Conferences – HoopSci

College Basketball Analytics, Insights, and Trends

Conferences
- America East
- American
- Atlantic 10
- ACC
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
- Big East
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
- Big West
- Coastal
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
- MAAC
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
- SEC
- Southern
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Teams
- America East
  - Albany
  - Bryant
  - Binghamton
  - Maine
  - New Hampshire
  - NJIT
  - UMass Lowell
  - UMBC
  - Vermont
- American
  - Charlotte
  - East Carolina
  - Florida Atlantic
  - Memphis
  - North Texas
  - Rice
  - Temple
  - Tulane
  - Tulsa
  - UAB
  - USF
  - UTSA
  - Wichita State
- Atlantic 10
  - Davidson
  - Dayton
  - Duquesne
  - Fordham
  - George Mason
  - George Washington
  - La Salle
  - Loyola-Chicago
  - Richmond
  - St. Josephs
  - Saint Louis
  - St. Bonaventure
  - Rhode Island
  - VCU
- ACC
  - Boston College
  - California
  - Clemson
  - Duke
  - Florida State
  - Georgia Tech
  - Louisville
  - Miami
  - NC State
  - North Carolina
  - Notre Dame
  - Pitt
  - SMU
  - Stanford
  - Syracuse
  - Virginia
  - Virginia Tech
  - Wake Forest
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
  - Arizona
  - Arizona State
  - Baylor
  - BYU
  - Cincinnati
  - Colorado
  - Houston
  - Iowa State
  - Kansas
  - Kansas State
  - Oklahoma State
  - TCU
  - Texas Tech
  - UCF
  - Utah
  - West Virginia
- Big East
  - Butler
  - Creighton
  - Depaul
  - Georgetown
  - Marquette
  - Providence
  - Seton Hall
  - St. John’s
  - UConn
  - Villanova
  - Xavier
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
  - Illinois
  - Indiana
  - Iowa
  - Maryland
  - Michigan State
  - Minnesota
  - Nebraska
  - Northwestern
  - Ohio State
  - Oregon
  - Penn State
  - Purdue
  - Rutgers
  - UCLA
  - USC
  - Washington
  - Wisconsin
- Big West
- Coastal
  - Campbell
  - Charleston
  - Drexel
  - Elon
  - Hampton
  - Hofstra
  - Monmouth
  - North Carolina A&T
  - Northeastern
  - Stony Brook
  - Towson
  - UNC Wilmington
  - William & Mary
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
  - Brown
  - Columbia
  - Cornell
  - Dartmouth
  - Harvard
  - Pennsylvania
  - Princeton
  - Yale
- MAAC
  - Canisius
  - Fairfield
  - Iona
  - Manhattan
  - Marist
  - Merrimack
  - Mt. St. Mary’s
  - Niagara
  - Quinnipiac
  - Rider
  - Sacred Heart
  - Saint Peter’s
  - Siena
- Mid-American
  - Akron
  - Ball State
  - Bowling Green
  - Buffalo
  - Central Michigan
  - Eastern Michigan
  - Kent State
  - Miami (OH)
  - Northern Illinois
  - Ohio
  - Toledo
  - UMass
  - Western Michigan
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
  - Belmont
  - Bradley
  - Drake
  - Evansville
  - Illinois State
  - Indiana State
  - Murray State
  - Northern Iowa
  - Southern Illinois
  - UIC
  - Valparaiso
- Mountain West
  - Air Force
  - Boise State
  - Colorado State
  - Fresno State
  - Grand Canyon
  - Nevada
  - New Mexico
  - San Diego State
  - San Jose State
  - UNLV
  - Utah State
  - Wyoming
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
  - American
  - Army
  - Boston University
  - Bucknell
  - Colgate
  - Holy Cross
  - Lafayette
  - Lehigh
  - Loyola (MD)
  - Navy
- SEC
  - Alabama
  - Arkansas
  - Auburn
  - Florida
  - Georgia
  - Kentucky
  - LSU
  - Mississippi State
  - Missouri
  - Oklahoma
  - Ole Miss
  - South Carolina
  - Tennessee
  - Texas
  - Texas A&M
  - Vanderbilt
- Southern
  - Chattanooga
  - East Tennessee State
  - Furman
  - Mercer
  - Samford
  - The Citadel
  - UNC Greensboro
  - VMI
  - Western Carolina
  - Wofford
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Games
Models
Statistics
Efficiency Trajectories
Articles
Contact

Search for:

Standings
Statistics
Trend Lab

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	5.288	109	-0.8806	285
2	SF Austin	1.248	148	0.9873	69
3	UT Rio Grande	-1.426	169	0.9915	68
4	Texas A&M-CC	-11.044	260	-0.8294	274
5	New Orleans	-11.760	269	0.6656	103
6	Lamar	-14.152	287	-1.3278	316
7	Nicholls	-16.008	300	-1.5307	328
8	SE Louisiana	-19.951	327	-1.8147	343
9	Houston Baptist	-21.147	331	-0.7912	273
10	Northwestern St	-21.168	332	-0.0146	189
11	Incarnate Word	-21.460	333	-1.3972	320
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	-22.963	342	-0.5373	248

