Conferences – HoopSci

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	17.450	43	2.2696	51
2	Miami (OH)	14.733	57	2.3328	45
3	Bowling Green	7.955	96	2.5957	36
4	Buffalo	4.216	124	4.8765	1
5	E Michigan	1.562	150	2.4750	38
6	UMass	1.117	154	0.4458	140
7	Toledo	-0.783	164	0.9696	114
8	Kent State	-1.864	179	-0.8621	244
9	Ohio	-6.028	209	-1.0823	256
10	W Michigan	-11.930	266	-0.4599	211
11	Cent Michigan	-14.530	288	-3.1254	345
12	Ball State	-15.165	292	-2.8682	339
13	N Illinois	-16.518	303	0.0079	174

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.264	26	0.0302	18
2	Akron	0.209	40	0.0079	109
3	Bowling Green	0.197	47	0.0293	21
4	Buffalo	0.107	112	0.0502	2
5	Kent State	0.046	163	-0.0041	203
6	UMass	0.040	165	0.0056	131
7	E Michigan	0.016	188	0.0102	96
8	Toledo	0.005	196	0.0101	98
9	W Michigan	-0.057	245	-0.0110	247
10	Cent Michigan	-0.087	267	-0.0319	342
11	Ohio	-0.091	272	-0.0057	215
12	N Illinois	-0.105	280	-0.0120	254
13	Ball State	-0.108	283	-0.0276	332

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	1663.322	30	32.0960	1
2	Akron	1660.491	33	4.4691	126
3	Kent State	1598.929	68	6.1591	100
4	Toledo	1524.097	149	-10.0604	290
5	Ohio	1503.815	177	-4.3443	230
6	Bowling Green	1496.977	185	13.4066	44
7	UMass	1461.864	236	-8.2148	268
8	E Michigan	1455.087	247	4.9808	116
9	Buffalo	1444.963	255	23.7323	8
10	W Michigan	1405.705	291	7.5042	87
11	Ball State	1395.865	307	-18.0211	344
12	Cent Michigan	1389.025	315	-14.6752	325
13	N Illinois	1334.532	349	-3.1185	214

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.585	48	0.0160	67
2	Akron	0.584	49	0.0087	141
3	Kent State	0.562	73	0.0142	87
4	Bowling Green	0.534	102	0.0317	7
5	Toledo	0.528	116	0.0059	172
6	Buffalo	0.526	121	0.0266	14
7	Ohio	0.507	153	0.0161	66
8	UMass	0.484	209	0.0081	150
9	E Michigan	0.483	211	0.0097	127
10	W Michigan	0.476	221	0.0191	49
11	N Illinois	0.435	291	0.0139	90
12	Cent Michigan	0.426	311	-0.0092	321
13	Ball State	0.404	335	-0.0056	295

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.605	1	0.0101	78
2	Miami (OH)	0.603	2	0.0162	29
3	Buffalo	0.556	48	0.0083	94
4	Kent State	0.546	65	0.0026	170
5	Bowling Green	0.528	123	0.0075	106
6	Toledo	0.528	123	0.0109	72
7	UMass	0.525	133	0.0176	23
8	Ohio	0.519	163	0.0125	53
9	W Michigan	0.512	187	0.0100	79
10	E Michigan	0.507	209	0.0083	96
11	Cent Michigan	0.490	271	0.0029	168
12	N Illinois	0.483	290	-0.0063	277
13	Ball State	0.467	328	0.0005	194

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	1.258	2	0.0326	34
2	Akron	1.254	3	0.0171	109
3	Buffalo	1.178	34	0.0231	72
4	Kent State	1.153	56	0.0163	116
5	Bowling Green	1.140	78	0.0237	70
6	Toledo	1.137	85	0.0097	157
7	Ohio	1.077	185	0.0102	153
8	UMass	1.061	216	0.0228	75
9	E Michigan	1.043	251	0.0181	101
10	W Michigan	1.042	252	0.0143	129
11	Cent Michigan	1.029	277	-0.0045	253
12	N Illinois	1.011	311	-0.0106	291
13	Ball State	1.000	323	0.0180	102

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.142	64	-0.0093	45
2	Akron	0.142	70	0.0015	257
3	Ball State	0.143	72	-0.0122	15
4	Toledo	0.147	100	0.0056	312
5	Buffalo	0.150	112	-0.0064	97
6	Bowling Green	0.155	146	-0.0067	92
7	Ohio	0.162	204	0.0089	343
8	Cent Michigan	0.162	204	0.0043	297
9	E Michigan	0.163	215	-0.0088	54
10	W Michigan	0.168	246	0.0035	286
11	UMass	0.177	295	0.0064	317
12	Kent State	0.180	310	0.0016	259
13	N Illinois	0.205	357	0.0131	359

