Conferences – HoopSci

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	23.992	30	5.5836	4
2	Bowling Green	11.768	81	4.9581	10
3	Miami (OH)	10.866	87	2.1610	83
4	Buffalo	5.609	121	5.9558	3
5	Kent State	2.612	140	-0.5490	224
6	UMass	1.495	154	-0.4755	217
7	E Michigan	0.529	163	4.2199	21
8	Toledo	-2.075	183	0.5046	167
9	W Michigan	-9.157	235	0.5625	164
10	Ohio	-11.588	258	-4.1543	345
11	Cent Michigan	-14.273	284	-1.7430	269
12	Ball State	-17.835	306	-2.8169	306
13	N Illinois	-23.444	333	1.0145	135

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.285	30	0.0538	21
2	Akron	0.232	51	0.0272	77
3	Bowling Green	0.227	53	0.0493	28
4	Buffalo	0.108	126	0.0665	7
5	E Michigan	0.041	170	0.0242	86
6	UMass	0.039	171	0.0095	143
7	Kent State	0.029	176	-0.0022	195
8	Toledo	-0.006	198	0.0101	138
9	W Michigan	-0.027	211	0.0011	176
10	Cent Michigan	-0.031	212	-0.0080	213
11	N Illinois	-0.078	246	-0.0127	237
12	Ball State	-0.095	259	-0.0378	314
13	Ohio	-0.148	292	-0.0585	347

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	1655.636	26	6.2699	97
2	Kent State	1609.412	58	6.8887	89
3	Miami (OH)	1590.997	78	19.8471	14
4	Toledo	1530.448	142	-15.3875	339
5	Ohio	1482.945	207	-16.1883	341
6	UMass	1476.196	218	-10.9792	302
7	Bowling Green	1471.818	226	8.6052	68
8	E Michigan	1470.846	227	12.6254	33
9	Buffalo	1449.416	255	19.8962	13
10	W Michigan	1447.972	258	16.7029	20
11	Cent Michigan	1433.317	275	-2.8767	217
12	Ball State	1408.777	304	-10.2829	293
13	N Illinois	1345.874	350	-3.0780	220

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.604	41	0.0177	78
2	Buffalo	0.587	58	0.0490	5
3	Bowling Green	0.526	130	0.0362	12
4	Kent State	0.523	133	-0.0036	214
5	Toledo	0.518	140	-0.0050	224
6	Ohio	0.502	168	-0.0004	193
7	Miami (OH)	0.498	173	0.0023	176
8	E Michigan	0.489	192	0.0066	141
9	W Michigan	0.475	213	0.0102	119
10	UMass	0.460	243	-0.0070	240
11	N Illinois	0.424	294	0.0169	86
12	Cent Michigan	0.416	304	-0.0211	299
13	Ball State	0.316	360	-0.0256	321

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.626	3	0.0280	6
2	Kent State	0.586	17	0.0427	1
3	Miami (OH)	0.579	25	0.0107	91
4	Buffalo	0.563	49	0.0251	13
5	Toledo	0.557	60	0.0113	86
6	W Michigan	0.525	135	0.0272	8
7	Bowling Green	0.523	144	0.0233	16
8	UMass	0.518	160	0.0158	56
9	E Michigan	0.499	210	0.0031	164
10	Cent Michigan	0.493	234	0.0066	124
11	Ohio	0.489	246	-0.0134	335
12	N Illinois	0.478	273	-0.0149	340
13	Ball State	0.450	336	-0.0284	361

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	1.280	3	0.0444	24
2	Miami (OH)	1.256	7	0.0394	36
3	Kent State	1.218	19	0.0518	12
4	Buffalo	1.166	60	0.0507	14
5	Toledo	1.149	76	0.0201	103
6	Bowling Green	1.146	79	0.0531	11
7	Cent Michigan	1.050	222	0.0026	193
8	UMass	1.034	249	0.0127	139
9	W Michigan	1.030	263	0.0155	124
10	E Michigan	1.023	273	-0.0024	229
11	Ohio	1.019	278	-0.0118	275
12	N Illinois	1.006	299	-0.0245	325
13	Ball State	0.931	344	-0.0415	357

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.138	42	-0.0011	149
2	Miami (OH)	0.138	45	-0.0124	14
3	Ohio	0.152	118	0.0034	233
4	Buffalo	0.153	123	-0.0063	71
5	Bowling Green	0.160	160	-0.0047	93
6	Ball State	0.162	168	-0.0017	141
7	Toledo	0.164	184	0.0048	262
8	Cent Michigan	0.171	229	0.0061	294
9	W Michigan	0.171	229	0.0086	318
10	Kent State	0.173	239	0.0043	252
11	E Michigan	0.177	256	0.0001	166
12	UMass	0.181	287	0.0060	289
13	N Illinois	0.196	339	0.0118	335