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.212	28	-0.0089	231
2	SF Austin	0.174	42	0.0097	76
3	UT Rio Grande	0.051	148	0.0222	28
4	Lamar	-0.007	204	-0.0035	196
5	Texas A&M-CC	-0.018	219	0.0049	115
6	Incarnate Word	-0.045	243	-0.0096	238
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	-0.067	262	-0.0003	167
8	New Orleans	-0.075	273	0.0237	24
9	Nicholls	-0.094	286	0.0021	137
10	Houston Baptist	-0.120	311	-0.0000	162
11	SE Louisiana	-0.136	321	-0.0027	185
12	Northwestern St	-0.142	329	0.0163	45

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1685.900	29	13.6151	54
2	SF Austin	1605.683	69	27.8912	7
3	Texas A&M-CC	1494.248	192	-2.4056	209
4	UT Rio Grande	1487.873	202	23.5223	15
5	Nicholls	1459.133	236	-9.7917	279
6	New Orleans	1399.762	296	20.4664	22
7	Lamar	1399.328	297	-16.8371	326
8	SE Louisiana	1380.999	310	-20.0994	340
9	Northwestern St	1374.756	316	-8.8290	273
10	Incarnate Word	1367.026	322	-6.8722	256
11	Houston Baptist	1352.013	333	1.7879	162
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	1320.292	349	-4.9360	244

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.582	41	0.0013	219
2	SF Austin	0.552	75	0.0069	128
3	UT Rio Grande	0.502	178	0.0143	33
4	Texas A&M-CC	0.489	207	-0.0005	246
5	New Orleans	0.482	219	0.0003	233
6	Nicholls	0.468	241	0.0053	150
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.438	293	0.0034	182
8	Lamar	0.431	310	-0.0003	243
9	Houston Baptist	0.428	313	0.0048	160
10	Incarnate Word	0.428	314	-0.0046	305
11	Northwestern St	0.416	329	0.0040	177
12	SE Louisiana	0.413	332	-0.0016	263

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	0.549	55	0.0198	17
2	SF Austin	0.522	147	0.0053	114
3	McNeese	0.514	186	-0.0137	339
4	Nicholls	0.508	208	-0.0087	291
5	Incarnate Word	0.504	227	0.0049	117
6	Houston Baptist	0.500	251	-0.0069	272
7	New Orleans	0.498	263	-0.0113	320
8	Texas A&M-CC	0.497	271	0.0162	29
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.496	275	0.0073	90
10	Northwestern St	0.487	303	-0.0193	355
11	Lamar	0.478	323	-0.0172	350
12	SE Louisiana	0.470	339	0.0058	108

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1.162	43	-0.0234	338
2	SF Austin	1.129	83	0.0246	44
3	UT Rio Grande	1.126	84	0.0324	23
4	Incarnate Word	1.093	139	0.0009	195
5	New Orleans	1.045	252	0.0015	189
6	Texas A&M-CC	1.042	258	0.0257	42
7	Nicholls	1.039	267	-0.0161	297
8	Lamar	1.020	298	-0.0391	361
9	Northwestern St	1.020	299	-0.0362	360
10	Houston Baptist	1.008	318	-0.0181	308
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.999	325	0.0118	110
12	SE Louisiana	0.975	343	0.0076	146

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.129	20	-0.0106	30
2	McNeese	0.132	29	-0.0106	29
3	Incarnate Word	0.154	175	-0.0075	72
4	Nicholls	0.162	233	0.0066	336
5	UT Rio Grande	0.164	241	-0.0039	160
6	Northwestern St	0.167	267	0.0025	292
7	Lamar	0.169	278	0.0058	331
8	SE Louisiana	0.171	297	-0.0036	168
9	Houston Baptist	0.175	308	-0.0016	216
10	Texas A&M-CC	0.177	316	0.0072	343
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.179	329	-0.0081	59
12	New Orleans	0.188	349	-0.0069	86

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	33.840	34	0.0129	17
2	McNeese	33.800	35	-0.0354	351
3	Lamar	33.710	37	-0.0057	141
4	SF Austin	32.170	65	-0.0126	202
5	Incarnate Word	29.730	129	-0.0390	361
6	Texas A&M-CC	28.540	170	0.0040	66
7	Houston Baptist	27.670	203	-0.0239	298
8	SE Louisiana	26.920	226	-0.0080	163
9	Nicholls	26.650	233	0.0069	45
10	UT Rio Grande	25.980	255	-0.0190	260
11	Northwestern St	23.360	324	-0.0221	289
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	22.940	331	-0.0137	216

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	0.478	3	0.0196	48
2	Texas A&M-CC	0.426	45	-0.0228	326
3	SE Louisiana	0.415	58	-0.0055	229
4	Northwestern St	0.411	63	0.0024	158
5	McNeese	0.402	72	0.0143	74
6	Houston Baptist	0.365	170	-0.0032	213
7	Nicholls	0.355	191	-0.0165	294
8	Incarnate Word	0.348	210	-0.0007	189
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.322	271	0.0108	96
10	SF Austin	0.315	286	0.0010	172
11	UT Rio Grande	0.291	335	-0.0008	190
12	Lamar	0.287	339	-0.0145	278

