Conferences – HoopSci

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	18.939	40	0.7849	89
2	Miami (OH)	14.588	58	1.6715	23
3	Bowling Green	4.265	120	-0.1932	206
4	Toledo	2.029	139	1.3658	34
5	Buffalo	1.008	150	1.1025	56
6	Kent State	-0.186	161	-0.2054	208
7	UMass	-0.468	163	-0.1735	204
8	Ohio	-3.576	193	0.5704	110
9	E Michigan	-3.683	195	-0.0686	197
10	Cent Michigan	-7.160	230	0.4540	126
11	Ball State	-10.926	259	-0.2643	220
12	W Michigan	-11.594	266	-0.3784	230
13	N Illinois	-19.733	326	0.0313	176

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.246	20	0.0029	132
2	Akron	0.198	32	0.0012	148
3	Bowling Green	0.155	54	-0.0072	218
4	Buffalo	0.084	115	0.0061	107
5	Kent State	0.042	161	-0.0065	214
6	UMass	0.034	166	-0.0043	197
7	Toledo	0.010	188	0.0083	88
8	E Michigan	-0.003	199	-0.0055	207
9	Ohio	-0.064	258	0.0054	109
10	W Michigan	-0.074	271	-0.0093	234
11	Cent Michigan	-0.085	280	0.0021	138
12	Ball State	-0.108	299	-0.0055	206
13	N Illinois	-0.112	301	-0.0110	254

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	1715.809	17	35.3054	2
2	Akron	1707.098	20	15.2440	48
3	Kent State	1622.922	61	7.5675	107
4	Toledo	1535.270	138	-5.2717	247
5	Ohio	1478.675	211	-5.1218	245
6	Bowling Green	1475.443	215	2.8257	145
7	UMass	1427.601	261	-10.2564	281
8	Buffalo	1421.385	273	4.6725	127
9	Ball State	1413.549	283	-6.9675	257
10	Cent Michigan	1394.622	299	-9.1712	274
11	E Michigan	1383.234	308	-15.7236	320
12	W Michigan	1379.697	312	-6.3698	252
13	N Illinois	1321.591	348	-3.3801	225

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.605	28	0.0228	7
2	Akron	0.585	35	0.0043	172
3	Kent State	0.559	65	0.0108	62
4	Toledo	0.534	99	0.0048	162
5	Bowling Green	0.503	177	0.0072	120
6	Buffalo	0.500	181	0.0006	229
7	Ohio	0.497	191	0.0045	167
8	UMass	0.491	203	0.0101	73
9	W Michigan	0.458	254	0.0064	136
10	E Michigan	0.448	271	-0.0017	265
11	Cent Michigan	0.437	298	0.0027	196
12	Ball State	0.435	303	0.0137	40
13	N Illinois	0.433	306	0.0057	144

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.593	7	0.0145	37
2	Miami (OH)	0.592	8	-0.0105	315
3	Buffalo	0.557	30	0.0029	144
4	Toledo	0.544	66	0.0175	27
5	UMass	0.534	102	0.0115	55
6	Kent State	0.527	128	0.0076	87
7	Cent Michigan	0.520	159	0.0124	45
8	Bowling Green	0.519	170	-0.0099	308
9	Ohio	0.511	200	-0.0069	271
10	W Michigan	0.500	251	-0.0047	242
11	E Michigan	0.499	257	-0.0099	309
12	N Illinois	0.475	330	-0.0140	340
13	Ball State	0.471	337	0.0150	33

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	1.228	2	0.0133	97
2	Miami (OH)	1.221	5	-0.0198	319
3	Buffalo	1.150	52	0.0065	156
4	Toledo	1.141	62	0.0267	39
5	Kent State	1.119	93	0.0138	93
6	Bowling Green	1.100	132	-0.0013	211
7	Ohio	1.085	162	0.0119	108
8	UMass	1.080	175	0.0123	103
9	Cent Michigan	1.055	229	0.0040	175
10	W Michigan	1.048	249	0.0015	188
11	E Michigan	1.016	309	-0.0219	331
12	Ball State	0.994	330	0.0238	45
13	N Illinois	0.975	342	-0.0356	359

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.137	49	-0.0056	117
2	Toledo	0.138	56	-0.0084	56
3	Ohio	0.139	65	-0.0160	5
4	Ball State	0.145	101	-0.0041	157
5	Akron	0.148	124	0.0072	345
6	W Michigan	0.152	159	-0.0053	125
7	Bowling Green	0.153	161	-0.0101	36
8	Buffalo	0.153	163	-0.0049	135
9	E Michigan	0.165	254	-0.0034	173
10	Cent Michigan	0.167	272	0.0066	339
11	UMass	0.169	279	-0.0019	211
12	Kent State	0.178	325	-0.0031	183
13	N Illinois	0.193	356	-0.0018	213