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	33.340	73	0.0046	227
2	Akron	33.130	75	0.0080	199
3	Kent State	32.800	82	0.0718	12
4	Toledo	31.160	114	0.0496	44
5	Cent Michigan	30.790	125	0.0216	125
6	N Illinois	30.500	135	0.0411	55
7	Bowling Green	30.420	137	0.0715	13
8	Ohio	28.160	201	0.0300	92
9	E Michigan	26.560	236	0.0252	110
10	Buffalo	26.300	243	0.0059	214
11	Miami (OH)	25.780	253	0.0302	90
12	W Michigan	25.160	267	-0.0205	351
13	Ball State	25.040	272	0.0056	217

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	0.514	5	0.0108	135
2	Kent State	0.485	14	0.0305	42
3	N Illinois	0.385	130	0.0180	86
4	UMass	0.378	140	-0.0014	212
5	Ohio	0.366	166	0.0099	138
6	Bowling Green	0.364	170	0.0067	161
7	Miami (OH)	0.358	193	0.0113	130
8	Ball State	0.325	258	-0.0479	364
9	Akron	0.317	270	0.0051	174
10	Toledo	0.310	282	-0.0238	337
11	E Michigan	0.308	288	-0.0067	244
12	W Michigan	0.308	289	-0.0135	289
13	Cent Michigan	0.291	319	-0.0036	224

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	133.078	2	5.5245	1
2	Miami (OH)	118.369	60	1.7298	71
3	Buffalo	118.221	62	4.9991	3
4	Kent State	117.939	64	3.4314	19
5	Toledo	113.918	106	0.5404	151
6	Bowling Green	110.468	142	1.2451	97
7	Cent Michigan	106.745	199	0.3103	171
8	Ohio	106.292	205	-1.5326	288
9	E Michigan	105.061	217	0.4577	157
10	UMass	103.812	230	-1.0869	262
11	W Michigan	103.327	241	-0.5150	228
12	N Illinois	99.157	292	2.2405	49
13	Ball State	93.397	340	-3.4594	354

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	46.433	3	1.7175	32
2	Miami (OH)	43.399	10	1.2846	55
3	Toledo	42.631	21	1.5803	41
4	Kent State	40.691	73	1.5796	42
5	Bowling Green	40.353	79	2.2679	11
6	Cent Michigan	38.988	127	0.3452	153
7	E Michigan	37.547	191	0.2944	157
8	UMass	37.423	199	0.7934	101
9	W Michigan	37.098	213	0.5655	123
10	Buffalo	36.716	236	1.4693	48
11	Ohio	36.579	239	-0.3564	249
12	N Illinois	34.038	306	-0.7305	286
13	Ball State	32.902	335	-1.0840	323

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	88.422	27	-0.4159	237
2	Toledo	86.105	78	1.0801	68
3	Cent Michigan	85.569	96	-0.3901	231
4	E Michigan	84.224	139	0.0419	180
5	Ball State	83.801	153	2.7669	6
6	Bowling Green	83.655	162	0.7518	98
7	Ohio	83.633	163	0.8098	85
8	Miami (OH)	83.244	185	0.7194	101
9	UMass	81.121	268	-0.9088	283
10	W Michigan	79.955	295	-2.0685	350
11	Kent State	79.478	302	-2.3580	358
12	N Illinois	79.402	307	0.3007	148
13	Buffalo	77.249	345	-0.2416	223

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	52.820	3	2.2647	13
2	Miami (OH)	52.194	10	1.0792	80
3	Kent State	51.404	20	3.3323	1
4	Toledo	49.582	46	1.1779	68
5	Bowling Green	48.234	75	2.3255	12
6	Buffalo	47.618	92	1.9645	22
7	W Michigan	46.491	128	1.9029	24
8	UMass	46.092	140	1.4075	46
9	Cent Michigan	45.921	153	0.6774	115
10	E Michigan	44.717	207	0.2798	155
11	Ohio	43.632	256	-0.9787	314
12	N Illinois	42.815	286	-1.0110	317
13	Ball State	39.798	348	-2.6893	362

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	67.889	42	0.2044	149
2	W Michigan	67.342	47	-0.5850	216
3	Cent Michigan	66.080	71	0.1888	150
4	Toledo	66.065	72	-0.6524	222
5	UMass	65.531	82	0.5484	124
6	Bowling Green	63.865	116	0.7461	107
7	Ohio	63.575	122	0.7293	109
8	Ball State	58.192	221	-2.1611	315
9	N Illinois	57.317	243	1.2102	71
10	Buffalo	55.793	273	-0.3254	189
11	Akron	54.833	287	-0.1655	176
12	Miami (OH)	54.554	295	-0.4955	205
13	Kent State	53.219	314	-2.4378	330