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	113.792	140	-0.3460	315
2	SF Austin	110.210	192	1.7238	25
3	UT Rio Grande	110.052	194	0.9109	124
4	New Orleans	106.255	258	0.6096	181
5	Incarnate Word	104.716	279	-0.5610	334
6	Nicholls	103.602	291	0.1238	265
7	Lamar	101.402	318	0.1069	267
8	Texas A&M-CC	101.160	322	0.0255	278
9	Houston Baptist	100.824	328	-0.1069	285
10	Northwestern St	100.371	329	-0.3960	320
11	SE Louisiana	98.234	344	-0.3414	314
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	97.802	346	0.3635	226

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	40.742	43	0.5703	98
2	McNeese	40.698	44	-1.1503	346
3	UT Rio Grande	40.032	66	1.1329	33
4	Incarnate Word	38.191	161	0.0263	190
5	Lamar	37.532	195	-0.7541	306
6	Texas A&M-CC	36.813	234	1.0386	44
7	Nicholls	36.253	265	-0.1433	213
8	Houston Baptist	35.793	284	-0.2546	232
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	35.338	297	0.5113	108
10	New Orleans	34.640	321	-0.2889	242
11	Northwestern St	34.622	323	-1.5037	359
12	SE Louisiana	33.415	349	0.5076	109

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	90.272	4	0.7561	96
2	Lamar	88.312	16	0.4749	128
3	McNeese	86.758	38	-0.7753	301
4	Incarnate Word	85.888	73	-0.4451	253
5	UT Rio Grande	84.477	145	-0.2061	223
6	Nicholls	83.059	214	0.3523	141
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	81.560	284	0.1715	161
8	Houston Baptist	81.090	299	-0.3218	236
9	Texas A&M-CC	80.866	303	0.4817	125
10	SE Louisiana	80.443	320	0.2019	155
11	Northwestern St	79.296	341	-0.4609	258
12	New Orleans	78.346	353	0.6751	108

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	47.420	59	1.5872	16
2	McNeese	47.096	73	-0.9904	324
3	Texas A&M-CC	45.614	164	0.9902	51
4	SF Austin	45.169	185	0.3430	130
5	Incarnate Word	44.506	220	0.2654	141
6	New Orleans	44.446	227	-0.7236	295
7	Houston Baptist	44.257	239	-0.1243	193
8	Nicholls	43.687	275	-0.3612	231
9	Northwestern St	43.678	276	-1.6033	357
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	43.251	293	0.7066	87
11	Lamar	42.596	315	-1.0907	335
12	SE Louisiana	41.555	334	0.5353	108

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	68.141	34	-1.3399	321
2	New Orleans	66.536	54	0.4291	127
3	Northwestern St	66.005	69	1.1405	70
4	Lamar	65.805	78	0.3249	141
5	McNeese	65.166	92	-0.7556	274
6	Houston Baptist	63.337	128	0.6561	111
7	Incarnate Word	60.809	180	-1.4370	329
8	SE Louisiana	60.192	188	-0.4703	240
9	SF Austin	60.168	190	0.1336	164
10	Nicholls	56.022	273	0.3888	131
11	UT Rio Grande	55.969	274	-0.1639	193
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	53.684	327	-0.3223	208

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	31.202	11	-0.4816	271
2	Lamar	27.682	122	0.2379	150
3	Texas A&M-CC	27.633	125	-0.0814	213
4	SF Austin	27.443	136	0.2306	152
5	Houston Baptist	26.399	174	0.7704	69
6	New Orleans	26.261	187	0.3107	132
7	UT Rio Grande	26.143	192	0.5931	92
8	Northwestern St	25.674	219	-0.9715	336
9	Incarnate Word	25.594	225	-0.2547	235
10	SE Louisiana	24.341	290	0.3608	122
11	Nicholls	23.993	304	0.6844	82
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	23.121	328	0.4873	109

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	58.257	25	0.4912	136
2	McNeese	56.471	44	-1.1597	313
3	Texas A&M-CC	54.997	66	-0.8374	284
4	SF Austin	54.158	94	0.7691	101
5	Northwestern St	52.367	141	0.4830	140
6	Incarnate Word	52.230	143	-1.4869	338
7	New Orleans	51.863	154	0.7965	96
8	Houston Baptist	51.257	170	0.4855	139
9	SE Louisiana	48.505	231	-0.3174	228
10	UT Rio Grande	47.294	264	-0.1452	208
11	Nicholls	46.495	279	0.5582	133
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	43.784	335	-0.2231	214

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	56.058	51	1.7360	28
2	McNeese	55.223	70	0.4297	129
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	52.853	171	1.5029	43
4	Houston Baptist	51.659	222	1.0016	78
5	Nicholls	51.451	231	0.5698	109
6	SF Austin	50.772	257	-0.0073	186
7	New Orleans	50.682	260	-0.1718	208
8	Texas A&M-CC	50.396	273	0.5281	114
9	SE Louisiana	50.276	278	0.9753	81
10	Incarnate Word	49.103	306	0.9558	82
11	Northwestern St	48.900	315	-2.5799	362
12	Lamar	47.441	339	0.0644	178

