Conferences – HoopSci

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	23.574	28	5.4779	4
2	Bowling Green	11.563	82	4.9060	9
3	Miami (OH)	10.557	90	2.1329	83
4	Buffalo	5.990	118	5.8447	2
5	E Michigan	3.031	137	4.5518	15
6	Kent State	2.567	141	-0.5374	225
7	UMass	0.318	167	-0.7601	235
8	Toledo	-2.039	184	0.5272	166
9	W Michigan	-8.998	234	0.6147	159
10	Ohio	-11.386	259	-4.0797	344
11	Cent Michigan	-14.023	281	-1.6821	269
12	Ball State	-17.797	308	-2.3601	286
13	N Illinois	-23.048	332	1.1002	133

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.286	30	0.0530	24
2	Akron	0.232	53	0.0272	79
3	Bowling Green	0.227	55	0.0493	27
4	Buffalo	0.110	127	0.0673	7
5	E Michigan	0.046	169	0.0271	80
6	UMass	0.038	171	0.0081	149
7	Kent State	0.029	176	-0.0022	193
8	Toledo	-0.006	198	0.0101	138
9	W Michigan	-0.027	211	0.0011	177
10	Cent Michigan	-0.031	212	-0.0080	213
11	N Illinois	-0.078	246	-0.0127	239
12	Ball State	-0.089	254	-0.0363	311
13	Ohio	-0.148	292	-0.0585	347

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	1655.636	24	6.2699	96
2	Kent State	1609.412	59	6.8887	90
3	Miami (OH)	1579.600	84	18.9876	13
4	Toledo	1530.448	140	-15.3875	337
5	Ohio	1482.945	208	-16.1883	341
6	E Michigan	1477.611	219	13.1433	34
7	Bowling Green	1471.818	225	8.6052	67
8	UMass	1466.184	231	-13.2468	322
9	W Michigan	1447.972	258	16.7029	20
10	Buffalo	1436.437	270	17.2339	18
11	Cent Michigan	1433.317	275	-2.8767	213
12	Ball State	1418.457	290	-9.0203	280
13	N Illinois	1345.874	351	-3.0780	217

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.602	46	0.0177	76
2	Buffalo	0.569	71	0.0479	5
3	Kent State	0.516	143	-0.0036	207
4	Toledo	0.513	147	-0.0050	219
5	Bowling Green	0.511	152	0.0362	12
6	E Michigan	0.507	159	0.0035	166
7	Ohio	0.493	182	-0.0004	192
8	Miami (OH)	0.482	205	0.0040	159
9	W Michigan	0.476	213	0.0102	117
10	UMass	0.437	282	-0.0100	252
11	N Illinois	0.427	292	0.0169	83
12	Cent Michigan	0.417	303	-0.0211	299
13	Ball State	0.327	359	-0.0244	310

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.626	3	0.0280	7
2	Kent State	0.586	17	0.0427	1
3	Miami (OH)	0.578	23	0.0129	74
4	Toledo	0.557	59	0.0113	87
5	Buffalo	0.557	60	0.0218	22
6	W Michigan	0.525	139	0.0272	10
7	Bowling Green	0.523	146	0.0233	16
8	UMass	0.519	160	0.0163	51
9	Cent Michigan	0.493	231	0.0066	117
10	E Michigan	0.490	241	-0.0028	247
11	Ohio	0.489	245	-0.0134	332
12	N Illinois	0.478	273	-0.0149	337
13	Ball State	0.455	330	-0.0265	360

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	1.280	3	0.0444	21
2	Miami (OH)	1.258	8	0.0399	34
3	Kent State	1.218	23	0.0518	10
4	Buffalo	1.155	66	0.0401	33
5	Toledo	1.149	74	0.0201	102
6	Bowling Green	1.146	76	0.0531	9
7	Cent Michigan	1.050	224	0.0026	192
8	UMass	1.034	251	0.0124	140
9	W Michigan	1.030	264	0.0155	118
10	E Michigan	1.025	269	0.0018	203
11	Ohio	1.019	274	-0.0118	273
12	N Illinois	1.006	296	-0.0245	325
13	Ball State	0.926	344	-0.0484	358

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.138	40	-0.0011	147
2	Ohio	0.152	111	0.0034	233
3	Miami (OH)	0.152	113	-0.0039	102
4	Buffalo	0.153	122	-0.0054	78
5	Bowling Green	0.160	160	-0.0047	90
6	Toledo	0.164	184	0.0048	262
7	Ball State	0.168	207	0.0032	227
8	Cent Michigan	0.171	226	0.0061	288
9	W Michigan	0.171	226	0.0086	318
10	Kent State	0.173	240	0.0043	250
11	UMass	0.177	263	0.0044	253
12	E Michigan	0.178	267	0.0007	180
13	N Illinois	0.196	342	0.0118	338