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	32.532	10	1.6418	30
2	Akron	30.297	43	0.8839	73
3	Cent Michigan	29.580	60	0.4074	135
4	Bowling Green	29.304	69	2.1228	16
5	E Michigan	28.567	93	0.2756	151
6	Miami (OH)	28.467	100	1.2066	56
7	UMass	28.285	111	0.6313	110
8	Ohio	27.878	130	0.1778	170
9	W Michigan	27.711	138	-0.4157	251
10	Kent State	25.767	221	0.3923	138
11	Buffalo	23.541	299	0.6528	106
12	Ball State	22.593	319	-1.1910	331
13	N Illinois	22.170	332	-0.0293	195

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	57.751	29	0.2730	136
2	Toledo	57.267	36	0.3004	134
3	Cent Michigan	55.951	58	-0.1287	176
4	W Michigan	53.609	107	-1.7700	307
5	Bowling Green	53.467	110	1.0881	77
6	UMass	53.328	112	-0.1125	174
7	Ohio	53.297	113	1.1957	63
8	Ball State	48.638	216	-0.1895	181
9	Akron	48.220	232	-0.3186	195
10	Miami (OH)	45.289	283	-0.0087	162
11	N Illinois	45.195	286	0.9989	83
12	Buffalo	42.968	329	-0.3170	194
13	Kent State	42.360	332	-3.3998	352

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	62.852	10	2.5680	31
2	Akron	62.836	11	2.2281	43
3	Kent State	61.211	26	4.7094	2
4	Toledo	56.577	85	2.3071	38
5	Buffalo	54.623	140	1.6181	77
6	Bowling Green	54.385	149	2.7388	26
7	UMass	53.264	173	1.1465	111
8	Cent Michigan	52.351	210	0.6449	157
9	W Michigan	51.669	230	0.9350	126
10	Ohio	51.589	232	-1.2728	320
11	E Michigan	50.598	257	0.4920	173
12	N Illinois	48.753	300	-1.0444	306
13	Ball State	46.653	330	-2.2750	358

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	46.781	52	2.4378	36
2	Miami (OH)	45.446	71	0.4955	161
3	Akron	45.167	79	0.1655	190
4	Buffalo	44.207	93	0.3254	177
5	N Illinois	42.683	123	-1.2102	295
6	Ball State	41.808	145	2.1611	51
7	Ohio	36.425	244	-0.7293	257
8	Bowling Green	36.135	250	-0.7461	259
9	UMass	34.469	284	-0.5484	242
10	Toledo	33.935	294	0.6524	144
11	Cent Michigan	33.920	295	-0.1888	216
12	W Michigan	32.658	319	0.5850	150
13	E Michigan	32.111	324	-0.2044	217

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	16.136	9	0.8335	46
2	Miami (OH)	14.932	21	0.0780	175
3	Kent State	14.924	23	1.1873	22
4	Buffalo	13.175	71	0.8165	47
5	N Illinois	11.868	139	-0.7013	327
6	Bowling Green	11.049	183	0.1451	154
7	Ball State	10.310	230	0.1070	167
8	Toledo	10.099	244	-0.0615	194
9	Cent Michigan	9.408	283	-0.0622	196
10	W Michigan	9.387	287	0.9812	40
11	UMass	9.137	299	0.1621	149
12	E Michigan	8.980	304	0.0188	186
13	Ohio	8.701	313	-0.5342	293

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	40.202	35	-0.0974	209
2	Miami (OH)	37.956	75	0.7281	132
3	Kent State	37.118	90	1.0418	99
4	Ball State	35.164	131	2.9564	16
5	Buffalo	34.281	150	0.0754	192
6	N Illinois	34.207	151	-0.6982	255
7	Ohio	30.336	243	-0.3859	230
8	Bowling Green	30.188	247	-0.3363	227
9	Cent Michigan	29.617	260	-0.2613	221
10	Toledo	28.838	276	0.7797	128
11	UMass	27.794	299	-0.7963	264
12	E Michigan	26.473	323	-0.2311	216
13	W Michigan	26.346	326	-0.2985	223

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	41.232	6	2.5009	9
2	Miami (OH)	39.445	20	-0.3173	203
3	Kent State	38.977	25	2.1904	17
4	Buffalo	38.494	33	2.2143	16
5	W Michigan	35.480	111	3.6349	2
6	Bowling Green	35.101	127	0.6620	100
7	Toledo	34.757	147	-1.1063	288
8	N Illinois	34.420	156	-1.4147	314
9	E Michigan	33.754	175	0.4497	122
10	UMass	33.418	193	2.1158	19
11	Cent Michigan	31.128	272	-0.1424	186
12	Ball State	30.258	296	-2.5082	356
13	Ohio	26.929	353	-1.3386	308