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	46.316	39	0.3223	158
2	UT Rio Grande	44.031	92	0.1639	173
3	Nicholls	43.978	93	-0.3888	235
4	SF Austin	39.832	176	-0.1336	202
5	SE Louisiana	39.808	178	0.4703	126
6	Incarnate Word	39.191	186	1.4370	37
7	Houston Baptist	36.663	238	-0.6561	255
8	McNeese	34.834	274	0.7556	92
9	Lamar	34.195	288	-0.3249	225
10	Northwestern St	33.995	297	-1.1405	296
11	New Orleans	33.464	312	-0.4291	239
12	Texas A&M-CC	31.859	332	1.3399	45

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	13.890	47	0.5398	65
2	SF Austin	13.299	64	0.3397	87
3	Incarnate Word	12.598	102	0.2811	95
4	Nicholls	12.260	120	-0.8278	339
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	12.218	123	0.0239	168
6	Lamar	9.850	272	-0.9920	350
7	McNeese	9.496	295	-0.6687	318
8	Houston Baptist	9.394	300	-1.0251	352
9	Texas A&M-CC	9.180	309	1.1200	15
10	SE Louisiana	9.073	315	0.1468	131
11	Northwestern St	8.948	322	-0.5322	298
12	New Orleans	8.379	337	-0.5996	302

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	37.776	65	0.3946	139
2	UT Rio Grande	37.183	83	-0.0608	204
3	Nicholls	36.565	103	-0.2058	221
4	SF Austin	36.115	113	-0.0129	193
5	Incarnate Word	33.658	169	1.0418	66
6	SE Louisiana	31.937	204	0.5193	124
7	McNeese	30.287	249	0.3844	141
8	Lamar	30.055	255	-0.0162	196
9	Houston Baptist	29.833	264	-0.8072	281
10	Northwestern St	26.929	326	-0.9439	288
11	New Orleans	26.483	335	-0.1214	212
12	Texas A&M-CC	25.869	344	1.3190	46

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	36.909	38	1.6402	40
2	SF Austin	36.491	50	0.7671	96
3	Incarnate Word	36.424	51	0.0362	162
4	Texas A&M-CC	35.553	91	2.4720	19
5	Nicholls	33.757	198	-2.1400	351
6	Northwestern St	33.405	219	-0.6956	250
7	Lamar	33.252	225	-3.0906	364
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	32.009	285	0.0633	159
9	McNeese	31.445	306	-2.5780	362
10	New Orleans	31.185	312	-1.3970	305
11	Houston Baptist	30.725	329	-2.5520	361
12	SE Louisiana	28.901	360	-0.2120	185

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	47.810	3	1.9547	48
2	Texas A&M-CC	42.600	45	-2.2774	326
3	SE Louisiana	41.500	58	-0.5533	229
4	Northwestern St	41.120	63	0.2387	158
5	McNeese	40.160	72	1.4332	74
6	Houston Baptist	36.510	170	-0.3151	213
7	Nicholls	35.480	191	-1.6510	294
8	Incarnate Word	34.830	210	-0.0743	189
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	32.160	271	1.0821	96
10	SF Austin	31.540	286	0.0977	172
11	UT Rio Grande	29.060	335	-0.0852	190
12	Lamar	28.750	339	-1.4491	278

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	26.858	7	1.3278	37
2	McNeese	25.337	29	0.6285	104
3	Northwestern St	23.817	60	-0.0828	201
4	SE Louisiana	21.621	164	-0.3999	244
5	Texas A&M-CC	21.437	171	-0.6305	284
6	Houston Baptist	20.515	204	-0.4046	245
7	Incarnate Word	20.331	215	-0.2465	228
8	Nicholls	19.130	259	-0.4938	259
9	UT Rio Grande	18.672	275	0.4362	132
10	SF Austin	18.128	307	0.9849	71
11	Lamar	17.123	339	-1.4093	336
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	17.024	341	0.1591	170

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	36.131	9	2.2669	16
2	McNeese	33.594	39	1.0643	77
3	Northwestern St	32.106	69	0.0919	179
4	SE Louisiana	31.801	83	-0.2042	210
5	Texas A&M-CC	31.749	87	-1.4463	315
6	Houston Baptist	29.411	173	-0.3626	226
7	Nicholls	28.662	200	-1.0923	290
8	Incarnate Word	28.337	213	-0.5243	247
9	SF Austin	26.618	266	0.7203	107
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	25.170	310	0.8732	96
11	Lamar	24.459	331	-1.1235	293
12	UT Rio Grande	24.417	333	-0.0718	198

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	77.052	24	2.1986	39
2	McNeese	74.968	80	-0.5171	255
3	New Orleans	74.046	105	-0.7104	275
4	Northwestern St	73.884	114	-0.4191	243
5	Incarnate Word	71.360	217	-0.8659	290
6	Houston Baptist	69.430	276	-0.5645	259
7	SE Louisiana	68.809	290	-0.3558	237
8	SF Austin	68.713	293	1.4522	85
9	Lamar	68.248	311	-2.7354	355
10	Texas A&M-CC	67.691	324	0.8265	137
11	Nicholls	67.192	333	0.6952	146
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	67.028	339	-1.0255	303