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	33.200	61	0.0004	142
2	Kent State	33.080	64	0.0044	101
3	N Illinois	30.980	119	0.0174	35
4	UMass	30.570	141	-0.0057	202
5	Toledo	29.770	154	-0.0056	200
6	Buffalo	27.730	206	0.0021	124
7	W Michigan	27.660	207	-0.0006	150
8	Bowling Green	27.590	210	0.0060	90
9	Ohio	27.140	231	0.0152	39
10	Cent Michigan	26.930	240	-0.0166	281
11	E Michigan	26.870	244	-0.0078	220
12	Ball State	23.700	317	-0.0067	209
13	Miami (OH)	23.300	324	-0.0196	297

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	0.447	26	0.0185	92
2	Buffalo	0.446	29	-0.0231	337
3	N Illinois	0.417	61	0.0260	59
4	Bowling Green	0.397	96	0.0192	86
5	Miami (OH)	0.397	97	0.0329	36
6	UMass	0.395	108	0.0226	71
7	Ohio	0.377	145	0.0095	143
8	Toledo	0.364	180	0.0190	88
9	Ball State	0.337	247	-0.0135	297
10	E Michigan	0.320	276	-0.0134	296
11	W Michigan	0.302	308	-0.0099	278
12	Cent Michigan	0.295	322	-0.0183	321
13	Akron	0.279	343	-0.0153	308

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	128.212	10	3.0770	8
2	Miami (OH)	122.670	39	2.0650	36
3	Buffalo	118.338	68	3.6800	3
4	Toledo	115.034	97	0.3828	174
5	Kent State	114.889	100	1.2139	94
6	Bowling Green	111.881	138	1.3316	84
7	Ohio	108.799	179	-0.5568	273
8	E Michigan	108.144	183	0.7328	139
9	UMass	107.856	189	0.7814	134
10	Cent Michigan	106.217	215	-0.1504	235
11	W Michigan	105.844	226	0.3740	178
12	Ball State	100.484	301	-2.0328	353
13	N Illinois	100.325	303	0.2106	194

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	46.125	1	0.4564	115
2	Miami (OH)	43.354	8	0.9103	58
3	Toledo	40.898	44	0.0157	188
4	Bowling Green	40.154	76	0.8011	71
5	Buffalo	38.849	123	1.1569	40
6	Ohio	38.819	125	0.4204	120
7	Kent State	38.406	147	0.0309	184
8	E Michigan	38.186	162	1.2193	33
9	Cent Michigan	38.178	163	0.0730	178
10	W Michigan	37.717	189	0.4087	125
11	UMass	37.647	196	0.1279	170
12	Ball State	35.202	300	0.5956	102
13	N Illinois	33.771	329	-0.8239	313

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	88.683	15	0.2624	157
2	Toledo	85.331	92	-1.5461	339
3	Cent Michigan	85.047	107	0.2370	161
4	E Michigan	84.330	146	0.8072	90
5	Ball State	83.936	164	1.3514	50
6	W Michigan	83.129	207	-0.0549	193
7	Bowling Green	82.390	236	0.0405	178
8	UMass	81.508	270	-1.9133	350
9	Ohio	81.232	278	-1.2075	315
10	Buffalo	81.164	282	1.7425	25
11	Miami (OH)	80.663	304	-0.9462	288
12	Kent State	80.147	315	-0.3871	232
13	N Illinois	79.766	324	-1.1093	301

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	53.668	1	1.6890	15
2	Akron	52.062	3	0.2459	165
3	Bowling Green	48.620	39	0.9494	57
4	Kent State	47.986	55	0.1898	174
5	Toledo	47.925	60	0.9306	63
6	Buffalo	47.901	61	0.5326	118
7	Ohio	47.693	65	1.2603	31
8	UMass	46.147	136	1.0846	43
9	W Michigan	45.435	174	0.4846	129
10	E Michigan	45.308	180	0.8983	67
11	Cent Michigan	45.035	194	-0.1148	217
12	N Illinois	42.275	314	-0.4175	254
13	Ball State	42.255	316	-0.0669	210

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	68.467	31	0.4548	135
2	E Michigan	67.908	40	0.1744	162
3	Cent Michigan	66.119	59	-0.4184	224
4	Bowling Green	65.500	73	1.7393	33
5	W Michigan	64.734	94	-1.8774	332
6	UMass	64.224	108	-1.5361	313
7	Ohio	62.481	144	0.7170	111
8	Ball State	60.446	183	-0.5043	234
9	Buffalo	55.425	282	-0.1900	201
10	Akron	55.110	293	-2.5478	350
11	Kent State	54.848	301	-1.3204	297
12	N Illinois	54.672	305	0.2913	149
13	Miami (OH)	54.249	312	-0.3607	216