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	33.450	40	-0.0142	223
2	Akron	33.130	47	-0.0124	200
3	UMass	30.220	118	-0.0184	255
4	Cent Michigan	27.630	206	-0.0143	224
5	W Michigan	27.570	209	-0.0214	283
6	N Illinois	27.430	212	-0.0390	360
7	Toledo	27.270	217	-0.0195	265
8	Ohio	26.580	237	-0.0133	212
9	Bowling Green	26.330	242	-0.0174	249
10	Buffalo	25.660	264	-0.0204	273
11	E Michigan	25.280	277	-0.0250	309
12	Ball State	23.750	314	-0.0143	225
13	Miami (OH)	23.000	330	-0.0274	321

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	0.455	10	0.0116	87
2	Miami (OH)	0.414	59	0.0224	40
3	Buffalo	0.405	66	-0.0245	331
4	N Illinois	0.391	99	0.0045	137
5	UMass	0.385	112	0.0035	149
6	Bowling Green	0.375	139	0.0108	97
7	Ohio	0.369	156	-0.0060	231
8	W Michigan	0.337	237	0.0224	41
9	Ball State	0.324	261	-0.0224	322
10	Cent Michigan	0.322	272	-0.0092	248
11	Toledo	0.317	283	-0.0390	360
12	E Michigan	0.300	321	-0.0073	241
13	Akron	0.292	331	0.0021	161

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	127.811	24	0.6497	172
2	Miami (OH)	123.501	51	1.5768	35
3	Buffalo	118.582	75	1.2231	74
4	Toledo	118.447	78	0.9181	123
5	Kent State	114.552	129	0.1395	264
6	Ohio	112.836	155	0.7159	162
7	UMass	112.417	159	1.6469	30
8	Bowling Green	111.511	173	0.4368	217
9	Cent Michigan	111.003	176	1.0117	107
10	W Michigan	108.805	221	1.1096	90
11	E Michigan	106.859	247	0.2233	250
12	Ball State	102.344	305	-0.2948	306
13	N Illinois	99.884	331	-0.4187	323

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	44.435	3	0.2122	155
2	Miami (OH)	42.114	17	-0.8942	318
3	Toledo	42.053	19	2.1903	4
4	Bowling Green	38.930	113	-0.5929	284
5	Cent Michigan	38.809	123	0.4520	118
6	Ohio	38.689	129	0.2352	150
7	Buffalo	38.620	136	0.7494	74
8	UMass	38.541	140	0.3425	135
9	E Michigan	37.476	197	-0.4864	276
10	W Michigan	36.787	236	-0.9925	328
11	Kent State	36.617	245	-0.2664	236
12	Ball State	35.226	308	1.5665	19
13	N Illinois	33.109	355	-1.0857	337

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	87.716	25	-0.6190	278
2	Toledo	86.423	49	1.9620	14
3	Ball State	84.172	159	1.0546	67
4	E Michigan	83.890	174	-0.3403	240
5	Ohio	83.660	186	1.9219	15
6	W Michigan	83.651	187	-0.9185	312
7	Cent Michigan	83.349	199	-0.6542	285
8	Bowling Green	82.669	233	0.7212	99
9	UMass	82.256	259	-0.7715	299
10	Buffalo	81.209	295	1.0165	72
11	Kent State	80.544	314	-0.3436	241
12	Miami (OH)	80.425	321	-0.6365	282
13	N Illinois	79.829	327	-1.2038	333

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	52.349	1	-0.6563	289
2	Akron	50.725	9	0.6870	90
3	Toledo	48.799	31	1.4522	25
4	Buffalo	47.594	54	0.2239	146
5	Bowling Green	47.042	76	-1.0827	334
6	UMass	46.937	83	0.9353	56
7	Cent Michigan	46.757	90	0.8800	67
8	Ohio	46.240	121	-0.7215	294
9	Kent State	45.597	165	-0.1700	200
10	E Michigan	44.766	209	-0.4185	245
11	W Michigan	44.061	252	-0.7113	293
12	Ball State	41.995	329	1.2838	36
13	N Illinois	41.319	341	-0.7964	305

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	67.883	38	-0.4082	228
2	E Michigan	67.733	39	1.5848	43
3	Cent Michigan	66.080	67	-0.1326	190
4	Bowling Green	65.606	83	0.0881	169
5	W Michigan	64.931	97	-0.4887	242
6	UMass	63.955	112	-0.9625	291
7	Ohio	62.096	150	-0.0392	178
8	Ball State	60.987	177	0.3767	133
9	Miami (OH)	55.531	289	0.8128	95
10	N Illinois	55.091	298	1.0552	75
11	Buffalo	54.996	300	-0.0043	176
12	Kent State	54.609	307	-2.8765	362
13	Akron	54.476	310	-0.8927	285