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	64.316	9	-0.4028	204
2	UT Rio Grande	61.635	22	-0.6167	216
3	Houston Baptist	58.104	55	-0.4606	207
4	Lamar	55.645	99	-1.7434	293
5	SE Louisiana	52.427	174	0.1536	161
6	Nicholls	52.023	188	0.3603	144
7	New Orleans	51.877	197	1.5024	63
8	Northwestern St	51.639	206	0.3120	149
9	Texas A&M-CC	51.515	208	-0.1107	176
10	SF Austin	49.132	264	-0.7374	223
11	McNeese	48.922	271	-0.3946	201
12	Incarnate Word	45.130	336	0.8798	111

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	5.991	1	-0.9142	11
2	SF Austin	7.082	19	-0.9515	8
3	Incarnate Word	8.135	84	-0.5092	56
4	UT Rio Grande	8.745	168	0.3769	282
5	Nicholls	8.767	171	0.7078	332
6	Texas A&M-CC	9.014	194	0.6623	327
7	SE Louisiana	9.648	268	0.5282	306
8	Houston Baptist	9.759	278	-0.2442	120
9	Northwestern St	9.824	286	0.7270	339
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	9.839	288	0.0570	199
11	Lamar	10.836	340	0.7965	347
12	New Orleans	10.899	343	-0.3303	90

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	3.425	26	-0.3521	65
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	4.262	146	-0.0590	170
3	UT Rio Grande	4.433	179	-0.2896	83
4	Nicholls	4.442	183	0.0112	195
5	SE Louisiana	4.503	190	-0.1212	144
6	Incarnate Word	4.545	201	0.4608	325
7	Northwestern St	4.642	214	-0.0886	154
8	Houston Baptist	4.718	226	0.1530	254
9	Lamar	4.865	243	0.0585	216
10	SF Austin	5.008	267	0.3650	306
11	New Orleans	5.019	268	-0.4507	40
12	Texas A&M-CC	5.483	320	-0.5947	18

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	28.987	5	1.4253	23
2	SE Louisiana	26.535	43	-0.0650	226
3	Northwestern St	26.506	44	0.6355	104
4	McNeese	24.675	146	0.7746	84
5	Texas A&M-CC	24.213	170	0.7603	86
6	Nicholls	23.550	219	-0.1102	234
7	Incarnate Word	22.845	251	1.1403	47
8	Houston Baptist	22.645	268	0.6292	105
9	Lamar	22.467	280	-0.6950	315
10	UT Rio Grande	21.695	322	0.6682	99
11	SF Austin	21.650	324	0.4739	132
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	20.327	356	0.6138	107

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	71.399	109	-1.1258	305
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	69.453	214	-1.6701	346
3	Nicholls	69.273	218	-1.2718	318
4	Texas A&M-CC	68.379	257	-1.2948	322
5	SF Austin	67.934	278	-1.1428	309
6	McNeese	67.778	286	-0.0910	127
7	Lamar	67.361	297	-0.2788	158
8	UT Rio Grande	67.084	308	-1.3372	325
9	Incarnate Word	66.912	315	-1.6701	345
10	SE Louisiana	66.693	327	-0.0157	114
11	Northwestern St	66.194	335	-1.3538	328
12	Houston Baptist	65.704	345	0.1045	98

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.475	30	0.0121	295
2	UT Rio Grande	0.480	39	-0.0064	93
3	New Orleans	0.491	65	-0.0021	138
4	McNeese	0.491	68	-0.0087	67
5	Texas A&M-CC	0.502	105	-0.0049	109
6	Lamar	0.510	146	0.0090	265
7	SE Louisiana	0.525	230	0.0088	264
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.528	250	0.0007	171
9	Northwestern St	0.533	272	-0.0113	51
10	Nicholls	0.545	309	-0.0053	101
11	Houston Baptist	0.546	310	-0.0185	26
12	Incarnate Word	0.547	318	0.0015	177

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.975	24	0.0167	250
2	McNeese	0.987	32	-0.0140	65
3	UT Rio Grande	1.018	68	-0.0076	105
4	Texas A&M-CC	1.023	76	0.0048	178
5	Lamar	1.046	112	0.0144	237
6	SE Louisiana	1.077	202	0.0113	208
7	New Orleans	1.083	224	-0.0272	23
8	Nicholls	1.094	248	-0.0017	136
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	1.095	251	0.0165	248
10	Northwestern St	1.099	262	-0.0263	28
11	Houston Baptist	1.107	279	-0.0333	15
12	Incarnate Word	1.141	330	0.0024	164

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.221	2	0.0048	50
2	Nicholls	0.191	18	-0.0076	278
3	Texas A&M-CC	0.180	40	-0.0076	279
4	SE Louisiana	0.173	73	-0.0048	210
5	Houston Baptist	0.161	139	0.0054	46
6	SF Austin	0.160	142	-0.0061	242
7	Lamar	0.160	145	0.0003	106
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.158	157	-0.0048	213
9	Northwestern St	0.157	168	-0.0039	192
10	UT Rio Grande	0.153	200	-0.0062	246
11	Incarnate Word	0.142	268	-0.0056	234
12	New Orleans	0.137	303	0.0079	19