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	33.130	79	0.0080	203
2	Kent State	32.800	86	0.0718	10
3	UMass	32.600	87	-0.0013	272
4	Toledo	31.160	116	0.0496	34
5	Cent Michigan	30.790	125	0.0216	116
6	N Illinois	30.500	132	0.0411	48
7	Bowling Green	30.420	135	0.0715	11
8	E Michigan	28.400	194	0.0517	32
9	Ohio	28.160	202	0.0300	82
10	Miami (OH)	27.670	215	0.0575	24
11	Buffalo	25.240	268	0.0014	253
12	W Michigan	25.160	270	-0.0205	351
13	Ball State	23.630	303	-0.0003	264

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	0.534	2	0.0220	68
2	Kent State	0.485	16	0.0305	47
3	N Illinois	0.385	131	0.0180	89
4	UMass	0.377	144	-0.0058	247
5	Ohio	0.366	168	0.0099	137
6	Bowling Green	0.364	171	0.0067	159
7	Miami (OH)	0.354	203	0.0075	154
8	Ball State	0.325	260	-0.0533	365
9	Akron	0.317	275	0.0051	173
10	Toledo	0.310	288	-0.0238	336
11	E Michigan	0.309	292	-0.0065	249
12	W Michigan	0.308	294	-0.0135	295
13	Cent Michigan	0.291	319	-0.0036	230

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	130.759	1	4.9114	1
2	Kent State	115.875	63	2.8721	18
3	Miami (OH)	115.477	69	1.2070	73
4	Buffalo	115.267	72	4.5107	2
5	Toledo	111.927	104	0.0115	155
6	Bowling Green	108.546	145	0.7351	101
7	Cent Michigan	104.883	199	-0.1817	173
8	Ohio	104.436	208	-2.0253	287
9	E Michigan	103.699	213	0.0286	152
10	W Michigan	101.536	239	-0.9854	224
11	UMass	101.211	249	-1.7454	274
12	N Illinois	97.435	293	1.7689	42
13	Ball State	91.383	344	-3.5008	347

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	46.433	4	1.7175	27
2	Miami (OH)	43.471	12	1.3680	51
3	Toledo	42.631	24	1.5803	38
4	Kent State	40.691	70	1.5796	39
5	Bowling Green	40.353	77	2.2679	9
6	Cent Michigan	38.988	127	0.3452	150
7	E Michigan	37.463	194	0.2872	161
8	UMass	37.342	201	0.7933	94
9	W Michigan	37.098	213	0.5655	116
10	Ohio	36.579	232	-0.3564	245
11	Buffalo	35.710	269	0.7137	102
12	N Illinois	34.038	305	-0.7305	289
13	Ball State	32.826	339	-1.2271	329

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	88.422	25	-0.4159	227
2	Toledo	86.105	80	1.0801	70
3	Cent Michigan	85.569	96	-0.3901	222
4	E Michigan	84.969	117	0.7004	104
5	Bowling Green	83.655	160	0.7518	99
6	Ohio	83.633	162	0.8098	88
7	Miami (OH)	82.945	192	0.6577	108
8	Ball State	82.765	199	2.2132	12
9	UMass	80.750	278	-0.9974	288
10	W Michigan	79.955	297	-2.0685	351
11	Kent State	79.478	304	-2.3580	356
12	N Illinois	79.402	308	0.3007	150
13	Buffalo	76.509	353	-0.8233	271

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	52.820	3	2.2647	12
2	Miami (OH)	52.468	10	1.2147	64
3	Kent State	51.404	22	3.3323	1
4	Toledo	49.582	46	1.1779	68
5	Bowling Green	48.234	70	2.3255	11
6	Buffalo	46.848	111	1.4081	48
7	W Michigan	46.491	128	1.9029	21
8	UMass	46.195	139	1.4698	42
9	Cent Michigan	45.921	151	0.6774	112
10	E Michigan	44.189	235	-0.1191	217
11	Ohio	43.632	255	-0.9787	315
12	N Illinois	42.815	284	-1.0110	318
13	Ball State	40.213	343	-2.6050	362

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	69.078	26	1.1570	73
2	W Michigan	67.342	48	-0.5850	214
3	Cent Michigan	66.080	72	0.1888	145
4	Toledo	66.065	73	-0.6524	221
5	UMass	64.569	104	-0.1088	169
6	Bowling Green	63.865	115	0.7461	109
7	Ohio	63.575	120	0.7293	111
8	Ball State	58.465	217	-2.0734	310
9	N Illinois	57.317	242	1.2102	70
10	Akron	54.833	286	-0.1655	178
11	Buffalo	54.315	300	-1.6519	291
12	Miami (OH)	54.115	302	-0.9345	243
13	Kent State	53.219	314	-2.4378	329

