113
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.796	44	0.1083	187
3	Houston Baptist	36.316	87	1.3105	48
4	McNeese	31.666	208	-0.6139	271
5	Incarnate Word	31.452	218	-1.4182	337
6	Nicholls	31.061	228	-0.4055	242
7	SF Austin	30.306	247	2.5879	4
8	Northwestern St	29.732	269	1.7091	25
9	Lamar	28.704	303	0.5990	125
10	SE Louisiana	26.724	336	-0.6600	277
11	New Orleans	25.394	348	-0.8024	287
12	Texas A&M-CC	24.576	352	1.5682	32

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Incarnate Word	36.898	37	-1.2230	280
2	Lamar	35.730	79	-1.7884	319
3	Northwestern St	35.016	119	3.4941	2
4	Texas A&M-CC	34.299	168	0.6607	97
5	Nicholls	34.051	177	-0.0896	174
6	McNeese	33.696	194	-0.1360	176
7	Houston Baptist	33.624	200	-0.4909	215
8	UT Rio Grande	31.914	281	2.0363	24
9	SE Louisiana	31.620	296	-2.1024	338
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	30.997	319	0.8067	82
11	New Orleans	29.705	348	-2.2481	343
12	SF Austin	28.156	361	0.6690	96

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	35.876	109	-0.9746	235
2	McNeese	35.873	110	-0.0633	159
3	SE Louisiana	35.273	127	-0.0268	156
4	New Orleans	34.977	131	-2.0788	313
5	Nicholls	33.845	171	1.5908	50
6	SF Austin	33.315	189	-4.7124	363
7	Northwestern St	33.193	193	-0.9810	236
8	Houston Baptist	32.413	206	-2.6223	341
9	Incarnate Word	29.801	292	3.5293	9
10	Lamar	29.104	308	0.2293	129
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	28.639	318	-0.8081	226
12	UT Rio Grande	22.962	362	-4.3980	361

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SE Louisiana	21.806	78	0.7514	77
2	McNeese	20.992	117	-0.7218	269
3	Nicholls	19.583	187	0.2287	132
4	Northwestern St	19.349	205	0.0580	155
5	New Orleans	18.609	241	-0.4226	225
6	Texas A&M-CC	18.595	243	-0.9812	304
7	Houston Baptist	17.659	283	-2.0578	359
8	Incarnate Word	17.270	294	2.2517	5
9	Lamar	16.941	308	0.0036	161
10	SF Austin	16.787	316	-1.6406	344
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	14.307	357	0.0304	158
12	UT Rio Grande	13.705	362	-1.8993	355

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	30.131	68	-0.0274	162
2	Texas A&M-CC	29.483	85	-0.8776	261
3	SE Louisiana	29.158	98	0.8972	74
4	Nicholls	28.564	128	0.8554	77
5	New Orleans	27.747	169	-0.9562	269
6	Northwestern St	27.082	197	-0.8123	258
7	SF Austin	26.525	218	-3.0304	361
8	Houston Baptist	25.738	251	-1.7455	337
9	Incarnate Word	25.255	273	2.7306	8
10	Lamar	24.675	294	0.4109	114
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	22.241	342	-0.2316	190
12	UT Rio Grande	19.468	359	-3.3925	363

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SE Louisiana	74.887	79	0.0191	191
2	Northwestern St	70.343	239	2.8616	14
3	McNeese	69.472	262	-3.0179	351
4	UT Rio Grande	68.774	278	1.7758	52
5	Incarnate Word	68.104	296	1.0139	106
6	Nicholls	67.640	306	-1.2768	298
7	Lamar	67.595	309	-0.7197	254
8	Houston Baptist	67.447	312	-3.3834	358
9	New Orleans	66.965	320	0.6510	135
10	Texas A&M-CC	64.710	350	-1.6025	315
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	64.062	355	1.2769	87
12	SF Austin	63.526	357	1.8561	47