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	74.740	60	0.0082	112
2	Lamar	73.450	113	-0.0002	205
3	Texas A&M-CC	72.740	150	-0.0008	211
4	SE Louisiana	70.880	224	0.0006	197
5	UT Rio Grande	70.850	226	0.0092	101
6	Incarnate Word	70.600	234	0.0059	138
7	Houston Baptist	70.190	260	-0.0056	262
8	Northwestern St	68.760	309	0.0133	62
9	New Orleans	68.610	311	0.0030	174
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	68.530	313	-0.0091	294
11	McNeese	68.210	319	-0.0077	282
12	Nicholls	67.870	326	0.0152	52

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.310	70	-0.0263	27
2	Houston Baptist	0.314	79	0.0071	246
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.352	163	-0.0172	75
4	Northwestern St	0.371	221	-0.0434	2
5	Nicholls	0.386	261	-0.0245	35
6	UT Rio Grande	0.394	278	0.0152	290
7	New Orleans	0.399	292	-0.0043	170
8	SE Louisiana	0.422	315	-0.0119	109
9	Incarnate Word	0.429	323	-0.0343	11
10	McNeese	0.436	333	0.0119	276
11	Lamar	0.451	346	0.0030	222
12	Texas A&M-CC	0.484	357	0.0213	314

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	108.504	96	0.4984	163
2	SF Austin	108.963	107	0.9378	246
3	UT Rio Grande	111.477	152	0.0064	79
4	Texas A&M-CC	112.204	163	0.6667	192
5	Lamar	115.554	222	1.4343	309
6	New Orleans	118.015	266	-0.0547	72
7	SE Louisiana	118.185	273	1.4551	312
8	Nicholls	119.610	295	1.6811	330
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	120.765	309	0.9866	252
10	Northwestern St	121.538	320	-0.3113	46
11	Houston Baptist	121.971	326	0.7292	206
12	Incarnate Word	126.177	352	0.8992	231

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	31.717	4	-0.6720	55
2	Texas A&M-CC	34.065	36	-0.2493	104
3	UT Rio Grande	34.929	60	-0.2589	101
4	Lamar	35.000	63	0.4942	222
5	SF Austin	35.331	81	1.5976	345
6	SE Louisiana	36.403	127	1.0550	301
7	New Orleans	36.486	130	-0.5510	68
8	Nicholls	37.730	213	-0.1587	124
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.636	261	0.5984	241
10	Northwestern St	38.701	265	0.0782	155
11	Incarnate Word	39.802	311	0.6869	255
12	Houston Baptist	40.508	332	-1.3136	16

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	76.636	3	0.1906	189
2	McNeese	76.932	6	-0.7066	73
3	Lamar	79.208	43	-0.2855	129
4	Nicholls	79.434	48	1.1128	288
5	SE Louisiana	79.938	59	0.4446	211
6	Incarnate Word	82.182	118	1.5365	317
7	UT Rio Grande	82.920	142	-0.2775	132
8	Northwestern St	83.443	175	1.6035	322
9	SF Austin	83.628	181	1.1372	293
10	Houston Baptist	84.598	240	-0.2907	128
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	84.968	258	1.2245	302
12	New Orleans	85.702	291	-1.0488	45

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	41.487	36	-0.4904	91
2	UT Rio Grande	42.205	48	-0.0905	146
3	SF Austin	42.334	53	1.2947	314
4	New Orleans	42.568	61	-0.0651	151
5	Lamar	44.396	147	0.9660	288
6	Texas A&M-CC	44.673	173	-0.3630	105
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	45.716	232	-0.0505	155
8	SE Louisiana	45.740	235	1.0952	300
9	Northwestern St	46.478	272	-0.8125	60
10	Nicholls	47.831	323	-0.8832	49
11	Houston Baptist	48.003	326	-1.3584	29
12	Incarnate Word	48.556	342	-0.1588	133

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	53.184	17	-0.3342	139
2	New Orleans	59.583	149	0.4830	235
3	Nicholls	61.671	223	-2.2319	13
4	UT Rio Grande	61.760	227	1.3140	303
5	Northwestern St	61.843	231	0.7140	257
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	61.929	235	-0.9139	82
7	SE Louisiana	62.278	247	1.4660	310
8	Lamar	62.522	251	-0.0088	182
9	Houston Baptist	62.702	256	1.6326	321
10	Incarnate Word	64.697	310	-1.0310	72
11	SF Austin	64.860	314	-1.1889	57
12	Texas A&M-CC	65.095	318	-0.1080	167