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	31.979	7	1.4309	15
2	Cent Michigan	29.335	44	-0.0474	206
3	Akron	29.025	62	-0.9637	335
4	Bowling Green	28.876	65	-0.8484	324
5	Ohio	28.864	66	-0.0791	212
6	E Michigan	28.750	71	0.4624	115
7	UMass	28.134	98	0.0432	185
8	Miami (OH)	28.131	99	-0.0985	215
9	W Michigan	26.357	177	-1.3077	351
10	Ball State	24.858	262	1.0383	45
11	Buffalo	24.470	283	0.4977	106
12	Kent State	23.464	321	-1.7306	361
13	N Illinois	21.839	354	0.0243	190

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	58.721	17	0.9832	78
2	E Michigan	57.000	36	1.0106	75
3	Cent Michigan	54.986	69	-0.4402	238
4	Bowling Green	54.244	90	0.5668	132
5	W Michigan	54.144	96	-0.9822	304
6	UMass	52.710	128	-1.3192	327
7	Ohio	52.125	146	1.1170	66
8	Ball State	51.357	166	0.9984	77
9	Akron	47.764	251	-1.1446	312
10	Miami (OH)	44.661	316	0.3219	156
11	Buffalo	44.494	321	0.6556	119
12	Kent State	43.982	333	-2.5745	363
13	N Illinois	43.836	334	0.2054	167

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	62.906	2	-0.3438	241
2	Akron	60.473	11	-0.5361	265
3	Ohio	55.446	68	-1.1881	317
4	Buffalo	54.655	85	0.0414	180
5	Toledo	54.613	87	1.6312	37
6	Kent State	53.708	134	-1.1050	307
7	UMass	53.689	137	1.5649	38
8	Bowling Green	53.269	153	-1.9137	351
9	Cent Michigan	53.079	159	0.2078	151
10	E Michigan	51.143	246	-0.3698	245
11	N Illinois	49.678	293	-0.0854	200
12	W Michigan	48.657	319	-1.5745	339
13	Ball State	48.339	322	1.1422	63

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	45.524	56	0.8927	81
2	Kent State	45.391	59	2.8765	4
3	Buffalo	45.004	66	0.0043	190
4	N Illinois	44.909	68	-1.0552	291
5	Miami (OH)	44.469	77	-0.8128	271
6	Ball State	39.013	189	-0.3767	233
7	Ohio	37.904	216	0.0392	188
8	UMass	36.045	254	0.9625	75
9	W Michigan	35.069	269	0.4887	124
10	Bowling Green	34.394	283	-0.0881	197
11	Cent Michigan	33.920	299	0.1326	176
12	E Michigan	32.267	327	-1.5848	323
13	Toledo	32.117	328	0.4082	138

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	15.409	10	1.1759	13
2	Buffalo	14.150	38	0.2518	103
3	Miami (OH)	13.983	45	-0.7958	335
4	Kent State	13.153	75	1.4642	6
5	N Illinois	11.270	173	-1.1100	358
6	W Michigan	10.430	225	0.3152	90
7	UMass	10.408	227	0.2993	92
8	Ball State	10.368	232	0.5282	67
9	Toledo	10.075	254	0.7594	40
10	Bowling Green	10.054	255	0.2555	101
11	Ohio	9.824	274	0.3144	91
12	Cent Michigan	9.474	296	0.4994	73
13	E Michigan	8.726	329	-0.9487	348

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	39.952	30	0.5256	122
2	Buffalo	36.715	95	0.3609	147
3	Kent State	36.562	104	2.2309	7
4	N Illinois	35.993	115	-1.4091	327
5	Miami (OH)	35.764	119	-0.9584	290
6	Ball State	32.814	189	0.0562	184
7	Ohio	31.535	219	0.8049	86
8	UMass	29.546	268	0.5477	118
9	W Michigan	29.507	270	0.0636	183
10	Bowling Green	28.425	290	0.1545	174
11	Cent Michigan	28.362	292	-0.2139	224
12	Toledo	27.702	308	0.9788	74
13	E Michigan	26.890	327	-1.3508	320

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	39.469	8	-1.3286	300
2	Akron	38.779	12	2.6572	13
3	Buffalo	38.711	13	0.3207	132
4	Toledo	36.515	49	1.1486	73
5	UMass	35.254	112	0.4299	122
6	Bowling Green	35.181	119	0.5286	115
7	Kent State	35.161	121	1.7671	37
8	W Michigan	35.150	123	0.7042	103
9	Cent Michigan	32.834	239	1.4944	47
10	E Michigan	32.077	281	-2.4265	357
11	Ball State	31.691	299	1.4465	49
12	N Illinois	31.383	308	-1.9534	346
13	Ohio	30.404	338	0.3081	137