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	61.792	11	3.4388	8
2	UT Rio Grande	61.239	17	0.8691	105
3	Lamar	58.110	51	-4.0828	359
4	Northwestern St	53.804	128	1.0863	89
5	Texas A&M-CC	51.995	176	0.4105	127
6	SF Austin	51.253	203	-0.3580	177
7	New Orleans	50.050	231	-0.6936	206
8	McNeese	49.980	233	-1.0342	237
9	Houston Baptist	46.559	306	1.2939	80
10	SE Louisiana	45.793	317	-2.1327	302
11	Incarnate Word	44.892	330	-1.7911	287
12	Nicholls	42.728	354	1.6182	61

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SE Louisiana	8.154	61	-0.3494	78
2	Nicholls	8.804	126	1.1543	353
3	McNeese	8.872	137	-0.3156	88
4	UT Rio Grande	8.877	139	0.7155	322
5	Incarnate Word	8.904	141	-0.1439	126
6	Texas A&M-CC	9.639	228	0.6020	310
7	Northwestern St	10.376	292	0.9619	346
8	Lamar	10.507	305	0.8513	336
9	New Orleans	10.767	324	0.4770	292
10	Houston Baptist	11.285	350	0.2602	246
11	SF Austin	12.167	361	0.1223	201
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	13.300	363	-0.5735	39

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	2.961	3	0.2698	240
2	McNeese	4.315	129	-0.4073	40
3	Incarnate Word	4.364	144	-0.3608	51
4	Houston Baptist	4.631	198	-0.5025	24
5	SF Austin	4.736	225	-0.0352	140
6	Lamar	5.216	289	0.6885	338
7	SE Louisiana	5.387	307	0.1083	191
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	5.493	316	0.3071	253
9	Northwestern St	5.688	334	-0.4756	29
10	Texas A&M-CC	6.004	342	-0.3037	65
11	Nicholls	6.017	343	0.7473	344
12	New Orleans	6.433	360	-0.1638	98

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	23.355	197	-0.0673	211
2	SE Louisiana	23.176	209	0.9101	49
3	New Orleans	23.054	221	-0.6645	312
4	Houston Baptist	22.593	248	-0.2455	250
5	Northwestern St	22.289	266	-0.3660	270
6	Lamar	22.162	272	1.0204	40
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	22.155	274	-0.7484	321
8	SF Austin	21.988	286	-1.4644	363
9	Texas A&M-CC	21.463	310	-0.0938	219
10	Nicholls	20.503	340	-0.0751	212
11	Incarnate Word	20.458	341	1.4240	15
12	UT Rio Grande	17.645	364	-1.8022	364

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	72.893	43	0.3816	75
2	New Orleans	71.869	78	-0.4903	225
3	Nicholls	71.025	121	0.1272	106
4	SF Austin	70.023	178	0.5096	59
5	Texas A&M-CC	69.589	201	-2.4002	362
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	69.323	214	-0.5310	233
7	SE Louisiana	69.248	217	-0.7839	274
8	Lamar	68.938	228	-1.0802	320
9	McNeese	66.869	314	-0.2644	181
10	Incarnate Word	66.731	321	0.7913	40
11	Northwestern St	66.285	333	-1.6110	348
12	Houston Baptist	66.151	340	-1.3461	341

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	0.475	37	-0.0089	52
2	McNeese	0.477	41	-0.0040	111
3	Nicholls	0.478	47	-0.0100	46
4	SF Austin	0.487	72	0.0234	354
5	Northwestern St	0.501	129	0.0022	195
6	Texas A&M-CC	0.501	134	-0.0139	22
7	UT Rio Grande	0.509	179	-0.0077	66
8	SE Louisiana	0.516	214	0.0120	293
9	Incarnate Word	0.522	243	-0.0114	37
10	Houston Baptist	0.522	245	-0.0108	40
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.542	326	-0.0080	61
12	New Orleans	0.550	346	0.0146	312