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	31.468	10	-0.0842	190
2	Akron	30.641	24	-0.9888	328
3	Bowling Green	29.963	39	1.1189	40
4	Ohio	29.403	53	0.5725	95
5	Cent Michigan	29.335	54	-0.6441	286
6	E Michigan	29.032	61	1.1944	34
7	Miami (OH)	28.179	100	1.2090	33
8	W Michigan	27.597	131	-0.4569	259
9	UMass	27.550	135	-0.7553	300
10	Kent State	25.192	245	-0.1212	196
11	Ball State	24.824	260	0.1974	138
12	Buffalo	24.713	267	0.4530	110
13	N Illinois	22.074	342	-0.2924	232

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	58.475	20	-0.7661	251
2	E Michigan	57.523	26	0.5775	122
3	Cent Michigan	55.886	51	-0.1237	188
4	Bowling Green	53.912	88	1.4532	54
5	W Michigan	53.549	104	-1.6029	318
6	UMass	52.486	133	-2.5189	358
7	Ohio	51.013	168	-0.2367	199
8	Ball State	50.710	177	0.4094	139
9	Akron	48.875	218	-1.9923	343
10	Buffalo	44.834	307	0.8410	96
11	Kent State	43.944	329	-1.3985	301
12	Miami (OH)	43.713	331	-0.7766	254
13	N Illinois	43.455	334	-0.3792	211

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	64.054	1	3.6990	1
2	Akron	62.396	7	0.2221	165
3	Kent State	57.729	42	1.1352	65
4	Ohio	57.519	47	1.4081	49
5	Bowling Green	55.387	91	0.7953	95
6	Buffalo	55.088	101	0.0184	190
7	Toledo	53.807	143	0.5694	126
8	UMass	52.497	189	0.7596	102
9	Cent Michigan	52.231	197	-1.0576	301
10	E Michigan	51.359	234	1.5679	39
11	W Michigan	51.279	237	0.6491	113
12	N Illinois	50.506	264	-0.0292	194
13	Ball State	49.026	306	0.0361	189

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	45.751	54	0.3607	150
2	N Illinois	45.328	61	-0.2913	217
3	Kent State	45.152	65	1.3204	69
4	Akron	44.890	73	2.5478	16
5	Buffalo	44.575	84	0.1900	165
6	Ball State	39.554	183	0.5043	132
7	Ohio	37.519	222	-0.7170	255
8	UMass	35.776	258	1.5361	53
9	W Michigan	35.266	272	1.8774	34
10	Bowling Green	34.500	293	-1.7393	333
11	Cent Michigan	33.881	307	0.4184	142
12	E Michigan	32.092	326	-0.1744	204
13	Toledo	31.533	335	-0.4548	231

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	15.485	14	1.4451	11
2	Miami (OH)	15.175	18	-0.2987	256
3	Buffalo	14.136	38	0.7039	67
4	Kent State	13.214	74	0.1521	153
5	N Illinois	11.697	148	-0.5315	295
6	Ball State	10.379	241	0.3982	98
7	Bowling Green	10.191	248	-0.3178	259
8	W Michigan	10.121	255	0.8656	46
9	UMass	10.096	257	0.8832	41
10	Toledo	9.430	294	0.0999	167
11	Ohio	9.416	295	-0.1521	224
12	E Michigan	9.155	306	0.0249	184
13	Cent Michigan	8.843	318	0.7170	65

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	39.809	34	2.2546	22
2	Miami (OH)	36.949	89	-0.1696	200
3	Buffalo	36.331	105	0.9015	86
4	N Illinois	36.311	109	-0.7301	265
5	Kent State	36.203	113	1.0114	72
6	Ball State	33.227	181	0.9420	81
7	Ohio	30.218	253	-0.9708	298
8	W Michigan	29.579	264	1.5480	46
9	Cent Michigan	29.161	275	0.3607	139
10	UMass	29.022	280	0.6056	109
11	Bowling Green	28.477	294	-1.4127	331
12	Toledo	26.856	325	-0.7799	276
13	E Michigan	26.807	327	0.2297	150

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	41.560	2	-0.4902	247
2	Buffalo	39.026	13	1.3219	68
3	Akron	38.841	16	1.0284	94
4	Bowling Green	35.725	87	1.4378	58
5	Toledo	35.554	98	1.9009	29
6	Kent State	35.524	101	-0.4848	245
7	UMass	35.328	111	2.4926	12
8	W Michigan	33.993	180	1.0103	95
9	E Michigan	33.845	190	-0.2944	220
10	N Illinois	32.489	249	-0.5191	253
11	Ball State	31.602	285	0.0896	185
12	Ohio	30.232	332	0.7342	123
13	Cent Michigan	29.526	344	1.4962	53