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	45.490	10	1.1614	87
2	Miami (OH)	41.400	59	2.2413	40
3	Buffalo	40.470	66	-2.4491	331
4	N Illinois	39.070	99	0.4499	137
5	UMass	38.480	112	0.3520	149
6	Bowling Green	37.460	139	1.0774	97
7	Ohio	36.870	156	-0.5971	231
8	W Michigan	33.680	237	2.2376	41
9	Ball State	32.360	261	-2.2414	322
10	Cent Michigan	32.150	272	-0.9208	248
11	Toledo	31.680	283	-3.8994	360
12	E Michigan	29.980	321	-0.7249	241
13	Akron	29.250	331	0.2138	161

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	25.512	25	0.4516	128
2	Miami (OH)	23.934	56	0.6064	107
3	Buffalo	23.602	67	-1.1055	320
4	Bowling Green	22.081	140	0.7958	81
5	Ohio	21.283	177	0.4086	136
6	W Michigan	20.767	196	1.8256	18
7	UMass	20.516	203	0.2430	158
8	N Illinois	20.043	223	-0.2763	233
9	Toledo	19.950	227	-2.4718	363
10	Ball State	18.615	277	-1.2773	329
11	Cent Michigan	18.386	293	-0.9994	314
12	Akron	18.291	299	-0.2298	223
13	E Michigan	17.890	314	-0.2647	232

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	34.547	22	0.9725	86
2	Buffalo	31.870	78	-1.7448	330
3	Miami (OH)	31.864	80	1.7356	32
4	UMass	30.372	140	0.0762	183
5	Ohio	30.151	146	0.2775	159
6	N Illinois	30.117	148	-0.0910	199
7	Bowling Green	30.013	154	1.2441	61
8	W Michigan	27.978	225	1.6639	34
9	Ball State	26.792	261	-1.3924	311
10	Cent Michigan	26.330	274	-0.9521	281
11	Toledo	26.032	284	-2.9206	360
12	E Michigan	24.560	326	-0.5472	248
13	Akron	23.848	341	-0.1118	203

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	78.252	15	0.4873	161
2	Akron	75.230	72	-1.5012	323
3	W Michigan	74.325	97	2.0381	47
4	Buffalo	73.575	133	0.4634	163
5	Bowling Green	73.526	135	-0.0783	213
6	Miami (OH)	73.429	144	-2.0805	343
7	E Michigan	73.075	163	0.5847	152
8	Kent State	72.490	188	-1.6542	332
9	Ohio	71.719	201	-0.1752	225
10	Ball State	69.671	270	-1.0966	309
11	Cent Michigan	68.842	289	-1.5205	324
12	UMass	66.907	341	0.2970	176
13	N Illinois	65.939	352	-1.6684	333

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	60.889	27	-0.0786	172
2	Akron	58.413	50	0.3307	148
3	Kent State	57.523	62	1.8625	46
4	Cent Michigan	55.578	103	0.5708	132
5	Buffalo	54.596	127	-1.1536	259
6	Ball State	52.911	166	1.7867	49
7	N Illinois	51.975	189	-2.2671	318
8	Toledo	51.736	202	1.0729	90
9	Miami (OH)	50.763	228	-4.2184	361
10	Bowling Green	48.651	275	-0.9850	239
11	W Michigan	48.209	283	-1.1703	261
12	E Michigan	48.151	286	-1.0937	251
13	Ohio	47.775	292	0.5241	133

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ball State	7.372	30	-0.4728	62
2	Ohio	7.482	34	-0.5376	50
3	Toledo	7.806	55	0.1593	234
4	Miami (OH)	7.899	65	-0.3917	79
5	Akron	8.170	90	0.8986	353
6	Bowling Green	8.191	93	-0.0108	176
7	W Michigan	8.568	137	0.2985	265
8	Buffalo	8.930	184	0.0291	192
9	E Michigan	9.191	220	-0.0798	162
10	Kent State	9.207	221	-0.6424	36
11	UMass	9.663	269	-0.1111	151
12	Cent Michigan	10.370	319	0.8846	352
13	N Illinois	10.673	333	0.5451	308

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	3.177	9	0.1645	259
2	Buffalo	3.320	18	-0.0122	188
3	Ohio	3.603	41	-0.4565	37
4	Akron	3.734	62	-0.3835	51
5	Kent State	3.820	75	0.0121	196
6	UMass	3.858	77	-0.2907	82
7	Cent Michigan	4.536	197	0.4937	335
8	Toledo	4.544	200	0.0627	218
9	Bowling Green	4.983	264	0.1084	232
10	Ball State	5.133	287	-0.1984	110
11	E Michigan	5.351	307	-0.2774	87
12	W Michigan	5.776	339	0.1103	233
13	N Illinois	5.826	343	-0.1207	145