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	32.532	11	1.6418	27
2	Akron	30.297	43	0.8839	79
3	Cent Michigan	29.580	63	0.4074	135
4	Bowling Green	29.304	73	2.1228	13
5	E Michigan	28.814	84	0.4913	129
6	Miami (OH)	28.400	105	1.1581	57
7	UMass	28.249	108	0.6876	107
8	Ohio	27.878	128	0.1778	164
9	W Michigan	27.711	136	-0.4157	246
10	Kent State	25.767	220	0.3923	138
11	Ball State	22.389	322	-1.4513	348
12	Buffalo	22.258	326	-0.3827	240
13	N Illinois	22.170	331	-0.0293	191

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	59.227	17	1.4792	54
2	Toledo	57.267	38	0.3004	134
3	Cent Michigan	55.951	59	-0.1287	175
4	W Michigan	53.609	104	-1.7700	303
5	Bowling Green	53.467	107	1.0881	79
6	Ohio	53.297	110	1.1957	66
7	UMass	52.290	128	-0.7088	220
8	Ball State	48.274	222	-0.4243	205
9	Akron	48.220	227	-0.3186	192
10	N Illinois	45.195	286	0.9989	84
11	Miami (OH)	44.734	298	-0.4245	206
12	Kent State	42.360	331	-3.3998	353
13	Buffalo	41.301	339	-1.7591	302

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	63.417	9	2.9699	19
2	Akron	62.836	11	2.2281	40
3	Kent State	61.211	25	4.7094	2
4	Toledo	56.577	89	2.3071	37
5	Bowling Green	54.385	144	2.7388	25
6	UMass	54.110	151	1.7616	65
7	Buffalo	53.967	156	1.1982	97
8	Cent Michigan	52.351	202	0.6449	152
9	W Michigan	51.669	225	0.9350	122
10	Ohio	51.589	227	-1.2728	322
11	E Michigan	49.586	286	-0.3400	257
12	N Illinois	48.753	301	-1.0444	309
13	Ball State	46.608	331	-2.5743	360

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	46.781	52	2.4378	37
2	Miami (OH)	45.885	64	0.9345	123
3	Buffalo	45.685	66	1.6519	75
4	Akron	45.167	80	0.1655	188
5	N Illinois	42.683	124	-1.2102	296
6	Ball State	41.535	149	2.0734	56
7	Ohio	36.425	246	-0.7293	255
8	Bowling Green	36.135	251	-0.7461	257
9	UMass	35.431	262	0.1088	197
10	Toledo	33.935	293	0.6524	145
11	Cent Michigan	33.920	294	-0.1888	221
12	W Michigan	32.658	318	0.5850	152
13	E Michigan	30.922	340	-1.1570	293

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	16.136	9	0.8335	44
2	Miami (OH)	15.072	20	0.2099	136
3	Kent State	14.924	23	1.1873	20
4	Buffalo	13.452	67	1.0964	26
5	N Illinois	11.868	135	-0.7013	328
6	Bowling Green	11.049	183	0.1451	150
7	Ball State	10.437	221	0.2242	133
8	Toledo	10.099	243	-0.0615	189
9	Cent Michigan	9.408	280	-0.0622	191
10	W Michigan	9.387	284	0.9812	37
11	UMass	9.093	296	0.1057	160
12	Ohio	8.701	308	-0.5342	297
13	E Michigan	8.649	313	-0.2042	227

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	40.202	35	-0.0974	211
2	Miami (OH)	38.211	74	1.0822	96
3	Kent State	37.118	89	1.0418	100
4	Buffalo	35.208	130	0.9357	109
5	Ball State	34.491	145	2.6374	23
6	N Illinois	34.207	149	-0.6982	262
7	Ohio	30.336	242	-0.3859	231
8	Bowling Green	30.188	247	-0.3363	225
9	Cent Michigan	29.617	258	-0.2613	221
10	Toledo	28.838	275	0.7797	122
11	UMass	28.460	287	-0.2886	222
12	W Michigan	26.346	324	-0.2985	223
13	E Michigan	25.742	334	-0.7788	272

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	41.232	6	2.5009	13
2	Miami (OH)	39.568	19	-0.2948	200
3	Kent State	38.977	27	2.1904	18
4	Buffalo	38.195	38	2.0076	20
5	W Michigan	35.480	111	3.6349	2
6	Bowling Green	35.101	126	0.6620	102
7	Toledo	34.757	147	-1.1063	283
8	N Illinois	34.420	154	-1.4147	307
9	E Michigan	33.493	184	0.4126	122
10	UMass	32.270	228	1.1645	71
11	Ball State	31.151	269	-1.9896	335
12	Cent Michigan	31.128	271	-0.1424	185
13	Ohio	26.929	353	-1.3386	302