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	51.370	5	1.0784	135
2	Kent State	48.480	14	3.0484	42
3	N Illinois	38.490	130	1.8036	86
4	UMass	37.780	140	-0.1387	212
5	Ohio	36.580	166	0.9904	138
6	Bowling Green	36.440	170	0.6715	161
7	Miami (OH)	35.780	193	1.1316	130
8	Ball State	32.500	258	-4.7904	364
9	Akron	31.720	270	0.5112	174
10	Toledo	31.050	282	-2.3781	337
11	E Michigan	30.820	288	-0.6665	244
12	W Michigan	30.800	289	-1.3457	289
13	Cent Michigan	29.060	319	-0.3620	224

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	29.979	2	1.3173	66
2	Kent State	25.530	47	0.8386	116
3	Miami (OH)	23.910	87	1.2884	68
4	Bowling Green	22.865	111	0.6290	134
5	N Illinois	20.682	185	-0.2885	234
6	Ohio	20.078	210	0.0630	195
7	Toledo	19.513	228	-1.0853	311
8	UMass	19.455	231	-0.4807	257
9	W Michigan	19.377	237	-0.5527	270
10	Akron	18.410	266	0.1144	189
11	E Michigan	18.196	276	-0.8513	296
12	Cent Michigan	17.589	294	-0.3668	244
13	Ball State	16.955	305	-2.0871	357

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	40.019	4	0.8625	130
2	Kent State	35.210	43	1.2685	95
3	N Illinois	31.974	101	1.4156	84
4	Bowling Green	30.626	138	0.7421	142
5	Miami (OH)	30.365	149	1.2367	97
6	UMass	30.169	158	-0.2053	230
7	Ohio	29.631	175	0.8681	129
8	Ball State	25.733	279	-2.7822	362
9	W Michigan	25.418	287	-1.7600	341
10	Toledo	25.259	288	-1.7534	339
11	Akron	25.218	291	0.4315	172
12	E Michigan	25.214	292	-0.4271	251
13	Cent Michigan	24.459	308	-0.3554	244

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	77.144	37	1.0305	103
2	Miami (OH)	76.962	41	1.6293	61
3	W Michigan	75.611	66	2.9270	17
4	Buffalo	75.446	72	1.9521	45
5	Bowling Green	74.926	91	0.0563	176
6	Ohio	71.869	166	-0.1402	192
7	E Michigan	71.759	169	-1.7623	302
8	Cent Michigan	71.626	172	-0.4982	219
9	Kent State	70.964	190	-0.8252	245
10	Akron	70.556	203	-0.5892	230
11	Ball State	67.146	291	-0.6258	232
12	N Illinois	64.654	331	-4.0432	356
13	UMass	63.735	338	-1.0045	253

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	61.111	34	2.8329	40
2	Kent State	60.885	36	4.3049	12
3	Akron	59.215	53	0.9635	137
4	Cent Michigan	59.111	55	4.8903	8
5	Ball State	56.094	114	2.9245	38
6	Toledo	53.147	177	-0.1945	231
7	E Michigan	52.471	194	3.0301	32
8	Miami (OH)	52.220	199	-0.6970	255
9	Bowling Green	51.605	217	2.3260	53
10	Buffalo	50.098	244	-2.8911	345
11	W Michigan	49.735	253	1.5347	94
12	N Illinois	49.689	254	-2.1481	324
13	Ohio	44.577	334	-1.2564	289

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	6.419	34	-0.2158	171
2	Kent State	6.492	37	-1.1520	21
3	Miami (OH)	6.954	62	-0.9564	40
4	Ball State	7.070	68	-0.5936	102
5	Buffalo	7.420	92	-0.4699	124
6	Bowling Green	7.873	124	-0.2409	167
7	Toledo	8.763	193	-0.0432	211
8	Ohio	9.014	212	0.0076	223
9	E Michigan	9.026	216	-0.5894	104
10	W Michigan	9.090	222	0.7021	328
11	N Illinois	10.159	296	0.5877	313
12	UMass	10.416	307	0.2143	267
13	Cent Michigan	11.044	329	0.5923	314

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	2.522	11	-0.3037	110
2	Buffalo	2.678	18	-0.6306	28
3	Kent State	2.946	34	-0.6238	33
4	Akron	3.809	119	-0.0042	216
5	Cent Michigan	4.224	187	-0.5284	41
6	Bowling Green	4.421	210	-0.6543	21
7	UMass	4.524	221	-0.0511	198
8	W Michigan	4.889	260	-0.1455	158
9	Toledo	5.057	283	0.1026	255
10	Ohio	5.328	306	0.5762	335
11	N Illinois	6.011	339	1.0385	361
12	Ball State	6.468	353	0.9667	359
13	E Michigan	6.976	361	0.6358	342