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	26.254	56	0.2994	162
2	UMass	25.059	121	-0.5148	296
3	Ohio	25.016	124	0.4178	144
4	Bowling Green	24.429	162	1.2975	35
5	Miami (OH)	24.206	171	1.0472	53
6	Buffalo	23.773	198	-0.1500	241
7	N Illinois	23.748	199	0.5623	113
8	Cent Michigan	22.727	263	0.2109	174
9	W Michigan	22.537	277	1.1212	48
10	Toledo	22.292	286	-1.5248	361
11	E Michigan	22.007	307	-0.8569	332
12	Ball State	21.517	329	-0.3881	280
13	Akron	20.365	355	-0.3377	275

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	75.758	11	-0.6452	232
2	UMass	74.481	19	-0.1587	140
3	Miami (OH)	73.477	32	0.5578	46
4	Akron	72.376	77	-0.9409	276
5	Bowling Green	71.935	87	-0.4869	202
6	Ohio	71.889	90	0.5226	51
7	Toledo	70.958	132	-0.9770	283
8	W Michigan	70.857	137	-0.0549	122
9	N Illinois	70.276	168	-0.6394	231
10	E Michigan	69.573	203	0.4360	55
11	Buffalo	68.778	235	-0.7981	248
12	Cent Michigan	68.534	246	-0.5630	216
13	Ball State	67.207	303	0.1263	95

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	0.502	107	-0.0027	131
2	Miami (OH)	0.506	127	0.0031	196
3	Bowling Green	0.508	133	-0.0035	127
4	Akron	0.509	140	-0.0062	95
5	Kent State	0.523	216	0.0033	202
6	UMass	0.526	233	-0.0007	152
7	Ball State	0.527	244	-0.0208	14
8	Ohio	0.529	254	0.0106	281
9	Cent Michigan	0.542	303	0.0083	256
10	W Michigan	0.544	306	-0.0001	159
11	Toledo	0.548	319	-0.0020	139
12	Buffalo	0.552	330	0.0149	312
13	N Illinois	0.554	338	0.0249	359

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	1.014	62	0.0016	158
2	Miami (OH)	1.026	81	0.0118	210
3	Akron	1.035	95	-0.0350	12
4	E Michigan	1.062	157	0.0051	179
5	UMass	1.069	175	0.0250	300
6	Ball State	1.075	193	-0.0335	14
7	Kent State	1.082	220	0.0036	169
8	Ohio	1.105	275	0.0276	311
9	Toledo	1.109	282	-0.0080	101
10	Buffalo	1.112	286	0.0235	290
11	Cent Michigan	1.126	312	0.0018	160
12	N Illinois	1.140	328	0.0463	351
13	W Michigan	1.143	336	-0.0084	97

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.175	62	-0.0113	332
2	Akron	0.173	73	0.0028	74
3	Ball State	0.173	77	-0.0025	163
4	Toledo	0.171	86	-0.0029	172
5	Miami (OH)	0.168	99	-0.0134	352
6	Buffalo	0.166	109	0.0009	99
7	UMass	0.157	164	-0.0143	356
8	Cent Michigan	0.156	181	0.0039	58
9	Ohio	0.154	197	-0.0115	336
10	N Illinois	0.154	199	-0.0065	257
11	Kent State	0.152	206	0.0059	40
12	E Michigan	0.141	283	-0.0138	355
13	W Michigan	0.126	345	-0.0052	225

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	76.650	19	-0.0029	234
2	Bowling Green	75.320	40	0.0163	47
3	Miami (OH)	75.010	50	0.0067	126
4	W Michigan	73.070	134	0.0163	44
5	Kent State	72.850	145	-0.0050	259
6	E Michigan	72.720	151	0.0111	78
7	Akron	72.550	156	0.0252	10
8	N Illinois	71.130	208	-0.0009	212
9	Buffalo	71.090	211	0.0008	194
10	Ball State	70.650	229	0.0123	72
11	Ohio	68.990	301	0.0016	186
12	Toledo	67.260	334	0.0141	58
13	Cent Michigan	67.180	335	0.0024	179

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	0.270	16	-0.0143	88
2	Akron	0.305	61	-0.0325	14
3	Miami (OH)	0.311	72	-0.0173	74
4	Buffalo	0.316	83	-0.0021	188
5	Ball State	0.327	106	0.0170	299
6	E Michigan	0.362	199	0.0089	260
7	Ohio	0.383	246	0.0240	325
8	W Michigan	0.383	249	0.0124	280
9	N Illinois	0.387	266	-0.0344	10
10	Bowling Green	0.387	267	0.0087	255
11	Cent Michigan	0.400	293	-0.0213	56
12	Kent State	0.400	294	0.0216	318
13	UMass	0.467	350	0.0053	232