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	53.440	2	2.2039	68
2	Kent State	48.480	16	3.0484	47
3	N Illinois	38.490	131	1.8036	89
4	UMass	37.690	144	-0.5772	247
5	Ohio	36.580	168	0.9904	137
6	Bowling Green	36.440	171	0.6715	159
7	Miami (OH)	35.360	203	0.7452	154
8	Ball State	32.470	260	-5.3315	365
9	Akron	31.720	275	0.5112	173
10	Toledo	31.050	288	-2.3781	336
11	E Michigan	30.900	292	-0.6496	249
12	W Michigan	30.800	294	-1.3457	295
13	Cent Michigan	29.060	319	-0.3620	230

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	30.598	1	1.4873	47
2	Kent State	25.530	48	0.8386	115
3	Miami (OH)	23.791	90	1.0489	88
4	Bowling Green	22.865	114	0.6290	133
5	N Illinois	20.682	186	-0.2885	235
6	Ohio	20.078	209	0.0630	193
7	UMass	19.649	225	-0.4503	254
8	Toledo	19.513	232	-1.0853	320
9	W Michigan	19.377	241	-0.5527	271
10	E Michigan	18.941	254	-0.1937	223
11	Akron	18.410	266	0.1144	187
12	Cent Michigan	17.589	294	-0.3668	245
13	Ball State	16.464	320	-2.6117	362

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	41.415	1	1.4758	80
2	Kent State	35.210	45	1.2685	100
3	N Illinois	31.974	102	1.4156	89
4	Bowling Green	30.626	141	0.7421	140
5	Miami (OH)	30.017	165	0.8145	132
6	UMass	29.888	170	-0.6502	270
7	Ohio	29.631	178	0.8681	127
8	E Michigan	25.432	287	-0.2586	234
9	W Michigan	25.418	288	-1.7600	344
10	Toledo	25.259	290	-1.7534	343
11	Akron	25.218	293	0.4315	169
12	Ball State	25.199	294	-3.4842	364
13	Cent Michigan	24.459	308	-0.3554	243

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	77.208	33	1.7812	44
2	Toledo	77.144	36	1.0305	95
3	W Michigan	75.611	64	2.9270	14
4	Bowling Green	74.926	85	0.0563	170
5	E Michigan	74.268	101	0.5761	132
6	Buffalo	73.952	112	0.8066	111
7	Ohio	71.869	169	-0.1402	192
8	Cent Michigan	71.626	174	-0.4982	217
9	Kent State	70.964	191	-0.8252	243
10	Akron	70.556	202	-0.5892	226
11	Ball State	66.829	292	-0.6746	234
12	UMass	64.798	328	-0.0639	184
13	N Illinois	64.654	332	-4.0432	358

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	61.551	30	3.0999	29
2	Kent State	60.885	35	4.3049	11
3	Akron	59.215	52	0.9635	135
4	Cent Michigan	59.111	54	4.8903	7
5	Buffalo	53.813	164	0.0277	206
6	Ball State	53.236	175	0.6819	149
7	Toledo	53.147	178	-0.1945	225
8	E Michigan	52.118	201	2.9749	33
9	Miami (OH)	51.893	205	-0.7701	257
10	Bowling Green	51.605	211	2.3260	49
11	W Michigan	49.735	249	1.5347	95
12	N Illinois	49.689	250	-2.1481	326
13	Ohio	44.577	331	-1.2564	285

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	6.419	35	-0.2158	168
2	Kent State	6.492	38	-1.1520	20
3	Ball State	7.517	90	-0.2274	160
4	Buffalo	7.566	95	-0.2188	165
5	Miami (OH)	7.651	99	-0.3901	130
6	Bowling Green	7.873	120	-0.2409	159
7	Toledo	8.763	190	-0.0432	207
8	E Michigan	8.854	202	-0.8246	44
9	Ohio	9.014	214	0.0076	222
10	W Michigan	9.090	222	0.7021	329
11	N Illinois	10.159	292	0.5877	313
12	UMass	10.362	303	0.1372	254
13	Cent Michigan	11.044	332	0.5923	315

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	2.320	6	-0.4410	63
2	Kent State	2.946	34	-0.6238	32
3	Buffalo	2.976	38	-0.4192	68
4	Akron	3.809	118	-0.0042	212
5	UMass	3.967	143	-0.5166	46
6	Cent Michigan	4.224	183	-0.5284	43
7	Bowling Green	4.421	207	-0.6543	25
8	W Michigan	4.889	262	-0.1455	156
9	Toledo	5.057	282	0.1026	251
10	Ohio	5.328	303	0.5762	337
11	N Illinois	6.011	340	1.0385	363
12	Ball State	6.338	353	0.9444	362
13	E Michigan	6.906	361	0.5705	335