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.965	19	0.0043	162
2	SF Austin	0.985	48	0.0571	362
3	Lamar	0.990	51	-0.0204	30
4	Nicholls	1.004	73	-0.0206	29
5	Texas A&M-CC	1.024	125	-0.0136	47
6	SE Louisiana	1.040	162	0.0202	272
7	Northwestern St	1.048	191	0.0036	158
8	Houston Baptist	1.050	195	-0.0287	10
9	UT Rio Grande	1.054	213	0.0083	187
10	Incarnate Word	1.065	243	-0.0078	75
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	1.087	292	-0.0118	57
12	New Orleans	1.154	355	0.0160	248

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.198	22	-0.0040	204
2	SF Austin	0.190	34	-0.0152	358
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.188	39	0.0007	102
4	SE Louisiana	0.173	94	-0.0019	148
5	Texas A&M-CC	0.172	100	-0.0057	240
6	UT Rio Grande	0.169	113	-0.0065	257
7	Houston Baptist	0.168	117	0.0082	11
8	Incarnate Word	0.165	141	0.0027	71
9	Lamar	0.163	149	-0.0054	232
10	Nicholls	0.162	160	0.0048	42
11	Northwestern St	0.160	179	0.0016	90
12	New Orleans	0.151	247	-0.0078	283

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SE Louisiana	0.725	190	-0.0069	258
2	Nicholls	0.716	246	-0.0042	220
3	Houston Baptist	0.716	249	-0.0068	255
4	Lamar	0.711	259	0.0256	4
5	Texas A&M-CC	0.711	260	0.0020	138
6	McNeese	0.710	262	-0.0117	304
7	Incarnate Word	0.707	274	-0.0168	338
8	Northwestern St	0.700	299	0.0029	133
9	SF Austin	0.693	318	-0.0049	228
10	UT Rio Grande	0.677	347	-0.0144	324
11	New Orleans	0.666	356	0.0180	17
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.659	359	-0.0119	307

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	0.272	39	-0.0171	66
2	UT Rio Grande	0.300	91	-0.0035	164
3	Houston Baptist	0.301	94	0.0081	244
4	McNeese	0.324	152	-0.0130	83
5	Northwestern St	0.336	189	0.0182	304
6	Lamar	0.345	211	0.0177	300
7	SF Austin	0.348	215	-0.0317	17
8	Nicholls	0.364	253	-0.0249	29
9	Incarnate Word	0.367	262	0.0248	327
10	SE Louisiana	0.372	274	-0.0316	18
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.372	275	-0.0038	160
12	Texas A&M-CC	0.410	338	-0.0138	77

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	100.167	82	-0.2019	122
2	Lamar	102.122	103	-1.4401	10
3	SF Austin	103.993	132	1.0570	333
4	Nicholls	105.300	158	-0.4385	93
5	Texas A&M-CC	105.546	165	-0.5298	76
6	Northwestern St	107.237	195	-0.9228	30
7	SE Louisiana	108.165	216	0.2477	220
8	Houston Baptist	109.944	251	-1.5837	8
9	UT Rio Grande	110.442	257	-0.4458	91
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	111.008	270	0.5108	273
11	Incarnate Word	111.486	281	-0.9190	31
12	New Orleans	116.947	345	0.0467	176

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	32.829	13	0.0369	144
2	SF Austin	34.694	59	2.6323	363
3	Lamar	34.707	61	-1.0575	12
4	Nicholls	35.069	73	-0.1478	112
5	Texas A&M-CC	35.104	75	-0.7865	35
6	SE Louisiana	36.171	140	1.2535	324
7	Northwestern St	36.339	151	-0.4229	71
8	Incarnate Word	38.197	267	-0.7511	40
9	UT Rio Grande	38.500	283	0.0467	149
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.782	295	-0.1870	104
11	Houston Baptist	39.597	319	-1.3893	6
12	New Orleans	42.244	359	0.7692	269

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	80.981	67	1.2934	299
2	SE Louisiana	81.605	94	1.2752	297
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	81.787	98	0.7895	243
4	McNeese	81.942	106	1.4274	313
5	SF Austin	81.984	108	2.5639	359
6	Incarnate Word	82.321	122	-0.3101	102
7	Nicholls	83.052	153	1.0494	274
8	Lamar	83.851	192	-1.0481	34
9	Houston Baptist	84.105	208	-0.7021	64
10	Northwestern St	85.111	259	-1.0020	37
11	UT Rio Grande	85.765	288	2.0408	343
12	New Orleans	89.532	355	0.1277	164