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	107.247	77	0.7203	202
2	Akron	108.872	102	0.0991	100
3	Miami (OH)	108.914	104	0.0888	96
4	E Michigan	110.542	138	0.3021	128
5	UMass	112.885	171	1.8433	339
6	Ball State	113.270	183	-0.0864	68
7	Kent State	114.738	211	0.5255	168
8	Ohio	116.412	236	0.1168	102
9	Toledo	116.418	237	-0.4289	27
10	Buffalo	117.574	258	0.3776	144
11	Cent Michigan	118.163	272	0.5574	175
12	N Illinois	119.616	296	-0.3656	36
13	W Michigan	120.399	308	1.4751	315

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	34.586	50	0.0722	154
2	UMass	35.135	73	0.3164	200
3	Akron	36.249	112	-0.7779	47
4	Kent State	36.394	124	-0.5173	73
5	Miami (OH)	36.775	154	0.8751	274
6	E Michigan	37.282	186	0.1198	166
7	Ball State	37.637	209	-1.3639	14
8	Ohio	38.767	271	0.6581	252
9	Cent Michigan	39.371	305	0.8126	268
10	W Michigan	39.498	307	-0.1809	120
11	Buffalo	39.723	310	1.1548	313
12	N Illinois	40.034	316	1.8651	354
13	Toledo	41.195	341	0.0076	144

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	77.322	8	1.2759	305
2	Bowling Green	79.177	42	0.1635	187
3	Kent State	81.633	99	-1.2099	37
4	N Illinois	82.130	116	1.5207	316
5	Ball State	82.649	134	-0.6858	76
6	Miami (OH)	82.840	139	1.3518	307
7	Ohio	82.944	147	-0.0344	155
8	Cent Michigan	83.249	169	0.1468	182
9	Buffalo	83.515	178	-0.2404	136
10	Akron	83.910	205	-0.1032	145
11	E Michigan	84.124	216	0.7218	251
12	W Michigan	84.730	247	-0.7289	71
13	Toledo	86.421	312	0.6528	236

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	43.351	90	-0.8817	50
2	Bowling Green	43.810	110	-0.0250	158
3	E Michigan	44.352	144	-0.1030	141
4	Miami (OH)	44.441	154	0.2495	192
5	Kent State	44.661	170	-0.0575	153
6	Ball State	45.533	221	-1.4084	28
7	UMass	45.659	226	-0.2466	121
8	W Michigan	46.556	275	0.2036	187
9	Ohio	46.713	281	0.9265	284
10	Cent Michigan	47.399	302	0.8567	272
11	Toledo	47.671	316	-0.3288	114
12	Buffalo	47.723	317	1.4041	323
13	N Illinois	48.602	343	1.3705	321

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	56.485	58	2.0512	341
2	Akron	56.967	71	-1.2333	51
3	Kent State	57.069	76	-1.4932	36
4	UMass	57.602	86	-0.5509	114
5	Buffalo	57.766	91	1.1724	294
6	Bowling Green	57.853	93	1.9701	337
7	Ball State	59.120	133	2.0550	343
8	Toledo	59.622	151	-1.1094	62
9	Cent Michigan	61.568	219	-0.0597	174
10	N Illinois	62.107	239	-1.1196	61
11	Miami (OH)	62.675	255	0.8340	268
12	E Michigan	64.315	300	0.4267	230
13	Ohio	66.817	346	-0.1661	154

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	23.522	50	-1.2108	9
2	Bowling Green	23.738	55	0.5592	247
3	Kent State	24.118	73	-1.0650	19
4	UMass	24.385	84	-0.0291	145
5	Ball State	25.779	158	-0.1915	115
6	W Michigan	26.018	177	0.2632	191
7	Miami (OH)	26.531	210	0.5847	253
8	E Michigan	27.392	265	0.3424	202
9	Buffalo	27.408	268	0.9979	307
10	Cent Michigan	27.891	292	0.8328	288
11	Ohio	28.532	319	0.5116	237
12	N Illinois	28.761	325	-0.2054	112
13	Toledo	28.899	328	-0.2721	101

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	44.440	19	0.4297	212
2	Bowling Green	46.122	47	1.6504	330
3	Kent State	46.817	64	-1.9325	17
4	W Michigan	47.683	82	1.2584	295
5	Akron	47.766	86	-1.0965	55
6	Buffalo	48.335	100	0.8281	257
7	Ball State	48.769	119	1.2753	298
8	N Illinois	51.129	200	0.0731	176
9	Cent Michigan	51.153	203	-0.0458	151
10	Toledo	51.649	227	-0.4359	107
11	Miami (OH)	51.940	244	1.5640	323
12	E Michigan	54.155	314	0.8665	260
13	Ohio	55.452	338	-0.0406	153