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	44.650	26	1.8478	92
2	Buffalo	44.550	29	-2.3108	337
3	N Illinois	41.690	61	2.6010	59
4	Bowling Green	39.740	96	1.9185	86
5	Miami (OH)	39.720	97	3.2895	36
6	UMass	39.460	108	2.2614	71
7	Ohio	37.740	145	0.9553	143
8	Toledo	36.430	180	1.8949	88
9	Ball State	33.680	247	-1.3518	297
10	E Michigan	32.010	276	-1.3427	296
11	W Michigan	30.230	308	-0.9888	278
12	Cent Michigan	29.480	322	-1.8312	321
13	Akron	27.860	343	-1.5318	308

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	25.991	25	-0.7069	304
2	Kent State	25.316	36	1.4172	69
3	Miami (OH)	23.964	75	1.7356	48
4	Bowling Green	23.468	95	1.0902	94
5	Toledo	22.489	133	0.8359	116
6	N Illinois	21.838	150	1.1233	90
7	UMass	20.669	198	1.1444	86
8	Ohio	20.598	205	0.3332	185
9	Ball State	19.247	249	0.2153	204
10	E Michigan	18.779	270	-0.6549	299
11	W Michigan	18.677	277	-0.2513	260
12	Cent Michigan	17.736	310	-1.3095	339
13	Akron	17.394	319	-0.5902	295

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	35.084	25	-1.0866	311
2	Kent State	33.672	51	1.4141	90
3	N Illinois	32.298	89	1.6425	70
4	Bowling Green	31.496	111	1.5448	79
5	Miami (OH)	30.840	137	2.3545	34
6	UMass	30.576	142	1.1052	117
7	Ohio	29.918	167	0.5126	168
8	Toledo	28.985	197	0.9788	125
9	Ball State	27.218	257	-0.5576	267
10	E Michigan	26.250	276	-0.8332	298
11	W Michigan	25.360	297	-0.6878	282
12	Cent Michigan	24.877	313	-1.3752	327
13	Akron	22.814	347	-1.1624	317

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	78.183	13	0.7384	149
2	Miami (OH)	76.043	53	0.7956	145
3	Akron	75.709	59	2.0988	48
4	Kent State	74.663	86	1.5276	85
5	Bowling Green	74.507	90	-0.3883	238
6	Buffalo	74.149	105	0.2456	191
7	W Michigan	73.500	130	1.2591	109
8	E Michigan	72.022	183	0.5000	173
9	Ohio	71.379	205	-0.2732	228
10	Ball State	70.826	219	1.5286	84
11	Cent Michigan	70.334	240	-2.1882	334
12	N Illinois	67.571	311	-0.2021	221
13	UMass	67.224	323	1.5314	83

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	62.720	17	2.3127	50
2	Kent State	59.712	37	2.9760	24
3	Akron	59.541	39	2.5613	42
4	Cent Michigan	55.722	113	-0.3261	206
5	Buffalo	53.963	149	2.3701	49
6	Ball State	53.433	168	-0.6764	234
7	Miami (OH)	53.144	177	-1.3553	273
8	Bowling Green	52.077	204	0.8296	122
9	N Illinois	51.920	209	-0.2651	204
10	Toledo	51.726	215	0.8133	125
11	W Michigan	51.355	228	0.5363	144
12	E Michigan	49.674	261	0.1042	179
13	Ohio	46.689	322	-1.6364	295

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ball State	6.365	9	-0.5119	64
2	Akron	6.731	15	-0.0060	184
3	Toledo	7.504	47	0.2731	253
4	Bowling Green	7.709	66	-0.3976	86
5	Miami (OH)	7.945	84	-0.5968	54
6	Buffalo	8.178	106	-0.0055	186
7	Ohio	8.377	131	0.0710	206
8	Kent State	8.925	194	0.5136	298
9	W Michigan	8.929	195	0.7705	334
10	E Michigan	9.231	231	-0.2240	131
11	Cent Michigan	10.115	307	0.9319	347
12	UMass	10.165	309	0.8076	339
13	N Illinois	10.231	313	0.3006	260

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	2.911	5	-0.1969	97
2	Kent State	2.992	12	-0.3065	61
3	Buffalo	3.432	36	0.2428	263
4	Ohio	3.669	67	-0.6805	6
5	UMass	3.980	109	-0.5254	21
6	Akron	3.990	111	0.2215	253
7	Cent Michigan	4.061	123	0.2742	273
8	Bowling Green	4.508	190	-0.0036	170
9	Toledo	4.513	191	-0.3320	53
10	W Michigan	5.038	268	0.2505	266
11	Ball State	5.070	274	-0.0709	141
12	N Illinois	5.925	345	1.1000	363
13	E Michigan	6.208	355	-0.2091	92