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	19.890	3	0.0281	154
2	Lamar	24.459	88	0.6793	268
3	New Orleans	25.313	125	-0.1155	132
4	UT Rio Grande	25.324	126	0.6615	267
5	SE Louisiana	25.509	136	1.3427	337
6	Texas A&M-CC	25.515	137	-0.0415	144
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	26.646	216	0.1942	178
8	SF Austin	26.700	220	1.6770	349
9	Nicholls	27.112	246	-0.8518	36
10	Northwestern St	27.345	262	0.3655	209
11	Houston Baptist	29.411	337	-0.4302	83
12	Incarnate Word	29.708	343	-0.1287	128

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	41.052	4	-0.6944	87
2	Nicholls	48.644	111	-1.0705	57
3	Lamar	49.404	141	-0.2630	129
4	Texas A&M-CC	49.645	149	0.0358	169
5	SE Louisiana	49.688	154	1.4253	310
6	UT Rio Grande	51.081	198	0.8064	254
7	New Orleans	51.316	209	-0.1437	141
8	Northwestern St	51.665	228	1.5629	322
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	52.609	267	-0.0344	155
10	Houston Baptist	52.865	276	1.1725	285
11	Incarnate Word	52.909	279	0.0180	165
12	SF Austin	54.220	315	-0.2394	133

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	48.972	56	0.7987	242
2	Lamar	49.650	77	1.7455	323
3	SF Austin	49.665	78	3.3631	362
4	New Orleans	49.712	80	-0.0798	140
5	UT Rio Grande	50.253	101	0.3110	193
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	50.888	127	0.3038	191
7	SE Louisiana	51.824	171	1.3616	298
8	Texas A&M-CC	52.160	191	0.0864	163
9	Northwestern St	53.440	241	-0.9621	64
10	Houston Baptist	55.609	316	-1.7983	27
11	Nicholls	56.123	322	-0.7073	82
12	Incarnate Word	56.450	331	-0.4392	96

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	34.905	48	0.1080	199
2	SF Austin	35.140	52	1.1889	309
3	Incarnate Word	35.303	56	1.0310	294
4	Houston Baptist	37.298	110	-1.6326	45
5	Lamar	37.478	115	0.0088	184
6	SE Louisiana	37.722	119	-1.4660	56
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.071	131	0.9139	284
8	Northwestern St	38.157	135	-0.7140	109
9	UT Rio Grande	38.240	139	-1.3140	63
10	Nicholls	38.329	143	2.2319	353
11	New Orleans	40.417	217	-0.4830	131
12	McNeese	46.816	349	0.3342	227

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	8.551	14	-0.2077	136
2	SF Austin	8.631	18	-0.0794	162
3	UT Rio Grande	9.605	51	-0.9204	20
4	Incarnate Word	10.095	77	0.8155	326
5	Lamar	10.541	117	-0.1850	143
6	Nicholls	10.618	130	0.6931	314
7	SE Louisiana	10.893	159	-0.2877	119
8	Houston Baptist	11.097	181	-0.8834	23
9	New Orleans	11.173	187	-0.4355	82
10	Northwestern St	11.356	207	-0.2873	120
11	McNeese	11.827	246	-0.7001	46
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	11.989	260	0.4042	270

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	26.991	20	0.1549	207
2	Incarnate Word	29.273	59	1.5185	323
3	SF Austin	29.408	60	1.3766	309
4	Lamar	29.804	67	-0.0225	179
5	SE Louisiana	30.251	86	-0.9808	78
6	Nicholls	30.790	111	2.1833	353
7	Houston Baptist	31.733	135	-1.4631	39
8	Northwestern St	31.778	137	0.0406	188
9	UT Rio Grande	31.839	138	-1.0838	69
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	32.359	153	1.2589	303
11	New Orleans	34.386	240	-0.9051	81
12	McNeese	35.880	288	-0.0122	182

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	29.237	6	-1.7671	33
2	UT Rio Grande	30.535	28	-1.6147	40
3	Texas A&M-CC	31.895	71	-0.6714	111
4	New Orleans	32.133	81	-0.1864	161
5	McNeese	32.310	87	-2.0427	20
6	Nicholls	34.370	213	-0.1718	164
7	Incarnate Word	34.552	224	0.5563	233
8	Houston Baptist	34.557	225	-1.1607	74
9	Lamar	34.941	253	-0.0138	186
10	Northwestern St	35.558	285	-1.0767	80
11	SE Louisiana	35.722	292	0.2774	206
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	36.726	329	-0.2875	151

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	30.980	70	-2.6328	27
2	Houston Baptist	31.410	79	0.7093	246
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	35.190	163	-1.7183	75
4	Northwestern St	37.100	221	-4.3360	2
5	Nicholls	38.560	261	-2.4516	35
6	UT Rio Grande	39.370	278	1.5252	290
7	New Orleans	39.870	292	-0.4278	170
8	SE Louisiana	42.160	315	-1.1901	109
9	Incarnate Word	42.870	323	-3.4296	11
10	McNeese	43.610	333	1.1877	276
11	Lamar	45.050	346	0.3020	222
12	Texas A&M-CC	48.360	357	2.1310	314