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	27.721	40	0.4379	101
2	UMass	27.165	54	-0.0075	169
3	Ohio	27.078	60	0.2624	128
4	Kent State	24.154	149	-2.5369	357
5	Bowling Green	23.795	163	-1.2246	313
6	N Illinois	22.476	208	0.3133	122
7	Toledo	21.333	254	-2.4409	355
8	Cent Michigan	21.236	255	-1.3495	317
9	W Michigan	21.068	259	-0.7897	279
10	E Michigan	20.920	261	-2.7072	359
11	Akron	20.160	283	-0.6824	264
12	Ball State	19.708	295	-1.7865	338
13	Miami (OH)	18.997	313	-1.9622	341

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	79.856	8	3.1769	4
2	UMass	75.819	39	0.3779	186
3	W Michigan	73.725	90	0.1804	224
4	Akron	73.494	100	-0.0283	253
5	Miami (OH)	73.008	121	1.2662	73
6	Bowling Green	72.516	145	1.2376	75
7	Ohio	72.514	146	-0.0693	264
8	Toledo	72.353	152	1.3102	68
9	N Illinois	71.891	171	0.2189	213
10	E Michigan	70.397	216	0.0219	248
11	Ball State	68.272	305	-0.3341	299
12	Cent Michigan	68.159	310	0.4187	181
13	Buffalo	67.234	331	-1.8534	363

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.496	122	-0.0071	89
2	UMass	0.497	125	-0.0026	134
3	E Michigan	0.501	144	-0.0033	121
4	Miami (OH)	0.503	152	-0.0039	115
5	W Michigan	0.511	178	-0.0079	81
6	Akron	0.512	184	0.0043	225
7	Buffalo	0.530	251	-0.0089	72
8	Ball State	0.538	270	0.0026	198
9	Cent Michigan	0.541	274	0.0188	342
10	Kent State	0.541	276	0.0095	273
11	Ohio	0.542	279	0.0018	190
12	N Illinois	0.580	344	0.0154	325
13	Toledo	0.588	353	0.0070	260

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.950	39	-0.0143	84
2	Miami (OH)	0.971	61	-0.0163	77
3	UMass	0.975	67	-0.0195	58
4	E Michigan	1.017	122	-0.0117	101
5	Buffalo	1.061	191	-0.0192	60
6	Akron	1.063	194	0.0170	266
7	W Michigan	1.068	202	-0.0023	157
8	Ball State	1.073	211	-0.0035	151
9	Kent State	1.084	234	0.0039	202
10	Toledo	1.116	281	0.0002	176
11	Ohio	1.135	302	0.0116	235
12	Cent Michigan	1.165	326	0.0623	362
13	N Illinois	1.186	340	0.0277	303

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.213	11	0.0095	49
2	Miami (OH)	0.202	26	0.0083	66
3	Toledo	0.188	64	0.0072	75
4	UMass	0.186	77	0.0071	78
5	Buffalo	0.183	84	0.0085	59
6	Ball State	0.181	90	0.0102	42
7	E Michigan	0.172	126	0.0032	134
8	Akron	0.170	135	-0.0043	266
9	Kent State	0.163	178	-0.0005	201
10	N Illinois	0.163	186	0.0001	193
11	Ohio	0.159	209	0.0003	190
12	W Michigan	0.136	321	-0.0106	342
13	Cent Michigan	0.128	346	-0.0165	361

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	77.700	19	0.0153	29
2	Miami (OH)	76.640	33	0.0076	77
3	Bowling Green	74.430	91	-0.0149	284
4	W Michigan	74.030	102	0.0038	107
5	Kent State	73.940	105	0.0110	49
6	E Michigan	72.670	146	0.0041	102
7	Buffalo	71.020	200	-0.0129	268
8	Akron	69.510	244	-0.0102	250
9	Ball State	68.670	272	-0.0063	212
10	Cent Michigan	68.180	287	-0.0190	307
11	N Illinois	67.510	301	-0.0101	248
12	Toledo	67.270	307	-0.0089	238
13	Ohio	66.880	314	-0.0159	289

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	0.222	6	-0.0148	63
2	Ball State	0.263	25	0.0044	173
3	E Michigan	0.286	43	-0.0256	16
4	Akron	0.308	76	-0.0122	74
5	Ohio	0.314	89	-0.0210	31
6	Buffalo	0.329	121	-0.0141	66
7	Miami (OH)	0.338	135	-0.0022	129
8	Kent State	0.392	246	0.0011	150
9	W Michigan	0.394	249	0.0157	257
10	N Illinois	0.396	252	-0.0148	64
11	Bowling Green	0.398	256	0.0310	322
12	Cent Michigan	0.416	296	0.0347	336
13	UMass	0.459	332	0.0287	316