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	40.167	14	-0.5098	86
2	Lamar	41.387	39	-0.7102	63
3	Nicholls	42.278	71	-0.7989	53
4	SF Austin	42.440	77	1.7394	349
5	Northwestern St	42.798	95	0.0387	160
6	Texas A&M-CC	43.585	137	-1.6732	5
7	SE Louisiana	44.383	185	0.8667	287
8	UT Rio Grande	45.127	230	-0.9880	35
9	Incarnate Word	46.439	294	-0.7705	54
10	Houston Baptist	47.118	324	-1.2437	19
11	New Orleans	47.268	329	0.7958	278
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	47.574	338	-0.6660	70

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	53.359	13	-0.2618	172
2	New Orleans	57.523	70	-2.9654	9
3	SE Louisiana	57.770	74	0.1468	216
4	Northwestern St	60.277	150	0.6100	260
5	Lamar	61.224	192	0.2621	230
6	Nicholls	62.707	243	0.0584	206
7	SF Austin	63.175	256	-0.3615	161
8	Texas A&M-CC	63.217	260	-0.3062	168
9	UT Rio Grande	65.023	312	0.4036	244
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	65.182	315	1.0419	289
11	Incarnate Word	68.285	357	0.5373	257
12	Houston Baptist	68.471	359	-0.8158	108

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	20.586	8	-0.2811	118
2	Northwestern St	24.078	80	-0.5641	67
3	SF Austin	24.428	94	1.2221	335
4	Lamar	24.471	97	-0.6264	57
5	SE Louisiana	24.504	100	0.5335	254
6	Texas A&M-CC	24.650	105	-1.3922	11
7	Nicholls	25.792	177	0.0707	174
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	28.086	299	-0.0493	147
9	New Orleans	28.260	312	-0.3805	97
10	UT Rio Grande	28.603	328	-0.5171	75
11	Incarnate Word	28.945	335	-0.1376	132
12	Houston Baptist	31.038	361	-1.5618	6

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	43.805	17	0.6349	246
2	SE Louisiana	47.117	58	0.8973	274
3	Texas A&M-CC	51.211	187	0.6979	256
4	New Orleans	51.396	192	-2.4354	11
5	Northwestern St	51.418	193	-0.1664	152
6	Lamar	51.551	203	-0.4334	128
7	SF Austin	51.645	209	1.3230	293
8	Nicholls	51.902	215	0.7908	261
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	53.398	268	1.3717	298
10	UT Rio Grande	55.782	334	1.7625	324
11	Incarnate Word	56.547	344	0.2031	205
12	Houston Baptist	57.560	352	-1.1815	53

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	46.913	30	-0.8577	86
2	Lamar	47.463	42	-0.8662	84
3	McNeese	47.567	44	-1.1605	56
4	SF Austin	47.659	50	1.0041	276
5	Texas A&M-CC	48.605	73	-3.6021	1
6	Nicholls	49.504	116	-0.7718	92
7	Incarnate Word	50.960	173	-0.2905	129
8	UT Rio Grande	51.719	207	-2.3932	8
9	SE Louisiana	51.725	208	0.2977	196
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	53.124	270	-1.5843	33
11	Houston Baptist	54.183	306	-1.8018	21
12	New Orleans	55.340	331	1.7711	332

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	31.529	6	0.8158	257
2	Incarnate Word	31.715	8	-0.5373	108
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	34.818	50	-1.0419	76
4	UT Rio Grande	34.977	53	-0.4036	121
5	Texas A&M-CC	36.783	105	0.3062	197
6	SF Austin	36.825	109	0.3615	204
7	Nicholls	37.293	122	-0.0584	159
8	Lamar	38.776	173	-0.2621	135
9	Northwestern St	39.723	215	-0.6100	105
10	SE Louisiana	42.230	291	-0.1468	149
11	New Orleans	42.477	295	2.9654	356
12	McNeese	46.641	352	0.2618	193