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	49.373	69	-1.3845	38
2	E Michigan	50.361	103	0.1561	169
3	Miami (OH)	51.241	144	-0.5096	92
4	Ohio	51.627	159	1.2081	286
5	Kent State	51.851	172	-0.3599	106
6	Bowling Green	52.098	185	-0.7428	79
7	Ball State	53.271	234	-2.1304	13
8	W Michigan	54.854	296	-0.8260	73
9	UMass	55.490	312	-0.6667	84
10	Cent Michigan	55.553	315	1.7226	320
11	N Illinois	56.205	325	-0.5669	87
12	Toledo	56.377	328	0.3821	200
13	Buffalo	56.621	335	0.8649	247

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	33.183	20	0.1661	212
2	E Michigan	35.685	66	-0.4267	136
3	Miami (OH)	37.325	111	-0.8340	98
4	N Illinois	37.893	127	1.1196	305
5	Cent Michigan	38.432	147	0.0597	192
6	Toledo	40.378	215	1.1094	304
7	Ball State	40.880	233	-2.0550	23
8	Bowling Green	42.147	273	-1.9701	29
9	Buffalo	42.234	275	-1.1724	72
10	UMass	42.398	280	0.5509	252
11	Kent State	42.931	290	1.4932	330
12	Akron	43.033	295	1.2333	315
13	W Michigan	43.515	308	-2.0512	25

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	9.891	65	-0.2226	132
2	Ohio	10.235	85	0.1465	215
3	Miami (OH)	10.245	86	0.2904	246
4	UMass	10.750	145	0.3454	258
5	Bowling Green	10.848	153	-0.4870	73
6	N Illinois	11.272	196	2.0705	365
7	Cent Michigan	11.480	218	-0.0202	174
8	Ball State	11.858	248	-1.1723	7
9	Kent State	12.277	279	0.5477	295
10	Toledo	12.297	282	0.2797	243
11	Buffalo	12.316	286	0.1569	216
12	Akron	12.726	309	0.4329	276
13	W Michigan	13.480	341	-0.4441	80

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	27.492	25	0.0063	184
2	E Michigan	29.969	73	-0.1447	163
3	Miami (OH)	30.901	117	-0.2121	153
4	N Illinois	31.001	120	1.4477	316
5	Cent Michigan	32.096	147	0.1926	214
6	UMass	32.882	175	0.8461	272
7	Bowling Green	33.055	186	-1.4870	37
8	Ball State	33.879	222	-1.9611	17
9	Toledo	34.772	260	1.0888	296
10	Kent State	34.816	261	0.7226	259
11	Buffalo	35.180	272	-1.0685	72
12	Akron	36.144	292	0.9932	285
13	W Michigan	37.047	311	-1.9873	15

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	32.528	102	0.4367	225
2	Bowling Green	32.898	121	-0.4575	134
3	Miami (OH)	33.245	141	0.8945	266
4	E Michigan	33.321	144	-0.4164	139
5	Buffalo	34.681	234	0.9415	273
6	Kent State	34.855	246	0.5513	232
7	Cent Michigan	34.892	251	-0.1742	163
8	Ball State	34.954	254	-1.9478	24
9	Akron	35.005	258	0.3302	213
10	Toledo	35.169	267	-0.4527	136
11	W Michigan	35.707	291	0.7008	249
12	N Illinois	36.326	314	4.1179	364
13	Ohio	37.056	341	0.7136	251

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	26.980	16	-1.4336	88
2	Akron	30.550	61	-3.2495	14
3	Miami (OH)	31.140	72	-1.7345	74
4	Buffalo	31.580	83	-0.2060	188
5	Ball State	32.710	106	1.7051	299
6	E Michigan	36.210	199	0.8936	260
7	Ohio	38.250	246	2.3969	325
8	W Michigan	38.330	249	1.2432	280
9	N Illinois	38.670	266	-3.4421	10
10	Bowling Green	38.690	267	0.8697	255
11	Cent Michigan	39.960	293	-2.1312	56
12	Kent State	39.990	294	2.1608	318
13	UMass	46.710	350	0.5289	232

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	16.178	15	-1.0913	46
2	Akron	18.238	58	-2.3791	2
3	Miami (OH)	18.787	66	-0.8608	77
4	Buffalo	19.409	95	-0.1166	158
5	Ball State	20.391	139	0.5618	250
6	Bowling Green	21.413	193	0.5042	245
7	E Michigan	21.744	216	0.4916	242
8	W Michigan	21.801	223	-0.0291	171
9	Cent Michigan	22.383	255	-1.4204	25
10	N Illinois	22.679	270	-1.1690	42
11	Ohio	22.687	271	1.3010	312
12	Kent State	23.121	286	0.8455	275
13	UMass	25.919	352	1.5234	329