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	25.473	83	-0.2594	283
2	Kent State	25.354	94	0.7976	126
3	Bowling Green	24.497	138	0.9549	97
4	Buffalo	24.454	140	-0.4918	306
5	Ohio	24.156	154	0.2717	205
6	N Illinois	23.374	196	1.2712	55
7	Toledo	23.359	198	0.5621	154
8	E Michigan	23.127	210	-0.1031	264
9	Miami (OH)	22.448	242	1.4845	35
10	Cent Michigan	21.267	296	-0.3583	288
11	W Michigan	20.693	320	-0.6166	321
12	Ball State	20.602	323	-0.5337	313
13	Akron	19.667	346	-0.3898	292

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	77.903	8	0.9355	31
2	UMass	75.704	21	0.2582	105
3	Miami (OH)	73.832	50	1.5786	5
4	Akron	73.379	66	-0.7884	266
5	Bowling Green	73.067	76	0.3058	97
6	Ohio	72.651	91	-0.0411	152
7	Toledo	72.218	113	0.3032	98
8	W Michigan	72.060	123	-0.7095	254
9	N Illinois	71.705	134	0.1560	121
10	Buffalo	69.097	250	0.4093	83
11	E Michigan	68.799	261	-0.9398	293
12	Cent Michigan	68.028	290	-0.7727	263
13	Ball State	67.312	322	-1.1785	326

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	0.502	130	-0.0039	116
2	Miami (OH)	0.505	146	0.0077	252
3	Bowling Green	0.508	159	0.0011	169
4	UMass	0.510	169	0.0112	291
5	Akron	0.519	214	0.0025	197
6	Ohio	0.524	232	0.0032	208
7	W Michigan	0.538	278	0.0081	257
8	Buffalo	0.538	280	0.0130	306
9	Kent State	0.545	296	0.0151	322
10	N Illinois	0.554	314	-0.0029	131
11	Cent Michigan	0.557	320	0.0121	301
12	Ball State	0.559	329	0.0167	331
13	Toledo	0.566	342	-0.0056	96

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.997	55	0.0101	199
2	Miami (OH)	1.024	100	0.0201	268
3	UMass	1.027	109	0.0138	225
4	E Michigan	1.043	141	-0.0026	121
5	Akron	1.069	195	0.0010	142
6	Buffalo	1.095	250	0.0189	257
7	Ohio	1.103	263	0.0151	233
8	Ball State	1.117	280	0.0183	253
9	Kent State	1.117	281	0.0428	352
10	Toledo	1.125	294	0.0022	151
11	N Illinois	1.129	304	-0.0186	43
12	W Michigan	1.138	312	0.0335	325
13	Cent Michigan	1.174	344	0.0342	329

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.199	16	0.0001	134
2	Ball State	0.181	60	0.0074	31
3	Toledo	0.178	74	0.0006	122
4	Miami (OH)	0.177	81	-0.0002	143
5	Akron	0.173	96	0.0030	78
6	Buffalo	0.168	122	-0.0017	176
7	UMass	0.167	125	0.0005	128
8	N Illinois	0.166	131	0.0058	48
9	Ohio	0.164	149	0.0019	100
10	E Michigan	0.154	216	-0.0059	270
11	Kent State	0.149	244	-0.0142	354
12	Cent Michigan	0.144	271	-0.0057	267
13	W Michigan	0.131	338	-0.0084	306

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	77.180	10	0.0105	55
2	Miami (OH)	75.130	48	-0.0050	228
3	Bowling Green	73.910	88	-0.0127	296
4	Kent State	73.060	118	-0.0041	216
5	E Michigan	72.530	140	0.0063	86
6	W Michigan	71.820	173	-0.0074	251
7	Buffalo	70.630	222	0.0001	158
8	Akron	70.440	226	0.0007	148
9	N Illinois	69.880	251	0.0124	41
10	Ball State	68.470	297	-0.0043	218
11	Ohio	67.570	319	-0.0118	291
12	Toledo	66.550	334	-0.0129	299
13	Cent Michigan	66.340	338	-0.0136	305

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	0.266	21	0.0239	306
2	Ball State	0.293	47	0.0071	210
3	E Michigan	0.320	79	0.0040	183
4	Buffalo	0.324	92	0.0032	175
5	Miami (OH)	0.332	109	0.0042	187
6	Akron	0.333	117	-0.0065	101
7	Ohio	0.354	159	0.0265	314
8	W Michigan	0.389	251	0.0002	151
9	Bowling Green	0.408	278	0.0004	153
10	Kent State	0.418	300	0.0279	322
11	N Illinois	0.421	305	0.0031	174
12	Cent Michigan	0.421	306	0.0008	154
13	UMass	0.465	343	0.0137	253