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	18.256	60	-1.4470	24
2	Houston Baptist	18.539	64	0.1873	204
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	20.222	129	0.0496	182
4	Northwestern St	21.178	184	-2.4975	1
5	UT Rio Grande	22.360	253	0.6814	261
6	Nicholls	23.274	295	-0.5374	118
7	McNeese	23.464	298	0.6464	259
8	SE Louisiana	24.032	313	-0.6885	104
9	Lamar	24.055	314	0.6445	257
10	New Orleans	24.154	317	-1.1818	40
11	Incarnate Word	24.397	322	-1.9488	9
12	Texas A&M-CC	25.626	346	1.1888	301

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	25.388	59	-1.8675	27
2	Houston Baptist	25.959	73	0.5101	234
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	28.902	164	-0.8311	99
4	Nicholls	29.837	207	-1.3958	51
5	Northwestern St	30.219	226	-2.9743	2
6	UT Rio Grande	32.089	294	1.2798	303
7	McNeese	32.397	299	1.0746	290
8	SE Louisiana	32.707	308	-0.5615	126
9	New Orleans	33.648	323	-0.5732	124
10	Incarnate Word	34.030	329	-2.2655	16
11	Lamar	34.997	343	-0.0529	181
12	Texas A&M-CC	36.001	352	1.9571	342

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	67.990	16	1.3950	270
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	69.335	47	2.3594	329
3	UT Rio Grande	69.752	61	-0.3747	127
4	Northwestern St	70.795	100	-2.1122	19
5	Incarnate Word	70.864	105	-1.7179	34
6	Texas A&M-CC	70.871	106	-0.5975	111
7	New Orleans	71.238	124	-2.5723	10
8	SF Austin	71.421	138	-1.9939	24
9	McNeese	71.444	139	-0.2488	138
10	Houston Baptist	72.310	195	-0.7303	100
11	SE Louisiana	72.736	219	-0.8243	94
12	Nicholls	78.827	364	2.6492	338

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	46.394	43	0.3768	225
2	Texas A&M-CC	49.441	113	-0.8869	141
3	SE Louisiana	51.561	166	2.6983	339
4	Incarnate Word	51.589	167	-1.2188	105
5	Northwestern St	51.865	172	-0.6398	156
6	Houston Baptist	54.225	241	-1.3326	96
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	55.449	268	-1.1237	113
8	Nicholls	56.446	295	2.1167	322
9	McNeese	56.962	304	-3.3380	18
10	Lamar	58.259	327	1.1798	275
11	UT Rio Grande	59.069	331	-0.8967	140
12	New Orleans	59.810	341	-0.9914	130

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	14.889	1	0.4463	57
2	Nicholls	12.537	13	-0.2105	197
3	Texas A&M-CC	10.400	99	-0.0602	159
4	SE Louisiana	10.089	118	-0.2819	215
5	SF Austin	9.789	134	-0.5998	305
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	9.713	140	0.2373	92
7	Houston Baptist	9.563	154	0.3280	73
8	Northwestern St	9.244	184	-0.5537	294
9	Lamar	8.927	207	-0.2873	218
10	UT Rio Grande	8.549	241	-0.6328	313
11	New Orleans	8.037	280	0.4537	53
12	Incarnate Word	7.769	310	-0.3875	245

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	6.424	30	-0.7558	354
2	Lamar	6.270	37	-0.4703	324
3	Houston Baptist	5.613	81	0.4369	35
4	SF Austin	5.214	115	0.0671	121
5	New Orleans	5.189	119	-0.1477	209
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	4.547	190	-0.3672	287
7	SE Louisiana	4.125	246	-0.0470	168
8	UT Rio Grande	4.090	250	-0.0277	158
9	Nicholls	4.014	261	0.1363	90
10	Texas A&M-CC	3.864	275	-0.0419	165
11	Incarnate Word	3.596	300	-0.7673	356
12	Northwestern St	3.448	311	0.2137	72

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	23.581	82	0.5131	293
2	SF Austin	23.782	92	-0.3327	124
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	24.328	128	-0.4781	101
4	Northwestern St	25.225	188	-1.1003	29
5	Nicholls	26.009	241	-0.4947	96
6	Lamar	26.174	250	-0.1241	175
7	UT Rio Grande	26.336	262	0.5142	295
8	SE Louisiana	27.097	308	-0.7031	66
9	New Orleans	27.253	317	0.3256	273
10	Incarnate Word	27.369	321	-1.4851	7
11	McNeese	28.549	348	0.3327	274
12	Texas A&M-CC	30.530	364	1.2929	358

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	71.877	86	-0.8444	275
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	69.262	215	-1.5760	342
3	Nicholls	69.106	230	-1.7452	356
4	UT Rio Grande	68.729	249	-1.3742	323
5	Texas A&M-CC	68.151	277	-0.9206	288
6	McNeese	67.742	288	-0.2967	183
7	SF Austin	67.622	291	-1.1317	312
8	Lamar	67.323	304	-0.3764	196
9	Northwestern St	66.497	331	-0.9500	293
10	SE Louisiana	66.306	339	0.3194	81
11	Incarnate Word	65.902	349	-1.1052	309
12	Houston Baptist	65.740	352	0.5811	49

Location invert reset

Result invert reset

Game Type invert reset

Points Per Possession reset

Mean
Std
Median
Min
Max

selected out of records.

Showing - of

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Envo Magazine