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	27.238	47	0.2515	120
2	Ohio	27.078	51	0.2624	118
3	UMass	27.037	52	-0.0052	153
4	Kent State	24.154	148	-2.5369	358
5	Bowling Green	23.795	161	-1.2246	301
6	N Illinois	22.476	203	0.3133	111
7	E Michigan	21.671	235	-1.7335	330
8	Toledo	21.333	247	-2.4409	355
9	Cent Michigan	21.236	249	-1.3495	309
10	W Michigan	21.068	254	-0.7897	265
11	Akron	20.160	282	-0.6824	251
12	Miami (OH)	20.109	285	-1.0040	283
13	Ball State	20.027	288	-1.5313	321

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	79.856	7	3.1769	4
2	UMass	75.578	37	0.3016	195
3	W Michigan	73.725	89	0.1804	219
4	Akron	73.494	102	-0.0283	251
5	Miami (OH)	72.932	122	1.0083	91
6	Bowling Green	72.516	143	1.2376	75
7	Ohio	72.514	144	-0.0693	257
8	Toledo	72.353	148	1.3102	69
9	N Illinois	71.891	168	0.2189	207
10	E Michigan	69.870	242	-0.3542	301
11	Cent Michigan	68.159	311	0.4187	181
12	Ball State	67.964	317	-0.6486	322
13	Buffalo	67.047	335	-1.9451	365

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	0.488	108	-0.0098	70
2	Bowling Green	0.496	128	-0.0071	96
3	E Michigan	0.506	160	-0.0005	162
4	W Michigan	0.511	175	-0.0079	84
5	Miami (OH)	0.512	180	0.0018	184
6	Akron	0.512	184	0.0043	219
7	Ball State	0.537	264	0.0022	189
8	Buffalo	0.538	270	-0.0022	142
9	Cent Michigan	0.541	272	0.0188	339
10	Kent State	0.541	274	0.0095	273
11	Ohio	0.542	277	0.0018	182
12	N Illinois	0.580	344	0.0154	322
13	Toledo	0.588	353	0.0070	256

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.950	35	-0.0143	90
2	UMass	0.979	74	-0.0159	82
3	Miami (OH)	0.985	82	-0.0085	116
4	E Michigan	1.033	151	-0.0003	170
5	Akron	1.063	193	0.0170	264
6	W Michigan	1.068	201	-0.0023	154
7	Buffalo	1.072	208	-0.0105	108
8	Ball State	1.075	214	-0.0016	161
9	Kent State	1.084	232	0.0039	197
10	Toledo	1.116	284	0.0002	176
11	Ohio	1.135	304	0.0116	230
12	Cent Michigan	1.165	327	0.0623	362
13	N Illinois	1.186	342	0.0277	306

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.213	11	0.0095	51
2	Miami (OH)	0.194	46	0.0032	132
3	Toledo	0.188	61	0.0072	76
4	Ball State	0.187	66	0.0102	43
5	Buffalo	0.184	78	0.0067	82
6	UMass	0.179	94	0.0022	152
7	Akron	0.170	136	-0.0043	273
8	E Michigan	0.165	169	-0.0025	240
9	Kent State	0.163	180	-0.0005	199
10	N Illinois	0.163	186	0.0001	186
11	Ohio	0.159	204	0.0003	185
12	W Michigan	0.136	322	-0.0106	342
13	Cent Michigan	0.128	348	-0.0165	361

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	78.630	8	0.0219	8
2	UMass	76.870	31	0.0078	75
3	Bowling Green	74.430	89	-0.0149	289
4	W Michigan	74.030	101	0.0038	108
5	Kent State	73.940	104	0.0110	50
6	E Michigan	72.970	141	0.0072	82
7	Buffalo	71.420	192	-0.0074	225
8	Akron	69.510	249	-0.0102	253
9	Cent Michigan	68.180	289	-0.0190	309
10	Ball State	68.010	292	-0.0129	273
11	N Illinois	67.510	302	-0.0101	251
12	Toledo	67.270	308	-0.0089	240
13	Ohio	66.880	313	-0.0159	291

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	0.222	5	-0.0148	65
2	Ball State	0.256	21	-0.0030	127
3	E Michigan	0.297	61	-0.0154	62
4	Akron	0.308	76	-0.0122	77
5	Buffalo	0.310	79	-0.0265	17
6	Ohio	0.314	87	-0.0210	35
7	Miami (OH)	0.340	139	0.0006	145
8	Kent State	0.392	254	0.0011	150
9	W Michigan	0.394	256	0.0157	262
10	N Illinois	0.396	258	-0.0148	66
11	Bowling Green	0.398	262	0.0310	326
12	Cent Michigan	0.416	296	0.0347	338
13	UMass	0.472	339	0.0395	347