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	8.559	13	0.1725	195
2	Incarnate Word	9.252	28	-0.6135	45
3	Nicholls	9.277	31	-0.2185	110
4	UT Rio Grande	9.897	74	0.5637	269
5	Lamar	10.236	103	-0.4311	63
6	SF Austin	10.265	105	1.4103	353
7	Texas A&M-CC	10.454	123	0.6057	277
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	10.696	154	-0.1377	128
9	SE Louisiana	11.666	259	0.7199	294
10	McNeese	12.243	298	0.3180	225
11	Northwestern St	12.262	299	0.1411	189
12	New Orleans	13.984	357	1.1497	344

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Incarnate Word	25.774	8	-0.5132	100
2	Houston Baptist	26.545	15	0.4794	213
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	28.389	39	-0.5822	87
4	Texas A&M-CC	29.770	72	0.5955	227
5	UT Rio Grande	29.983	81	0.2783	183
6	SF Austin	30.339	97	1.2409	298
7	Nicholls	31.150	132	0.2586	181
8	Lamar	32.300	174	-0.6147	84
9	Northwestern St	33.693	230	-0.8356	69
10	SE Louisiana	34.488	264	0.3779	197
11	New Orleans	38.136	341	2.5631	351
12	McNeese	38.137	342	0.7924	249

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Nicholls	29.140	8	-1.0479	70
2	Lamar	31.018	41	-0.9860	75
3	McNeese	31.988	85	0.1619	184
4	Houston Baptist	32.366	104	0.1241	175
5	SF Austin	32.519	112	3.0724	355
6	UT Rio Grande	32.530	113	2.1126	335
7	SE Louisiana	33.839	195	1.7075	308
8	Texas A&M-CC	34.509	238	1.1040	274
9	Incarnate Word	34.683	247	-1.6443	34
10	Northwestern St	36.226	325	1.8151	320
11	New Orleans	36.378	328	0.7543	239
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	37.186	345	-0.1394	151

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	27.211	39	-1.7143	66
2	UT Rio Grande	29.970	91	-0.3475	164
3	Houston Baptist	30.066	94	0.8108	244
4	McNeese	32.354	152	-1.2977	83
5	Northwestern St	33.615	189	1.8169	304
6	Lamar	34.514	211	1.7673	300
7	SF Austin	34.762	215	-3.1669	17
8	Nicholls	36.406	253	-2.4875	29
9	Incarnate Word	36.665	262	2.4785	327
10	SE Louisiana	37.213	274	-3.1613	18
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	37.234	275	-0.3765	160
12	Texas A&M-CC	41.028	338	-1.3776	77

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	16.971	50	-1.0695	38
2	Houston Baptist	17.233	62	-0.2197	139
3	UT Rio Grande	18.497	115	0.2124	199
4	McNeese	18.632	121	0.0551	181
5	SF Austin	18.874	132	-0.9489	55
6	Lamar	19.321	157	0.5633	246
7	Northwestern St	19.869	190	1.0767	295
8	SE Louisiana	19.996	205	-1.1841	26
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	20.449	228	-0.6689	80
10	Incarnate Word	20.853	245	1.3526	318
11	Nicholls	21.004	254	-1.4581	18
12	Texas A&M-CC	21.750	287	-0.3729	121

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	23.570	46	-1.2906	52
2	Houston Baptist	24.593	84	0.5538	235
3	UT Rio Grande	24.794	96	0.3520	203
4	McNeese	25.913	128	-0.5547	111
5	SF Austin	27.856	205	-1.5505	34
6	Northwestern St	28.052	211	1.0502	284
7	Lamar	28.864	246	0.9922	278
8	Nicholls	29.570	269	-1.8536	24
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	29.602	271	0.1481	182
10	Incarnate Word	29.612	272	1.8808	327
11	SE Louisiana	29.686	274	-2.1157	18
12	Texas A&M-CC	32.280	330	-0.5204	116