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	103.926	67	-1.1525	43
2	E Michigan	106.582	110	-1.7499	20
3	UMass	106.739	113	0.3090	173
4	Miami (OH)	107.937	134	-0.0280	139
5	Akron	110.762	182	1.1547	261
6	Buffalo	114.122	237	-0.8097	72
7	Ohio	114.827	249	0.4227	186
8	Ball State	115.649	260	0.7415	219
9	Toledo	115.817	261	-0.5736	92
10	Kent State	116.753	278	2.3484	342
11	N Illinois	116.843	279	0.3896	182
12	W Michigan	117.774	289	0.8055	227
13	Cent Michigan	120.747	334	2.9954	358

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	33.405	29	0.2865	216
2	UMass	34.182	55	0.2538	208
3	Miami (OH)	36.027	130	0.5361	259
4	Akron	37.185	192	0.0831	175
5	E Michigan	37.395	207	-0.0382	153
6	Kent State	37.511	216	1.4507	338
7	Buffalo	38.175	249	0.2689	212
8	W Michigan	38.702	272	1.0954	315
9	Ohio	38.837	278	-0.0735	148
10	N Illinois	39.361	294	-0.4687	89
11	Ball State	39.863	310	0.2815	215
12	Cent Michigan	40.496	328	1.2156	325
13	Toledo	42.176	355	-0.4350	96

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	76.093	9	-1.0552	61
2	Bowling Green	76.605	12	0.3831	226
3	N Illinois	80.305	75	-1.3029	36
4	Kent State	80.874	92	0.3217	221
5	Miami (OH)	81.315	105	-0.0552	164
6	Buffalo	83.288	183	-0.3954	127
7	Akron	83.610	204	0.2624	211
8	Ball State	83.721	211	-1.1386	48
9	Ohio	83.975	228	-0.7867	86
10	Cent Michigan	84.264	241	0.8854	278
11	E Michigan	84.282	243	0.0985	184
12	W Michigan	84.630	253	0.9428	286
13	Toledo	85.665	293	-0.0992	158

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	43.791	137	0.1004	185
2	E Michigan	44.241	159	-0.1280	147
3	Miami (OH)	44.432	169	0.6880	271
4	Akron	44.516	174	0.0374	171
5	UMass	45.013	196	0.9441	295
6	W Michigan	45.627	229	0.6323	263
7	Ohio	46.095	250	0.2627	206
8	Buffalo	46.118	254	0.6364	265
9	Kent State	46.431	265	1.5400	338
10	Ball State	47.744	308	0.9742	297
11	Cent Michigan	48.292	326	1.1177	314
12	N Illinois	48.847	336	0.0613	178
13	Toledo	49.258	344	-0.5162	86

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	52.748	16	-0.8487	96
2	Buffalo	54.564	36	-2.9798	11
3	Akron	55.960	59	-1.3923	64
4	Bowling Green	56.436	67	-0.0831	185
5	Kent State	56.732	72	0.9619	295
6	Ball State	58.131	105	-0.2141	168
7	Toledo	59.531	156	-0.5474	131
8	UMass	59.545	157	0.1508	210
9	Cent Michigan	59.879	172	0.3891	242
10	N Illinois	61.674	220	1.2443	309
11	Miami (OH)	62.646	251	0.2987	233
12	E Michigan	64.417	308	1.7148	332
13	Ohio	65.335	323	0.2297	223

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	22.944	40	0.2275	220
2	Akron	24.653	103	-0.2834	140
3	Kent State	24.665	105	1.4465	352
4	W Michigan	24.763	117	0.4730	260
5	UMass	24.941	130	0.1028	195
6	Buffalo	25.404	161	-0.7792	54
7	Miami (OH)	26.164	210	0.4209	251
8	Ball State	26.249	213	-0.7975	52
9	E Michigan	27.398	274	0.3646	243
10	Cent Michigan	28.036	296	0.9846	313
11	Ohio	28.150	302	-0.0365	169
12	N Illinois	28.872	320	0.2677	230
13	Toledo	29.662	340	-0.3821	120

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	43.591	21	0.1978	213
2	W Michigan	44.557	28	-0.2766	162
3	UMass	45.058	35	-0.6064	123
4	Buffalo	45.442	42	-2.7762	6
5	Kent State	46.112	61	0.9661	286
6	Akron	46.751	76	-1.0429	83
7	Ball State	48.609	130	-0.9325	95
8	N Illinois	49.616	173	0.2464	217
9	Cent Michigan	50.384	204	0.8518	279
10	Miami (OH)	50.901	217	0.2317	216
11	Toledo	51.093	225	-0.5413	131
12	E Michigan	54.348	308	1.5157	321
13	Ohio	54.792	319	-0.2835	160