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	96.983	38	-4.2135	11
2	E Michigan	100.668	72	-4.5409	5
3	UMass	100.894	78	-0.9853	135
4	Miami (OH)	104.919	138	-0.8639	146
5	Akron	107.184	175	-0.4958	179
6	Ball State	109.181	201	-1.1153	128
7	Buffalo	109.277	203	-1.2946	116
8	W Michigan	110.534	220	-1.5780	100
9	Kent State	113.308	267	3.5518	363
10	Toledo	113.966	277	-0.4422	182
11	Ohio	115.822	297	2.0534	334
12	Cent Michigan	118.906	332	1.7076	320
13	N Illinois	120.482	342	0.6811	262

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	31.743	28	-1.0230	54
2	UMass	32.634	45	-0.6800	97
3	Miami (OH)	34.100	87	-0.5360	118
4	W Michigan	35.544	134	-0.6308	102
5	Kent State	36.116	153	0.0990	209
6	E Michigan	36.571	178	-0.2783	150
7	Buffalo	36.780	189	-0.7807	77
8	Akron	37.379	208	0.6181	271
9	Ball State	38.993	276	-0.6475	101
10	Cent Michigan	40.505	319	2.1529	355
11	Ohio	40.610	323	0.8563	288
12	N Illinois	41.454	338	1.5389	344
13	Toledo	43.267	358	0.5636	264

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	73.773	7	-2.2742	17
2	Bowling Green	74.678	10	-1.1958	75
3	Miami (OH)	77.463	46	-0.8528	113
4	Kent State	80.368	109	-0.4995	150
5	Buffalo	81.814	157	0.2933	231
6	N Illinois	82.394	181	0.7105	274
7	W Michigan	83.259	211	0.3793	242
8	E Michigan	84.054	237	0.1872	219
9	Ball State	84.414	247	-1.2317	71
10	Toledo	84.711	256	-0.1327	187
11	Akron	85.139	272	1.4722	327
12	Cent Michigan	85.920	292	0.7511	283
13	Ohio	86.704	306	1.4328	325

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	42.785	111	-1.0212	56
2	Bowling Green	42.878	116	-0.6114	92
3	E Michigan	43.307	127	-0.5878	94
4	Akron	43.929	159	0.0404	171
5	Miami (OH)	43.994	163	-0.2686	128
6	UMass	44.298	174	0.3554	220
7	Buffalo	45.189	200	-1.0593	52
8	Kent State	45.208	201	0.3950	227
9	Ball State	46.318	247	-0.0563	162
10	Ohio	46.831	273	0.2160	195
11	Cent Michigan	47.124	283	1.9988	355
12	N Illinois	50.427	344	1.4687	333
13	Toledo	51.194	353	0.7176	263

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	52.515	23	-1.0570	109
2	Kent State	53.012	29	-1.4506	77
3	Buffalo	54.319	47	-2.3678	32
4	Bowling Green	55.190	60	-1.0643	108
5	Akron	55.612	65	-2.4730	29
6	Ball State	57.431	101	-1.2287	93
7	Toledo	58.458	136	-0.4547	163
8	N Illinois	58.773	143	-0.2445	184
9	Cent Michigan	59.759	167	0.8116	288
10	Ohio	60.355	181	-0.9135	118
11	UMass	60.437	185	1.5491	334
12	E Michigan	61.117	209	-0.8234	126
13	Miami (OH)	62.795	255	0.6287	268

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	21.918	38	-1.0386	58
2	Bowling Green	22.003	40	-0.6473	103
3	Kent State	22.058	42	-0.7212	96
4	Buffalo	24.118	112	-1.0759	54
5	Miami (OH)	24.351	129	-0.2780	151
6	UMass	24.655	141	0.5582	268
7	Akron	24.730	144	-0.3240	141
8	E Michigan	25.060	159	-0.7919	87
9	Ball State	26.324	222	-1.0111	64
10	Ohio	27.733	276	0.6661	282
11	Cent Michigan	28.460	296	2.2289	363
12	N Illinois	29.019	317	1.3117	339
13	Toledo	30.550	345	0.6540	279

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	41.564	15	-1.4343	83
2	Kent State	42.921	31	-1.4739	78
3	W Michigan	43.713	40	-0.6724	155
4	Buffalo	44.468	50	-1.8326	53
5	UMass	44.658	55	-0.2029	200
6	Akron	47.183	116	-1.3696	91
7	Ball State	48.299	146	-1.7898	59
8	N Illinois	48.471	151	0.2641	249
9	Miami (OH)	48.647	155	-0.0866	211
10	Toledo	49.668	194	-0.3867	180
11	Cent Michigan	51.255	232	1.1136	308
12	E Michigan	51.374	236	-0.5582	163
13	Ohio	52.309	263	0.0606	227