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	66.685	5	-0.1446	142
2	Houston Baptist	66.806	8	-2.7582	13
3	Lamar	68.021	22	-0.9775	69
4	SE Louisiana	68.270	27	1.3633	275
5	SF Austin	68.587	35	0.2258	181
6	Nicholls	69.360	56	-0.4289	116
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	69.856	87	-3.1661	8
8	Incarnate Word	70.112	97	0.1322	173
9	Northwestern St	70.814	127	0.9978	252
10	New Orleans	70.836	128	-0.3438	121
11	McNeese	71.821	187	1.6076	301
12	UT Rio Grande	73.224	258	0.3399	193

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	43.848	21	0.7616	238
2	Incarnate Word	48.109	94	-0.6869	118
3	Nicholls	49.915	128	-0.2362	153
4	Northwestern St	50.761	155	-0.0756	167
5	SE Louisiana	50.793	158	0.0007	176
6	UT Rio Grande	51.004	167	-0.0875	166
7	Texas A&M-CC	52.301	202	1.4803	287
8	SF Austin	53.137	224	-0.1866	158
9	Lamar	55.297	277	-0.2958	149
10	McNeese	56.065	289	-0.5821	126
11	New Orleans	58.368	326	2.1560	321
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	59.425	336	-0.3381	146

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	13.285	11	-0.3262	232
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	12.048	33	0.5658	39
3	Houston Baptist	11.736	41	0.6334	30
4	SF Austin	11.625	42	-0.7687	337
5	Nicholls	10.753	89	0.6844	28
6	Texas A&M-CC	10.352	112	0.1310	119
7	UT Rio Grande	10.290	117	0.5007	50
8	Lamar	10.190	126	0.0255	140
9	New Orleans	10.117	131	-0.0300	154
10	SE Louisiana	10.041	140	0.0401	134
11	Northwestern St	9.965	146	0.4928	53
12	Incarnate Word	9.724	170	0.8578	17

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	7.554	11	0.5770	31
2	Northwestern St	6.333	45	-0.4982	326
3	SF Austin	5.833	74	0.0546	148
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	5.689	82	0.7773	15
5	Houston Baptist	5.381	100	0.5040	42
6	Nicholls	5.377	101	-0.4014	306
7	Incarnate Word	5.348	105	-0.3464	291
8	Texas A&M-CC	5.180	122	-0.1096	215
9	McNeese	5.174	123	0.4947	43
10	UT Rio Grande	3.799	283	0.4867	45
11	New Orleans	3.652	296	-0.0850	207
12	SE Louisiana	3.331	319	-0.0761	203

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	20.549	14	-0.4964	83
2	New Orleans	20.931	24	-1.4547	9
3	Lamar	22.889	88	0.2510	236
4	UT Rio Grande	23.033	96	-1.0499	36
5	SF Austin	23.844	155	-1.9378	3
6	Northwestern St	23.851	157	0.4463	267
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	24.200	180	0.2949	243
8	McNeese	24.943	220	0.1885	228
9	Nicholls	25.119	232	-1.0660	34
10	Incarnate Word	25.175	240	0.8518	315
11	SE Louisiana	25.419	251	-1.3927	12
12	Texas A&M-CC	26.616	317	-0.6324	67

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	72.140	62	0.3427	87
2	New Orleans	71.608	80	-0.7561	279
3	Nicholls	70.545	134	-0.0963	153
4	SF Austin	70.184	153	-0.1959	173
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	69.083	203	-0.7670	282
6	Texas A&M-CC	68.343	245	-2.1153	361
7	SE Louisiana	67.978	263	-0.6608	256
8	Lamar	67.593	282	-0.9978	308
9	Incarnate Word	67.062	302	0.8657	30
10	McNeese	66.938	311	0.3523	86
11	Houston Baptist	66.375	334	-1.3995	343
12	Northwestern St	66.019	343	-1.1830	329

Location invert reset

Result invert reset

Game Type invert reset

Points Per Possession reset

Mean
Std
Median
Min
Max

selected out of records.

Showing - of

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Envo Magazine