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	98.700	35	-3.7739	10
2	UMass	102.317	71	-0.6114	129
3	E Michigan	104.532	103	-3.7852	9
4	Miami (OH)	107.503	148	-0.3555	144
5	Akron	109.086	173	0.0144	176
6	Ball State	111.232	200	-0.6084	131
7	W Michigan	112.484	218	-1.0528	103
8	Buffalo	112.612	224	-0.8721	116
9	Kent State	115.327	272	4.0980	363
10	Toledo	115.993	280	0.0923	183
11	Ohio	117.880	301	2.6206	334
12	Cent Michigan	121.018	330	2.2446	321
13	N Illinois	122.601	342	1.2365	264

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	31.743	27	-1.0230	54
2	UMass	32.400	37	-0.9267	63
3	Miami (OH)	34.491	103	-0.3567	136
4	W Michigan	35.544	133	-0.6308	101
5	Kent State	36.116	154	0.0990	200
6	E Michigan	37.036	195	0.1133	203
7	Akron	37.379	207	0.6181	267
8	Buffalo	37.774	225	-0.1411	166
9	Ball State	39.303	286	-0.3473	139
10	Cent Michigan	40.505	316	2.1529	357
11	Ohio	40.610	321	0.8563	289
12	N Illinois	41.454	337	1.5389	344
13	Toledo	43.267	357	0.5636	260

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	74.382	8	-1.8379	36
2	Bowling Green	74.678	10	-1.1958	74
3	Miami (OH)	77.271	40	-1.1602	75
4	Kent State	80.368	108	-0.4995	147
5	Buffalo	82.393	180	0.4785	254
6	N Illinois	82.394	181	0.7105	283
7	W Michigan	83.259	213	0.3793	242
8	E Michigan	83.893	231	0.1191	212
9	Toledo	84.711	258	-0.1327	186
10	Akron	85.139	272	1.4722	330
11	Ball State	85.213	276	-0.5822	140
12	Cent Michigan	85.920	290	0.7511	288
13	Ohio	86.704	306	1.4328	329

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	42.785	111	-1.0212	54
2	Bowling Green	42.878	116	-0.6114	94
3	UMass	43.661	147	-0.1938	142
4	Akron	43.929	160	0.0404	170
5	E Michigan	43.976	163	-0.0507	165
6	Miami (OH)	44.622	183	0.1415	185
7	Kent State	45.208	204	0.3950	225
8	Buffalo	46.006	238	-0.4238	115
9	Ball State	46.240	245	-0.0595	163
10	Ohio	46.831	269	0.2160	197
11	Cent Michigan	47.124	279	1.9988	357
12	N Illinois	50.427	344	1.4687	329
13	Toledo	51.194	355	0.7176	261

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	52.515	23	-1.0570	111
2	Kent State	53.012	31	-1.4506	79
3	Buffalo	54.498	48	-2.4014	33
4	Bowling Green	55.190	60	-1.0643	110
5	Akron	55.612	67	-2.4730	31
6	Ball State	58.457	134	-0.4409	167
7	Toledo	58.458	135	-0.4547	164
8	N Illinois	58.773	147	-0.2445	182
9	Cent Michigan	59.759	167	0.8116	284
10	Ohio	60.355	182	-0.9135	121
11	UMass	60.428	185	1.3047	317
12	E Michigan	62.505	237	0.4690	249
13	Miami (OH)	63.041	261	0.7410	278

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	21.918	37	-1.0386	54
2	Bowling Green	22.003	39	-0.6473	103
3	Kent State	22.058	41	-0.7212	97
4	Miami (OH)	24.380	123	-0.3022	148
5	Akron	24.730	137	-0.3240	144
6	UMass	24.806	143	0.5572	270
7	Buffalo	25.044	156	-0.5192	116
8	E Michigan	25.940	199	0.0501	196
9	Ball State	26.614	227	-0.7636	90
10	Ohio	27.733	273	0.6661	286
11	Cent Michigan	28.460	300	2.2289	363
12	N Illinois	29.019	318	1.3117	335
13	Toledo	30.550	345	0.6540	283

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	41.564	15	-1.4343	75
2	Kent State	42.921	30	-1.4739	71
3	W Michigan	43.713	39	-0.6724	153
4	Buffalo	44.935	60	-1.7570	59
5	UMass	45.012	62	-0.1109	212
6	Akron	47.183	115	-1.3696	84
7	N Illinois	48.471	148	0.2641	251
8	Miami (OH)	48.713	155	-0.1870	202
9	Toledo	49.668	189	-0.3867	184
10	Ball State	49.718	191	-0.7026	148
11	Cent Michigan	51.255	236	1.1136	306
12	Ohio	52.309	267	0.0606	229
13	E Michigan	52.420	272	0.4634	268