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	48.180	83	-1.1846	59
2	W Michigan	49.829	120	-1.7374	27
3	Miami (OH)	50.154	132	-0.5943	101
4	Akron	51.745	173	0.8218	242
5	Kent State	52.406	186	0.2034	166
6	Bowling Green	52.957	202	0.0627	154
7	Ohio	53.334	215	1.2583	273
8	Buffalo	54.272	245	-0.2432	129
9	Ball State	55.700	285	0.2804	173
10	Cent Michigan	55.899	289	3.1670	358
11	UMass	55.923	291	1.3143	277
12	N Illinois	60.196	345	2.2970	342
13	Toledo	61.882	357	1.6553	308

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	37.205	111	-0.6287	98
2	E Michigan	38.883	157	0.8234	240
3	UMass	39.563	181	-1.5491	32
4	Ohio	39.645	185	0.9135	248
5	Cent Michigan	40.241	199	-0.8116	78
6	N Illinois	41.227	223	0.2445	182
7	Toledo	41.542	230	0.4547	203
8	Ball State	42.569	265	1.2287	273
9	Akron	44.388	301	2.4730	337
10	Bowling Green	44.810	306	1.0643	258
11	Buffalo	45.681	319	2.3678	334
12	Kent State	46.988	337	1.4506	289
13	W Michigan	47.485	343	1.0570	257

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	7.979	18	-1.2382	7
2	Bowling Green	9.740	95	-0.3757	95
3	Miami (OH)	9.749	97	-0.2579	121
4	E Michigan	11.511	231	0.5136	279
5	Cent Michigan	12.045	257	-0.0761	165
6	N Illinois	12.434	272	0.2273	229
7	Akron	12.649	285	0.9421	336
8	Buffalo	12.662	286	0.2952	243
9	Ball State	12.669	288	0.3635	255
10	Toledo	12.717	291	-0.0904	159
11	Ohio	12.878	305	0.1902	219
12	W Michigan	13.626	333	0.4078	263
13	Kent State	14.058	340	0.8203	326

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	28.816	68	-0.7663	80
2	UMass	29.115	79	-2.0713	16
3	E Michigan	32.680	181	0.7454	248
4	Bowling Green	33.114	190	0.2385	197
5	N Illinois	33.924	214	0.4464	215
6	Ohio	34.396	228	1.3722	297
7	Cent Michigan	34.666	236	-0.3625	125
8	Toledo	35.043	248	0.2540	201
9	Ball State	36.116	281	0.5581	224
10	Buffalo	37.346	307	2.1259	336
11	Kent State	37.446	311	0.9744	269
12	Akron	37.956	322	2.8418	354
13	W Michigan	39.546	341	1.0517	281

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	26.936	14	-2.2380	16
2	Bowling Green	30.205	74	-1.1327	76
3	Akron	33.520	195	0.2676	225
4	Cent Michigan	33.692	204	0.0771	200
5	Buffalo	33.893	210	-1.2071	67
6	Miami (OH)	33.900	211	-0.0220	184
7	E Michigan	34.878	242	0.7755	275
8	W Michigan	35.075	248	0.4464	244
9	Ball State	35.458	268	0.1557	209
10	Toledo	35.751	275	-0.8020	102
11	N Illinois	36.846	308	0.2858	228
12	Kent State	36.984	313	1.5067	324
13	Ohio	37.232	319	-1.1215	78

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	22.240	6	-1.4834	63
2	Ball State	26.270	25	0.4410	173
3	E Michigan	28.580	43	-2.5623	16
4	Akron	30.830	76	-1.2168	74
5	Ohio	31.370	89	-2.0957	31
6	Buffalo	32.910	121	-1.4110	66
7	Miami (OH)	33.780	135	-0.2218	129
8	Kent State	39.230	246	0.1139	150
9	W Michigan	39.370	249	1.5731	257
10	N Illinois	39.590	252	-1.4772	64
11	Bowling Green	39.760	256	3.0979	322
12	Cent Michigan	41.630	296	3.4703	336
13	UMass	45.940	332	2.8702	316

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	12.396	3	-1.0159	37
2	Ball State	16.675	44	0.6395	232
3	E Michigan	17.040	50	-1.1225	26
4	Akron	18.898	107	-0.4794	102
5	Miami (OH)	19.142	112	-0.2997	117
6	Ohio	19.384	124	-0.7384	65
7	Buffalo	19.866	137	-0.6518	79
8	Bowling Green	21.779	206	0.9925	276
9	W Michigan	22.073	222	0.6266	230
10	Kent State	22.117	224	-0.6324	81
11	N Illinois	23.277	274	-0.5406	95
12	Cent Michigan	23.490	277	1.9988	340
13	UMass	24.222	294	0.6465	234