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	49.887	107	-0.6051	93
2	Ohio	51.411	164	-0.0759	152
3	Miami (OH)	51.634	171	0.7629	252
4	Akron	52.503	208	0.6894	244
5	Bowling Green	53.437	236	0.2239	192
6	Kent State	53.938	254	1.9297	337
7	Ball State	54.831	283	-0.4511	111
8	W Michigan	55.555	296	1.3495	309
9	UMass	55.785	301	0.5874	239
10	Buffalo	56.161	309	1.5788	321
11	Cent Michigan	56.703	317	1.4283	313
12	N Illinois	58.198	340	0.0074	167
13	Toledo	58.327	341	-0.2303	136

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	34.665	43	-0.2297	143
2	E Michigan	35.583	58	-1.7148	34
3	Miami (OH)	37.354	115	-0.2987	133
4	N Illinois	38.326	146	-1.2443	57
5	Cent Michigan	40.121	194	-0.3891	124
6	UMass	40.455	209	-0.1508	156
7	Toledo	40.469	210	0.5474	235
8	Ball State	41.869	261	0.2141	198
9	Kent State	43.268	294	-0.9619	71
10	Bowling Green	43.564	299	0.0831	181
11	Akron	44.040	307	1.3923	302
12	Buffalo	45.436	330	2.9798	355
13	W Michigan	47.252	350	0.8487	270

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	9.241	44	0.1509	199
2	Miami (OH)	9.863	82	0.1152	189
3	E Michigan	9.997	89	-0.4028	83
4	Bowling Green	10.460	126	0.0590	172
5	N Illinois	10.490	128	-0.7365	31
6	Ohio	10.687	145	-0.0370	151
7	Cent Michigan	12.461	288	0.2310	217
8	Toledo	12.513	291	-0.0529	148
9	Akron	12.532	294	0.3666	244
10	Buffalo	12.771	304	1.0481	344
11	Kent State	12.846	310	0.0042	159
12	Ball State	13.615	341	1.0790	347
13	W Michigan	13.940	350	0.6224	299

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	29.183	63	-0.5032	109
2	E Michigan	29.934	92	-1.4172	38
3	Miami (OH)	30.414	109	-0.2869	140
4	N Illinois	30.688	113	-1.5493	33
5	UMass	31.035	118	-0.4488	121
6	Bowling Green	33.014	180	0.1853	197
7	Cent Michigan	33.880	218	0.0336	177
8	Toledo	34.572	245	0.4421	232
9	Kent State	34.762	254	-0.6443	87
10	Ball State	35.112	265	-0.2062	148
11	Akron	36.859	300	1.3053	302
12	Buffalo	37.847	326	2.3808	353
13	W Michigan	40.074	354	1.2195	293

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	29.622	27	1.3882	301
2	Miami (OH)	32.620	124	0.6215	233
3	Bowling Green	32.658	126	0.1661	193
4	Buffalo	33.726	179	0.4615	215
5	Akron	33.930	187	0.0225	172
6	E Michigan	33.950	188	1.5477	316
7	W Michigan	34.151	201	-0.0682	165
8	N Illinois	34.156	203	-0.5338	122
9	Ohio	35.849	286	0.5031	219
10	Toledo	36.010	295	-0.6512	115
11	Cent Michigan	36.111	300	0.7701	243
12	Kent State	36.728	324	0.9854	261
13	Ball State	38.906	359	3.1669	361

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	26.620	21	2.3868	306
2	Ball State	29.320	47	0.7123	210
3	E Michigan	31.990	79	0.3972	183
4	Buffalo	32.410	92	0.3195	175
5	Miami (OH)	33.160	109	0.4202	187
6	Akron	33.320	117	-0.6512	101
7	Ohio	35.400	159	2.6501	314
8	W Michigan	38.890	251	0.0235	151
9	Bowling Green	40.770	278	0.0418	153
10	Kent State	41.840	300	2.7918	322
11	N Illinois	42.070	305	0.3094	174
12	Cent Michigan	42.120	306	0.0746	154
13	UMass	46.520	343	1.3677	253

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	15.603	13	1.1391	276
2	Ball State	18.361	64	0.2148	163
3	E Michigan	19.525	100	0.2162	165
4	Akron	19.985	119	-0.4364	83
5	Buffalo	20.404	141	0.3061	176
6	Miami (OH)	20.446	144	0.8231	237
7	Ohio	21.900	208	1.6971	328
8	Bowling Green	22.430	240	0.3798	186
9	W Michigan	22.473	243	0.5401	205
10	N Illinois	23.684	289	-0.1868	119
11	Kent State	23.842	296	1.3701	302
12	Cent Michigan	23.928	299	0.7610	230
13	UMass	25.056	326	0.7235	225