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	48.839	99	-0.5541	106
2	W Michigan	49.829	125	-1.7374	32
3	Miami (OH)	50.132	136	-0.5492	107
4	Akron	51.745	174	0.8218	240
5	Kent State	52.406	187	0.2034	166
6	Bowling Green	52.957	203	0.0627	150
7	Ohio	53.334	215	1.2583	276
8	Ball State	54.775	254	-0.3777	116
9	Buffalo	55.649	284	0.8180	239
10	UMass	55.760	286	1.1538	271
11	Cent Michigan	55.899	290	3.1670	359
12	N Illinois	60.196	346	2.2970	340
13	Toledo	61.882	356	1.6553	310

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	36.959	105	-0.7410	88
2	E Michigan	37.495	129	-0.4690	117
3	UMass	39.572	181	-1.3047	49
4	Ohio	39.645	184	0.9135	245
5	Cent Michigan	40.241	199	-0.8116	82
6	N Illinois	41.227	219	0.2445	184
7	Toledo	41.542	231	0.4547	202
8	Ball State	41.543	232	0.4409	199
9	Akron	44.388	299	2.4730	335
10	Bowling Green	44.810	306	1.0643	256
11	Buffalo	45.502	318	2.4014	333
12	Kent State	46.988	335	1.4506	287
13	W Michigan	47.485	343	1.0570	255

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	7.594	11	-1.4839	3
2	Bowling Green	9.740	93	-0.3757	94
3	Miami (OH)	10.110	127	-0.0545	169
4	E Michigan	11.096	201	0.0632	193
5	Cent Michigan	12.045	261	-0.0761	164
6	N Illinois	12.434	274	0.2273	232
7	Akron	12.649	285	0.9421	335
8	Ball State	12.690	287	0.4163	269
9	Toledo	12.717	291	-0.0904	159
10	Buffalo	12.730	292	0.3781	260
11	Ohio	12.878	303	0.1902	219
12	W Michigan	13.626	333	0.4078	268
13	Kent State	14.058	341	0.8203	325

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	28.558	60	-0.9732	71
2	UMass	29.370	81	-1.7270	31
3	E Michigan	31.473	149	-0.3443	134
4	Bowling Green	33.114	193	0.2385	193
5	N Illinois	33.924	217	0.4464	218
6	Ohio	34.396	228	1.3722	292
7	Cent Michigan	34.666	237	-0.3625	131
8	Toledo	35.043	248	0.2540	198
9	Ball State	35.496	263	0.1204	180
10	Kent State	37.446	310	0.9744	268
11	Buffalo	37.457	311	2.2355	339
12	Akron	37.956	321	2.8418	353
13	W Michigan	39.546	341	1.0517	276

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	25.546	6	-3.2216	2
2	Bowling Green	30.205	71	-1.1327	78
3	Akron	33.520	194	0.2676	216
4	Cent Michigan	33.692	202	0.0771	199
5	Buffalo	33.973	212	-1.1038	80
6	E Michigan	34.962	240	0.6008	250
7	W Michigan	35.075	242	0.4464	235
8	Miami (OH)	35.550	267	0.9642	286
9	Toledo	35.751	274	-0.8020	104
10	Ball State	36.196	293	0.8694	274
11	N Illinois	36.846	309	0.2858	219
12	Kent State	36.984	313	1.5067	325
13	Ohio	37.232	318	-1.1215	79

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	22.240	5	-1.4834	65
2	Ball State	25.580	21	-0.2960	127
3	E Michigan	29.710	61	-1.5386	62
4	Akron	30.830	76	-1.2168	77
5	Buffalo	30.970	79	-2.6480	17
6	Ohio	31.370	87	-2.0957	35
7	Miami (OH)	33.990	139	0.0653	145
8	Kent State	39.230	254	0.1139	150
9	W Michigan	39.370	256	1.5731	262
10	N Illinois	39.590	258	-1.4772	66
11	Bowling Green	39.760	262	3.0979	326
12	Cent Michigan	41.630	296	3.4703	338
13	UMass	47.250	339	3.9540	347

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	12.396	3	-1.0159	36
2	Ball State	16.251	37	0.1692	183
3	E Michigan	18.133	81	-0.3205	117
4	Akron	18.898	106	-0.4794	98
5	Buffalo	18.970	110	-1.1392	26
6	Ohio	19.384	126	-0.7384	62
7	Miami (OH)	19.389	127	-0.0800	152
8	Bowling Green	21.779	212	0.9925	281
9	W Michigan	22.073	224	0.6266	236
10	Kent State	22.117	226	-0.6324	77
11	N Illinois	23.277	273	-0.5406	93
12	Cent Michigan	23.490	280	1.9988	344
13	UMass	25.517	319	1.7494	334