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	18.332	4	-1.1598	42
2	Ball State	21.558	15	0.0822	149
3	E Michigan	23.366	36	-1.8239	13
4	Akron	25.278	70	-0.7927	76
5	Miami (OH)	26.182	98	-0.4096	110
6	Ohio	26.560	110	-1.1393	46
7	Buffalo	26.591	111	-0.9674	60
8	Bowling Green	29.772	191	2.0341	315
9	Kent State	30.548	206	-0.2664	123
10	N Illinois	32.078	257	-0.7774	77
11	W Michigan	32.169	259	1.4227	277
12	UMass	34.202	307	1.3844	272
13	Cent Michigan	36.197	333	3.1001	356

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	66.028	35	0.1356	222
2	Toledo	67.301	60	-0.6336	143
3	W Michigan	69.637	120	-0.2969	177
4	UMass	70.752	168	-0.4584	155
5	Ohio	70.796	169	0.2838	236
6	Bowling Green	71.256	191	-1.7475	54
7	Kent State	71.624	204	-1.5858	70
8	N Illinois	72.052	225	0.3664	243
9	Miami (OH)	72.609	242	-0.0311	200
10	Buffalo	74.156	278	0.4724	254
11	E Michigan	74.218	280	1.3649	305
12	Akron	74.307	285	0.4321	250
13	Ball State	77.151	336	2.2758	344

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	47.182	78	-1.2446	84
2	Ohio	48.162	98	-0.7259	114
3	Kent State	50.794	141	-0.4711	136
4	Toledo	51.832	164	1.1642	245
5	E Michigan	52.595	179	2.4219	315
6	Bowling Green	52.847	186	0.2903	182
7	UMass	53.422	199	-2.5414	26
8	Akron	53.628	206	3.1377	335
9	N Illinois	54.010	217	-0.6634	123
10	Ball State	54.468	230	1.0521	240
11	W Michigan	55.541	252	-0.3298	144
12	Cent Michigan	58.211	297	2.5955	326
13	Buffalo	62.099	347	2.4806	317

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	14.487	9	0.9056	28
2	Buffalo	11.800	48	0.6760	61
3	Toledo	11.721	53	0.7197	49
4	Ball State	10.626	109	1.0991	18
5	Miami (OH)	10.551	115	0.2300	128
6	Akron	10.151	135	-0.4231	265
7	E Michigan	9.792	161	0.0570	169
8	UMass	9.757	167	0.0713	165
9	Kent State	9.251	202	-0.3488	252
10	N Illinois	7.896	283	-0.0144	182
11	Ohio	7.891	284	-0.1033	198
12	W Michigan	5.826	360	-1.2434	360
13	Cent Michigan	5.611	362	-1.2863	361

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	5.858	80	0.0855	152
2	Kent State	5.594	97	0.4723	55
3	Ball State	4.937	154	0.4363	64
4	E Michigan	4.732	172	0.3505	85
5	Buffalo	4.531	189	0.1458	142
6	Miami (OH)	4.357	210	-0.2686	260
7	Akron	3.892	253	-0.2480	252
8	Bowling Green	3.830	262	-0.3130	279
9	Toledo	3.605	270	0.1460	141
10	W Michigan	3.204	301	0.1801	131
11	Ohio	3.129	308	-0.2438	248
12	UMass	2.717	328	-0.4214	295
13	N Illinois	2.335	345	-0.7695	345

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	20.270	11	-0.6835	43
2	Akron	22.625	47	-0.6928	41
3	Ohio	22.716	51	-0.3100	91
4	Ball State	22.968	58	0.5242	244
5	E Michigan	23.194	72	-0.8638	28
6	Miami (OH)	23.860	101	-0.7310	38
7	Bowling Green	25.290	174	0.5650	247
8	Buffalo	25.774	206	0.0085	149
9	Kent State	25.944	212	-0.3871	82
10	W Michigan	26.409	238	0.2853	199
11	Cent Michigan	26.518	245	0.3467	208
12	UMass	28.535	317	1.0507	316
13	N Illinois	30.267	350	0.7289	278

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	78.525	13	2.5636	8
2	Akron	73.539	98	-0.2899	282
3	UMass	73.267	111	-0.1554	259
4	W Michigan	72.744	132	-0.1054	253
5	Miami (OH)	72.126	161	0.1951	208
6	Toledo	72.044	165	1.0282	88
7	E Michigan	71.308	194	-0.0441	247
8	Ohio	71.189	196	-0.4529	298
9	Bowling Green	70.969	205	-0.2650	276
10	N Illinois	68.819	286	-0.7141	323
11	Cent Michigan	68.756	289	0.0119	236
12	Buffalo	66.991	335	-1.7098	362
13	Ball State	66.519	345	-0.9453	340