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	22.627	19	1.9635	318
2	Ball State	24.077	41	0.2553	168
3	Buffalo	26.623	86	0.3067	173
4	E Michigan	26.754	93	0.4017	183
5	Miami (OH)	26.815	94	0.3701	175
6	Akron	26.979	97	-0.5766	81
7	Ohio	29.209	172	1.7754	306
8	Bowling Green	30.158	214	0.2123	163
9	W Michigan	31.864	262	0.2722	170
10	N Illinois	33.006	299	-0.3663	105
11	Kent State	33.142	304	2.4985	343
12	Cent Michigan	34.460	323	0.1172	156
13	UMass	34.796	328	0.7944	231

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	69.265	74	-0.3170	131
2	Cent Michigan	69.747	91	1.7662	299
3	N Illinois	70.951	132	0.4621	204
4	W Michigan	71.281	150	1.9514	310
5	Kent State	71.804	181	-0.9563	81
6	UMass	72.252	195	0.9557	251
7	Akron	73.160	246	0.0262	169
8	E Michigan	74.090	289	-0.2363	141
9	Ohio	74.135	290	1.6997	294
10	Bowling Green	74.333	293	1.4775	282
11	Miami (OH)	76.139	341	2.0664	318
12	Ball State	76.691	349	-0.2834	135
13	Buffalo	77.237	354	0.6224	215

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	46.684	50	-0.8663	107
2	Miami (OH)	47.972	73	0.5446	216
3	E Michigan	50.844	136	0.2319	188
4	Akron	51.094	144	1.2301	268
5	N Illinois	52.392	183	-1.3667	76
6	Bowling Green	52.401	184	-1.0458	94
7	Toledo	52.940	198	1.7618	309
8	W Michigan	55.655	266	0.5219	214
9	Ball State	55.861	272	-0.1235	156
10	Kent State	56.382	284	0.6907	226
11	UMass	56.740	290	0.4921	210
12	Cent Michigan	59.803	329	1.7678	310
13	Buffalo	60.378	337	2.8811	346

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	12.665	24	0.2690	97
2	Ball State	11.542	49	1.2472	8
3	Buffalo	11.500	51	0.3035	87
4	Akron	11.015	80	0.5250	47
5	Toledo	10.766	91	0.4583	60
6	Miami (OH)	9.679	164	0.1035	136
7	UMass	9.429	182	0.0515	146
8	N Illinois	8.578	241	0.3918	72
9	Kent State	8.361	259	-1.1311	358
10	E Michigan	8.349	261	-0.5162	289
11	Ohio	8.072	285	-0.4608	279
12	Cent Michigan	7.900	299	0.0221	151
13	W Michigan	6.117	356	-0.8123	343

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	5.973	71	0.2705	98
2	E Michigan	5.140	131	0.2928	92
3	Miami (OH)	4.747	167	0.2714	97
4	Kent State	4.699	177	-0.0575	206
5	Bowling Green	4.642	188	0.4150	72
6	Ball State	4.258	218	0.0873	158
7	Ohio	4.086	242	0.6359	26
8	Akron	4.008	250	-0.2425	262
9	Buffalo	3.952	254	-0.0892	213
10	UMass	3.457	304	-0.0176	190
11	W Michigan	3.412	311	0.3338	85
12	Toledo	3.191	326	-0.1281	227
13	N Illinois	2.287	356	-0.5486	339

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	22.406	40	0.5648	252
2	Akron	23.203	62	-0.5271	62
3	Miami (OH)	23.652	81	-0.1231	123
4	Ball State	23.689	83	-0.0679	134
5	Buffalo	24.160	105	-0.0735	132
6	Ohio	24.285	114	1.0269	314
7	E Michigan	24.960	145	0.4135	222
8	Bowling Green	25.724	203	-0.0109	143
9	Cent Michigan	26.227	232	-0.2326	106
10	W Michigan	27.218	296	0.4296	226
11	Kent State	27.661	315	1.3570	338
12	UMass	28.450	333	0.2063	175
13	N Illinois	29.227	344	-0.1827	114

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	76.544	11	1.2943	18
2	UMass	74.378	39	0.4871	78
3	Miami (OH)	74.352	41	1.9730	3
4	Akron	73.097	72	-0.7446	286
5	Ohio	71.975	110	-0.3755	220
6	Bowling Green	71.953	113	0.1135	135
7	Toledo	71.566	131	0.2048	119
8	W Michigan	71.104	152	-0.5786	253
9	N Illinois	70.475	188	0.5957	67
10	E Michigan	69.954	216	-0.6351	266
11	Buffalo	69.390	246	0.7142	55
12	Cent Michigan	68.935	265	-0.1316	180
13	Ball State	66.303	346	-0.8370	296