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	18.332	4	-1.1598	52
2	Ball State	21.127	13	-0.3783	112
3	E Michigan	24.416	54	-1.0198	62
4	Buffalo	24.947	64	-1.9553	12
5	Akron	25.278	73	-0.7927	72
6	Miami (OH)	26.301	97	-0.2689	118
7	Ohio	26.560	105	-1.1393	54
8	Bowling Green	29.772	194	2.0341	324
9	Kent State	30.548	214	-0.2664	120
10	N Illinois	32.078	261	-0.7774	74
11	W Michigan	32.169	262	1.4227	282
12	UMass	35.601	328	2.5250	343
13	Cent Michigan	36.197	333	3.1001	357

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	66.028	32	0.1356	213
2	Toledo	67.301	55	-0.6336	134
3	W Michigan	69.637	123	-0.2969	171
4	Ohio	70.796	162	0.2838	230
5	Bowling Green	71.256	182	-1.7475	50
6	UMass	71.391	188	0.2004	222
7	Kent State	71.624	199	-1.5858	65
8	N Illinois	72.052	220	0.3664	234
9	Miami (OH)	73.275	248	0.4701	245
10	Akron	74.307	282	0.4321	243
11	E Michigan	75.057	299	1.8502	328
12	Ball State	76.660	328	1.7319	322
13	Buffalo	77.027	332	2.5577	352

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	48.162	93	-0.7259	114
2	Miami (OH)	49.965	126	0.6559	211
3	Kent State	50.794	139	-0.4711	133
4	E Michigan	51.264	146	1.0497	243
5	Toledo	51.832	161	1.1642	248
6	Bowling Green	52.847	185	0.2903	181
7	UMass	53.534	200	-2.1687	34
8	Akron	53.628	204	3.1377	330
9	N Illinois	54.010	213	-0.6634	122
10	W Michigan	55.541	247	-0.3298	140
11	Ball State	56.109	257	2.2335	302
12	Cent Michigan	58.211	291	2.5955	319
13	Buffalo	60.575	330	1.4735	265

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	14.487	8	0.9056	33
2	Buffalo	12.128	38	0.9368	31
3	Toledo	11.721	51	0.7197	52
4	Ball State	11.231	83	1.5371	7
5	Akron	10.151	139	-0.4231	262
6	Miami (OH)	9.745	168	-0.2402	227
7	UMass	9.470	185	-0.2105	219
8	Kent State	9.251	204	-0.3488	251
9	E Michigan	8.960	224	-0.6217	305
10	N Illinois	7.896	285	-0.0144	182
11	Ohio	7.891	286	-0.1033	193
12	W Michigan	5.826	359	-1.2434	360
13	Cent Michigan	5.611	361	-1.2863	361

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	5.858	83	0.0855	156
2	Kent State	5.594	99	0.4723	60
3	Ball State	4.924	155	0.4116	72
4	E Michigan	4.848	163	0.3623	81
5	Buffalo	4.028	239	-0.2568	254
6	Akron	3.892	253	-0.2480	252
7	Bowling Green	3.830	261	-0.3130	277
8	Miami (OH)	3.734	266	-0.5998	332
9	Toledo	3.605	273	0.1460	143
10	W Michigan	3.204	302	0.1801	132
11	UMass	3.134	309	-0.1440	222
12	Ohio	3.129	310	-0.2438	249
13	N Illinois	2.335	348	-0.7695	349

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	20.270	11	-0.6835	44
2	Akron	22.625	46	-0.6928	42
3	Ohio	22.716	50	-0.3100	95
4	Ball State	23.451	79	0.7661	287
5	E Michigan	23.524	84	-0.5772	57
6	Miami (OH)	23.784	101	-0.7044	41
7	Buffalo	24.549	146	-0.7608	37
8	Bowling Green	25.290	180	0.5650	254
9	Kent State	25.944	216	-0.3871	83
10	W Michigan	26.409	244	0.2853	206
11	Cent Michigan	26.518	250	0.3467	216
12	UMass	29.124	331	1.5230	349
13	N Illinois	30.267	351	0.7289	286

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	78.525	13	2.5636	8
2	Akron	73.539	96	-0.2899	285
3	Miami (OH)	73.292	106	0.9524	95
4	UMass	73.203	109	-0.0836	252
5	W Michigan	72.744	134	-0.1054	258
6	Toledo	72.044	158	1.0282	87
7	Ohio	71.189	191	-0.4529	299
8	E Michigan	70.970	204	-0.2221	273
9	Bowling Green	70.969	205	-0.2650	281
10	N Illinois	68.819	283	-0.7141	325
11	Cent Michigan	68.756	287	0.0119	233
12	Buffalo	67.081	335	-1.5930	360
13	Ball State	66.042	351	-1.2603	350