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	23.028	19	-1.1097	77
2	Akron	25.101	55	-2.5704	6
3	Miami (OH)	25.533	64	-1.1447	71
4	Buffalo	26.008	75	-0.2578	159
5	Ball State	26.380	87	1.1399	294
6	Bowling Green	29.589	197	0.8795	261
7	E Michigan	30.088	224	1.0606	286
8	Ohio	30.966	264	1.7759	330
9	N Illinois	31.059	266	-2.2144	17
10	W Michigan	31.269	274	0.7265	254
11	Kent State	31.756	287	1.1747	296
12	Cent Michigan	32.397	300	-1.7035	34
13	UMass	35.303	347	1.0062	278

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	68.946	33	-1.2882	60
2	W Michigan	70.049	71	-1.7379	31
3	Toledo	70.222	77	-1.3520	56
4	Akron	71.043	115	-3.0279	6
5	Bowling Green	72.085	183	-0.8546	90
6	Ohio	72.604	213	-0.2236	142
7	N Illinois	72.673	217	1.4905	281
8	UMass	72.777	222	2.3179	327
9	E Michigan	72.874	230	-1.1613	68
10	Kent State	73.110	239	0.2077	178
11	Miami (OH)	74.113	281	1.4332	273
12	Buffalo	74.313	289	0.1426	170
13	Ball State	77.323	358	-1.4980	46

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	46.579	52	-0.2180	182
2	Miami (OH)	46.925	54	-1.2130	106
3	Akron	49.822	120	-0.2170	183
4	Toledo	50.770	145	-1.7655	69
5	E Michigan	51.347	161	-1.5888	79
6	Bowling Green	51.356	163	-3.1624	20
7	Ball State	53.150	213	-1.0572	121
8	W Michigan	53.385	219	-2.4271	38
9	N Illinois	54.117	239	2.8628	343
10	Kent State	54.275	242	-0.6311	157
11	Cent Michigan	56.337	291	1.3553	282
12	UMass	57.995	322	0.4936	233
13	Buffalo	59.463	334	1.4414	288

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	11.523	33	-0.6857	325
2	Ball State	11.226	43	0.3063	79
3	Toledo	11.006	63	0.8168	15
4	Buffalo	11.003	64	-0.0928	171
5	Akron	10.271	105	0.5258	46
6	Miami (OH)	9.704	142	-0.4116	256
7	UMass	8.961	200	-0.6425	315
8	Kent State	8.868	214	0.4518	55
9	Cent Michigan	8.840	217	0.1276	106
10	N Illinois	8.101	275	-0.0063	144
11	E Michigan	8.089	277	-0.6564	321
12	Ohio	7.955	293	-0.8409	338
13	W Michigan	5.784	363	-0.9505	348

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	5.871	60	-0.3114	273
2	E Michigan	5.866	62	0.5033	31
3	Bowling Green	5.046	135	0.1027	110
4	Ohio	4.627	180	0.4151	38
5	Kent State	4.607	184	-0.1037	191
6	Miami (OH)	4.303	215	-0.3481	282
7	Buffalo	4.130	244	0.1486	86
8	Ball State	4.051	253	0.3113	51
9	Toledo	3.949	267	0.0152	138
10	Akron	3.821	279	-0.4455	320
11	W Michigan	3.539	305	0.2124	73
12	UMass	3.013	341	-0.3852	295
13	N Illinois	2.648	351	-0.1593	218

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	21.832	28	-0.8448	53
2	Miami (OH)	22.421	38	-0.8226	55
3	Akron	22.468	40	-0.9701	39
4	Buffalo	23.242	68	-0.8615	52
5	Ball State	24.074	114	0.5112	292
6	Ohio	24.867	159	0.4339	285
7	Bowling Green	25.425	201	0.0338	218
8	Cent Michigan	25.608	214	-0.5080	92
9	E Michigan	26.007	240	0.4011	281
10	W Michigan	26.193	253	-0.6832	70
11	Kent State	26.402	270	-0.2643	146
12	N Illinois	27.147	309	-1.5521	5
13	UMass	28.876	351	0.6374	313

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	74.888	14	0.0364	123
2	Miami (OH)	73.865	29	0.7267	37
3	UMass	73.699	32	0.1727	101
4	Akron	72.423	66	-0.3381	189
5	Ohio	72.109	78	0.4254	72
6	Bowling Green	71.237	108	0.0820	117
7	W Michigan	70.305	159	0.4674	63
8	Toledo	70.199	164	-1.1490	313
9	E Michigan	70.077	173	0.0249	125
10	Buffalo	69.185	222	-0.2780	175
11	Cent Michigan	69.180	223	-0.4182	203
12	N Illinois	69.154	225	-0.5320	218
13	Ball State	66.388	337	0.0757	119